Диссертация (1137652), страница 20
Текст из файла (страница 20)
1997. Vol. 23, № 1. P.25–45.70. Colston H.L., O’Brien J. Contrast and pragmatics in figurativelanguage: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better // Journal ofPragmatics. 2000. Vol. 32, № 11. P. 1557–1583.71. Colston H.L., O’Brien J. Contrast of Kind Versus Contrast ofMagnitude: The Pragmatic Accomplishments of Irony and Hyperbole //Discourse Processes. 2000. Vol.
30, № 2. P. 179–199.14172. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics / ed. Mey J.L. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1998.73. Coulmas F. Language and Economy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.74. Davies B.L. Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Meaning and rationality// Journal of Pragmatics. 2007. Vol. 39, № 12. P. 2308–2331.75. Davies C., Katsos N. Are speakers and listeners “only moderatelyGricean”? An empirical response to Engelhardt et al. (2006) // Journal ofPragmatics. 2013.
Vol. 49, № 1. P. 78–106.76. Davis W.A. Communicating, telling, and informing // Philosophicalinquiry. 1999. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 21–43.77. Davis W.A. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in theFailure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.78. Davis W.A. Meaning, Expression, and Thought. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2003.79. Davis W.A.
Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference: An IdeationalSemantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.80. de Bruin B. Common knowledge of payoff uncertainty in games //Synthese. 2007. Vol. 163, № 1. P. 79–97.81. de Bruin B. Common knowledge of rationality in extensive games //Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Vol.
49, № 3. P. 261–280.82. de Bruin B. Explaining Games: The Epistemic Programme in GameTheory (Synthese Library). Springer, 2012. P. 200.83. de Jaegher K. The evolution of Horn’s rule // Journal of EconomicMethodology. 2008. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 275–284.84. Dekker P., van Rooij R. Bi-Directional Optimality Theory: AnApplication of Game Theory // Journal of Semantics. 2000. Vol. 17, № 3.P. 217–242.85. Dennis M. et al. Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, anddeceptive praise following childhood head injury. // Brain and language.2001.
Vol. 78, № 1. P. 1–16.86. Doerge F.C., Siebel M. Gricean communication and transmission ofthoughts // Erkenntnis. 2008. Vol. 69, № 1. P. 55–67.87. Douven I. The pragmatics of belief // Journal of Pragmatics. 2010.Vol. 42, № 1. P. 35–47.88. Dutilh Novaes C. Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories.Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.89. Egorova N., Shtyrov Y., Pulvermüller F. Early and parallelprocessing of pragmatic and semantic information in speech acts:neurophysiological evidence // Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013.Vol.
7. P. 86.90. Ehrenfeucht A. An application of games to the completeness problemfor formalized theories // Fundamenta Mathematicae. 1961. № 49. P. 129–141.14291. Engelhardt P., Bailey K., Ferreira F. Do speakers and listenersobserve the Gricean Maxim of Quantity? // Journal of Memory andLanguage. 2006. Vol. 54, № 4. P. 554–573.92. Engelhardt P.E. Are listeners “fully” Gricean?: A comment onDavies and Katsos (2013) // Journal of Pragmatics.
2013. Vol. 49, № 1. P.107–113.93. Experimental Pragmatics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language,and Cognition) / ed. Noveck I.A., Sperber D. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan, 2004. P. 320.94. Fitch W.T., Hauser M.D., Chomsky N. The evolution of the languagefaculty: clarifications and implications. // Cognition. 2005. Vol. 97, № 2. P.179–210.95. Franke M. et al. Vagueness, Signaling and Bounded Rationality //New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence / eds. T.
Onada, D. Bekki,E. McCready. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.96. Franke M. Game Theoretic Pragmatics // Philosophy Compass.2013. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 269–284.97. Franke M. Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, andrational conversation // Semantics and Pragmatics. 2011. Vol. 4. P. 1–82.98. Franke M. Signal to Act: Game Theory in Pragmatic: PhD thesis.Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2009.99. Franke M., de Jager T., van Rooij R. Relevance in Cooperation andConflict // Journal of Logic and Computation. 2009. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 23–54.100. Franke M., Jäger G. Bidirectional Optimization from Reasoning andLearning in Games // Journal of Logic, Language and Information.
2011.Vol. 21, № 1. P. 117–139.101. Franke M., Jäger G., van Rooij R. Vagueness, Signaling andBounded Rationality // New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence / ed. OnadaT., Bekki D., McCready E. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. P. 45–59.102. Fraser B. Perspectives on politeness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1990.Vol. 14, № 2. P. 219–236.103.
Gabbay D., Woods J. Non-cooperation in dialogue logic // Synthese.2001. Vol. 127, № 1/2. P. 161–186.104. Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning (Current Research in theSemantics/Pragmatics Interface) / ed. A.-V. Pietarinen. Oxford: Elsevier,2007.105. Game Theory and Pragmatics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics,Language, and Cognition) / eds. A. Benz,G. Jäger, R. van Rooij. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.106. Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy (Logic,Epistemology, and the Unity of Science) / eds. O.
Majer, A.-V. Pietarinen,T. Tulenheimo. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.143107. Gazdar G. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and LogicalForm. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1978.108. Geurts B. Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics // Mind &Language. 2009. Vol. 24, № 1. P.
51–79.109. Gibbs Jr. R.W. A new look at literal meaning in understanding whatis said and implicated // Journal of Pragmatics. 2002. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 457–486.110. Gibbs R.W. Irony in Talk Among Friends // Metaphor and Symbol.2000. Vol. 15, № 1-2.
P. 5–27.111. Givoni S., Giora R., Bergerbest D. How speakers alert addressees tomultiple meanings // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 48, № 1. P. 29–40.112. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. A Model of Persuasion with BoundedlyRational Agents // Journal of Political Economy. 2013. Vol. 120, № 6. P.1057–1082.113. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. A study in the pragmatics of persuasion: agame theoretical approach // Theoretical Economics. 2006. Vol.
1, № 4. P.395–410.114. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. Debates and decisions: On a rationale ofargumentation rules // Games and Economic Behavior. 2001. Vol. 36, № 2.P. 158–173.115. Glazer J., Rubinstein A. On optimal rules of persuasion //Econometrica. 2004. Vol. 72, № 6. P. 1715–1736.116. Gochet P. The dynamic turn in twentieth century logic // Synthese.2002. Vol. 130, № 2. P. 175–184.117.
Goodman N.D., Stuhlmüller A. Knowledge and implicature:modeling language understanding as social cognition. // Topics in cognitivescience. 2013. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 173–184.118. Green G.M. The universality of Gricean interpretation // Proceedingsof the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 2011. Vol. 16.P. 411–428.119. Greenall A.K. Towards a new theory of flouting // Journal ofPragmatics. 2009. Vol. 41, № 11.
P. 2295–2311.120. Grice H.P. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: HarvardUniversity Press, 1991. P. 406.121. Harnish R.M. Logical form and implicature // An integrated theoryof linguistic ability / ed. Bever T.G., Katz J.. J., Langendoen D.T.
N. Y.:Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1976. Vol. 313. P. 313–391.122. Haugh M. The co-constitution of politeness implicature inconversation // Journal of Pragmatics. 2007. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 84–110.123. Haugh M. The intuitive basis of implicature: relevance theoreticimplicitness versus gricean implying // Pragmatics. InternationalPragmatics Association, 2002. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 117–134.144124.
Hintikka J. Logic of conversation as a logic of dialogue //Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends / ed.Grandy R.E., Warner R. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986. P. 259–276.125. Hintikka J., Sandu G. Game-Theoretical Semantics // Handbook oflogic and language / eds. J. van Benthem, A. ter Meulen. L.: Elsevier, 2011.P. 415–465.126.
Horn L.R. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity //Language. 1985. Vol. 61, № 1. P. 121–174.127. Hugly P., Sayward C. A Problem About Conversational Implicature// Linguistics and Philosophy. 1979. Vol. 3. P. 19–25.128. Huttegger S.M. Evolution and the Explanation of Meaning //Philosophy of Science. 2007. Vol. 74, № 1.
P. 1–27.129. Jackendoff R., Pinker S. The nature of the language faculty and itsimplications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, andChomsky) // Cognition. 2005. Vol. 97, № 2. P. 211–225.130. Jäger G. Applications of Game Theory in Linguistics // Languageand Linguistics Compass. 2008. Vol. 2, № 3. P.
406–421.131. Jäger G., van Rooij R. Language structure: psychological and socialconstraints // Synthese. 2006. Vol. 159, № 1. P. 99–130.132. Jäger G.. Game-Theoretical Pragmatics // Handbook of Logic andLanguage / eds. J. van Benthem, A. Ter Meulen.
L.: Elsevier, 2011. P.467–488.133. Jorgensen J. The functions of sarcastic irony in speech // Journal ofPragmatics. 1996. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 613–634.134. Karttunen L., Peters S. Conventional Implicature in MontagueGrammar // Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the BerkeleyLinguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1975. P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
