Диссертация (1145018), страница 86
Текст из файла (страница 86)
A Case For Theoretical Eclectism // Javnost – The Public. 2008.Vol. 15, Issue 3. P. 5–22.235. Katz E. The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report ona Hypothesis // The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1957. Vol. 21, Issue 1. P. 61–78.236. Katz R. S., Mair P. Changing Models of Party Organization and PartyDemocracy: the emergence of the cartel party // Party Politics.
2005. Vol. 1, Issue 1.P. 5–31.237. Katz R. S., Mair P. et al. The Membership of Political Parties in EuropeanDemocracies, 1960–1990 // European Journal of Political Research. 1992. Vol. 22.P. 329–345.238. Keane J. Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere //Communication Review. 1995. Vol. 1, Issue 1.
P. 1–22.239. Kelly M. Influences on Broadcasting Policies for Election Coverage //Communicating to Voters: Television in the First European Parliamentary Elections/ ed. by J. Blumler. London, 1983. P. 65–82.240. Kepplinger H. M., Martin V. Die Funktionen der Massenmedien in derAlltagskommunikation // Publizistik. 1986. Vol. 31. P. 118–128.241. Kepplinger H. M. Mediatization of Politics: Theory and Data // Journal ofCommunication. 2002. Vol. 52, Issue 4. P. 972–986.242. Kirchheimer O.
The Transformation of Western European Party Systems //Political Parties and Political Development / ed. by J. La Palombara, M. Weiner.Princeton (NJ), 1966. P. 177–199.243. Kleinnijenhuis J., Rietberg E. M. Parties, Media, the Public and theEconomy: Patterns of Societal Agenda-Setting // European Journal of PoliticalResearch.
1995. Vol. 28, Issue 1. P. 95-118.244. Koivisto J., Väliverronen E. The Resurgence of the Critical Theories of thePublic Sphere // Journal of Communication Inquiry. 1996. Vol. 20, Issue 2. P. 18–36.426245. Kom A. Writing under A Monocracy: Intellectual Poverty in Cameroon //Research in African Literatures. 1991. Vol. 22, Number 1. P. 83-92.246. Kotler P., Levy S. J. Broadening the Concept of Marketing // Journal ofMarketing. 1969. Vol.
33. P. 10–15.247. Krasner S. D. Abiding the Sovereignty // International Political ScienceReview. 2001. Vol. 22, Issue 3. P. 229–251.248. Kristol I. Business and the New Class // The Wall Street Journal. 1975.May 19.249. Krotz F. Qualitative Methoden der Kommunikationsforschung //Oeffentliche Kommunikation: Handbuch Kommunikations- ind Medienwissenschaft/ hrsg. von G. Bentele. Wiesbaden, 2003. S. 245–261.250. Krotz F.
The meta-process of «mediatization» as a conceptual frame //Global Media and Communication. 2007. Vol. 3, Issue 3. P. 256–260.251. Krouwel A. Otto Kirchheimer and the Catch-all Party // West EuropeanPolitics. 2003. Vol. 26, Issue 2. P. 23–40.252. Kunelius R., Sparks C. Problems with a European Public Sphere. AnIntroduction // Javnost – The Public. 2001. Vol. 8, Issue 1.
P. 5–20.253. Lagos T. G. The dangers of mediacracy // The Seattle Times. 2007. 31 Dec.– http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2004068026_taso13.html254. Land J. M., Lenz G. A. Exploiting a Rare Shift in Communication Flows toDocument News Media Persuasion: The 1997 United Kingdom General Election //Center for Causal Inference and Program Evaluation Working Paper Series. 2008 –http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/causalinf/papers/LaddLenzBritish.pdf255. Lang A. Discipline in Crisis? The Shifting Paradigm on MassCommunication Research // Communication Theory.
2013. Vol. 23, Number 1. P.10–24.256. Larocca R. Strategic Diversion in Political Communication // The Journalof Politics. 2004. Vol. 66, Issue 2. P. 469–491.257. Lasswell H. D. The structure and function of communication in society //The Communication of ideas / ed. by L. Bryson. New York, 1948.258. Latin American Media // Communication Booknotes Quarterly. 2005.
Vol.36, Issue 3. P. 194-198.259. Laver M., Garry J. Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts //American Journal of Political Science. 2000. Vol. 44, Issue 3. P. 619–634.260. Lazarsfeld P. F., Merton R. K. Mass Communication, Popular Taste andOrganized Social Action // Mass Communications: A Book of Readings / 2nd ed. /ed. by W.
Schramm. Urbana, 1960.261. Lazere D. Reflections on Capitalist Culture and the SystematicMonopolizationofAmericanPublics//Cyrano.[s.a.]http://www.bestcyrano.org/reflections.html262. Lijphart A. Comparative politics and the comparative method // TheAmerican Political Science Review. 1971. Vol.
65, Issue 3. P. 682–693.263. Linstone H. A. Mediacracy, mediocracy, or new democracy: Where are theinformation age Jeffersons and Madisons when we need them? // TechnologicalForecasting and Social Change. 1989. Vol. 36, Issues 1–2. P. 153–169.427264. Litvinenko A. A. A New Definition of Journalism Functions in theFramework of Hybrid Media Systems: German and Russian Academic Perspectives.// Global Media Journal.
German Edition. No.1, Spring/Summer 2013. URL:http://wwwdb-thueringende/servlets/Derivat...inenko_finalpdf.265. Litvinenko A. Mediacracy in Germany // Средства массовой информациив современном мире: молодые исследователи. Тезисы VII межвуз. науч.-практ.конф. СПб., 2008. C. 207–209.266. Livingstone S. On the Challenges of Cross-National Comparative MediaResearch // European Journal of Communication.
2003. Vol. 18, Issue 4. P. 477–500.267. Livingstone S. On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address2008 // Journal of communication. 2009. Vol. 59, Issue 1. P. 1–18.268. Luhmann N. Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und öffentliche Meinung //Luhmann N. Soziologische Aufklärung. Vol. 5: Konstruktivistische Perspektiven.Opladen, 1990.
P. 170–182.269. Maddison S. No vision, no aspiration, no connection: Understanding thestate of public debate in Australia today // Australian Quarterly. 2012. Vol. 83, Issue3. P. 3-8.270. Mair P. Comparative politics: An introduction to comparative overview //A New Handbook of Political Science / ed.
by R. E. Goodin, H.-D. Klingemann.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. P. 309–335.271. Making a Difference: Strengthening the Nursing, Midwifery and HealthVisiting Contribution to Health and Healthcare // Department of Health. London,1999.272. Mancini P., Swanson D. L. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy:Introduction // Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy. An International Study ofInnovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences / ed.
by D. L.Swanson, P. Mancini Westport, 1996. P. 1–26.273. Mansbridge J., Hartz-Karp J., Amengual M., Gastil J. Norms ofDeliberation: An Inductive Study // The Journal of Public Deliberation. 2006. Vol.2, Issue 7. P. 1–47.274. Mapping Journalism Cultures Across Nations: A comparative study of 18countries / Hanitzsch T., Hanusch F., Mellado C., Anikina M., Berganza R., CangozI., Coman M., Hamada B., Hernández M.
E., Karadjov C. D., Moreira S. V.,Mwesige P. G., Plaisance P. L., Reich Z., Seethaler J., Skewes E. A., Noor D. V.,Kee Wang Yuen E. // Journalism Studies. 2011. Vol. 12, Number 3. P. 273–293.275. Marcinkowski F. Media system and political communication // Handbookof Swiss politics / ed. by U. Kloethi, P. Knoepfel, H. Kriesi et al. Zurich, 2007.
P.381–402.276. Marcinkowski F. Mediatisation of Politics: Reflections on the State of theConcept // Javnost - The Public. 2014. Vol. 21, Number 2. P. 5-22.277. Marcinkowski F., Steiner A. Mediatization and Political Autonomy: ASystems Approach // Mediatization of Politics / ed. by F. Esser, J. Strömbäck.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. P. 74-90.428278. Marcinkowski F. System Theory // Encyclopedia of PoliticalCommunication / ed. by L. L. Kaid, C.
Holtz-Bacha. London/Thousand Oaks, 2008.279. Margolis M., Resnick D. Politics As Usual // Contemporary AmericanPolitics / ed. by B. Sinclair. Thousand Oaks, 2000.280. Mariani A. De la démocratie en Argentine : représenter le peuple après le2001 // Sociology. UniversitéToulouse le Mirail - Toulouse II, 2012.281. Marshall M. G., Cole B. R. Global Report 2009: Conflict, Governance, andState Fragility // Polity IV Project: George Mason’s University Center for SystemicPeace & Center for Global Policy 2009 report.
2009. 7 Dec. – URL:http://www.systemicpeace.org/Global%20Report%202009.pdf282. Matonytė I. Сontrolled or controlling free media and electoral campaigns:The legislative experiment in Lithuania 2008 // Information Sciences (Informacijosmokslai). 2012. Issue 59. P. 7-23.283. Matonytė I. From liberal to predatory mass media in post-communistLithuania // Journalism Research. 2009. Number 2. P. 159-179.284. Matonytė I. (Liberal) mass media and the (multi)party system in postcommunist Lithuania // Central European Journal of Communication. 2008. Vol. 1.P. 123-144.285.
Mauro E. Un regime vuoto // La Repubblica. 2011. 26 Ott. P. 1.286. Mazzoleni G. Mediatization of Politics // The International Encyclopedia ofCommunication / ed. by W. Donsbach. New York, 2008a. P. 3047–3051.287. Mazzoleni G. Mediatization of Society // The International Encyclopedia ofCommunication / ed. by W. Donsbach. New York, 2008b. P. 3052–3055.288. Mazzoleni G., Schulz W. «Mediatization» of Politics: A Challenge forDemocracy? // Political Communication. 1999. Vol.
16, Issue 3. P. 247–261.289. MacArthur B. Perhaps it was The Sun wot won it // Sunday Times. 1992.12 Apr.290. McCombs M. E., Shaw D. L. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media// Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972. Vol. 36. P. 176–187.291. McEnteer J. Doughnut to gentle: The rise of the Philippine Mediacracy //Metro Manila: Philippine Journalism Review. 1995.
P. 24-33.292. McKee D. Fact is Free but Comment is Sacred; or Was It The Sun WotWon It? // Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1992 / ed.by I. Crewe, B. Gosschalk. Cambridge, 1995.293. McNair B. PR Must Die: spin, anti-spin and political public relations in theUK, 1997–2004 // Journalism Studies. 2004. Vol.
5, Issue 3. P. 325–338.294. Mediensysteme vergleichen // Mediensysteme im internazionalenVergleich / hrsg. von B. Thomass. Konstanz, 2007. P. 12–41.295. Meijer A. J. Public eyes: Direct accountability in an information age // FirstMonday: peer-reviewed journal on the Internet. 2005. Vol. 10, Number 4. URL:http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1218/1138.296. Messaggio alle Camere del Presidente della Repubblica Carlo AdzeglioCiampi in materia di pluralismo e imparzialità dell’informazione // Palazzo delQuirinale.
2002. 23 Lug.429297. Meyer C. Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring theEuropean Union’s Communication Deficit // Journal of Common Market Studies.1999. Vol. 37, Issue 4. P. 617–639.298. Meyer D. E., Schvaneveldt R. W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words:Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology. 1971. Vol. 90. P. 227–234.299. Meyrowitz J.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
