Диссертация (1145656), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
6. – P. 1529-1532.238.Nelson D. A., Lassman F. M. Combined effects of recovery periodand stimulus intensity on the human auditory evoked vertex response //Journal ofSpeech, Language, and Hearing Research. – 1973. – Т. 16. – №. 2. – P. 297-308.239.Nelson D. A., Lassman F. M. Re-examination of the effects ofperiodic and aperiodic stimulation on the auditory-evoked vertex response//Audiology. – 1977. – Т. 16.
– №. 5. – P. 409-418.240.Neville H. et al. Syntactically based sentence processing classes:Evidence from event-related brain potentials //Journal of cognitive Neuroscience. –1991. – Т. 3. – №. 2. – P. 151-165.241.Nielsen-Bohlman L. et al. Differential auditory processing continuesduring sleep //Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. – 1991. – Т.79. – №. 4. – P.
281-290.242.Nunez P.L., Srinivasan R., Fields R.D. EEG functional connectivity,axon delays and white matter disease. // Clin. Neurophysiol. – 2014. – S1388–2457(14)00190-4.243.Obleser J., Elbert T., Eulitz C. Attentional influences on functionalmapping of speech sounds in human auditory cortex //BMC neuroscience. – 2004.– Т. 5. – №. 1. – P. 24.244.Obleser J., Scott S. K., Eulitz C. Now you hear it, now you don't:transient traces of consonants and their nonspeech analogues in the human brain//Cerebral Cortex.
– 2006. – Т. 16. – №. 8. – P. 1069-1076.245.O'Connell R.G., Balsters J.H., Kilcullen S.M., Campbell W., BokdeA.W., Lai R., Upton N., Robertson I.H. A simultaneous ERP/fMRI investigation ofthe P300 aging effect. // Neurobiol. Aging. – 2012. – V. 33. – P. 2448–2461.126246.Ortigue S. et al. Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generatormodulation to emotional words //Neuroimage. – 2004. – Т. 21. – №.
4. – P. 12421251.247.Osterhout L., Holcomb P. J. Event-related brain potentials elicited bysyntactic anomaly //Journal of memory and language. – 1992. – Т. 31. – №. 6. – P.785-806.248.Osterhout L., McLaughlin J., Bersick M. Event-related brainpotentials and human language //Trends in Cognitive Sciences. – 1997. – Т. 1. –№. 6. – P. 203-209.249.Paavilainen P. The mismatch-negativity (MMN) component of theauditory event-related potential to violations of abstract regularities: a review//International Journal of Psychophysiology. – 2013. – Т. 88. – №.
2. – P. 109-123.250.Pakarinen S. et al. Measurement of extensive auditory discriminationprofiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-relatedpotential (ERP) //Clinical Neurophysiology. – 2007. – Т. 118. – №. 1. – P. 177185.251.Pakarinen S. et al. Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording severalmismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds//Biological psychology.
– 2009. – Т. 82. – №. 3. – P. 219-226.252.Pazo-Alvarez P., Cadaveira F., Amenedo E. MMN in the visualmodality: a review //Biological psychology. – 2003. – Т. 63. – №. 3. – P. 199-236.253.Perez V.B., Vogel E.K. What ERPs can tell us about WorkingMemory. // The Oxford handbook of event– related potential components. / LuckS.J., Kappenman E.S.
eds. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. – P. 361–372254.Petersen S. E. et al. Positron emission tomographic studies of thecortical anatomy of single-word processing //Nature. – 1988. – Т. 331. – №. 6157.– P. 585-589.255.Piai V., Roelofs A., Maris E. Oscillatory brain responses in spokenword production reflect lexical frequency and sentential constraint//Neuropsychologia. – 2014. – Т. 53.
– P. 146-156.256.Picton T. W., Woods D. L., Proulx G. B. Human auditory sustainedpotentials. I. The nature of the response //Electroencephalography and clinicalneurophysiology. – 1978. – Т. 45. – №. 2. – P. 186-197.257.Picton T. W., Woods D. L., Proulx G. B. Human auditory sustainedpotentials. II. Stimulus relationships //Electroencephalography and clinicalneurophysiology. – 1978. – Т. 45. – №.
2. – P. 198-210.258.Poeppel D. A critical review of PET studies of phonologicalprocessing //Brain and language. – 1996. – Т. 55. – №. 3. – P. 317-351.259.Poeppel D. et al. Towards a new neurobiology of language //Journalof Neuroscience. – 2012. – Т. 32. – №. 41.
– P. 14125-14131.260.Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Bleich N., Mittelman N. The N1complex to gaps in noise: Effects of preceding noise duration and intensity. // Clin.Neurophysiol. –2007. – V. 118. – P. 1078–1087.127261.Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H. J., Bleich N., Mittelman N. Theauditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound. // Clin. Neurophysiol.
–2008. – V. 119. – P. 376–387.262.Pratt H. Sensory ERP Components. // The Oxford handbook ofevent– related potential components. / Luck S.J., Kappenman E.S. eds. – Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2012. – P. 89–114.263.Prasada S., Pinker S. Similarity-based and rule-based generalizationsin inflectional morphology //Language and Cognitive Processes. – 1993. – Т. 8. –P. 1-56.264.Pratarelli M. E. Semantic processing of pictures and spoken words:Evidence from event-related brain potentials //Brain and Cognition.
– 1994. – Т.24. – №. 1. – P. 137-157.265.Preissl H. et al. Evoked potentials distinguish between nouns andverbs //Neuroscience Letters. – 1995. – Т. 197. – №. 1. – P. 81-83.266.Price C. J. The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studiespublished in 2009 //Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. – 2010. – Т.1191. – №. 1. – P. 62-88.267.Pugh K. R. et al. Auditory selective attention: an fMRI investigation//Neuroimage.
– 1996. – Т. 4. – №. 3. – P. 159-173.268.Pulvermüller F. et al. Spectral responses in the gamma-band:physiological signs of higher cognitive processes? //Neuroreport. – 1995. – Т. 6. –№. 15. – P. 2059-2064.269.Pulvermüller F. et al. High-frequency brain activity: its possible rolein attention, perception and language processing //Progress in neurobiology. –1997. – Т.
52. – №. 5. – P. 427-445.270.Pulvermüller F., Lutzenberger W., Preissl H. Nouns and verbs in theintact brain: evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency corticalresponses //Cerebral cortex. – 1999. – Т. 9. – №. 5. – P. 497-506.271.Pulvermüller F. et al. Memory traces for words as revealed by themismatch negativity //Neuroimage. – 2001. – Т. 14. – №. 3.
– P. 607-616.272.Pulvermüller F. The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits ofwords and serial order. – Cambridge University Press, 2002.273.Pulvermüller F. et al. Word-specific cortical activity as revealed bythe mismatch negativity //Psychophysiology. – 2004.
– Т. 41. – №. 1. – P. 106112.274.Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y. Language outside the focus of attention:the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes//Progress in neurobiology. – 2006. – Т. 79. – №. 1. – P. 49-71.275.Pulvermüller F., Assadollahi R. Grammar or serial order?: Discretecombinatorial brain mechanisms reflected by the syntactic mismatch negativity//Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
– 2007. – Т. 19. – №. 6. – P. 971-980.276.Ranta R., Salido– Ruiz R., Louis– Dorr V. Reference estimation inEEG recordings. // Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2010. – 2010. – P.5371–5374.128277.Richardson F. M., Price C. J. Structural MRI studies of languagefunction in the undamaged brain //Brain Structure and Function. – 2009.
– Т. 213.– №. 6. – P. 511-523.278.Rinne T. et al. Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontalmismatch negativity sources //Neuroimage. – 2000. – Т. 12. – №. 1. – P. 14-19.279.Rodríguez-Fornells A. et al. Neurophysiological mechanismsinvolved in language learning in adults //Philosophical Transactions of the RoyalSociety of London B: Biological Sciences. – 2009. – Т. 364. – №. 1536.
– P. 37113735.280.Ross L.A., Saint– Amour D., Leavitt V.M., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. Doyou see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehensionin noisy environments. // Cereb. Cortex. – 2007a. – V. 17. – P. 1147–1153.281.Ross L.A., Saint– Amour D., Leavitt V.M., Molholm S., Javitt D.C.,Foxe J.J. Impaired multisensory processing in schizophrenia: deficits in the visualenhancement of speech comprehension under noisy environmental conditions.
//Schizophr Res. – 2007b. – V. 97. – P. 173–183.282.Ross B., Tremblay K. Stimulus experience modifies auditoryneuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners // Hear Res. – 2009. – V.248. – P. 48–59.283.Ross L.A., Molholm S., Blanco D., Gomez– Ramirez M., Saint–Amour D., Foxe J.J. The development of multisensory speech perception continuesinto the late childhood years.
// Eur. J. Neurosci. – 2011. – V. 33. – P. 2329–2337.284.Rudell A. P. Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential//Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. – 1992. – Т. 83. – №. 1. –P. 77-82.285.Rudell A. P. The recognition potential and the word frequency effectat a high rate of word presentation //Cognitive Brain Research. – 1999. – Т. 8. –№. 2. – P. 173-175.286.Rumelhart D.
E. et al. Parallel distributed processing, Vol. 1&2//Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. – 1986.287.Rugg M. D. The Effects of Semantic Priming and Word Repetitionon Event-Related Potentials //Psychophysiology. – 1985. – Т. 22. – №. 6. – P.642-647.288.Rugg M. D. Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetitioneffects of high-and low-frequency words //Memory & Cognition.
– 1990. – Т. 18.– №. 4. – P. 367-379.289.Russo N., Mottron L., Burack J.A., Jemel B. Parameters of semanticmultisensory integration depend on timing and modality order among people onthe autism spectrum: evidence from event– related potentials. // Neuropsychologia.– 2012. – V. 50.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
