Диссертация (1145656), страница 24
Текст из файла (страница 24)
– P. 2131–2141.290.Sams M. et al. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-relatedpotentials //Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/EvokedPotentials Section. – 1985. – Т. 62. – №. 6. – P. 437-448.129291.Sams M. et al. The human auditory sensory memory trace persistsabout 10 sec: neuromagnetic evidence //Journal of cognitive neuroscience. – 1993.– Т. 5. – №.
3. – P. 363-370.292.Sarfarazi M. et al. Visual event related potentials modulated bycontextually relevant and irrelevant olfactory primes //Chemical Senses. – 1999. –Т. 24. – №. 2. – P. 145-154.293.Schlögl A., Keinrath C., Zimmermann D., Scherer R., Leeb R.,Pfurtscheller G. A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEGrecordings. // Clin. Neurophysiol. – 2007. – V.
118. – P. 98–104.294.Senkowski D., Saint– Amour D., Gruber T., Foxe J.J. Look who‘stalking: the deployment of visuo– spatial attention during multisensory speechprocessing under noisy environmental conditions. // Neuroimage. – 2008. – V. 43.– P. 379–387.295.Sereno S. C., Rayner K., Posner M.
I. Establishing a time-line ofword recognition: evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials//Neuroreport. – 1998. – Т. 9. – №. 10. – P. 2195-2200.296.Sereno S. C., Brewer C. C., O'Donnell P. J. Context effects in wordrecognition: Evidence for early interactive processing //Psychological Science. –2003. – Т. 14. – №. 4. – P. 328-333.297.Shahin A.J., Roberts L.E., Miller L.M., McDonald K.L., Alain C.Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responsesmodulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
// Brain Topogr. – 2007a. – V. 20. –P. 55–61.298.Shahin A.J., Roberts L.E., Pantev C., Aziz M., Picton T.W.Enhanced anterior– temporal processing for complex tones in musicians. // Clin.Neurophysiol. – 2007b. – V. 118. – P. 209–220.299.Shahin A.J., Picton T.W., Miller L.M. Brain oscillations duringsemantic evaluation of speech. // Brain Cogn.
– 2009. – V. 70. – P. 259–266.300.Shannon R. V., Zeng F. G., Wygonski J. Speech recognition withaltered spectral distribution of envelope cues //The Journal of the AcousticalSociety of America. – 1998. – Т. 104. – №. 4. – P. 2467-2476.301.Shtyrov Y. et al. Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeechsounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres//Neuroimage. – 2000. – Т.
12. – №. 6. – P. 657-663.302.Shtyrov Y., Pulvermüller F. Neurophysiological evidence of memorytraces for words in the human brain //Neuroreport. – 2002. – Т. 13. – №. 4. – P.521-525.303.Shtyrov Y., Nikulin V. V., Pulvermüller F. Rapid cortical plasticityunderlying novel word learning //Journal of Neuroscience. – 2010. – Т. 30. – №.50.
– P. 16864-16867.304.Shtyrov Y. et al. Event-related potentials reflecting the frequency ofunattended spoken words: A neuronal index of connection strength in lexicalmemory circuits? //Neuroimage. – 2011. – Т. 55. – №. 2. – P. 658-668.130305.Shtyrov Y. Neural bases of rapid word learning //The Neuroscientist.– 2012. – Т. 18. – №. 4. – P. 312-319.306.Sinke C., Neufeld J., Wiswede D., Emrich H.M., Bleich S., MünteT.F., Szycik GR. N1 enhancement in synesthesia during visual and audio– visualperception in semantic cross– modal conflict situations: an ERP study. // Front.Hum. Neurosci. – 2014. – V.
8. – A. 21.307.Sitnikova T., Holcomb P.J., Kiyonaga K.A., Kuperberg G.R. Twoneurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension ofreal– world events. // J. Cogn. Neurosci. – 2008. – V. 20. – P. 2037–2057.308.Sitnikova T. et al. Neurocognitive mechanisms of conceptualprocessing in healthy adults and patients with schizophrenia //International Journalof Psychophysiology.
– 2010. – Т. 75. – №. 2. – P. 86-99.309.Skrandies W. Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaning—abrain mapping study //Cognitive Brain Research. – 1998. – Т. 6. – №. 3. – P. 173183.310.Skrandies W., Chiu M. J. Dimensions of affective semanticmeaning—behavioral and evoked potential correlates in Chinese subjects//Neuroscience letters. – 2003. – Т. 341. – №. 1. – P. 45-48.311.Sokolov A. et al.
Reciprocal modulation of neuromagnetic inducedgamma activity by attention in the human visual and auditory cortex //Neuroimage.– 2004. – Т. 22. – №. 2. – P. 521-529.312.Sorokin A., Alku P., Kujala T. Change and novelty detection inspeech and non-speech sound streams //Brain research. – 2010. – Т. 1327. – P. 7790.313.Stam C.J. Characterization of anatomical and functional connectivityin the brain: a complex networks perspective. // Int. J.
Psychophysiol. – 2010. – V.77. – P. 186–194.314.Stefanics G., Kremláček J., Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity: apredictive coding view. // Front. Hum. Neurosci. – 2014. – V. 8. – A. 666.315.Stein B.E., Stanford T.R., Ramachandran R., Perrault T.J.Jr.,Rowland B.A. Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternativecriteria, models, and inverse effectiveness.
// Exp. Brain Res. – 2009. – V. 198. –P. 113–126.316.Stein B.E., Rowland B.A. Organization and plasticity inmultisensory integration: early and late experience affects its governing principles.// Prog. Brain Res. – 2011. – V. 191. – P. 145–163.317.Strobel A., Debener S., Sorger B., Peters J.C., Kranczioch C.,Hoechstetter K., Engel A.K., Brocke B., Goebel R. Novelty and target processingduring an auditory novelty oddball: a simultaneous event– related potential andfunctional magnetic resonance imaging study. // Neuroimage.
– 2008. – V. 40. – P.869–883.318.Swaab T. Y., Camblin C. C., Gordon P. C. Electrophysiologicalevidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing //Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience. – 2004. – Т. 16. – №. 5. – P. 715-726.131319.Swaab T. Y. et al.
Language-related ERP components //Oxfordhandbook of event-related potential components. – 2012. – P. 397-440.320.Tallal P. et al. Familial aggregation in specific language impairment//Journal of Speech, Language, and hearing research. – 2001. – Т. 44. – №. 5. – P.1172-1182.321.Tavabi K., Embick D., Roberts T.P. Spectral– temporal analysis ofcortical oscillations during lexical processing. // Neuroreport. – 2011a. – V.
22. –P. 474–478.322.Tavabi K., Embick D., Roberts T. Word repetition priming– inducedoscillations in auditory cortex: A magnetoencephalography study. // Neuroreport. –2011b. – V. 22. – P. 887–891. 323.Tiitinen H. et al. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governedby pre-attentive sensory memory //Nature. – 1994. – Т. 372. – №. 6501.
– P. 90.324.Tomasello M., Bates E. Language development: The essentialreadings. – Blackwell, 2001.325.Tort A.B., Komorowski R.W., Manns J.R., Kopell N.J., EichenbaumH. Theta– gamma coupling increases during the learning of item– contextassociations. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. – 2009. – V. 106. – P. 20942–20947.326.Tse C.Y., Lee C. L., Sullivan J., Garnsey S.M., Dell G.S., FabianiM., Gratton G. Imaging cortical dynamics of language processing with the event–related optical signal.
// Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. – 2007. – V. 104. – P. 17157–17162.327.Tzourio N. et al. Functional anatomy of human auditory attentionstudied with PET //Neuroimage. – 1997. – Т. 5. – №. 1. – P. 63-77.328.Van Berkum J.J.A., van den Brink D., Tesink C.M.J.Y., Kos M.,Hagoort P.
The neural integration of speaker and message. // J. Cogn. Neurosci. –2008. – V. 20. – P. 580– 591.329.Van Berkum J. J. A. The neuropragmatics of'simple'utterancecomprehension: An ERP review //Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment totheory. – Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – P. 276-316.330.Van Den Brink D., Brown C. M., Hagoort P. Electrophysiologicalevidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200versus N400 effects //Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. – 2001. – Т.
13. – №. 7.– P. 967-985.331.Van Petten C., Kutas M. Interactions between sentence context andword frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials //Memory & Cognition. – 1990. – Т.18. – №. 4. – P. 380-393.332.Van Petten C. et al. Fractionating the word repetition effect withevent-related potentials //Journal of cognitive neuroscience. – 1991. – Т. 3. – №. 2.– P. 131-150.333.Van Petten C., Luka B.
J. Neural localization of semantic contexteffects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies //Brain and language. – 2006.– Т. 97. – №. 3. – P. 279-293.132334.Vigneau M. et al. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas:phonology, semantics, and sentence processing //Neuroimage. – 2006. – Т. 30. –№. 4. – P. 1414-1432.335.Walker L. J. et al. Possible neuronal refractory or recovery artifactsassociated with recording the mismatch negativity response //Journal of theAmerican Academy of Audiology. – 2001.
– Т. 12. – №. 7. – Р. 348-56.336.Wang L., Jensen O., van den Brink D., Weder N., Schoffelen J.– M.,Magyari L., Hagoort P., Bastiaansen M. Beta oscillations relate to the N400mduring language comprehension. // Hum. Brain Mapp. – 2012. – V. 33. – P. 2898–2912.337.Wennekers T., Garagnani M., Pulvermüller F. Language modelsbased on Hebbian cell assemblies //Journal of Physiology-Paris. – 2006. – Т. 100.– №. 1. – P.
16-30.338.West W. C., Holcomb P. J. Imaginal, semantic, and surface-levelprocessing of concrete and abstract words: an electrophysiological investigation//Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. – 2000. – Т. 12. – №. 6. – P. 1024-1037.339.Winkler I. et al. Brain responses reveal the learning of foreignlanguage phonemes //Psychophysiology. – 1999. – Т. 36. – №. 5.
– P. 638-642.340.Woods D. L., Courchesne E. The recovery functions of auditoryevent-relatedpotentialsduringsplit-seconddiscriminations//Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked PotentialsSection. – 1986. – Т. 65. – №. 4. – P. 304-315.341.Wong P. C. M., Perrachione T. K. Learning pitch patterns in lexicalidentification by native English-speaking adults //Applied Psycholinguistics.
–2007. – Т. 28. – №. 04. – P. 565-585.342.Wong P. et al. Volume of left Heschl's gyrus and linguistic pitchlearning //Cerebral cortex. – 2008. – Т. 18. – №. 4. – P. 828-836.343.Wu Y. C., Coulson S. Meaningful gestures: Electrophysiologicalindices of iconic gesture comprehension //Psychophysiology. – 2005. – Т. 42. – №.6.
– P. 654-667.344.Yabe H. et al. Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN tosound omission //Neuroreport. – 1997. – Т. 8. – №. 8. – P. 1971-1974.345.Yue J., Bastiaanse R., Alter K. Cortical plasticity induced by rapidHebbian learning of novel tonal word-forms: Evidence from mismatch negativity//Brain and language. – 2014.
– Т. 139. – P. 10-22..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
