Диссертация (1136144), страница 82
Текст из файла (страница 82)
G. More than friends: Popularity on Facebook and its role in impression for-mation // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2014. Vol. 19. pp. 358–372.doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12067651.Segal-Caspi L., Roccas S., Sagiv L. Don‘t judge a book by its cover, revisited perceivedand reported traits and values of attractive women // Psychological Science, 2012. Vol.
23. pp. 1112–1116. doi: 10.1177/0956797612446349418652.Selfhout M., Denissen J., Branje S., Meeus W. In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, ac-tual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009. Vol. 96. pp. 1152-1165.doi: 10.1037/a0014468653.Sen S., Burmeister M., Ghosh D. Meta-analysis of the association between a serotonintransporter promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and anxiety-related personality traits // AmericanJournal of Medical Genetics, Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 2004.
Vol. 127. pp. 85–89. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.20158654.Sharp C., Wright A. G. C., Fowler J. C., Frueh B. C., Allen J. G., Oldham J., Clark L. A.The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‗g‘) and specific (‗s‘) factors? // Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2015. Vol. 124. pp. 387–398. doi: 10.1037/abn0000033655.Shchebetenko S. ―The best man in the world‖: Attitudes toward personality traits. Psy-chology // Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014. Vol. 11.
N 3. pp. 129–148.656.Shchebetenko S. Reflexive characteristic adaptations within the five-factor theory: Be-tween basic tendencies and external outcomes // Personality and Individual Differences, 2016.Vol. 101. pp. 35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.055657.Shchebetenko S. Bergfeld A. Y. The relationship between extraversion and physical at-tractiveness of online network users assessed by personnel recruiters // Australian Journal of Psychology, 2016.
Vol. 68. pp. 301–311. doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12108658.Shiner R. L. The development of temperament and personality traits in childhood andadolescence // APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 4: Personality processesand individual differences / M.
Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, R. J. Larsen (Eds.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2015. pp. 85–105.659.Shiner R. L., Buss K. A., McClowry S. G., Putnam S. P., Saudino K. J., Zentner M.What is temperament now? Assessing progress in temperament research on the twenty-fifth anniver-419sary of Goldsmith et al.
// Child Development Perspectives, 2012. Vol. 6. pp. 436–444.doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00254.xShmelyov A. G., Pokhil‘ko V. I. A taxonomy-oriented study of Russian personality-trait660.names // European Journal of Personality, 1993.
Vol. 7. pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1002/per.2410070102661.Shrauger J. S., Schoeneman T. J. Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Throughthe looking glass darkly // Psychological Bulletin, 1979. Vol. 86. pp. 549–573. doi: 10.1037/00332909.86.3.549662.Sijtsema J. J., Rambaran A. J., Caravita S., Gini G. Friendship selection and influence inbullying and defending: Effects of moral disengagement // Developmental Psychology, 2014.
Vol. 50.pp. 2093-2104. doi: 10.1037/a0037145663.Silvia P. J., Duval T. S. Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduringproblems // Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2001. Vol. 5. pp. 230–241.doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_4664.cive‖?//Singer E., Bossarte R. M. Incentives for survey participation: When are they ―coerAmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine,2006.Vol.31.pp.411–418.doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.013665.Skodol A. E. Personality disorders in DSM–5 // Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,2012. Vol.
8. pp. 317–344.666.Slobodskaya H. R. The associations among the Big Five, behavioural inhibition and be-havioural approach systems and child and adolescent adjustment in Russia // Personality and Individual Differences, 2007. Vol. 43. pp. 913–924. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.012667.Smillie L. D., Pickering A. D., Jackson C.
J. The new reinforcement sensitivity theory:Implications for personality measurement // Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006. Vol. 10.pp. 320–335. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3668.Smith E. E., Jonides J. Working memory: A view from neuroimaging // Cognitive Psy-chology, 1997. Vol. 33. pp. 5–42.
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0658420669.Smith E. R., DeCoster J. Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Con-ceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems // Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2000. Vol. 4. pp.
108–131. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01670.Smith T. W., Uchino B. N., Berg C. A., Florsheim P., Pearce G., Hawkins M., … YoonH.-C. Associations of self-reports versus spouse ratings of negative affectivity, dominance, and affiliation with coronary artery disease: Where should we look and who should we ask when studying personality and health? // Health Psychology, 2008.
Vol. 27. pp. 676–684. doi: 10.1037/02786133.27.6.676671.Smith T. W., Williams P. G., Segerstrom S. C. Personality and physical health // APAhandbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 4: Personality processes and individual differences / M. Mikulincer, P. R.
Shaver, M. L. Cooper, R. J. Larsen (Eds.). Washington, DC: AmericanPsychological Association, 2015. pp. 639–661.672.Soto C. J., John O. P., Gosling S. D., Potter J. Age differences in personality traits from10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample // Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 2011. Vol. 100. pp. 330–348. doi: 10.1037/a0021717673.South S. C., Reichborn-Kjennerud T., Eaton N. R., Krueger R. F. Genetics of personali-ty // APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 4: Personality processes and individual differences / M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M.
L. Cooper, R. J. Larsen (Eds.). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association, 2015. pp. 31–60.674.Spain J. S., Eaton L. G., Funder D. C. Perspective on personality: The relative accuracyof self versus others for the prediction of emotion and behavior // Journal of Personality, 2000. Vol. 68.pp. 837–867. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00118675.Spoont M. R. Modulatory role of serotonin in neural information processing: Implica-tions for human psychopathology // Psychological Bulletin, 1992. Vol. 112. pp. 330–350.doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.330421676.Stangor C., Lange J.
E. Mental representations of social groups: Advances in under-standing stereotypes and stereotyping // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 26). /M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Academic Press, 1994. pp. 357–416.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260108601574677.Steele C. M., Aronson J.
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of Afri-can Americans // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995. Vol. 69. pp. 797–811.doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797678.Steffens M. C., König S. S. Predicting spontaneous big five behavior with implicit asso-ciation tests // European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2006. Vol. 22. pp. 13–20.doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.13679.Sternberg S. High-speed scanning in human memory // Science, 1966. Vol. 153.№ 3736.
pp. 652–654. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3736.652680.Stopfer J. M., Egloff B., Nestler S., Back M. D. Being popular in online social net-works: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking // Journalof Research in Personality, 2013. Vol. 47. pp.
592–598. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.005681.Stopfer J. M., Egloff B., Nestler S., Back M. D. Personality expression and impressionformation in online social networks: An integrative approach to understanding the processes of accuracy, impression management and meta-accuracy // European Journal of Personality, 2014. Vol. 28.pp. 73–94. doi: 10.1002/per.1935682.Stoughton J. W., Thompson L. F., Meade A. W.
Big five personality traits reflected injob applicants‘ social media postings // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2013.Vol. 16. pp. 800–805. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0163683.sonalityStrack F., Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior // PerandSocialPsychologydoi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1Review,2004.Vol.8.pp.220–247.422684.Strelau J. The concept of temperament in personality research // European Journal ofPersonality, 1987. Vol.
1. pp. 107–117. doi: 10.1002/per.2410010205685.Suls J., Bunde J. Anger, anxiety, and depression as risk factors for cardiovascular dis-ease: The problems and implications of overlapping affective dispositions // Psychological Bulletin,2005. Vol. 131. pp. 260–300. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.260686.Sutin A. R., Beason-Held L. L., Resnick S. M., Costa P. T. Sex differences in resting-state: Neural correlates of openness to experience among older adults // Cerebral Cortex, 2009.Vol. 19. pp.
2797-2802. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp066687.Swami V., Malpass F., Havard D., Benford K., Costescu A., Sofitiki A., Taylor D.Metalheads: The influence of personality and individual differences on preference for heavy metal //Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2013. Vol. 7. pp.
377–383. doi: 10.1037/a0034493688.Swami V., Pietschnig J., Stieger S., Nader I. W., Voracek M. Beautiful as the chancemeeting on a dissecting table of a sewing machine and an umbrella! Individual differences and preference for surrealist literature // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2012. Vol. 6. pp. 35–42. doi: 10.1037/a0024750689.Swami V., Stieger S., Pietschnig J., Voracek M. The disinterested play of thought: Indi-vidual differences and preference for surrealist motion pictures // Personality and Individual Differences, 2010. Vol.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
