Диссертация (1147543), страница 41
Текст из файла (страница 41)
Глава в монографии «Современная психофизика». Изд-во Институтпсихологии РАН. 2009. Москва. 542 с.133.Шелепин, Ю.Е., Чихман, В.Н., Фореман, Н. Анализ исследований восприятияфрагментированных изображений – целостное восприятие и восприятие по информативнымпризнакам // Российский физиологический журнал им. И.М. Сеченова. Т. 94. № 7. 2008, С.758776.134.Шехтер, М. С. Психологические проблемы узнавания. — М., 1967. — 219 с.135.Шехтер, М.С.
Зрительное опознание: закономерности и механизмы. М. 1983. 264с.136.Шехтер, М.С. Целостность восприятия и обучения опознавательным навыкам Вопросампсихологии. 1985. №5. С.17-29137.Шиффман, X. Р. Ощущение и восприятие. 5-е изд. СПб.: Питер, 2003. 928 с.138.Шкуpатова, И.П. Когнитивный стиль и общение.
— Ростов н/Д.: ИздательствоРостовского педагогического унивеpситета, 1994. — 156 с.139.Шкуратова, И.П. Когнитивные стили как регуляторы мировосприятия личности // Перваяроссийская конференция по когнитивной науке. Тезисы докладов. – Казань: КГУ, 2004, с.256257.140.Шошина, И.И., Перевозчикова, И.Н., Конкина, С.А., Пронин, С.В., Шелепин, Ю.Е.,Бендера, А.П. Особенности восприятия длины отрезков в условиях иллюзии Понцо и МюллераЛайера при шизофрении // Журнал высшей нервной деятельности. Вып. - 61(6).- 2011.
– С. 697–705170141.Шошина, И.И., Шелепин, Ю.Е. Контрастная чувствительность у больных шизофренией сразной длительностью заболевания Российский физиологический журнал им. И.М. Сеченова.2013. Т.99. № 8. С. 657.142.Шошина, И.И., Шелепин, Ю.Е., Конкина, С.А., Пронин, С.В., Бендера, А.П. Исследованиепарвоцеллюлярных и магноцеллюлярных каналов в норме и при патологии // Российскийфизиологический журнал им. Сеченова.
- Вып. 98(5).- 2012.- С. 657–664.143.Экспериментальная психология познания: когнитивная логика сознательного ибессознательного / В. М. Аллахвердов и др. — СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2006. — 352 с144.Эткинд, А. М. Тест Роршаха и структура психического образа // Вопросы психологии.1981 № 5. С. 106-115.145.Aitkin, M. A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linearmodels.
Biometrics, 55, - 1999. – С.117–128.146.Andrews, T.J., Schluppeck, D., Homfray, D., Matthews, P. and Blakemore, C. Activity in theFusiform Gyrus Predicts Conscious Perception of Rubin's Vase-face Illusion. Neuroimage. - 2002. - 17(2). - Р. 890-901.;147.Auyeung, B., Wheelwright, S., Allison, C., Atkinson, M., Samarawickrema, N., & Baron-Cohen,S. The children’s empathy quotient and systemizing quotient: Sex differences in typical developmentand in autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. -2009.
– 39. –Р.1509–1521.148.Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, M., Thorpe, S. J. The time course of visualprocessing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation.Vision Research. - 2005. – 45.- Р.1459–1469.149.Baguley, T. Understanding statistical power in the context of applied research. AppliedErgonomics. 2004. – 35. – Р.73–80.150.Barlow H. B. A method of determining the overall quantum efficiency of visual discriminations// Journal of Physiology (London), 1962.
- №160. - Р.155–168.151.Baron-Cohen, S. The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London:Penguin Books. 2004. - 274 p.152.Barsalou, L. W. Perceptual symbol systems / L. W. Barsalou // Behavioral and Brain Sciences.– 1999. – Vol. 22. – Pp. 577–609.153.Bates, D. Fitting linear models in R. R News. 2005. – 5. – Р.27–30.154.Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A.
Relations between executive function andacademicachievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learning andIndividual Differences. 2011. – 21. – Р.327–336.171155.Biederman, I. & Gerhardstein, P. C. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual objectrecognition: A critical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance, 1995. - 21, P. 1506-1514.156.Biederman, I.
(1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review, 94 , 115-147.157.Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992. - 18, P. 121-133.158.Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.
C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditionsfor 3- dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance, 1993. - 19, P. 1162-1182.159.Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J. C., Glass, A. L. & Stacey, E. W. J. On the information extractedfrom a glance at a scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology.
1974. - 103(3). – Р. 597-600.160.Boer LC, Keuss PJ. Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: an analysis of speed_accuracytradeoff functions // Percept Psychophys.– 1982.– V. 31.– №4.– Р.358–366.161.Bruner, J. S. On Perceptual Readiness / J. S. Bruner // Psychological Review. – 1957. – Vol. 64.– P.
123–152.162.Bruner, J. S. On the perception of incongruity: a paradigm / J. S. Bruner, L. Postman // Journalof Personality. – 1949. – Vol. 18, I. 2. – Pp. 206–223.163.Bruner, J., Goodman C Value and Need as Organizing Factors in Perception. Journal ofAbnormal and Social Psychology. 1947. - 42, P. 33-44.164.Burack, J. A., Enns, J. T., Iarocci, G., & Randolph, B.. Age differences in visual search forcompound patterns: Long versus short range grouping.
// Developmental Psychology.– 2000.– V.36.–Р.721–730.165.Calderon, С Coping strategies and psychological well-being among teacher educationstudents. European Journal of Psychology Education 2013. - 28, Р.1127–1140.166.Cohen, M.A., Alvarez, G.A., and Nakayama, K. Natural- scene perception requiresattention. Psychological Science. 2011. - 22 (9) P. 1165-1172.167.Conci, M. & von Mühlenen, A. Limitations of perceptual segmentation on contextual cueing invisual search. Visual Cognition, 2011. - 19(2). - Р.203-233.168.Conci, M., Sun, L.
& Müller, H.J. Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable targetlocation changes.Psychological Research, 2011. - 75(4). Р.279-289.169.Craik, F. I. M., Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research // Journalof Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. - 1972. - Vol. 11. - Р.671-684.170.Craik, F. Levels of Processing: Past, Present ...
and Future? // Memory. 2002 Vol. 10. № 5—6.172171.Crouzet, S. M., Joubert, O. R., Thorpe, S. J., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2012). Animal detectionprecedes access to scene category. PloS ONE, 7, 1–9.172.Crouzet, S. M., Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. Fast saccades toward faces: Face detection in just100 ms. Journal of Vision. - 2010. - №10. – Р.1–17.173.Curry, L. Review of learning style? Studying approach, and instructional preference research inmedical education / International perspectives on individual differences.
R.J. Riding, S.G. Rayner (Eds.).Vol. 1: cognitive styles/ Stamford, CT: Ablex, 2000. P.239-276.174.175.Dakin, S.C., Watt, R.J. The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture // VisionResearch. 1997. V. 37. P. 3181–3192.176.Davenport, J. L., Potter, M. C. Scene consistency in object and background perception.Psychological Science. - 2004. - 15. С.559–564.177.De la Rosa, R., Conway, T.L., Romero, R.A., Assessment of Dietary Intakes of FilipinoAmericans: Implications for Food Frequency Questionnaire Design.
Journal of Nutrition Education andBehavior. 2011. - 43, Р.505-510.178.Deary, I. J., Der, G., & Ford, G. Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-basedcohort study. Intelligence. - 2001. - 29. – Р.389–399.179.Dukette, D.; Stiles, J. The effects of stimulus density of children’s analysis of. hierarchicalpatterns. //Developmental science.– 2001.– V.4.– №2.–Р.233–251180.Evans, K.K, Treisman A.
Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attentionfree? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance. – 2005. – 31. – Р.1476–1492.181.Evans, K.K, Treisman, A. Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attentionfree? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance. 2005. - Р.1476–1492.182.Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C. & Thorpe, S.J. A limit to the speed of processing inUltra-Rapid Visual categorisation of novel natural scenes. J Cognitive Neurosci, 2001.
- 13, Р. 171-180183.Fei–Fei, L. What do we perceive in a glance of a real–world scene? / L. Fei–Fei [et al.] // Journalof Vision. – 2007. – Vol. 7(1):10. – Pp. 1–29.184.Fodor, Jerry Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. New York: Oxford UniversityPress 1998a. Р.1823-1865.185.Foreman, N. Correlates of performance on the Gollin and Mooney tests of visual closure // TheJournal of General Psychology. – 1991. – V. 118, № 1. – P. 13-20.186.Foreman, N., Hemmings, R. The Gollin incomplete figures test: a flexible, computerized version//Perception.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
