Диссертация (1145018), страница 85
Текст из файла (страница 85)
by C.Calhoun. Cambridge, 1992. P. 109–163.183. Fraser N. Rethinking the Public Sphere // Social Text. 1990. Vol. 25/26. P.56–80.184. Friedland L. A., Hove T., Rojas H. The Networked Public Sphere // Javnost– The Public. 2006. Vol. 13, Issue 4. P. 5–26.185. Fuchs D. A Metatheory of the Democratic Process // Publication Series ofthe Research Unit Institutions and Social Change of the Research Area SocialChange, Institutions and Mediation Processes of the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlinfür Sozialforschung. FS m 93-203. Berlin, 1993.186.
Gasiorowski M. J. The Political Regimes Project // Studies in ComparativeInternational Development. 1990. Vol. 25, Issue 1. P. 109–125.187. Gavin N. T., Sanders D. The Press and Political Attitudes under NewLabour // Political Studies. 2003. Vol. 51, Issue 3. P. 573–591.188. Gerbner G., Gross L., Morgan M., Signorielli N.
Charting the Mainstream:Television’s Contribution to Political Orientations // Journal of Communication.1982. Vol. 32, Issue 2. P. 100–127.189. Gerbner G., Gross L. System of cultural indicators // Public OpinionQuarterly. 1974. Vol. 38. P. 460–461.190. Gerhards J. Diskursive versus liberale Öffentlichkeit: Eine empirischeAuseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas // Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie undSozialpsychologie. 1997.
Bd 49. S. 1–34.191. Gerhards J., Neidhardt F. Strukturen und Funktionen modernerÖffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen und Ansätze // Öffentlichkeit, Kultur,Massenkommunikation / hrsg. von S. Müller-Doohm, K. Neumann-Braun.Oldenburg, 1991. S. 31–89.192. Gerhards J. Politische Öffentlichkeit. Ein system- und akteurstheoretischerBestimmungsversuch // Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen:Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft 34 / hrsg.
vonF. Neidhardt. Opladen, 1994. S. 77–105.193. Gerhards J., Schäfer M. S. Hegemonie der Befürworter: Der medialeDiskurs über Humangenomforschung in Deutschland und den USA im Vergleich //Soziale Welt. 2007. Vol. 58. P. 367–395.194. Golding P. Media Professionalism in the Third World: The Transfer of anIdeology // Mass Communication and Society / ed. by J.
Curran, M. Gurevitch, J.Wollacott. Beverly Hills, 1977. P. 291–308.423195. Green P. Farewell to Democracy? // Democracia, Mass media e Esferapública / org. de M. N. da Costa. Largo do Paço: Universidade do Minho, 2011. P.139-159.196. Grossi G. Public Opinion and Public Sphere: from Modernity to PostDemocracy? // VII Congreso Español de Ciencia Política y de la Administración:DemocraciayBuenGobierno.2005.URL:www.sociologiadip.unimib.it/dipartimento/ricerca/pdfDownload.php?idPaper=90.197. Grúber K.
Globalisation, regions, nations and integration: Central andWestern European perspectives // Perspectives on European Politics and Society.2002. Vol. 3, Issue 2. P. 199-228.198. Gurevitch M., Coleman S., Blumler J. G. Political Communication: Old andNew Media Relationships // The ANNALS of the American Academy of Politicaland Social Science.
2009. Vol. 625, Issue 1. P. 164–181.199. György P. Art after the end of art history?: The question of representationin the 1980s // Philosophy and Social Criticism. 1994. Vol. 20, Issue 3. P. 37-63.200. Habermas J., Derrida J. February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together:A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe //Constellations. 2003. Vol. 10, Issue 3.
P. 291–297.201. Habermas J. Further Reflections on the Public Sphere // Habermas and thePublic Sphere / ed. by C. Calhoun. Cambridge, 1992b.202. Habermas J. The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedic Article // New GermanCritique. 1974. Vol. 3. P. 49.203. Habermas J. The public sphere // Communications and the class struggle.Vol. 1 / ed.
by A. Mattelart, S. Seigelaub. New York, 1979.204. Hafez K. Journalism Ethics Revisited: A Comparison of Ethics Codes inEurope, North Africa, the Middle East, and Muslim Asia // PoliticalCommunication. 2002. Vol. 19. P. 225–250.205. Hall I. Tories look for Saatchi and Bell for salvation // PRWeek. 2003. 25Apr. P. 1.206. Hallin D. C., Mancini P. Italy’s Television, Italy’s Democracy //OpenDemocracy Project.
2001. 18 Jul. – http://www.opendemocracy.net/mediapublicservice/article_59.jsp207. Hanitzsch T. Comparing Media Systems Reconsidered: RecentDevelopment and Directions for Future Research // Journal of Global MassCommunication. 2008. Vol. 1, Issue 3/4. P. 111–117.208. Hanitzsch T. Deconstructing Journalism Culture: towards a universaltheory // Communication Theory. 2007. Vol. 17, Issue 4. P. 367–385.209. Hardt H. The making of the public sphere: class relations andcommunication in the United States // Javnost — The Public. 1996.
Vol. 3, Issue 1.P. 7–23.210. Harrison D., Paterson T. Thanks to Hitler, hunting with hounds is stillverboten//TheDailyTelegraph.2002.22Sept.–www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1407954/Thanks-to-Hitler-hunting-withhounds-is-still-verboten.html424211. Harrop M., Scammell M. A Tabloid War // The British General Election of1992 / ed. by D. Butler, D. Kavanagh. London, 1992. P. 180–210.212. Hegedűs I. The Mass Media, Political Parties, and Europessimism inHungary // Mediterranean Quarterly.
2006. Vol 17, Number 2. P. 72-83.213. Heikkilä H., Kunelius R. Journalists Imagining the European Public Sphere:Professional discourses about the EU news practices in ten countries // Javnost –The Public. 2006. Vol. 13, Issue 4. P. 63–80.214.
Hewitt P., Gould P. Lessons from America // Renewal. 1993. Issue 1. P.45–51.215. Hjarvard S. The Mediatization of Religion: A Theory of the Media asAgents of Religious Change // Northern Lights 2008: Yearbook of Film & MediaStudies. Bristol, 2008.216. Hohendahl P. Critical Theory, Public Sphere and Culture: JürgenHabermas and his Critics // New German Critique. 1979. Vol. 16. P. 89–118.217. Hough D. The PDS and the Concept of the Catch-All Party // GermanPolitics and Society.
2002. Vol. 20, Issue 4. P. 27–47.218. Hundal S. What happens to politics after the Sun dies? // The Staggers: TheNewStatesmanrollingblog.2010.3Jun.–http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/06/sun-media-Labourpolitics219. Huntington S. P. Democracy’s Third Wave // Journal of Democracy. 1991.Vol. 2, Issue 2. P. 12–34.220. Inglehart R.
The Changing Structure of Political Cleavages in WesternSociety // Electoral Change: Realignment and Dealignment in Advanced IndustrialDemocracies / ed. by R. J. Dalton, S. C. Flanagan, P. A. Beck. Princeton (NJ), 1984.P. 25–69.221. Iosifides P. Pluralism and media concentration policy in the EuropeanUnion // Javnost – The Public. 1997. Vol. 4, Issue 1. P. 85–104.222.
Jakubowicz K. Media Systems Research: An Overview // ComparativeMedia Systems: European and Global Perspectives / ed. by B. Dobek-Ostrowska,M. Głowacki, K. Jakubowicz, M. Sükösd. Budapest: Central European UniversityPress, 2010. P. 1–22.223. Jakubowicz K. Rude awakening: Social and media change in Central andEastern Europe // Javnost – The Public. 2001. Vol. 8, Issue 4. P. 59–80.224.
Jakubowicz K., Sükösd M. Twelve concepts regarding media systemevolution and democratization in post-communist societies // Finding the RightPlace on the Map: Central and European Media Change In a Global Perspective / ed.by K. Jakubowicz, M. Sükösd. Bristol, 2008. P. 9–40.225. Jakubowicz K.
The Eastern-European Post-Communist Media System: AnIntroduction // European Media Governance: National and Regional Dimensions /ed. by G. Terzis. Bristol; Chicago: Intellect Books, 2007. P. 303–312.226. Janda K., Harmel R., Edens C., Goff P. Changes in Party Identity:Evidence from Party Manoifestos // Party Politics. 1995. Vol.
1. P. 171–196.425227. Johnstone J. W. C., Slawski E. J., Bowman W. W. The Professional Valuesof American Newsmen // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972–1973. Vol. 36, Issue 4. P.522–540.228. Jones N. 24-hours media // Journal of Public Affairs. 2003. Vol. 3, Issue 1.P. 27–31.229. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequencyand probability // Cognitive Psychology. 1973. Vol. 5, Issue 2. P. 207–232.230. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames // AmericanPsychologist.
1984. Vol. 39. P. 341–350.231. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory – Analysis of decision under risk// Econometrica. 1979. Vol. 47. P. 263–291.232. Kantola A. Leaving Public Places: Anlipolitical and Antipublic Forces ofthe Transnational Economy // Javnost – The Public. 2001.
Vol. 8, № 1. P. 59–74.233. Kaplan R. L. The News About New Institutionalism: Journalism’s Ethic ofObjectivity and Its Political Origins // Political Communication. 2006. Vol. 23, Issue2. P. 173–185.234. Karppinen K., Moe H., Svensson J. Habermas, Mouffe And PoliticalCommunication.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
