Диссертация (1145018), страница 84
Текст из файла (страница 84)
2013. Issue 174. P. 121146.137. Crivelli G. Il cancelliere mediatico e il prussiano di Baviera // Il Sole 24Ore. 2002. 10 Dic. –http://www.ilsole24ore.com/fc?cmd=art&codid=22.0.821966221&chId=30138. Curran J., Iyengar S., Brink Lund A., Salovaara-Moring I. Media System,Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study // European Journal ofCommunication. 2009. Vol. 24, Issue 1. P. 5–26.139. Curran J.
Rethinking the Media as a Public Sphere // Communication andCitizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere in the New Media Age / ed. by P.Dahlgren, C. Sparks. London, 1991. P. 27–57.140. Curtice J., Semetko H. Does it Matter What the Papers Say? // Labour’sLast Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond / ed. by A. Heath, R. Jowell, J.Curtice, B. Taylor. Aldershot, 1994. P. 43–64.141. Curtice J.
Was it The Sun that won it again? The Influence of newspapersin the 1997 election campaign // The Oxford University Centre for Research intoElections and Social Trends (CREST) Working Paper Series. Paper № 75. Oxford,1999.142. D’Angelo P. Framing the Press: A New Approach to Assessing the CynicalNature of Press Self-Coverage and Its Implications for Information Processing in thePolitical Campaign Context // Paper presented to the Mass Communication Divisionat the 49th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, SanFrancisco, 1999.143. D’Angelo P. News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: Aresponse to Entman // Journal of Communication.
2002. Vol. 52, Issue 4. P. 870–888.144. Dahl R. A. Procedural Democracy // Philosophy, Politics and Society / ed.by P. Laslett, J. Fishkin. Oxford, 1979. P. 97–133.145. Dahlberg L. The Habermasian Public Sphere Encounters Cyber-Reality //Javnost – The Public. 2001. Vol. 8, Issue 3. P. 83–96.146. Dahlberg L. The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking DifferenceSeriously? // Theory and Society. 2005. Vol. 34, Issue 2. P. 111–136.147. Dahlgren P.
Information and Ideology in the Public Sphere // The Ideologyof the Information Age / ed. by J. Slack, F. Fejes. Norwood, 1987.148. Dahlgren P. The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication:Dispersion and Deliberation // Political Communication. 2005. Vol. 22. P. 147–162.420149. Dallmayr F. R. Globalization and Inequality: A Plea for CosmopolitanJustice // Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. 2006.Vol.
26, Number 1. P. 63-74.150. Daschmann G. Quantitative Methoden der Kommunikationsforschung //Oeffentliche Kommunikation: Handbuch Kommunikations- ind Medienwissenschaft/ hrsg. von G. Bentele. Wiesbaden, 2003. S. 262–282.151. Davis D. K. Mass and modernity: The future of journalism in a post ColdWar and postmodern world // Research in political sociology / ed. by P.
C.Wasburn. Vol. 7: Mass media and politics. Greenwich (CT), 1995. P. 325–353.152. De Smaele H. The Applicability of Western Media Models on the RussianMedia System // European Journal of Communication. 1999. Vol. 14, Issue 2. P.173–189.153. De Vreese C. News framing: Theory and typology // Information DesignJournal + Document Design. 2005. Vol.
13, Issue 1. P. 51–62.154. De Vreese C. Political Cynicism // The International Encyclopedia ofCommunication / ed. by W. Dosnbach. Hoboken (NJ), 2008 –http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405131995_yr2011_chunk_g978140513199521_ss55-1155. Deacon D., Golding P., Billig M. Press and broadcasting: «real issues» andreal coverage // Britain Votes 2001 / ed.
by P. Norris. Oxford, 2001. P. 102–114.156. Deacon D., Wring D. Partisan Dealignment and the British Press // PoliticalCommunications: The British General Election Campaign of 2001 / ed. by J. Bartle,R. Mortimore, S. Atkinson. London, 2002. P. 135–149.157. Deligiaouri A. Innovations In Greek Political Communication AndConsequences: Significant changes from 1981-2009 // Estudos em Comunicação.2011. Number 10. P. 47-70.158. Detterbeck K. Parteiendemokratie in der Mediengesellschaft //Mediendemokratie / hrsg.
von P. Massing. Schwalbach, 2004. S. 50–66.159. Diamond L. Is the Third Wave over? // Journal of Democracy. 1996. Vol.7, Issue 3. P. 20–37.160. Dickson M., Gewirtz Sh., Power S. Unravelling a «spun» policy: a casestudy of the constitutive role of «spin» in the education policy process // Journal ofEducation Policy. 2004.
Vol. 19, Issue 3. P. 321–342.161. Dickson N. What is The Third Way? // BBC Online Service. 1999. 27 Sept.– http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/458626.stm162. Dimitras P. E. Greece // The media in Western Europe: The EuromediaHandbook / ed. by B. S. Østergaard. London, 1997. P. 98–109.163. Dimitrova D. V., Strömbäck J.
Election News in Sweden and the UnitedStates: A Comparative Study of Sources and Media Frames // Journalism. 2012.Vol. 13, Issue 5. P. 604-619.164. Diodato R. On the Sense of Aesthetic Experience // Research on Educationand Media. 2014. Vol. VI, Number 2. P. 89-97.165. Downey J., Stanyer J. Comparative media analysis: Why some fuzzythinking might help. Applying fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to the421personalization of mediated political communication // European Journal ofCommunication.
2010. Vol. 25, Issue 4. P. 331–347.166. Dryzek J. S., Niemeyer S. Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as PoliticalIdeals // American Journal of Political Science. 2006. Vol. 50, Issue 3. P. 634–649.167. Eilders C. Massenmedien als Produzenten öffentlicher Meinungen:Pressekommentare als Manifestation der politischen Akteurrolle // Massenmedienals politische Akteure: Konzepte und Analysen / hrsg.
von B. Pfetsch, S. Adam.Wiesbaden, 2008. S. 27–52.168. Eilders C. Media as Political Actors? Issue Focusing and SelectiveEmphasis in the German Quality Press // German Politics. 2000. Vol. 9, Issue 3. P.181–206.169. Entman R. M. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm //Journal of Communication. 1993. Vol. 43, Issue 4. P. 51–58.170. Erber R., Lau R.
R. Political cynicism revisited: An information processingreconciliation of policy-based and incumbency-based interpretations of changes oftrust in government // American Journal of Political Science. 1990. Vol. 34, Issue 1.P. 236–253.171. Esser F., D’Angelo P. Framing the Press and Publicity Process in German,British and U.S. general election campaigns: A comparative study of«Metacoverage» // Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2006.
Vol. 11,Issue 3. P. 44–66.172. Esser F. Journalismus vergleichen: Komparative Forschung undTheoriebildung // Theories des Journalismus: Ein diskursives Handbuch / hrsg. vonM. Löffenholz / Aufl. 2. Wiesbaden, 2004. S. 151–180.173. Esser F. Media Politics and Media Self-coverage in the British Press //International Communications Association Annual Meeting Conference Paper.
SanDiego (CA), 2003.174. Esser F., Pfetsch B. Meeting the Challenges of Global Communication andPolitical Integration // Comparing Political Communication: Theories, cases, andchallenges / ed. by F. Esser, B. Pfetsch. Cambridge, 2004. P. 384-410.175. Esser F., Reinemann C., Fan D. Spin Doctors in the United States, GreatBritain, and Germany: Metacommunication about Media Manipulation // HarvardInternational Journal of Press/Politics. 2001. Vol. 6, Issue 1. P. 16–45.176. Esser F., Strömbäck J. Shaping Politics: Mediatization and MediaInterventionism // Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences / ed. By K.Lundby.
New York, 2009. P. 205–223.177. Fahmy E. A Disconnected Generation? Encouraging Young People’sPolitical Participation in the UK // Youth&Policy. 2003. Vol. 81. P. 1–20.178. Fenton N., Downey J. Counter public spheres and global modernity //Javnost – The Public. 2003. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 15–32.179. Ferree M. M., Gamson W. A., Gerhards J., Rucht D. Four Models of thePublic Sphere in Modern Democracies // Theory and Society.
2002. Vol. 31, Issue3. P. 289–324.422180. Foa M. The Invisible Threat: How Spin Doctors Bypass Media EthicsRules // Media and Ethics: International Symposium (organized by Turkish NationalCommission for UNESCO) – Speeches and Final Report. Ankara, 2007.181. Franzmann S., Kaiser A. Locating Political Parties in Policy Space: AReanalysis of Party Manifesto Data // Party Politics. 2006. Vol. 12, Issue 2. P. 163–188.182. Fraser N. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique ofActually Existing Democracy // Habermas and the Public Sphere / ed.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
