Диссертация (1145018), страница 87
Текст из файла (страница 87)
How Television Changes the Political Drama // Research inpolitical sociology. Vol. 7: Mass media and politics / ed. by P. C. Wasburn.Greenwich (CT), 1995. P. 117–138.300. Michalczyk S. Demokracja medialna: między wizją a rzeczywistością //Media i komunikowanie w społeczeństwie demokratycznym: szkice medioznawcze/ pod red. S. Michalczyka.
Sosnowiec, 2006. S. 137–157.301. Miller A. H. Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970 //American Political Science Review. 1974. Vol. 68, Issue 3. P. 951–972.302. Miller D. System failure: It’s not just the Media – the Whole PoliticalSystem has Failed // Journal of Public Affairs. 2004. Vol. 4, Issue 4. P. 374–382.303. Mitchell C. Women’s (Community) Radio As a Feminist Public Sphere //Javnost – The Public. 1998.
Vol. 5, Issue 2. P. 73–85.304. Montes N. M. Framing Immigration in the Political and Public Agenda: TheRole of Media Logic and News Hypes // Journalism and Mass Communication.2012. Vol. 2, Number 2. P. 373-384.305. Morlino L. ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Democracies: How to Conduct Research intothe Quality of Democracy // Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics.Vol.20, Issue 1. P. 5–27.306. Mughan A., Gunther R. The Media in Democratic and NondemocraticRegimes: A Multilevel Perspective // Democracy and the Media: A ComparativePerspective / ed.
by R. Gunther, A. Mughan. Cambridge, 2000.307. Münch R. Elemente einer Theorie der Integration moderner Gesellschaften:Eine Bestandsaufnahme // Was hält die Gesellschaft zusammen? BundesrepublikDeutschland: Auf dem Weg von der Konsens- zur Konflikt-gesellschaft / Hrsg. v.W. Heitmeyer / Band 2.
Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1997. S. 66–109;308. Naroll R. Galton’s Problem: The Logic of Cross-Cultural Analysis // SocialResearch. 1965. Vol. 32. P. 428–451.309. Navarro L. H. Images of the Dirty TV-War: The Hour of Mediacracy //Latin American Perspectives. 2006. Vol. 33, Issue 2. P. 70-77.310. Newton K., Brynin M. The national press and party voting in the UK //Political Studies.
2001. Vol. 49. P. 265–285.311. Newton K. Do People Read Everything They Believe in the Papers? //British Elections and Paries Yearbook 1991 / ed. by I. Crewe, P. Norris, D. Denver,D. Broughton. Hemel Hempstead, 1991.312. Newton K. May the Weak Force be With You: The Power of the MassMedia in Modern Politics // European Journal of Political Research. 2006. Vol. 45.P.
209–234.430313. Nicolaïdis K. The New Constitution as European Demoi-cracy? // CriticalReview of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2004. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 76–93.314. Nieminen H. Hegemony and the Public Sphere. Essays on theDemocratisation of Communication // Working Papers of University of Turku,School of Art, Literature and Music, Department of Media Studies.
Series A. 2000.Issue 44.315. Nieminen H. Median sääntely ja informoitu kansalaisuus // Demokratia jasäädöspolitiikka: Eduskunnan juhlaseminaari 2. Lokakuuta / ed. by S. Paasilehto.Helsinki: Eduskunta, 2007. P. 59-70.316. Noelle-Neumann E. Return to the concept of powerful mass media //Studies in Broadcasting. 1973. Vol. 9. P. 67–112.317. Norris P. Comparative political communications: Common frameworks orBabelian confusion? // Government and Opposition. 2009. Vol.
44, Issue 3. P. 321–340.318. Norris P. Did the Media Matter?: Agenda-Setting, Persuasion, andMobilization Effects in the British General Election Campaign // British Politics.2006. Vol. 1. P. 1–27.319. Norris P. Global Political Communication: Good Governance, HumanDevelopment and Mass Communication // Comparing Political Communication:Theories, cases, and challenges / ed. by F. Esser, B. Pfetsch. Cambridge, 2004. P.115–150.320. O’Cass A. Political marketing and the marketing concept // EuropeanJournal of Marketing. 1996. Vol. 30, Issue 10–11.
P. 45–61.321. O’Donnell S. Analyzing the Internet and the Public Sphere: The Case ofWomenslink // Javnost – The Public. 2001. Vol. 8, Issue 1. P. 39–58.322. Offenhäuser D. Die UNESCO und die globale Infornationsgesellschaft //Globalisierung der Medien?: Medienpolitik in der Informationsgesellschaft / hrsg.von P. Donges, O.
Jarren, H. Schatz. Wiesbaden, 1999. S. 73–88.323. O’Neill D., Harcup T. News Values and Selectivity // The Handbook ofJournalism Studies / ed. by K. Wahl-Jorgensen, T. Hanitzsch. London: Routledge,2009. P. 161-174.324. O’Shaughnessy N. Political marketing and political propaganda //Handbook of political marketing / ed. by B. I. Newman.
Thousand Oaks (CA),1999. P. 3–18.325. O’Shaughnessy N. The Marketing of Political Marketing // EuropeanJournal of Marketing. 2001. Vol. 35, Issue 9–10. P. 1047–1057.326. Pan Z., Kosicki G. M. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse //Political Communication. 1993. Vol. 10, Issue 1. P. 55–75.327. Parsons T. Some Problems of General Theory in Sociology // TheoreticalSociology: Perspectives and Developments / ed. by J. C. McKinney, E. A.Tiryakian.
New York, 1970. P. 27–68.328. Parteien in der Mediendemokratie // hrsg. von U. von Alemann, S.Marschall. Wiesbaden, 2002.431329. Pasquino G. That obscure object of desire: A new electoral law for Italy //West European Politics. 1989. Vol. 12, Issue 3. P. 280-294.330. Patterson T. E., Donsbach W. News Decisions: Journalists as PartisanActors // Political Communication. 1996. Vol. 13.
P. 455–468.331. Patterson T. E., Donsbach W. Press-Party Parallelism: A Cross-NationalComparison // Paper presented at the International Communication Associationconference. Washington (DC), 1993, May 28.332. Patterson T. E. The News Media: An Effective Political Actor? // PoliticalCommunication. 1997. Vol. 14, Issue 4. P. 445-455.333. Pedersen O. K., Horst M. Dialogjournalistikken: Nutidens politiskedagsorden // Politisk journalistik / ed. O. K.
Pedersen, P. Kjær, A. Esmark, M.Horst, E. M. Carlsen. Århus: Ajour, 2000. P. 169-220.334. Pehe J. Populism in the Age of Mediocracy and Mediacracy // Populism inCentral Europe / ed. by V. Nekvapil, M. Staszkiewicz. Prague: Association forInternational Affairs (AMO), 2007. P. 59-64.335. Perloff R. M. Progress, Paradigms, and a Discipline Engaged: A Responseto Lang and Reflections on Media Effects Research // Communication Theory.2013. Vol. 23, Number 4. P. 317–333.336.
Perry J. L., Rainey H. G. The Public-Private Distinction in OrganizationTheory: A Critique and Research Strategy // Academic Management Review. 1988.Vol. 13, Issue 2. P. 182–201.337. Peters J., Cmiel K. Media Ethics and the Public Sphere // Communication.1991. Vol.
12. P. 197–215.338. Peters J. Distrust of Representation: Habermas On The Public Sphere //Media, Culture and Society. 1993. Vol. 15, Issue 4. P. 541–571.339. Pfetsch B. Convergence Through Privatization?: Changing MediaEnvironments and Televised Politics in Germany // European Journal ofCommunication. 1996. Vol. 8, Issue 3. P. 425–450.340. Pfetsch B., Esser F.
Conceptual Challenges to the Paradigms ofComparative Media Systems in a Globalized World // Journal of Global MassCommunication. 2008. Vol. 1, Issue 3/4. P. 118–131.341. Pfetsch B. From Political Culture to Political Communications Culture: ATheoretical Approach to Comparative Analysis // Comparing PoliticalCommunication: Theories, Cases and Challenges / ed. by F.
Esser, B. Pfetsch.Cambridge, 2004. P. 349.342. Pilger J. By voting for Blair, you will walk over the corpses of at least100,000 people, most of them innocent, slaughtered in defiance of international law// New Statesman. 2005. 25 Apr. P. 19.343. Plasser F. TV-Confrontainments und Strategien populistischerPolitikvermittlung in Österreich // Medien und politischer Prozess: politischeÖffentlichkeit und massenmediale Politikvermittlung im Wandel.
Opladen:Westdeutscher Verlag, 1996. S. 95-102.344. Pollard S. Here today, gone tomorrow // New Statesman. 2003. 14 Apr.345. Poster M. Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere // InternetCulture / ed. by D. Porter. New York, 1997.432346. Pravdová H. Coordinates of interests of media, political subjects andrecipients // Preferencje Polityczne. 2012. Vol. 3. P.347. Puchala D. J.
Institutionalism, Intergovernmentalism and EuropeanIntegration: A Review Article // Journal of Common Market Studies. 1999. Vol. 37,Issue 2. P. 317–331.348. Putnam R. D. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital //Journal of Democracy. 1995a. Vol. 6, Issue 1. P. 65–78.349. Putnam R. D. Tuning in, Tuning out: The Strange Disappearance of SocialCapital in America // Political Science and Politics. 1995b. Vol. 28, Issue 4.
P. 664–683.350. Ramírez M. M. Journalism Culture and Political Conflict: MexicanJournalists Reflect their Performance During 2006 Presidential Elections //Derecom: Revista Online Especializada en Derecho de la Comunicación. 2010. Vol.1, Issue 1. P. 1-25.351. Rasmussen T. The Internet and differentiation of the political public sphere// NORDICOM Review.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
