Диссертация (1145018), страница 83
Текст из файла (страница 83)
Re-measuring left-right: A comparison of SEM and Bayesianmeasurement models for extracting left-right party placements // Electoral Studies.2009. Vol. 28. P. 413–421.85. Barnett S. The Age of Contempt // The Guardian. 2002. 28 Oct. –http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,820392,00.html.86. Bayram S.
Political Parallelism in the Turkish Press, a HistoricalInterpretation // Turkish Studies. 2010. Vol. 11, Issue 4. P. 579–611.87. Bennett W. L., Iyengar S. A new era of minimal effects? The changingfoundations of political сommunication // Journal of Communication. 2008. Vol. 58,Issue 4. P. 707–731.88. Bennett W. L., Livingstone S. Gatekeepeing, Indexing, and Live-EventNews: Is Technology Altering the Construction of News? // PoliticalCommunication. 2003. Vol. 20, Issue 4. P. 363–380.89.
Benoit K., Laver M. Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expertsurveys and hand-coded content analysis // Electoral Studies. 2007. Vol. 26. P. 90–107.90. Benson R., Blach- Ørsten M., Powers M., Willig I., Zambrano S. V. MediaSystems Online and Off: Comparing the Form of News in the United States,Denmark, and France // Journal of Communication. 2012.
Vol. 62, Issue 1. P. 21–38.91. Benson R. Comparative News Media Systems // Routledge Companion toNews Media and Journalism Studies / ed. by S. Allan. London: Routledge, 2010. P.614–626.92. Benson R. Field theory in comparative context: A new paradigm for mediastudies // Theory and Society. 1998. Vol. 28. P. 463–498.93. Beregoi N. Consideraţii privind manifestarea politicilor mediatice // RevistaMoldovenească de drept internaţional şi relaţii internaţionale. 2011.
Nr 1. P. 97-105.94. Berggruen N., Gardels N. The Future of Democracy // New PerspectivesQuarterly. 2011. Vol. 28, Issue 1. P. 55-69.95. Berkel B. Politischer Parallelismus in Sachen Europa: ZurSynchronisierung der Meinungen der europäischen Presse im Haider-Konflikt //Massenmedien als politische Akteure: Konzepte und Analysen / hrsg.
von B.Pfetsch, S. Adam. Wiesbaden, 2008. S. 245–266.96. Bieber C. Bausteine der Mediendemokratie // Mediendemokratie / hrsg.von P. Massing. Schwalbach, 2004. S. 10–33.97. Bitzer L. F. Functional Communication: A Situational Perspective //Rhetoric in Transition / ed. by E.
E. White. University Park, 1980. P. 21–38.98. Bitzer L. F. The Rhetorical Situation // Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1968. №1. P. 1–14.99. Blair T. Principle, Purpose, Power: Election leaflet for party leadershipcontest, May 1994 // Tony Blair In His Own Words / ed. by P. Richards. London,2004a. P. 77-80.100. Blair T. The Third Way: new politics for the new century: Fabian Societypamphlet, 1998 // Tony Blair In His Own Words / ed. by P. Richards. London,2004b.
P. 187– 192.417101. Blum R. Bausteine zu einer Theorie der Mediensysteme //Medienwissenschaft Schweiz. 2005. Vol. 2. Issue 2. P. 5–11.102. Blumler J. G. Elections, the Media and the Modern Publicity Process //Public communication: The new imperatives: Future directions for media research /ed. by Ferguson M. London; Beverly Hills, 1990. P. 101–113.103. Blumler J. G., Kavanagh D.
The Third Age of Political Communication:Influences and Features // Political Communication. 1999. Vol. 16. P. 209-230.104. Blumler J. G., Gurevitch M. Comparative Research: The extending frontier// New Directions in Political Communication: A Sourcebook / ed. by D. Swanson,D. Nimmo. London; Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 1990. P. 305–325.105. Blumler J. G., Gurevitch M. Americanization Reconsidered: UK-USCampaign Communication Comparisons across Time // Mediated Politics:Communication in the Future of Democracy / ed. by W.
L. Bennett, R. M. Entman.Cambridge, 2000. P. 380–403.106. Blumler J. G., Gurevitch M. State of the Art of Comparative PoliticalCommunication Research: Poised for Maturity? // Comparing PoliticalCommunication: Theories, Cases and Challenges / ed. by F. Esser, B. Pfetsch.Cambridge, 2004. P. 325–343.107. Blumler J.
G., Gurevitch M. Towards a comparative framework forpoliticalcommunication research // Political communication: Issues and strategiesfor research / ed. by S. H. Chaffe. London: Sage, 1975. P. 165–193.108. Blumler J. G. Origins of the Crisis of Communication for Citizenship //Political Communication. 1997. Vol. 14, Issue 4. P. 395–404.109. Bollen K. A. Issues in comparative measurement of political democracy //American Sociological Review. 1980. Vol. 45. P. 370–390.110. Borrat H. El periodico, actor del sistema politico // Analisi. 1989. Vol.
12.P. 67-80.111. Bozóki A. Intellectuals and democratization in Hungary // Social ChangeAnd Political Transformation: A New Europe? / ed. by C. Rootes, H. Davis.London: Routledge, 2003. P. 149-175.112. Brady J. S. Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theoryof the Public Sphere // Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2004. Vol. 30, Issue 3. P.331–354.113.
Brandenburg H. Party Strategy and Media Bias: A Quantitative Analysis ofthe 2005 UK Election Campaign // Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties.2006. Vol. 16, Issue 2. P. 157–178.114. Bryson M. C., McDill W. R. The Political Spectrum: A Bi-DimensionalApproach // Rampart Journal of Individualist Thought. 1968. Vol.
4, Issue 2. P. 19–26.115. Budge I., Farlie D. Saliency Theory of Party Competition – SelectiveEmphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View With Data // WestEuropean Party Systems / ed. by H. Daalder, P. Mair. London, 1983.116. Burawoy M. Transition Without Transformation: Russia’s InvoluntionaryRoad to Capitalism // East European Politics and Societies. 2001. Vol. 15, Issue 2.P. 269–290.418117.
Butler P., Collins N. Political marketing: structure and process // EuropeanJournal of Marketing. 1994. Vol. 28, Issue 1. P. 19–34.118. Calhoun C. Introduction // Habermas and the Public Sphere / ed. by C.Calhoun. Cambridge, 1992.119. Calhoun C. The Democratic Integration of Europe: Interests, Identity, andthe Public Sphere // Europe Without Borders: Re-Mapping Territory, Citizenshipand Identity in a Transnational Age / ed. by M. Berezin, M. Schain. Baltimore,2003.120. Çarkoglu А., Yavuz G.
Press-party Parallelism in Turkey: An IndividualLevel Interpretation // Turkish Studies. 2010. Vol. 11, Issue 4. P. 613–624.121. Castells M. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communicationnetworks, and global governance // The ANNALS of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science.
2008. Vol. 616, Issue 1. P. 78–93.122. Chadwick A. The hybrid media system’, paper presented at the EuropeanConsortium for Political Research // Paper presented at the ECPR GeneralConference,Reykjavik(Iceland),August2011.URL:http://newpolcom.rhul.ac.uk/storage/chadwick/Andrew_Chadwick_Hybrid_Media_System_ECPR_August_9th_2011.pdf.123. Chandiramani R. Howard appoints trio to head Tory comms // PRWeek.2003. 21 Nov.
P. 1.124. Chiper V. Mediacracy turns into a synonym of mediocrity? //Managementul Intercultural. 2014. Vol. XVI, Issue 2(31). P. 69-76.125. Citrin J. The Political Relevance of Trust in Government // The AmericanPolitical Science Review. 1974. Vol. 68, Issue 3. P. 973–988.126. Cobb R., Elder C. The politics of agenda-building: An alternativeperspective for modern democratic theory // Journal of Politics. 1971.
Vol. 33, Issue4. P. 892–915.127. Cockerell M. An Inside View on Blair’s No 10 // The Blair Effect / ed. byA. Seldon. London, 2001.128. Cohen N. This Time, Will Even he Bother to Vote? // New Statesman.2005. 25 Apr. P. 20.129. Coleman S. Mediated Politics and Everyday Life // International Journal ofCommunication. 2007. Vol.
1. P. 49–60.130. Comparing Media Systems and Media Content: Online Newspapers in TenEastern and Western European Countries / Wessler H., Skorek M., Kleinen-VonKönigslöw K., Held M., Dobreva M., Adolphsen M. // Journal of Global MassCommunication. 2008. Vol.
1, Issue 3/4. P. 165–189.131. Cooper M. Ethical Dimensions of Political Advocacy from a PostmodernPerspective // Ethical Dimensions of Political Advertising / ed. by R.E. Denton.Thousand Oaks (CA), 1991. P. 23–47.132. Coppedge M., Reinicke W. H. Measuring Polyarchy // Studies inComparative International Development. 1990. Vol. 25. P.
51–72.133. Couldry N., Hepp A. Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions,Arguments // Communication Theory. 2013. Vol. 23. P. 191–202.419134. Couldry N. Media and the Problem of Voice // Participation and MediaProduction: Critical Reflections on Content Creation / ed. by N. Carpentier, B. deCleen. Bristol, 2008.135. Cracknell D. Are Blair’s PROs giving us value? // PRWeek. 2004. 2 April.P.8.136. Creţu F. Just how tabloidized is tabloid press? Personalization,sensationalism and negativism in the coverage of the Romanian presidentialelections, 2009 // The Sphere of Politics (Sfera Politicii).
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
