Диссертация (1145656), страница 20
Текст из файла (страница 20)
– V. 56. – P. 814–825.82.Blinowska K., Kus R., Kaminski M., Janiszewska J. Transmission ofbrain activity during cognitive task. // Brain Topogr. – 2010. – V. 23. – P. 205–213.83.Bosch S., Krause H., Leminen A. The time-course ofmorphosyntactic and semantic priming in late bilinguals: A study of German115adjectives //Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. – 2017. – Т. 20.
– №. 3. – P.435-456.84.Brennan J., Lignos C., Embick D., Roberts T.P.L. Spectro– temporalcorrelates of lexical access during auditory lexical decision. // Brain Lang. – 2014.– V. 133. – P. 39–46.85.Brualla J. et al. Auditory event-related potentials to semanticprimingduringsleep//ElectroencephalographyandClinicalNeurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. – 1998. – Т. 108.
– №. 3. – P. 283290.86.Budd T. W. et al. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-relatedpotential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness //InternationalJournal of Psychophysiology. – 1998. – Т. 31. – №. 1. – P. 51-68.87.Butler R. A. Monaural and binaural localization of noise burstsvertically in median sagittal plane //Journal of Auditory Research. – 1969. – Т. 9.
–№. 3. – P. 230-235.88.Butler R. A. The cumulative effects of different stimulus repititionrates on the auditory evoked response in man //Electroencephalography andclinical neurophysiology. – 1973. – Т. 35. – №. 4. – P. 337-345.89.Caramazza A., Miozzo M. More is not always better: A response toRoelofs, Meyer, and Levelt //Cognition. – 1998. – Т. 69. – №. 2. – P. 231-241.90.Cheour M. et al. Development of language-specific phonemerepresentations in the infant brain //Nature neuroscience. – 1998.
– Т. 1. – №. 5. –P. 351-353.91.Cheour-Luhtanen M. et al. Mismatch negativity indicates voweldiscrimination in newborns //Hearing research. – 1995. – Т. 82. – №. 1. – P. 53-58.92.Cheour-Luhtanen M. et al. The ontogenetically earliestdiscriminative response of the human brain //Psychophysiology. – 1996. – Т. 33. –№. 4. – P. 478-481.93.Chernigovskaya T., Gor K., Kataeva G., Korotkov A., Memetova K.,Medvedev Sv. Processing Inflectional Verbal Morphology: PET study of RussianData // Paris, ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics,May 2011. P. 59-62.94.Cleland A. A. et al. Frequency effects in spoken and visual wordrecognition: Evidence from dual-task methodologies //Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance.
– 2006. – Т. 32. – №. 1. – P.104.95.Cong F., Kalyakin I., Huttunen–Scott T., Li H., Lyytinen H.,Ristaniemi T. Single–trial based independent component analysis on mismatchnegativity in children. // Int. J. Neural. Syst. – 2010. – V. 20. – P. 279–292.96.Cong F., Kalyakin I., Li H., Huttunen–Scott T., Huang Y.X.,Lyytinen H., Rustaniemi T. Answering six questions in extracting children'smismatch negativity through combining wavelet decomposition and independentcomponent analysis. // Cogn.
Neurodyn. – 2011. – V. 5. – P. 343–359.97.Cong F., Aleksandrov A., Knyazeva V., Deinekina T., Ristaniemi T.116A systematic independent component analysis approach to extract mismatchnegativity // Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Advances in Neural Networks ISNN 2012 – Vol. 7367 LNCS. – I. PART 1. – 2012. – P. 411-421.98.Cong F., Huang Y., Kalyakin I., Li H., Huttunen– Scott T., LyytinenH., Ristaniemi T.
Frequency response based wavelet decomposition to extractchildren's mismatch negativity elicited by uninterrupted sound. // J. Med. Biol.Eng. – 2012b. – V. 32. – P. 205–214.99.Connine C. M., Blasko D. G., Titone D. Do the beginnings ofspoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? //Journal ofMemory and Language. – 1993. – Т. 32.
– №. 2. – P. 193.100.Coulson S. Cognitive neuroscience of figurative language. // TheCambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. / Spivey M.J, Joanisse M.F.,McRrae K. eds. – London: Cambridge University Press. - 2012. – P. 523 – 538.101.Cowan N. et al.
Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in theauditory event-related potential (ERP) //Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition. – 1993. – Т. 19. – №. 4. – P. 909.102.Creutzfeldt O., Ojemann G., Lettich E. Single neuron activity in theright and left human temporal lobe during listening and speaking //Duality andUnity of the Brain. – Springer US, 1987.
– С. 295-310.103.Csépe V., Karmos G., Molnar M. Evoked potential correlates ofstimulus deviance during wakefulness and sleep in cat—animal model of mismatchnegativity //Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. – 1987. – Т. 66.– №. 6. – P. 571-578.104.Csépe V., Karmos G., Molnár M. Subcortical evoked potentialcorrelates of early information processing: mismatch negativity in cats //Braindynamics.
– Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1989. – P. 279-289.105.Dahan D., Magnuson J. S., Tanenhaus M. K. Time course offrequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements//Cognitive psychology. – 2001. – Т. 42. – №. 4. – P. 317-367.106.Daltrozzo J., Wioland N., Kotchoubey B. Sex differences in twoevent-related potentials components related to semantic priming //Archives ofsexual behavior.
– 2007. – Т. 36. – №. 4. – P. 555-568.107.Davis M. H., Gaskell M. G. A complementary systems account ofword learning: neural and behavioural evidence //Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. – 2009. – Т. 364. – №. 1536. – P.3773-3800.108.Deacon D. et al. Event-related potential indices of semantic primingusing masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a postlexical process //Cognitive Brain Research.
– 2000. – Т. 9. – №. 2. – P. 137-146.109.Dehaene S. Electrophysiological evidence for category-specificword processing in the normal human brain //NeuroReport. – 1995. – Т. 6. – №.16. – P. 2153-2157.117110.Diesch E., Biermann S., Luce T. The magnetic mismatch fieldelicited by words and phonological non-words //NeuroReport. – 1998.
– Т. 9. – №.3. – С. 455-460.111.Eddy M., Schmid A., Holcomb P. J. Masked repetition priming andevent-related brain potentials: A new approach for tracking the time-course ofobject perception //Psychophysiology. – 2006. – Т. 43. – №. 6. – P. 564-568.112.Eimer M., Kiss M. An electrophysiological measure of access torepresentations in visual working memory. // Psychophysiology. – 2010. – V. 47. –P. 197–200.113.Evstigneeva M. D., Aleksandrov A.
A. Mismatch negativity: thecontribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuronpopulations //Neuroscience and behavioral physiology. – 2009. – Т. 39. – №. 9. –P. 833-840.114.Evstigneeva M. D. et al. Muscle contraction force and fatigue:effects on mismatch negativity //Neuroreport. – 2010. – Т. 21. – №. 18. – P.
11521156.115.Eulitz C. Representation of phonological features in the brain:Evidence from mismatch negativity //Proceedings of the 16th InternationalCongress of Phonetic Science. – 2007 а. – P. 113-116.116.Eulitz C., Obleser J. Perception of acoustically complexphonological features in vowels is reflected in the induced brain-magnetic activity//Behavioral and Brain Functions. – 2007 b. – Т. 3. – №. 1. – P. 26.117.Federmeier K. D. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction inlanguage comprehension //Psychophysiology.
– 2007. – Т. 44. – №. 4. – P. 491505.118.Federmeier K. D., Wlotko E. W., Meyer A. M. What's ‘Right’inLanguage Comprehension: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Right HemisphereLanguage Capabilities //Language and linguistics compass. – 2008. – Т.
2. – №. 1.– P. 1-17.119.Ferrari V., Bradley M.M., Codispoti M., Lang P.J. Detecting noveltyand significance. // J. Cogn. Neurosci. – 2010. – V. 22. – P. 404–411.120.Folstein J. R., Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control andmismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review // Psychophysiology. – 2008.– Vol. 45, No 1. – P. 152-170.121.Folstein J.R., Van Petten C., Rose S.A.
Novelty and conflict in thecategorization of complex stimuli. // Psychophysiology. – 2008 b. – V. 45. – P.467–479.122.Friederici A. D., Pfeifer E., Hahne A. Event-related brain potentialsduring natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntacticviolations //Cognitive brain research. – 1993. – Т. 1. – №. 3. – P. 183-192.123.Friederici A. D., Weissenborn J.
Mapping sentence form ontomeaning: The syntax–semantic interface //Brain research. – 2007. – Т. 1146. – P.50-58.118124.Friederici A. D. The brain basis of language processing: fromstructure to function //Physiological reviews. – 2011. – Т. 91. – №. 4. – P. 13571392.125.Fromkin V., Rodman R., Hyams N.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
