Диссертация (1145018), страница 88
Текст из файла (страница 88)
2008. Vol. 29, Issue 2. P. 73–83.352. Raupp J. Organizational Communication in a Networked Public Sphere //Studies in Communication and Media. WP I/2011. Berlin, 2011. P. 71–93.353. Resnick D. The normalization of cyberspace // The Politics of Cyberspace /ed. by C. Toulouse, T. Luke. London, 1998. P.
48–68.354. Richman J., Mercer D. «Modern language» or «spin»? Nursing,«newspeak» and organizational culture: new health scriptures // Journal of NursingManagement. 2004. Vol. 12. P. 290–298.355. Roberts A. S. Spin Control and Freedom of Information: Lessons for theUnited Kingdom from Canada // Public Administration. 2005. Vol. 83, № 1. P. 123.356. Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity// Global Modernities / ed. by M. Featherstone, S. Lash, R.
Robertson. London,1995. P. 25–44.357. Robertson R. The Globalization Paradigm: Thinking Globally // Religion inthe Process of Globalization / ed. by P. Beyer. Wurzburg, 2001. P. 3–22.358. Rogers E., Dearing J. Agenda-setting Research: Where has it been, whereis it going? // Communication Yearbook. 1988. Vol.
11. P. 555–594.359. Roper S. D. The Romanian Party System and the Catch-all PartyPhenomenon // East European Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 28, Issue 4. P. 519–532.360. Rose R., MacKenzie W. J. M. Comparing forms of comparative analysis //Political Studies. 1991. Vol. 39, Issue 3. P.
446–462.361. Rousselin P. Reconstruire l’Europe avec l’Allemagne // Le Figaro. 2011.26 Oct. P. 1.362. Rue L. After the Death of Discourse // University of Cincinnati LiteratureReview. 1995-1996. Vol. 64. 1277-1279.363. Rupnik J., Zielonka J.
Introduction: The State of Democracy 20 Years on:Domestic and External Factor // East European Politics and Societies and Cultures.2013. Vol. 27, Number 1. P. 3-25.433364. Rusconi G.-E. Die Mediendemokratie und ihre Grenzen – am Beispiel vonBerlusconis Italien // Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte / Das Parlament: Beilage zurWochenzeitung. Berlin, 2004.365.
Russell D., Beck P. A., Huckfeldt R. Partisan Cues and the Media:Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election // American Political ScienceReview. 1998. Vol. 92, Issue 1. P. 111–126.366. Sanson C. Gullibility and Mediacracy: A conflict of disinterests //Etalkinghead.
2004. 15 Jun. – http://www.etalkinghead.com/archives/gullibilityand-mediacracy-a-conflict-of-disinterests-2004-06-15.html367. Sartori G. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics // The AmericanPolitical Science Review. 1970. Vol. 64, Issue 4. P. 1033–1053.368. Sartori G. Video Power // Government and Opposition. 1989. Vol. 24,Issue 1. P.
39–53.369. Savinova O. N. The Role of Mass Media in Strangthening InterculturalDialogue and Accord in Society // Asian Social Science. 2015. Vol. 11, Issue 3. P.262-266.370. Scammell M. The Media and Media Management // The Blair Effect / ed.by A. Seldon. London, 2001.371. Scannell P. Public Service Broadcasting and Modern Public Life // Media,Culture and Society. 1989. Vol. 11, № 2.
P. 135–166.372. Schedler A. Antipolitics: Closing and Colonizing the Public Sphere // TheEnd of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics / ed. by A. Schedler.London, 1997. P. 1–20.373. Scheufele D. A. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Anotherlook at cognitive effects of political communication // Mass Communication &Society. 2000. Vol. 3, Issue 2/3.
P. 297–316.374. Scheufele D. A. Deliberation Or Dispute? An Exploratory Study ExaminingDimensions of Public Opinion Expression // International Journal of Public OpinionResearch. 1999a. Vol. 11. P. 25–58.375. Scheufele D. A. Framing as a theory of media effects // Journal ofCommunication. 1999b. Vol. 49, Issue 1. P. 103–122.376. Scheufele D. A., Tewksbury D. Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: TheEvolution of Three Media Effects Models // Journal of Communication. 2007. Vol.57.
P. 9–20.377. Schiffer A. J. Assessing Partisan Bias in Political News: The Case(s) ofLocal Senate Election Coverage // Political Communication. 2006. Vol. 23. P. 23–39.378. Schoenbach K., Becker L. B. Origins and Consequences of Mediated PublicOpinion // Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent / ed.
by T. L. Glasser,C. T. Salmon. New York, 1995. P. 323–347.379. Schoepflin G. Post-Communism: a profile // Javnost – The Public. 1995.Vol. 2, Issue 1. P. 63–74.380. Schulz W., Blumler J. G. Die Bedeutung der Kampagnen für das EuropaEngagement der Bürger: Eine Mehr-Ebenen-Analyse // Wahlen und EuropäischeEinigung / hrsg.
von O. Niedermayer, H. Schmitt. Opladen, 1994. S. 199–223.434381. Schulz W. Changes of Mass Media And The Public Sphere // Javnost – ThePublic. 1997. Vol. 4, Issue 2. P. 57–69.382. Schulz W. Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept //European Journal of Communication. 2004. Vol. 19, Issue 1.
P. 87–101.383. Seisselberg J. Conditions of Success and Political Problems of a «Mediamediated Personality-Party»: The Case of Forza Italia // West European Politics.1996. Vol. 19, Issue 4. P. 715–743.384. Semetko H., Valkenburg P. M. Framing European Politics: A ContentAnalysis of Press and Television News // Journal of Communication. 2000. Vol. 50,Issue 2. P. 93–109.385.
Shaw D. L., Hamm B. J. Agenda for a public union or for privatecommunities?: How individuals are using media to reshape American society //Communication and Democracy / ed. by M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, D. Weaver.Mahwah (NJ), 1997. P. 209–230.386. Smith C. A., Smith K. B. A rhetorical perspective on the 1997 British partymanifestos // Political Communication. 2000. Issue 17.
P. 457–473.387. Sparks C. Media systems in transition: Poland, Russia, China // ChineseJournal of Communication. 2008. Vol. 1, Issue 1. P. 7–24.388. Sparrow N. More Anger than Apathy // The Guardian. 2001. 6 Nov. –http://politics.guardian.co.uk/polls/comment/0,11030,611962,00.html389. Spin Cycles: The spin doctor is in: Nicholas Jones Interview // CBC News.2007. 9 Feb. – http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/spincycles/transcript-jones.html390.
Spin RIP? A Commentary // Political Quarterly. 2002. Vol. 73, Issue 4. P.379–380.391. Splichal S. From State Control to Commodification: MediaDemocratization in East and Central Europe // Democracy and Communication inthe New Europe: Change and Continuity in East and West / ed. by F. Corcoran, P.Preston. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press, 1995.
P. 51–65.392. Splichal S. Imitative revolutions: Changes in the media and journalism inEast-Central Europe // Javnost – The Public. 2001. Vol. 8, Issue 4. P. 31–58.393. Starr P. An Unexpected Crisis: the News Media in Post-IndustrialDemocracies // The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2012. Vol. 17, Issue 2. P.234–242.394. Statham P.
Berlusconi, the Media, and the New Right in Italy // TheHarvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 1996. Vol. 1, Issue 1. P. 87–105.395. Stevenson R. L. Problems of Comparative Political CommunicationResearch: Culture as a Key Variable // Comparing Political Communication:Theories, cases, and challenges / ed. by F. Esser, B. Pfetch.
Cambridge, 2004. P.367–383.396. Strömbäck J. Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of theMediatization of Politics // The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2008. Vol.13, Issue 3. P. 228–246.397. Strömbäck J. Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Conceptual Frameworkfor Comparative Research // The Sourcebook for Political Communication435Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques / ed. by E. P. Buсy, R. L.Holbert. New York, 2011. P. 367–382.398. Stromer-Galley J. New voices in the public sphere: a comparative analysisof interpersonal and online political talk // Javnost – The Public. 2002.
Vol. 9, Issue2. P. 23–42.399. Tan Y., Weaver D. H. Agenda-Setting Effects among the Media, the Public,and Congress, 1946–2004 // Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2007.Vol. 84, Issue 4. P. 729–744.400. The one hundred… worst Britons // Channel 4 Documentary. 2003.401. The Quality and Independence of British Journalism: Tracking the changesover 20 years // A report prepared by Professor Justin Lewis, Dr. Andrew Williams,Professor Bob Franklin, Dr.
James Thomas and Nick Mosdell at the Cardiff Schoolof Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies. Cardiff, 2006.402. Townsley E. The public intellectual trope in the United States // TheAmerican Sociologist. 2006. Vol. 37, Issue 3. P. 39-66.403. Trenz H.-J. The European public sphere: Contradictory findings in adiverse research field // European Political Science. 2005. Vol.
4. P. 407–420.404. Tsfari Y., Meyer O., Peri Y. What is good journalism? Comparing Israelipublic and journalists’ perspectives // Journalism. 2006. Vol. 7, Issue 2. P. 152–173.405. Tuchman G. Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen'snotions of objectivity // The American Journal of Sociology. 1972. Vol. 77, Issue 4.P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
