Диссертация (1136144), страница 81
Текст из файла (страница 81)
Vienna: RFoundation for Statistical Computing, 2017. https://www.Rproject.org/606.effectofResnick S. M., Gottesman I. I., McGue M. Sensation seeking in opposite-sex twins: Anprenatalhormones?//BehaviorGenetics,1993.Vol.23.pp.323–329.doi: 10.1007/BF01067432607.Revelle W. An overview of the psych package, 2016. http://personality-project.org/r/psych/413608.Revelle W., Rocklin T.
Very simple structure: An alternative procedure for estimatingthe optimal number of interpretable factors // Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1979. Vol. 14.pp. 403–414. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2609.Richardson M., Abraham C., Bond R. Psychological correlates of university students‘academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Psychological Bulletin, 2012.Vol. 138. pp.
353–387. doi: 10.1037/a0026838610.Richter D., Körtner J. L., Saßenroth D. Personality has minor effects on panel attrition //Journal of Research in Personality, 2014. Vol. 53. pp. 31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.001611.Riemann R., Angleitner A., Strelau J. Genetic and environmental influences on person-ality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales // Journal of Personality, 1997.
Vol. 65. pp. 449–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00324.x612.Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system // Annual Review of Neurosci-ence, 2004. Vol. 27. pp. 169–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230613.Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition ofmotor actions // Cognitive Brain Research, 1996. Vol. 3. pp. 131–141. doi: 10.1016/09266410(95)00038-0614.Roberts B. W., Caspi A., Moffitt T. The kids are alright: Growth and stability in person-ality development from adolescence to adulthood // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001.
Vol. 81. pp. 670–683. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.670615.Roberts B. W., DelVecchio W. F. The rank-order consistency of personality traits fromchildhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies // Psychological Bulletin, 2000.Vol. 126. pp. 3–25. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3616.Roberts B. W., Walton K. E., Viechtbauer W. Patterns of mean-level change in person-ality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies // Psychological Bulletin,2006.
Vol. 132. pp. 1–25. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1414617.Roberts B. W., Wood D. Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality // Handbook of personality development / D. Mroczek, T. Little(Eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2006. pp. 11–39.618.Robins R.
W., Pals J. L. Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications forgoal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change // Self and Identity, 2002. Vol. 1. pp. 313–336. doi: 10.1080/15298860290106805619.Rogelberg S. G., Conway J. M., Sederburg M. E., Spitzmüller C., Aziz S., Knight W.
E.Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey // Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003. Vol. 88. pp. 1104–1114. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1104620.Rommetveit R. On message structure: A framework for the study of language andcommunication. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1974. 143 p.621.Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Universi-ty Press, 1965.622.Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L. The volunteer subject (Vol. xiv). Oxford, UK: John Wiley& Sons, 1975.623.Ross C., Orr E.
S., Sisic M., Arseneault J. M., Simmering M. G., Orr R. R. Personalityand motivations associated with Facebook use // Computers in Human Behavior, 2009. Vol. 25.pp. 578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024624.Rothbart M. K. Temperament, development, and personality // Current Directions inPsychological Science, 2007. Vol. 16.
pp. 207–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00505.x625.Rothbart M. K. Becoming who we are: Temperament and personality in development.New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2011.626.Rueda M. R. Effortful control // Handbook of temperament / M. Zentner, R. L. Shiner(Eds.). New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2012. pp. 145–167.415627.Rushton J. P., Irwing P.
A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two meta-analysesof the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005) // Personality andIndividual Differences, 2008. Vol. 45. pp. 679–683. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.015628.Rutledge T., Hogan B.
E. A quantitative review of prospective evidence linking psycho-logical factors with hypertension development // Psychosomatic Medicine, 2002. Vol. 64. pp. 758–766.629.Ryan T., Xenos S. Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship betweenthe Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage // Computers in Human Behavior,2011. Vol. 27. pp. 1658–1664. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004630.Saliba A., Ostojic P.
Personality and participation: Who volunteers to participate instudies // Psychology, 2014. Vol. 5. pp. 230–243. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.53034631.Salthouse T. A. Selectivity of attrition in longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning //The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2014. Vol.
69.pp. 567–574. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt046632.Santor D. A., Bagby R. M., Joffe R. T. Evaluating stability and change in personalityand depression // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73. pp. 1354–1362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1354633.Satherley N., Milojev P., Greaves L. M., Huang Y., Osborne D., Bulbulia J., Si-bley C. G. Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: Evidence from the New ZealandAttitudesandValuesStudy//PLoSONE,2015.Vol.10.e0121950.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121950634.Saucier G.
Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors //Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73. pp. 1296–1312. doi: 10.1037/00223514.73.6.1296416635.Saucier G., Georgiades S., Tsaousis I., Goldberg L. R. The factor structure of Greekpersonality adjectives // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005. Vol. 88. pp. 856–875.doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.856636.Saucier, G., Goldberg, L. R. The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on thefive-factor model // The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York, NY:Guilford Press, 1996. pp. 21–50.637.Savine A. C., McDaniel M. A., Shelton J.
T., Scullin M. K. A characterization of indi-vidual differences in prospective memory monitoring using the Complex Ongoing Serial Task // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012. Vol. 141. pp. 337–362. doi: 10.1037/a0025753638.Schlenker B. R. Self-presentation // Handbook of self and identity / M. R. Leary,J. P. Tangney (Eds.). New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2003. pp. 492–518.639.Schmit M. J., Ryan A. M. The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in appli-cant and nonapplicant populations // Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993. Vol.
78. pp. 966–974.doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.966640.Schmitt D. P. Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects ofsex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person‘s partner // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004. Vol. 86. pp. 560–584. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.560641.Schmitt D. P., Allik J.
Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scalein 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem // Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 2005. Vol. 89. pp. 623–642. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623642.Schmitt D.
P., Realo A., Voracek M., Allik J. Why can‘t a man be more like a woman?Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures // Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 2008. Vol. 94. pp. 168–182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168643.Schräpler J.-P., Schupp J., Wagner G. G. Individual and neighborhood determinants ofsurvey nonresponse: An analysis based on a new subsample of the German Socio-Economic Panel(SOEP), microgeographic characteristics and survey-based interviewer characteristics (SSRN Scholar-417ly Paper No.
ID 1588730). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2010.http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1588730644.Schraw G., Moshman D. Metacognitive theories // Educational Psychology Review,1995. Vol. 7. pp. 351–371. doi: 10.1007/BF02212307645.Schultheiss O. C. A memory-systems approach to the classification of personality tests:Comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006) // Journal of Personality Assessment, 2007.
Vol. 89. pp. 197–201. doi: 10.1080/00223890701357431646.Schwartz S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advancesand empirical tests in 20 countries // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25). /M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Academic Press, 1992. pp. 1–65.647.Schwarz N., Bless H., Strack F., Klumpp G., Rittenauer-Schatka H., Simons A. Ease ofretrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic // Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 1991.
Vol. 61. pp. 195–202. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195648.Schwarz N., Strack F., Mai H.-P. Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole ques-tion sequences: A conversational logic analysis // Public Opinion Quarterly, 1991. Vol. 55. pp. 3–23.doi: 10.1086/269239649.Schwertman N. C., Owens M. A., Adnan R. A simple more general boxplot method foridentifying outliers // Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2004. Vol. 47. pp. 165–174.doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2003.10.012650.Scott G.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
