Диссертация (1147543), страница 42
Текст из файла (страница 42)
1987. № 16. Р. 543–548.173187.Galindo, A., Solovieva, Yu., Quintanar, L. Selective visual recognition in of hierarchcal stimuliin urban and rural choolchildren.// The third international conference on cognitive science.– June 20–25.– 2008.–Moscow.– Russia.– P.43–44.188.Gardner, R.W., Lohrenz, L.J., Schoen, R.A.
Cognitive control of differentiation in perception ofpersons and objects // Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1968. Vol. 26. P. 311-330.189.Gollin, E. S. Developmental studies of visual recognition of incomplete object // Perceptual andMotor Skills. – 1960. – V. 11.
– P. 289-298.190.Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing theforest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology. 2009b. – 58. – Р.137–176.191.Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. The briefest of glances: The time course of natural sceneunderstanding. Psychological Science. - 2009a. – 20. – Р.464 – 472.192.Grice, G.R, Canham, L, Boroughs, J.M. Forest before trees? It depends where you look // PerceptPsychophys.– 1983.– V. 33.– №2.– Р. 121–128.193.Grigorenko, E.L., Sternberg, R.J. Thinking styles / International handbook of personality andintelligence.
D.H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.) New York: Premium Press, 1995. P.2005-229.194.Haberman, J., Whitney, D. Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces //Current Biology. 2007. V. 17, P. R751–R753.195.Halberda, J., Sires, S.F., Feigenson, L. Multiple spatially overlapping sets can be enumerated inparallel // Psychological Science. 2006. V. 17. P. 572-576.196.Han, S, He, X, Woods, DL.
Hierarchical processing and level_repetition effect as indexed byearly brain potentials. //Psychophysiology.– 2000.– v.37.– №6.– P.817–30.197.Han, Sh., Weaver, J., Murray, S., Kang, X., Yund, W., Woods, D. Hemispheric asymmetry inglobal-local processing: Effect of stimulus position and spatial frequency. // Neuroimage.– 2002.– v.17.–Р.1290–1299.198.Hayes J., Allinson C.W. Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collectivelearning in organizations // Human Relations, 1998. № 51. P.
847-87.199.Hick, W. E. On the rate of Gain of Information // Quart. Journ. Exper. Psychol. — 1952. — Vol.4. 465 р.200.Intraub, H. Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures // Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1981. V. 7. P. 604-610.201.Joubert, O.
R., Rousselet, G. A., Fize, D., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. Processing scene context: Fastcategorization and object interference. Vision Research. 2007. – 47. – Р.3286–3297.202.Kadar, I., & Ben-Shahar, O. A perceptual paradigm and psychophysical evidence for hierarchyin scene gist processing. Journal of Vision. - 2012. – 12. – Р.1–17.174203.Kagan, J. American longitudinal research on psychological development.
Child Development,1964 Child Development, 1966, 37, P. 519-632.204.Keller, J., & Ripoll, H. Reflective–impulsive style and conceptual tempo in a gross-motor task.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2000. 92, P. 739–749.205.Keller, J., Ripoll, H. Reflective-impulsive style and conceptual tempo in a gross motor task.Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2001. 92(3 Pt 1), 739-49.206.Kozhevnikov M. Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an IntegratedFramework of Cognitive Style Psychological Bulletin 2007.
- Vol. 133. - No. 3. - pp 464–481207.Kret, M. E., & De Gelder, B. A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals.Neuropsychologia. - 2012. – 50. – Р.1211–1221.208.Kristjansson, A., Wang, D.L., Nakayama, K. The role of priming in conjunctive visual search //Cognition.
2002. V. 85. P. 37-52.209.Kubilius, J., Wagemans, J., & Op de Beeck, H.P. Emergence of perceptual Gestalts in the humanvisual cortex: The case of the configural superiority effect // Psychological Science. - 2011. - 9(11). Р. 1296-1303.210.Landy, M.
S., Goutcher, R., Trommershuser, J., & Mamassian, P. Visual estimation under risk //Journal of Vision. - 2007. - 4(6). - P.1–15.211.Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. Looking at pictures: Affective,facial, visceral and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology. - 1993. - 30. – Р.261–273.212.Li, J., Wen, J., Lease, K.A., Doke, J.T., Tax, F.E., and Walker, J.C.
BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRRreceptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. 2002. Cell 110, Р. 213–222.213.Liu, L., Plomp, G., van Leeuwen, C., & Ioannides, A. Neural correlates of priming on occludedfigure interpretation in human fusiform cortex. Neuroscience, 2006. 141, P. 1585-1597.214.Luck, S.J., Vogel, E.K.
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions //Nature. 1997. V. 390. P. 279-281.215.Mack, M. L., & Palmeri, T. J. Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versusinconsistent objects. Journal of Vision. - 2010. – 10. – Р.1–11.216.Mack, M. L., & Palmeri, T. J. The timing of visual object categorization. Frontiers in Psychology.- 2011. - 2.
– Р.1–8.217.Maljkovic, V., Nakayama K. Priming of popout: I. Role of features // Memory and Cognition.1994. V. 22. P. 657-672.218.Mamassian, P. Uncertainty and confidence in visual perception // Vision Research. - 2008. №48. - P. 2143–2153.175219. Mather, G. The Psychology of Visual Art Eye, Brain and Art. - Cambridg, 2014. p.289.220.Myczek K., Simons D.J.
Better than average: alternatives to statistical summary representationsfor rapid judgments of average size // Perception and Psychophysics. V. 70. P. 772–788.221.Nakayama, K., Silverman G.H. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions //Nature. 1986. V.
320. P. 264-265.222.Navon, D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception // CognitivePsychology. 1977. V. 9. P. 353-383.223.Neisser U. Cognitive Psychology. — N. Y., 1967. 210p.224.New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestralpriorities, not expertise. PNAS.
- 2007. – 104. – Р.16598–16603.225.Niaz, M. Mobility-fixity dimension in Witkin’s theory of field-dependence-independence and itsimplication for problems solving in science. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1987. 65, P. 755–764.226.Oliva, A., Torralba, A. Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features inrecognition // Progress in Brain Research. 2006. V. 155.
P. 23-36227.Oliva, A., Torralba, A. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatialenvelope // International Journal in Computer Vision. 2001. - V. 42. - P. 145-175.228.Palmeri, T.J., Gauthier, I. Visual object understanding // Nature reviews Neuroscience. - 2004. №5. - Р. 291-304.229.Perea, M., Carreiras, M. Perceptual uncertainty is a property of the cognitive system Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 2012, 35, pp 298-299.230.Potter, M.C Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpse pictures / M. C.
Potter, A. Staub,D. H. O'Connor // Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance. – 2004.– Vol. 30. – Pp. 478–489.231.Potter, M.C. Meaning in visual search // Science. 1975. V. 187. P. 965-966.232.Potter, M.C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures // Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory. 1976. V. 2. P. 509-522.233.Praβ, M., Grimsen, C., König, M., & Fahle, M.
Ultra rapid object categorization: Effects of level,animacy and context. PloS ONE. - 2014. - 8. – Р.1–10.234.Proulх T., Heine S.J., Vohs K.D. When is the unfamiliar the uncanny? Measuring affirmationafter exposure to absurdist literature, humor and art. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2010,36(6), 817–829.235.Pylyshyn, Z. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visualperception / Z.
Pylyshyn // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. – 1999. – Vol. 22, I. 3. – Pp. 341–423.176236.Ratcliff, R. Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin. 1993. №114. – Р.510–532.237.Rensink, R.A. The dynamic representation of scenes // Visual Cognition. 2000.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
