Диссертация (1149049), страница 33
Текст из файла (страница 33)
Minio-Paluello, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.17340.Aristotle, De Anima, edited, with introduction and commentary by Sir D. Ross,Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.41.Aristotle, Parva Naturalia, a revised text with introduction and commentary by SirD. Ross, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955.42.Aristotle’s Physics, a revised text with introduction and commentary by W.D.Ross, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.43.Bäck, A. T. Aristotle’s Theory of Predication. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill, 2000.44.Beierwaltes (1975): W. Beierwaltes, ‘Das Problem der Erkenntnis bei Proklos’, in:B.D.
Larsen, De Jamblique a Proclus (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique, 21),Vandoeuvres – Genève: Fondation Hardt, 1975, 153–183.45.Beierwaltes, W. Proklos. Grundzüge seiner Metaphysik (PhilosophischeAbhandlungen, 24), Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1979. [first edition 1965]46.Blumenthal, H.J. ‘Plotinus and Proclus on the Criterion of Truth’, in: Soul andIntellect.
Studies in Later Platonism. eds. Huby / Neal (1989), pp. 257–280.47.Blumenthal, H.J. ‘Proclus on Perception’, Bulletin of the Institute of ClassicalStudies 29 (1982), 1–11.48.Blumenthal, H.J. ‘Some Neoplatonic Views on Perception and Memory:Similarities, Differences and Motivations’, in: Cleary (1999), 319–335.49.Blumenthal, H.J. Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity. Interpretations ofthe De anima, London: Duckworth, 1996.50.Bostock, D., Metaphysics Books Z and H. Translated with a commentary, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1994.51.Brisson, L. ‘Λόγος et λόγοι chez Plotin.
Leur nature et leur rôle’, CahiersPhilosophiques de Strasbourg 8 (1999), 87–108.52.Chlup, R. Proclus. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2012.53.Cleary J.J. (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism (Ancient and medievalphilosophy, Series 1, 24), Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1997.54.Crivelli, P. Aristotle on Truth.
Cambridge University Press, 2004.17455.d’Hoine, P. ‘Aristotle’s Criticism of Non-Substance Forms and its Interpretationby the Ancient Commentators’, Phronesis 56 (2011), 262–307.56.d’Hoine, P. ‘Forms of sumbeb¯ekota in the Neoplatonic Commentaries on Platoand Aristotle’, in: T. Bénatouïl / F.
Trabattoni / G. van Riel (eds.), Plato, Aristotle,or both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity (EuropaeaMemoria, Reihe I: Studien), Hildesheim: Olms, 2010.57.d’Hoine, P. ‘Proclus and Syrianus on ideas of artefacts: a test case for Neoplatonichermeneutics’, in: Perkams / Piccione (2006), 279–302.58.d’Hoine, P. ‘The Status of the Arts. Proclus’ Theory of Artefacts’, Elenchos 27.2(2006), 305–344.59.de Haas, F. A. J.
‘The discriminating capacity of the soul in Aristotle’s theory oflearning’, in: R. Salles (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics in Ancient Thought –Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005,321–344.60.de Haas, F.A.J. / Leunissen, M. / Martijn, M. (eds.), Interpretations of Aristotle’sPosterior Analytics (Philosophia antiqua, 124), Leiden: Brill, 2010.61.de Libera, A. La querelle des universaux. De Platon à la fin du Moyen Âge, Paris:Éditions du Seuil, 1996.62.de Rijk, L.M.
‘Causation and participation in Proclus. The pivotal role of scopedistinction in his metaphysics’, in: E.P. Bos / P.A. Meijer (eds.), On Proclus andhis influence in Medieval philosophy (Philosophia antiqua, 53), Leiden – NewYork – Köln: Brill, 1992, 1–34.63.de Rijk, L.M. Aristotle. Semantics and Ontology. Volume 1: General Introduction.The Works on Logic (Philosophia Antiqua, 151.1), Leiden – Boston – Köln: Brill,2002.64.de Rijk, L.M. Aristotle. Semantics and Ontology. Volume 2: The Metaphysics.Semantics in Aristotle’s Strategy of Argument (Philosophia Antiqua, 151.2),Leiden – Boston – Köln: Brill, 2002.
De Smet / Sebti / de Callatäy (2008): D. DeSmet / M. Sebti / G. de Callatäy (eds.), Miroir et savoir: la transmission d’un thème175platonicien, des Alexandrins à la philosophie arabo-musulmane (Ancient andmedieval philosophy, Series 1, 38), Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2008.65.de Rijk, L.M. Plato’s Sophist. A Philosophical Commentary (KoninklijkeNederlandseAkademievanWetenschappen,VerhandelingenAfdelingLetterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel 133), Amsterdam – Oxford – New York: NorthHolland Publishing Company, 1986.66.Derbolav, J.
Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften.Darmstadt : Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972.67.Dodds (1963): Proclus, The Elements of Theology, a revised text with translation,introduction and commentary by E.R. Dodds, second edition, Oxford: ClarendonPress, 1963. [впервые издано в 1933]68.Emilsson, E.K. ‘Cognition and its object’, in: L.P. Gerson (ed.), The Cambridgecompanion to Plotinus, Cambridg: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 217–249.69.Emilsson, E.K. ‘Plotinus on Sense Perception’, in: Knuuttila / Kärkkäinen (2008),23–33.70.Emilsson, E.K. Plotinus on Sense-Perception, Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1988.71.Everson, St.
Aristotle on Perception, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.72.Évrard, E. ‘FANTASIA chez Proclus’, in: Phantasia – imaginatio, V. colloquiointernazionale Roma 9–11 gennaio 1986, atti a cura di M. Fattori e M. Bianchi(Lessico intellettuale europeo, 46), Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1988, 57–68.73.Festugière, A.
- J. Études de philosophie grecque, Paris: Vrin, 1971.74.Festugière, A. –J . Commentaire sur le Timée, 5 vol. (Bibliothèque des textesphilosophiques), Paris: Vrin, 1966–1968.75.Festugière, A. J. ‘Modes de composition des Commentaires de Proclus’, MuseumHelveticum 20 (1963), 77–100. [reprinted in Festugière (1971), 551–574]76.Festugière, A.-J. Commentaire sur le Timée, 5 vol. (Bibliothèque des textesphilosophiques), Paris: Vrin, 1966–1968.17677.Fine, G. On Ideas.
Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1993.78.Fowler, D. Fowler, The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy: A New Reconstruction,Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. [first published 1987]79.Frede / Patzig (1988): M. Frede / G. Patzig, Aristoteles ‘Metaphysik Z’. Text,Übersetzung und Kommentar. Erster Band: Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung;zweiter Band: Kommentar, München: Beck, 1988.80.Frede, D. ‘Not in the Book: How Does Recollection Work?’, in: A. Havlíˇcek / F.Karfík (eds.), Plato’s Phaedo, Proceedings of the Second Symposium PlatonicumPragense, Prague: Oikumen¯e, 2001, 241–265.81.Frede, D. ‘The cognitive role of phantasia in Aristotle’, in: Nussbaum / Rorty(1992), 279–295.82.Frede, D. ‘The Philosophical Economy of Plato’s Psychology: Rationality andCommon Concepts in the Timaeus’, in: Frede / Striker (1996), 29–58.83.Frede, M. / Patzig, G.
Aristoteles ‘Metaphysik Z’. Text, Übersetzung undKommentar. Erster Band: Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung; zweiter Band:Kommentar, München: Beck, 1988.84.Frede, M. ‘An empiricist view of knowledge: memorism’, in: St. Everson (ed.),Epistemology (Companions to Ancient Thought, 1), Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1990, 225–250.85.Frede, M. ‘Observations on Perception in Plato’s Later Dialogues’, in: Frede, M.(1987a), 3–8.86.Frede, M. Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.87.Gersh, S. E. Kinesis akinetos.
A study of spiritual motion in the philosophy ofProclus. Philosophia antiqua 26. Leiden: Brill, 1973.88.Gersh, St. From Iamblichus to Eriugena. An Investigation of the Prehistory andEvolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition (Studien zur Problemgeschichte derantiken und mittelalterlichen Philosophie, 8), Leiden: Brill, 1978.17789.Gerson, L.P. ‘Platonism and the Invention of the Problem of Universals’, Archivfür Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2004), 1–26.90.Gerson, L.P.
Aristotle and other Platonists, Ithaca – London: Cornell UniversityPress, 2005.91.Gregoric, P. Aristotle on the Common Sense, Oxford: Oxford University Press,2007.92.Guthrie, W.K.G. A History of Greek Philosophy, Volume VI: Aristotle – AnEncounter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.93.Hadot, I. ‘Aristote dans l’enseignement philosophique néoplatonicien’, Revue deThéologie et de Philosophie 124 (1992), 407–425.94.Hadot, I.
‘Aspects de la théorie de la perception chez les néoplatoniciens:sensations (aisth¯esis), sensations commune (koin¯e aisth¯esis), sensiblescommunes (κοινά aisth¯eta) et conscience de soi (sunaisth¯esis)’, Documenti estudi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 7 (1997), 33–85.95.Hadot, I.
‘La division néoplatonicienne des écrits d’Aristote’, in: J. Wiesner,Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung, Paul Moraux gewidmet, vol. II, Berlin: de Gruyter,1987, 249–285.96.Hadot, I. ‘The Role of the Commentaries on Aristotle in the Teaching ofPhilosophy according to the Prefaces of the Neoplatonic Commentaries on theCategories’, in: H. Blumenthal / H. Robinson (eds.), Aristotle and the LaterTradition (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary volume 1991),Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, 175–189.97.Hadot, P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
