Диссертация (1136465), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
Mostly sunny: a forecast of tomorrow's power indexresearch / Kurz S., Maaser N., Napel S., Weber M. // HomoOeconomicus. – 2015. – Vol. 32. – No. 1. – P. 133-146.135. Laruelle, A., Valenciano, F. Voting and Power // Holler M., Nurmi H.(eds.). Power, Voting, and Voting Power: 30 Years After. – Springer.– 2012. – P.137-149.136. Laver M., Shepsle K. Making and breaking governments: Cabinetsand legislatures in parliamentary democracies.
– Cambridge:Cambridge university press, 1996. – 301 p.137. Le Breton M., Montero M., Zaporozhets V. Voting power in the EUCouncil of Ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics //152Mathematical Social Sciences. – 2012.
– Vol. 63. – No. 2. – P. 159173.138. Leech D. An empirical comparison of the performance of classicalpower indices // Political Studies. – 2002a. – Vol. 50. – No. 1. – P. 122.139. Leech D. The utility of the voting power approach // European UnionPolitics. – 2003. – Vol. 4. – No. 4. – P. 234-242.140. Leech D. Voting power in the governance of the InternationalMonetary Fund // Annals of Operations Research.
– 2002b. – Vol.109. – No. 1-4. – P. 375-397.141. Leiserson M. Coalitions in politics: A theoretical and empirical study:PhD dissertation. – New Haven, L.: Yale university press, 1966. – 455p.142. Lindner I. Annick Laruelle and Federico Valenciano: Voting andcollective decision-making // Social Choice and Welfare.
– 2012. –Vol. 38. – No. 1. – P. 161-179.143. Lindstädt R., Slapin J., Vander Wielen R. Balancing competingdemands: Position taking and election proximity in the EuropeanParliament // Legislative Studies Quarterly. – 2011. – Vol. 36. – No.1. –P. 37-70.144. March J. Measurement concepts in the theory of influence // TheJournal of Politics. – 1957. – Vol. 19. – No. 2. – P. 202-226.145. Napel S., Widgrén M.
Power measurement as sensitivity analysis aunified approach // Journal of Theoretical Politics. – 2004. – Vol. 16.– No. 4. – P. 517-538.146. Napel S., Widgrén M. The possibility of a preference-based powerindex // Journal of Theoretical Politics.
– 2005. – Vol. 17. – No. 3. –P. 377-387.153147. Noury A. Ideology, nationality and Euro-parliamentarians // EuropeanUnion Politics. – 2002. – Vol. 3. – No. 1. – P. 33-58.148. Nurmi H. The representation of voter groups in the EuropeanParliament: a Penrose-Banzhaf index analysis // Electoral Studies. –1997. – Vol. 16. – No. 3. – P. 317-339.149. Nurmi H., Meskanen T.
A priori power measures and the institutionsof the European Union // European Journal of Political Research. –1999. – Vol. 35. – No. 2. – P. 161-179.150. Owen G., Shapley L. Optimal location of candidates in ideologicalspace // International Journal of Game Theory. – 1989. – Vol.
18. –No. 3. – P. 339-356.151. Penrose L. The elementary statistics of majority voting // Journal ofthe Royal Statistical Society. – 1946. – Vol. 109. – No. 1. – P. 53-57.152. Pogorelskiy K. Implications of the Quota & Voice Reform of theIMF: the Aspect of Power. Working paper WP7/2010/01. – Moscow:State University - Higher School of Economics. – 2010.
– 24 p.153. Poole K, Lewis J., Lo J., Carroll R. Scaling Roll Call Votes withwnominate in R // Journal of Statistical Software. — 2011. — Vol. 42— No. 14. — pp. 1–21.154. Poole K., Rosenthal H. A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll CallAnalysis. // American Journal of Political Science. — 1985. — Vol.29. — P. 357-384.155. Potthoff H., Miller S., The Social Democratic Party of Germany,1848-2005 / Translated by M. Kane. – Dietz, 2006.156. Rae D. Decision-rules and individual values in constitutional choice //American Political Science Review.
– 1969. – Vol. 63. – No. 1. – P.40-56.154157. Raunio T., Wiberg M. Controlling Outcomes: Voting Power in theEuropean Parliament 1979-2000 // Journal of European Integration. –2002. – Vol. 24. – No. 2. – P. 75-90.158. Reichstagswahlergebnisse und Mandate in der Weimarer Republik /Historische ausstellung des deutschen bundestages. [Электронныйресурс]URL:http://www.bundestag.de/blob/190456/f8d637d1039a06a614cff0264f8b5d10/reichstagswahlergebnisse-data.pdf. (проверено: 21.06.2016).159. Reichswahlgesetz. Vom 27.
April 1920. [Электронный ресурс]URL:http://www.doc-mentarchiv.de/wr.html.(проверено:21.06.2016).160. Riker W. The Theory of Political Coalitions. – New Haven: YaleUniversity Press. – 1962. – 300 p.161. Riker W. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. – Boston:Little, Brown. – 1964. – 169 p.162. Riker W. The first power index // Social Choice and Welfare. – 1986.– Vol. 3. – No. 4. – P. 293-295.163.
Rippert U. German Social Democrats meet in the shadow of thefinancial crisis / World Socialist Web Site, 24 October 2008:[Электронныйресурс]URL:http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/oct2008/spdc-o24.shtml(проверено: 21.06.2016).164. Schmeidler D. The nucleolus of a characteristic function game //SIAM Journal on applied mathematics. – 1969. – Vol. 17.
– No. 6. –P. 1163-1170.165. Schofield N., Laver M. Bargaining Theory and Portfolio Payoffs inEuropean Coalition Governments, 1945-83 // British Journal ofPolitical Science. — 1985. — Vol. 15. — No 2. — p. 143–164.155166. Selck T., Steunenberg B. Between Power and Luck The EuropeanParliament in the EU Legislative Process // European Union Politics. –2004. – Vol. 5.
– No. 1. – P. 25-46.167. Shapley L., Shubik M. A method for evaluating the distribution ofpower in a committee system // American Political Science Review. –1954. – Vol. 48. – No. 3. – P. 787-792.168. Shvarts D., Ushakov M. On evaluation of the power indices withallowance of agents’ preferences in the anonimous games /Издательский дом ВШЭ. Series WP7 "Математические методыанализа решений в экономике, бизнесе и политике". – 2015. – No.4. – 16 p.169. Steunenberg B., Schmidtchen D., Koboldt C. Strategic power in theEuropean Union evaluating the distribution of power in policy games// Journal of Theoretical Politics. – 1999.
– Vol. 11. – No. 3. – P. 339366.170. Sutter M. Flexible integration, EMU and relative voting power in theEU // Public Choice. – 2000. – Vol. 104. – No. 1-2. – P. 41-62.171. Swaan de A. Coalition theories and cabinet formations: A study offormal theories of coalition formation to nine European parliamentsafter 1948. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass publisher, 1973. – 347 p.172. The Constitution of the German Federation of August 11, 1919.[Электронныйресурс]http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jobrien/reference/ob13.htmlURL:(проверено:21.06.2016).173.
Tsebelis G. Veto players and institutional analysis // Governance. –2000. – Vol.13. – No. 4. – p. 441-474.174. Turnovec F. Power Indices: Swings or Pivots? // Reasoned Choices:Essays in Honour of Hannu Nurmi. – The Finnish Political ScienceAssociation, Turku. – 2004. – P. 374-390.156175. Van der Eijk, C., M. Franklin et al.
Choosing Europe? The EuropeanElectorate and National Politics in the Face of the Union. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press. – 1996.176. Volkens A., Lehmann P., Matthieß Th., Merz N., Regel S., Werner A.TheManifestoDataCollection.ManifestoProject(MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2015a.
[Электронный ресурс]URL:https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/datasets(проверено:21.06.2016).177. Weber M. Choosing voting systems behind the veil of ignorance: Atwo-tier voting experiment. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper (№14-042/I). – 2014. – 60 p.178. Widgrén M.
The Impact of Council Voting Rules on EU DecisionMaking. ETLA discussion paper (No. 1162). – 2009. – 30 p.179. Xu R., Wunsch II R.C. Clustering. IEEE Press Series onComputational Intelligence, John Wiley and Sons. — 2009. — 358 p.180. Zaporozhets V. Voting power and decision making in environmentalcommittees: The case of French water agencies // Water Resourcesand Economics. – 2015.
– Vol. 12. – P. 40-51.181. Zoch P. Ancient Rome: An Introductory History. – Norman:University of Oklahoma Press, 2012. – 320 p.157Приложение 1. Влияние в выборных органах и международныхорганизацияхРассмотрим подробнее приложения классических индексоввлияния.РасширениеЕСсталооднимизнаиболеепопулярныхприложений индексов влияния с середины 1990-х гг. Самым крупнымза всю историю стало включение в состав Европейского союза 10новых членов в 2004 году (и еще двух — в 2007 г.), семь из которыхсоставляют так называемый “восточный блок”. Проблема того, какперераспределится власть в институтах ЕС исследователей сталаинтересовать задолго до фактического расширения. Принципиальноерешение о включении новых членов и сопутствующем пересмотречисла голосов и квоты было принято на Ниццком саммите в 2001 г.Новая процедура принятия решений в Совете Министров быларассмотрена в [Bilbao et al.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
