Диссертация (1137652), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
2004. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 195–209.208. van Rooij R. Evolution of Conventional Meaning and ConversationalPrinciples // Synthese. 2004. Vol. 139, № 2. P. 331–366.209. van Rooij R. Games and Quantity implicatures // Journal ofEconomic Methodology. Taylor and Francis Journals, 2008. Vol. 15, № 3.P. 261–274.210. van Rooij R. Optimality-Theoretic and Game-Theoretic Approachesto Implicature // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
2008. URL:http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicature-optimality-games/211. van Rooij R. Schulz K. Exhaustive Interpretation of ComplexSentences // Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 2004. Vol. 13, №4. P. 491–519212. van Rooij R. Strengthening conditional presuppositions // Journal ofSemantics. 2007. Vol. 24, № 3. P.
289–304.213. van Rooij R. Vagueness and Linguistics // Vagueness: A guide / ed.Ronzitti G. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. P. 123–170.149214. van Rooij R., Schulz K. Only: Meaning and implicatures // Universityof Amsterdam. 2005.215. van Rooij R., Schulz K. Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonicreasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation // Linguistics andPhilosophy.
Springer Netherlands, 2006. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 205–25216. van Rooij R.Quality and Quantity of Information Exchange // Journalof Logic, Language and Information. 2003. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 423–451.217. von. Fintel K. Would you believe it? The King of France is Back //Descriptions and Beyond / eds. M. Reimer, A.
Bezuidenhout. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2004.218. Weiner M. Are all conversational implicatures cancellable? //Analysis. 2006. Vol. 66, № 290. P. 127–130.219. Wilson D. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? //Lingua. 2006. Vol. 116, № 10. P. 1722–1743.150.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
