Диссертация (1149049), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
"Sur divers sens du mot πρᾶγμα dans la tradition philosophique grecque",in Pierre Aubenque (édi.), Concepts et catégories dans la pensée antique, Vrin,1980, p. 312.98.Harari, O. ‘Methexis and Geometrical Reasoning in Proclus’ Commentary onEuclid’s Elements’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30 (2006), 361–389.99.Harari, O. ‘Proclus’ Account of Explanatory Demonstrations in Mathematics andits Context’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2008), 137–164.178100.Harari, O. Knowledge and Demonstration. Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics,Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.101.Helmig, C.
‘Aristotle’s Notion of Intelligible Matter’, Quaestio. Yearbookof the History of Metaphysics 7 (2007), 53–78.102.Helmig, C. ‘Der Gegensatz von Platon und Aristoteles in denneuplatonischen Interpretationen des Menonparadoxons und der Anamnesislehre’,in: Erler / Brisson (2007), 273–277.103.Helmig, C. ‘Die atmende Form in der Materie – Einige Überlegungen zumENY}ON EI_Oo in der Philosophie des Proklos’, in: Perkams / Piccione (2006),259–278.104.Helmig, C. ‘Plato’s Arguments against Conceptualism – Parm. 132b3-c11reconsidered’, Elenchos 28 (2007), 303–336.105.Helmig, C. ‘Proclus and other Neoplatonists on Universals and Predication’,Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 19 (2008), 31–52.106.Helmig, C.
‘Proclus’ Criticism of Aristotle’s Theory of Concept Formationand Abstraction in Analytica Posteriora II 19’, in: de Haas / Leunissen / Martijn(2010), 27–54.107.Helmig, C. ‘The Truth can never be refuted. Syrianus’ View(s) on Aristotlereconsidered’, in: Longo (2009), 347–380.108.Helmig, C. ‘What is the Systematic Place of Abstraction and ConceptFormation in Plato’s philosophy? Ancient and Modern Readings of Phaedrus249b–c’, in: van Riel / Macé (2004), 83–97.109.Helmig, C. Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the PlatonicTradition. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina, Quellen und Studien5. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 2012.110.Hintikka, J.
‘Aristotelian induction’, Revue internationale de philosophie 34(1980), 422–439.111.Höffe, O. Aristoteles-Lexikon, Stuttgart: Kröner, 2005.179112.https://hiw.kuleuven.be/dwmc/ancientphilosophy/proclus/proclusbiblio.html (на 07.03.2014)113.Hussey, E., Physics Books III and IV, Translated with an introduction andnotes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.114.Irwin, T. H. Aristotle's First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.115.Jaeger W.
Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of his Development.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.116.Johansen, T. K. Aristotle on the Sense-Organs, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1998.117.Kahn, Ch. ‘The Role of nous in the Cognition of First Principles in PosteriorAnalytics II 19’, in: Berti (1981), 385–414.118.Kahn, Ch. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue.
The philosophical use of aliterary form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.119.Kalligas, P. ‘Λόγος and the Sensible Object in Plotinus’, Ancient Philosophy17 (1997), 397–410.120.King, R. A. H. Aristotle and Plotinus on memory (Quellen und Studien zurPhilosophie, 94), Berlin – New York: de Gruyter, 2009.121.Kobusch, T. Sein und Sprache. Historische Grundlegung einer Ontologie derSprache, Leiden: Brill, 1987.122.Kullmann,W.WissenschaftundMethode.InterpretationenzurAristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1974.123.Kutash, E., Ten Gifts of the Demiurge: Proclus on Plato’s Timaeus,London/New York: Bristol Classical Press, 2011.124.Lautner, P. ‘Different Types of Λόγοι and their Place in EmpiricalKnowledge and Noetic Understanding in Syrianus’, Ancient Philosophy 29 (2009),373–390.125.Lautner, P.
‘Some Clarifications on Proclus’ Fourfold Division of Sense-Perception in the Timaeus Commentary’, in: Perkams / Piccione (2006), 117–135.180126.Lautner, P. ‘The koine aisthesis in Proclus and Ps.-Simplicius’, in: P.Adamson / H. Baltussen / M.W.F. Stone (eds.), Philosophy, Sciences and Exegesisin Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries, Volume I, London: Institute of ClassicalStudies, 2004, 163–174.127.Lautner, P.‘The distinction between phantasia and doxa in Proclus’ InTimaeum’, Classical Quarterly 52 (2002), 257–269.128.Lesher, J.
H. ‘The Meaning of NOUS in the Posterior Analytics’, Phronesis18 (1973), 44–68.129.Lloyd A. C. The Anatomy of Neo-Platonism. Oxford: Clarendon Press,1990.130.MacIsaac, D. G. ‘Phantasia between Soul and Body in Proclus’ EuclidCommentary’, Dionysius 19 (2001), 125–136.131.MacIsaac, D. G. ‘Projection and Time in Proclus’, in: J. Inglis (ed.),Medieval Philosophy and the Classical Traditions, London: Routledge / Curzon,2002, 83–105. MacIsaac (2005): D.G. MacIsaac, Choronous: The Soul in theNeoplatonism of Proclus, 2005.
[unpublished manuscript of the Dissertation,University of Notre Dame]132.MacIsaac, D. G. ‘The origin of determination in the Neoplatonism ofProclus’, in: W. Otten / W. Hannam / M. Treschow, Divine Creation in Ancient,Medieval, and Early Modern Thought. Essays presented to the Rev’d DoctorRobert D. Crouse, Leiden: Brill, 2007, 141–172.133.Martijn, M. Proclus on Nature. Philosophy of Nature and Its Methods inProclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus (Philosophia Antiqua, 121), Leiden –Boston: Brill, 2010.134.Modrak, D.
Aristotle: The Power of Perception, Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1987.135.Moravcsik, J. M. E. ‘Being and Meaning in the Sophist’, Acta PhilosophicaFennica 14 (1962), 23–78.181136.Morrison, D. ‘Separation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, Oxford Studies inAncientPhilosophy 3 (1985), 125–157.137.Moutsopoulos, E. A. Les structures de l’imaginaire dans la philosophie deProclus, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1985.
Mueller (1979): I. Mueller, ‘Aristotle onGeometrical Objects’, in: J. Barnes / M. Schofield / R. Sorabji (eds.), Articles onAristotle. 3. Metaphysics, London: Duckworth, 1979, 96–107. [first published inArchiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52 (1970), 156–171]138.Mueller, I. ‘Mathematics and philosophy in Proclus’ Commentary on BookI of Euclid’s Elements’, in: Pépin / Saffrey (1987), 305–318.139.Nikulin, D.
Imagination and Mathematics in Proclus’, Ancient Philosophy28(2008), 153–172.140.Nussbaum M. C. / Rorty A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De anima,Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.141.O’Meara, D. J. ‘Intentional Objects in later Neoplatonism’, in: Perler (2001),115–125.142.O’Meara, D. J.
Pythagoras Revived. Mathematics and Philosophy in LateAntiquity, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.143.O’Neil, W. Proclus. Alcibiades. Translation and Commentary. The Hague:Nijhoff, 1965.144.Opsomer, J. Proclus on Demiurgy and Procession in the Timaeus. In: Reasonand Necessity. Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. Ed. By M.R. Wright.
Duckworth andClassical Press of Wales, 2000, pp. 113-145.145.Opsomer, J. To find the maker and father. Proclus' exegesis of Tim. 28C3-5. Etudes Platoniciennes, 2, (2006), pp. 261-283.146.Owens, J., The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics. 3d ed.,rev., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1978.147.Perler, D., Der propositionale Wahrheitsbegriff im 14.
Jahrhundert, Berlin &New York, de Gruyter 1992.182148.Platonic Ideas and Concept Formation in Ancient and Medieval Thought, ed.by G. Van Riel and C. Macé, with the assistance of L. Van Campe (De WulfMansion Centre, Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, series 1, 32), Leuven: LeuvenUniversity Press, 2004.149.Polansky, R. Aristotle’s De anima: A Commentary. Cambridge UniversityPress, 2007.150.Procli Diadochi In Platonis Cratylum commentaria, edidit G.
Pasqvali(Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana), Lipsiae:Teubner, 1908. [reprint Stuttgart 1994]151.Procli Diadochi In Platonis Timaeum commentaria, edidit E. Diehl(Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana), Leipzig:Teubner, 1903–1906. [второе издание: Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1965]152.Procli in Platonis Parmenidem commentaria, edidit C. Steel, Vol. 1 libros I–III continens; Vol. 2 libros IV–V continens; Vol. 3 libros VI–VII et indicescontinens (Oxford classical texts), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007–2009.153.Procli Philosophi Platonici Opera inedita quae primus olim e codicibusmanuscriptis Parisinis Italicisque vulgaverat, nunc secundis curis emendavit etauxit V. Cousin, Paris: Durand 1864.
[first published Paris: Eberhart, 1820–1827,reprinted Frankfurt am Main: Minerva 1962]154.Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Volume 2, Book II: Proclus onthe Causes of the Cosmos and its Creation, translated by D.T. Runia & M. Share,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.155.Proclus, On Plato’s Cratylus, translated by B. Duvick (The AncientCommentators on Aristotle), London: Duckworth, 2007.156.Proclus, The Elements of Theology, a revised text with translation,introduction and commentary by E.R. Dodds, second edition, Oxford: ClarendonPress, 1963. [впервые издано в 1933]183157.Proclus, Théologie platonicienne, texte établi et traduit par H.D. Saffrey etL.G. Westerink, volumes 1–6 (Collection des universités de France), Paris: LesBelles Lettres, 1974–1997.158.Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, translated by G.R.
Morrowand J.M. Dillon, with an introduction and notes by J.M. Dillon, Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1987.159.Rapp, Chr. ‘Intentionalität und Phantasia bei Aristoteles’, in: Perler (2001),63–96.160.Rosán L. J., The philosophy of Proclus. The final phase of Ancient thought,New York: Cosmos, 1949. [reprinted with revised bibliography, London:Prometheus Trust 2009]161.Ross, W. D. Plato’s Theory of Ideas, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951.162.Rutten, C. Les Catégories du monde sensible dans les Ennéades de Plotin(Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, 160),Paris: Les Belles Lettres,1961.163.Saffrey, H.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
