Диссертация (1136762), страница 35
Текст из файла (страница 35)
2005. Vol. 11. No 1.P. 25-36.124.Coates H. Student Engagement in Campus-Based and Online Education:University Connections. London: Taylor and Francis, 2006.125.Coleman J.S., Campbell E.Q., Hobson C.J., McPartland J., Mood A.M.,Weinfeld F.D.,York R.L.EqualityofEducationalOpportunity.Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education & Welfare.Office of Education (OE-38001 and supp.), 1966.126.Coleman J.S., Hoffer T.B., Kilgore S. High school achievement: Public,Catholic, and Private schools compared.
New York: Basic Books, 1982.127.Coleman J.S., Hoffer T. Public and private high schools. The impact ofcommunities. New York: Basic Books, 1987.128.Cornbleth C., Korth W. Context Factors and Individual Differences inPupil Involvement in Learning Activity // The Journal of EducationalResearch. 1980.
Vol. 73. No 6. P. 318-323.129.Coombs C. Psychological Scaling without a Unit of Measurement //Psychological Review. 1950. Vol. 57. P. 145-158.130.Coombs C.H. A theory of psychological scaling // Engineering ResearchInstitute Bulletin. 1952. No 34. Ann Arbor: University of MichiganPress.131.Cronbach L.J. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests //Psychometrika.
1951. Vol. 16. No 3. P. 297-334.132.Cronbach L.J., Meehl P.E. Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.Psychological Bulletin. 1955. Vol. 52. No 4. P. 281-302.133.Davis T.M., Murrell P.H. A structural model of perceived academic,personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility //Research in Higher Education. 1993.
Vol. 34. No 3. P. 267-289.134.Dewey J. Democracy and Education. The Macmillan Company, 1916.221135.Dey E., Hurtado S. College impact, student impact: A reconsideration ofthe role of students within American higher education // HigherEducation. 1995. No 30. P. 207-223.136.Duncan O.D. Path Analysis: Sociological Examples // American Journalof Sociology. 1966. Vol. 72. No 1. P.
1-16.137.Eckert P. Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the highschool. New York: Teachers College Press, 1989.138.Eckland B. College dropouts who come back // Harvard EducationalReview. 1964. No 34. P. 402-420.139.Eddington A.S. The Nature of The Physical World. New York:Macmillan, 1933.140.Esposto A., Weaver D. Continuous Team Assessment to ImproveStudent Engagement and Active Learning // Journal of UniversityTeaching & Learning Practice.
2011. Vol. 8. No 1. P. 1-14.141.Ethington C., Pollizzi T. An Assessment of the Construct Validity of theCCSEQ Quality of Effort Scales // Research in Higher Education. 1996.Vol. 37. No 6. P. 711-730.142.Ewell P.T., Jones D.P. ‘Actions matter: The case for indirect measures inassessing higher education’s progress on the national education goals’//Journal of General Education. 1993. Vol. 42. No 2. P. 56-121.143.Ewell P.T., Jones D.P. Indicators of "Good Practice" in UndergraduateEducation: A Handbook for Development and Implementation. Boulder,CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, 1996.144.Fletcher A. Guide to Students as Partners in School Change.
Olympia,WA: SoundOut. Retrieved, 2005.145.Fredrick W.C., Walberg H.J. Learning as a Function of Time // TheJournal of Educational Research. 1980. Vol. 73. No 4. P. 183-194.146.Fredricks J., Blumenfeld P., Paris A. School Engagement: Potential ofthe Concept, State of the Evidence // Review of Educational Research.2004. Vol. 74. No 1. P. 59-109.222147.Galton F. Hereditary Talent and Character // Macmillan’s Magazine.1865. June. P. 157-166.148.Galton F. Inquires into Human Faculty and its Development. London:Macmillan Co., 1883.149.Galton F. Natural Inheritance. London & N.Y.: MacMillan and Co.,1989.150.Gekoski N., Schwartz S.
Student Mortality and Related Factors // TheJournal of Educational Research. 1961. Vol. 54. No 5, P. 192-194.151.Goldberg N.A., Ingram K.W. Improving Student Engagement in aLower-Division Botany Course // Journal of the Scholarship of Teachingand Learning. 2011. Vol. 11. No 2. P. 76-90.152.Goldberg A.S. Structural Equation Methods in the Social Sciences //Econometrica. 1972. Vol. 40. No 6. P. 979-1001.153.Gordon J., Ludlum J., Hoey J. Validating the National Survey of StudentEngagement against Student Outcomes: Are They Related? // Researchin Higher Education. 2008.
Vol. 49. No 1. P. 19-39.154.Grave B. The effect of student time allocation on academic achievement// Education Economics. 2011. Vol. 19. No 3. P. 291-310.155.Gvaramadze I. Student Engagement in the Scottish Quality EnhancementFramework // Quality in Higher Education.
2011. Vol. 17. No 1. P. 19–36.156.Gump P. Life in Classrooms by Philip W. Jackson // AmericanEducational Research Journal. 1969. Vol. 6, No 1. P. 109-112.157.Guttman L. A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data. American SociologicalReview. 1944. Vol. 9. No 2. P. 139-150.158.Habermas J., Blazek J.R. The Idea of the University: Learning Processes// New German Critique. 1987. No 41. P. 3-22.159.Handelsman M., Briggs W., Sullivan N., Towler A. A Measure ofCollege Student Course Engagement // The Journal of EducationalResearch.
2005. Vol. 98. No 3. P. 184-191.223160.Harper S.R., Quaye S.J. Student engagement in higher education:Theoreticalperspectivesandpracticalapproachesfordiversepopulations. New York: Routledge, 2009.161.Hausmann L., Schofield J., Woods R. Sense of belonging as a predictorof intentions to persist among African American and white first-yearcollege students // Research in Higher Education. 2007. Vol.
48, No 7. P.803–839.162.Heath D. Growing up in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.163.Heidegger M. What is called thinking? L.: Harper & Row, 1968.164.Henry N.W. Latent Structure Analysis at Fifty. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Baltimore, MD,1999.165.Hu Y.L., Ching G.S., Chao P.C. Taiwan Student Engagement Model:Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties //International Journal of Research Studies in Education.
2012. Vol. 1.No 1. P. 69-90.166.Huang Y., Chang S. Academic and Cocurricular Involvement: TheirRelationship and the Best Combinations for Student Growth // Journal ofCollege Student Development. 2004. Vol. 45. No 4. P. 391-406.167.Hurtado S., Carter D.F. Effects of College Transition and Perceptions ofthe Campus Racial Climate on Latino Students’ Sense of Belonging.Sociology of Education. 1997.
Vol. 70. No 4. P. 324-345.168.Inger M. Alternative Approaches to Outcomes Assessment forPostsecondary Vocational Education // CenterFocus. 1995. No 10.169.Iffert R. Retention and withdrawal of college students. Washington, D.C:U.S. Department of Health. Education and Walfare, 1958, No. I.170.Jackson P. Life in Classrooms. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.171.Jencks С., Smith M., Acland H., Bane M.S., Cohen D., Gintis H., et al.Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effects of Family and School inAmerica, New York, 1972.224172.Kahu E.R. Framing student engagement in higher education // Studies inHigher Education.
2013. Vol. 38. No 5. P. 758-773.173.Kerr С. A Critical Age in the University World: accumulated heritageversus modern imperatives // European Journal of Education. 1987.Vol. 22. No 2. P. 183-193.174.Kliebard H. The Tyler Rationale // Bellack A., Kliebard H. Curriculumand evaluation. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1977.175.Kohlberg L.Stagesofmoraldevelopment//Beck C. M.,Crittenden B. S., Sullivan E. V. Moral Education. Toronto: University ofToronto Press, 1971.176.Koljatic M., Kuh G.D. A longitudinal assessment of college studentengagement in good practices in undergraduate education // HigherEducation.
2001, Vol. 42. No 3. P. 351-371.177.Koopmans T.C.,Reiersol O.TheidentificationofStructuralCharacteristics // Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1950. Vol. 21. P.165-181.178.Krause K. Understanding and Promoting Student Engagement inUniversity Learning Communities // Paper presented as keynote address:Engaged, Inert or Otherwise Occupied?: Deconstructing the 21stCentury Undergraduate Student at the James Cook UniversitySymposium ‘Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: EngagingStudents’.
James Cook University, Townsville/Cairns, Queensland,Australia, 2005. 21–22 September.179.Krause K., Coates H. Students’ engagement in first‐year university,Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2008. Vol. 33. No 5. P.493-505.180.Krohn G.A., O'Connor C.M. Student Effort and Performance over theSemester // The Journal of Economic Education. 2005. Vol. 36. No 1. P.3-28.225181.Kuh G. What Student Engagement Data Tell Us about CollegeReadiness // Peer Review.
2007. Vol. 9. No 1. P. 4-8.182.Kuh G. Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning: Inside theNational Survey of Student Engagement // Change. 2001. Vol. 33. No 3.P. 10-17, 66.183.Kuh G.D. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptualframework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2001.184.Kuh G., Cruce T., Shoup R., Kinzie J. Unmasking the Effects of StudentEngagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence // The Journalof Higher Education.
2008. Vol. 79. No 5. P. 540-563.185.Kuh G.D., Kinzie J., Buckley J.A., Bridges B.K., Hayek J.C. WhatMatters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature. CommissionedReport for the National Symposium on Postsecondary Student Success:Spearheading a Dialog on Student Success, 2006.186.LaNassa S.M., Cabrera A.F., Transgrud H.
The Construct Validity ofStudent Engagement: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach //Research in Higher Education. 2009. Vol. 50. No 4. P. 315-332.187.Lazarsfeld P.F. Notes on the History of Quantification of Sociology –Trends, Source and Problems // Isis. 1961. Vol. 52, No 2. P. 277-333.188.Lazarsfeld P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
