Диссертация (1136144), страница 78
Текст из файла (страница 78)
P., Naumann L. P., Soto C. J. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five traittaxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues // Handbook of personality: Theory and research / O. P. John, R. W. Robins, L. A. Pervin (Eds.). New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2008. pp. 114–158.474.John O. P., Robins R. W. Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits:The big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self // Journal ofPersonality, 1993.
Vol. 61. pp. 521–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x475.view//Jost J. T., Kruglanski A. W., Nelson T. O. Social metacognition: An expansionist rePersonalityandSocialPsychologyReview,1998.Vol.2.pp.137–154.doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6476.Jung R. E., Grazioplene R., Caprihan A., Chavez R. S., Haier R. J.
White matter integri-ty, creativity, and psychopathology: Disentangling constructs with diffusion tensor imaging // PLOSONE, 2010. Vol. 5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009818477.Jussim L., Soffin S., Brown R., Ley J., Kohlhepp K. Understanding reactions to feed-back by integrating ideas from symbolic interactionism and cognitive evaluation theory // Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 1992.
Vol. 62. pp. 402–421. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.402399478.Kahneman D., Krueger A. B., Schkade D. A., Schwarz N., Stone A. A. A survey meth-od for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method // Science, 2004.Vol. 306(5702). pp. 1776–1780. doi: 10.1126/science.1103572479.Kaiser H. F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis // Educationaland Psychological Measurement, 1960. Vol.
20. pp. 141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116480.Kamins M. L., Dweck C. S. Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications forcontingent self-worth and coping // Developmental Psychology, 1999. Vol. 35. pp. 835–847.doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835481.Kammrath L. K., Dweck C. Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among in-cremental and entity theorists // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2006. Vol. 32. pp. 1497–1508. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291476482.Kanai R., Bahrami B., Roylance R., Rees G.
Online social network size is reflected inhuman brain structure // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2012.Vol. 279(1732). pp. 1327–1334. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1959483.Kandler C., Riemann R., Spinath F. M., Angleitner A. Sources of variance in personali-ty facets: A multiple-rater twin study of self-peer, peer-peer, and self-self (dis)agreement // Journal ofPersonality, 2010. Vol.
78. pp. 1565–1594. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00661.x484.Karpov A. V. The structure of reflection as the basis of the procedural organization ofconsciousness // Psychology in Russia: Sate of the Art, 2015. Vol. 8. N. 3. pp. 17–27.485.Keightley M. L., Winocur G., Graham S. J., Mayberg H. S., Hevenor S.
J., Grady C. L.An fMRI study investigating cognitive modulation of brain regions associated with emotional processing of visual stimuli // Neuropsychologia, 2003. Vol. 41. pp. 585–596. doi: 10.1016/S00283932(02)00199-9486.Kenny D. A.
Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guil-ford Press, 1994. 292 p.400487.Kenny D. A. PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception // Personality andSocial Psychology Review, 2004. Vol. 8. pp. 265–280. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3488.Kenny D. A., Acitelli L. K. Measuring similarity in couples // Journal of Family Psy-chology, 1994. Vol. 8. pp. 417–431. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.417489.Kenny D. A., DePaulo B. M. Do people know how others view them? An empirical andtheoretical account // Psychological Bulletin, 1993. Vol.
114. pp. 145–161. doi: 10.1037/00332909.114.1.145490.Kenny D. A., Kashy D. A., Cook W. L. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: GuilfordPress, 2006.491.Kinch J. W. A formalized theory of the self-concept // American Journal of Sociology,1963. Vol. 68. pp. 481–486.492.Kline R. B. Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioralresearch. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2013.
325 p.493.Klonsky E. D., Oltmanns T. F. Informant-reports of personality disorder: Relation toself-reports and future research directions // Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2002. Vol. 9.pp. 300–311. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.9.3.300494.Kniazev G. G. EEG correlates of self-referencial processing // Frontiers in Human Neu-roscience, 2013. Vol. 7. pp. 1–14.495.Knyazev G. G., Pylkova L.
V., Slobodskoj-Plusnin J. Y., Bocharov A. V., Ush-akov D. V. Personality and the neural efficiency theory // Personality and Individual Differences, 2015.Vol. 86. pp. 67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.002496.Knyazev G. G., Bocharov A. V., Pylkova L. V. Extraversion and fronto-posterior EEGspectral power gradient: An independent component analysis // Biological Psychology, 2012. Vol. 89.pp. 515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.023401497.Knyazev G. G., Zupancic M., Slobodskaya H. R. Child personality in Slovenia andRussia: Structure and mean level of traits in parent and self-ratings // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2008.
Vol. 39. pp. 317–334. doi: 10.1177/0022022108314542498.Korth B., Tucker L. R. The distribution of chance congruence coefficients from simu-lated data // Psychometrika, 1975. Vol. 40. pp. 361–372. doi: 10.1007/BF02291763499.Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable fromdigital records of human behavior // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013.Vol. 110, pp. 5802–5805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110500.Krämer N. C., Winter S. Impression Management 2.0 // Journal of Media Psychology,2008.
Vol. 20. pp. 106–116. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.106501.Krasner M. S., Epstein R. M., Beckman H., Suchman A. L., Chapman B., Mooney C. J.,Quill T. E. Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy,and attitudes among primary care physicians // JAMA, 2009. Vol. 302. pp. 1284–1293.doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1384502.Kray L.
J., Haselhuhn M. P. Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: Experimentaland longitudinal evidence // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007. Vol. 93. pp. 49–64.doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.49503.Krueger R. F., South S. C., Johnson W., Iacono W. The heritability of personality is notalways 50%: Gene-environment interactions and correlations between personality and parenting //Journal of Personality, 2008. Vol. 76. pp. 1485–1522. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00529.x504.Kurtz J. E., Sherker J. L. Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreementon personality ratings in college roommates // Journal of Personality, 2003.
Vol. 71. pp. 21–48.doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.t01-1-00005505.Kyl-Heku L. M., Buss D. M. Tactics as units of analysis in personality psychology: Anillustration using tactics of hierarchy negotiation // Personality and Individual Differences, 1996.Vol. 21. pp. 497–517. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00103-1402506.Laing R.
D., Phillipson H., Lee A. R. Interpersonal perception: A theory and a methodof research (Vol. VII). Oxford, UK: Springer, 1966. 179 p.507.Lamb M. E., Chuang S. S., Wessels H., Broberg A. G., Hwang C. P. Emergence andconstruct validations of the Big Five factors in early childhood: A longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden // Child Development, 2002. Vol. 73. pp. 1517–1524. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00487508.Landers R. N., Lounsbury J. W. An investigation of Big Five and narrow personalitytraits in relation to Internet usage // Computers in Human Behavior, 2006.
Vol. 22. pp. 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.001509.Leary M. R., Patton K. M., Orlando A. E., Funk W. The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies // Journal of Personality, 2000. Vol. 68.pp. 725–756. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00114510.Leary T. Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A Functional theory and methodologyfor personality evaluation. New York, NY: Ronald Press, 1957.511.Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI //Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2003. Vol. 4. pp. 469–480. doi: 10.1038/nrn1119512.Leikas S., Verkasalo M., Lönnqvist J.-E.
Posing personality: Is it possible to enact theBig Five traits in photographs? // Journal of Research in Personality, 2013. Vol. 47. pp. 15–21.doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.012513.Leising D., Erbs J., Fritz U. The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings ofpersonality // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010. Vol. 98. pp. 668–682.doi: 10.1037/a0018771514.Levy S. R., Stroessner S. J., Dweck C. S. Stereotype formation and endorsement: Therole of implicit theories // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998. Vol. 74. pp.
1421–1436. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421403515.Lieberman M. D., Rosenthal R. Why introverts can‘t always tell who likes them: Multi-tasking and nonverbal decoding // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001. Vol. 80.pp. 294–310. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.294516.Linnenbrink E. A., Ryan A. M., Pintrich P. R. The role of goals and affect in workingmemory functioning // Learning and Individual Differences, 1999. Vol. 11.
pp. 213–230.doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80006-0517.Livneh H., Livneh C. The five-factor model of personality: Is evidence of its cross-measure validity premature? // Personality and Individual Differences, 1989. Vol. 10. pp. 75–80.doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90181-5518.Loehlin J. C. Genes and environment in personality development (Vol.
xiv). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1992. 145 p.519.Löckenhoff C. E., Duberstein P. R., Friedman B., Costa Jr. P. T. Five-factor personalitytraits and subjective health among caregivers: The role of caregiver strain and self-efficacy // Psychology and Aging. 2011. Vol. 26, № 3. pp. 592–604.520.Lubin B., Levitt E. E., Zuckerman M. Some personality differences between respondersand nonresponders to a survey questionnaire // Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1962. Vol. 26.p. 192. doi: 10.1037/h0048697521.Lucas R.
E., Donnellan M. B. Age differences in personality: Evidence from a national-ly representative sample of Australians // Developmental Psychology, 2009. Vol. 45. pp. 1353–1363.doi:10.1037/a0013914522.Lucas R. E., Donnellan M. B. Personality development across the life span: Longitudi-nal analyses with a national sample from Germany // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2011. Vol. 101. pp. 847–861. doi: 10.1037/a0024298523.Lugtig P. Panel attrition: Separating stayers, fast attriters, gradual attriters, and lurkers //Sociological Methods & Research, 2014. Vol. 43. pp. 699–723. doi: 10.1177/0049124113520305404524.MacCoby E.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
