Диссертация (1136621), страница 28
Текст из файла (страница 28)
– № 3. – P. 656669.143. Leach C.W. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical(multicomponent) model of in-group identification. / C.W. Leach et al. // Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 95. – № 1. – P. 144-165.144. Lenth R.V. Some practical guidelines for effective sample sizedetermination / R.V. Lenth // American Statistician. – 2001. – Vol. 55. – № 3.– P. 187-193.145. LePine J.A. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms ofcontextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Fivepersonality characteristics and cognitive ability. / J.A. LePine, L.
Van Dyne //Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2001. – Vol. 86. – № 2. – P. 326-336.146. Levine J.M. Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations /J.M. Levine, M.A. Hogg. – Sage Publications, Inc, 2010. – 998 p.139147. Lickel B. Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. / B.Lickel et al. // Journal of personality and social psychology. – 2000. – Vol. 78. –№ 2. – P. 223-246.148. Liden R.C. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and taskinterdependence: implications for individual and group performance / R.C. Lidenet al. // Journal of Organizational Behavior. – 2006.
– Vol. 27. – № 6. – P. 723-746.149. MacKenzie S.B. Do citizenship behaviors matter more for managers thanfor salespeople? / S.B. MacKenzie, P.M. Podsakoff, J.B. Paine // Journal of theAcademy of Marketing Science. – 1999. – Vol. 27. – № 4. – P. 396-410.150. MacKenzie S.B. Organizational citizenship behavior and objectiveproductivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons’performance / S.B. MacKenzie, P.M. Podsakoff, R.
Fetter // Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes. – 1991. – Vol. 50. – № 1. – P. 123-150.151. MacLean T.L. Navigating Multiple Identities Across Multiple Boundaries:A Cross-Level Model of Organizational Identification / T.L. MacLean, S.S. Webber// Journal of Management Inquiry.
– 2015. – Vol. 24. – № 2. – P. 156-173.152. Mael F. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulatedmodel of organizational identification / F. Mael, B.E. Ashforth // Journal ofOrganizational Behavior. – 1992. – Vol. 13. – № 2. – P. 103-123.153. Mannarini T. How Identification Processes and InterCommunityRelationships Affect Sense of Community / T.
Mannarini, A. Rochira, C. Talò// Journal of Community Psychology. – 2012. – Vol. 40. – № 8. – P. 951-967.154. Mannix E.A. What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise andReality of Diverse Teams in Organizations / E.A. Mannix, M.A. Neale //Psychological Science in the Public Interest. – 2005. – Vol.
6. – № 2. – P. 3155.155. Marinova S.V. Are all good soldier behaviors the same? Supportingmultidimensionality of organizational citizenship behaviors based on rewards androles / S.V. Marinova, H. Moon, L. Van Dyne // Human Relations. – 2010. – Vol. 63.– № 10. – P. 1463-1485.156. Meier C. Doing’groupness’ in a spatially distributed work group: The caseof videoconferences at Technics / C. Meier // Group communication in context:Studies of bona fide groups. – 2003.
– Vol. 2. – P. 367-397.140157. Meneses R. Criteria for Assessing the Level of Group Development (LGD)of Work Groups Groupness, Entitativity, and Groupality as Theoretical Perspectives/ R. Meneses et al. // Small Group Research. – 2008. – Vol. 39. – № 4. – P. 492-514.158.
Meyer J.P. A three-component conceptualization of organizationalcommitment / J.P. Meyer, N.J. Allen // Human resource management review. –1991. – Vol. 1. – № 1. – P. 61-89.159. Miscenko D. Identity and identification at work / D. Miscenko, D.V. Day// Organizational Psychology Review. – 2015. – P. 1-33.160. Moon H. The circumplex model and the future of organizational citizenshipbehavior research. Handbook of organizational citizenship behavior / H. Moon et al.// Handbook of organizational citizenship behavior / ed. D.L. Turnipseed. – NovaScience Publishers, Inc., 2005.
– P. 3-23.161. Moritz S.E. Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacyas an example of a multilevel model. / S.E. Moritz, C.B. Watson // Group Dynamics:Theory, Research, and Practice. – 1998. – Vol. 2. – № 4. – P. 285-298.162. Morrison E.W. Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior:The importance of the employee’s perspective. / E.W. Morrison // Academy ofManagement Journal. – 1994. – Vol. 37. – № 6. – P. 1543-1567.163. Motowidlo S.J. Evidence that task performance should be distinguishedfrom contextual performance.
/ S.J. Motowidlo, J.R. Van Scotter // Journal ofApplied Psychology. – 1994. – Vol. 79. – № 4. – P. 475-480.164. Mowday R.T. The measurement of organizational commitment / R.T.Mowday, R.M. Steers, L.W. Porter // Journal of Vocational Behavior.
– 1979. –Vol. 14. – № 2. – P. 224-247.165. Oplatka I. Going Beyond Role Expectations: Toward an Understanding ofthe Determinants and Components of Teacher Organizational Citizenship Behavior/ I. Oplatka // Educational Administration Quarterly. – 2006. – Vol. 42. – № 3. –P. 385-423.166. Organ D.W. A metaanalitic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictorsof organizational citizenship behavior / D.W. Organ, K. Ryan // PersonnelPsychology. – 1995. – Vol.
48. – № 4. – P. 775-802.167. Organ D.W. A Restatement of the Satisfaction-Performance Hypothesis /D.W. Organ // Journal of Management. – 1988. – Vol. 14. – № 4. – P. 547-557.141168. Organ D.W. Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizationalcitizenship behavior / D.W. Organ, M. Konovsky // Journal of Applied Psychology.– 1989. – Vol. 74. – № 1.
– P. 157-164.169. Organ D.W. Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-uptime / D.W. Organ // Human performance. – 1997. – Vol. 10. – № 2. – P. 85-97.170. Organ D.W. Personality, Satisfaction, and Organizational CitizenshipBehavior / D.W. Organ, A. Lingl // The Journal of social psychology. – 1995.– Vol.
135. – № 3. – P. 339-350.171. O’Reilly C. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment:The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior/ C. O’Reilly, J. Chatman // Journal of Applied Psychology. – 1986. – Vol. 71. –№ 3. – P. 492-499.172. Penner L.A. Beyond Job Attitudes: A Personality and Social PsychologyPerspective on the Causes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior / L.A. Penner,A.R.
Midili, J. Kegelmeyer // Human performance. – 1997. – Vol. 10. – № 2. –P. 111-131.173. Podsakoff N.P. Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenshipbehaviors: A review and recommendations for future research / N.P. Podsakoff etal. // Journal of Organizational Behavior. – 2014. – Vol. 35. – № S1. – P.
87-119.174. Podsakoff N.P. Individual- and organizational-level consequences oforganizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. / N.P. Podsakoff et al. //Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 94. – № 1. – P. 122-141.175. Podsakoff P.M.
Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review ofthe theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research / P.M.Podsakoff et al. // Journal of Management. – 2000. – Vol. 26. – № 3. – P. 513-563.176. Porter L.W. Behavior in organizations / L.W.
Porter, E.E. Lawler, J.R.Hackman. – McGraw-Hill, 1975. – 561 p.177. Postmes T. A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability,validity, and utility / T. Postmes, S.A. Haslam, L. Jans // British Journal of SocialPsychology. – 2012. – Vol. 52. – № 4. – P. 597-617.178.
Pratt M.G. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizationalidentities / M.G. Pratt, P.O. Foreman // Academy of Management Review. – 2000.– Vol. 25. – № 1. – P. 18-42.142179. Ramarajan L. Past, Present and Future Research on Multiple Identities:Toward an Intrapersonal Network Approach / L. Ramarajan // The Academy ofManagement Annals. – 2014. – Vol. 8. – № 1. – P. 589-659.180. Raub S. Does bureaucracy kill individual initiative? The impact of structureon organizational citizenship behavior in the hospitality industry / S. Raub //International Journal of Hospitality Management. – 2008. – Vol.
27. – № 2. –P. 179-186.181. Reicher S. The social identity approach in social psychology / S. Reicher,R. Spears, S.A. Haslam // The Sage identities handbook. – 2010. – P. 45-62.182. Richter A.W. Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, andeffective intergroup relations / A.W. Richter et al. // Academy of ManagementJournal. – 2006. – Vol. 49. – № 6. – P. 1252-1269.183.
Riketta M. Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparisonof the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification andcommitment / M. Riketta, R. van Dick // Journal of Vocational Behavior. – 2005. –Vol. 67. – № 3. – P. 490-510.184. Riketta M. Organizational identification: A meta-analysis / M. Riketta //Journal of Vocational Behavior. – 2005. – Vol.
66. – № 2. – P. 358-384.185. Rioux S.M. The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: Amotivational analysis. / S.M. Rioux, L.A. Penner // Journal of Applied Psychology.– 2001. – Vol. 86. – № 6. – P. 1306-1314.186. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling / Y.Rosseel // Journal of Statistical Software. – 2012. – Vol. 42. – № 2.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
