Диссертация (1136621), страница 29
Текст из файла (страница 29)
– P. 1-36.187. Rubini M. Increasing Group Entitativity: Linguistic IntergroupDiscrimination in the Minimal Group Paradigm / M. Rubini, S. Moscatelli, A.Palmonari // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. – 2007. – Vol. 10. – № 2. –P. 280-296.188. Rutchick A.M. Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamicallyconstrued groups / A.M. Rutchick, D.L. Hamilton, J.D. Sack // European Journalof Social Psychology.
– 2008. – Vol. 38. – № 6. – P. 905-921.189. Rydell R.J. Implicit Theories About Groups and Stereotyping: The Role ofGroup Entitativity / R.J. Rydell et al. // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.– 2007. – Vol. 33. – № 4. – P. 549-558.143190. Rydell R.J. Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change / R.J. Rydell,A.R. McConnell // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. – 2005. – Vol. 31. –№ 1.
– P. 99-110.191. Sanna L.J. Group research trends in social and organizational psychology:Whatever happened to intragroup research? / L.J. Sanna, C.D. Parks // PsychologicalScience. – 1997. – Vol. 8. – № 4. – P. 261-267.192. Schilpzand M.C. The Relationship between Organizational Justice andOrganizational Citizenship Behaviour: The Role of Cultural Value Orientations /M.C. Schilpzand et al. // Management and Organization Review. – 2013.
– Vol. 9. –№ 2. – P. 345-374.193. Schneider B. The ASA framework: An update / B. Schneider, H.W.Goldstiein, D.B. Smith // Personnel Psychology. – 1995. – Vol. 48. – № 4. – P. 747773.194. Sherman D.K. Perceived polarization: Reconciling ingroup and intergroupperceptions under uncertainty / D.K. Sherman, M.A. Hogg, A.T. Maitner // GroupProcesses & Intergroup Relations. – 2009. – Vol. 12. – № 1. – P. 95-109.195.
Smith C.A. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents./ C.A. Smith, D.W. Organ, J.P. Near // Journal of Applied Psychology. – 1983. –Vol. 68. – № 4. – P. 653-663.196. Smith L.G. Getting new staff to stay: the mediating role of organizationalidentification / L.G.
Smith et al. // British Journal of Management. – 2012. – Vol. 23.– № 1. – P. 45-64.197. Spector P.E. Introduction: The dark and light sides of organizationalcitizenship behavior / P.E. Spector // Journal of Organizational Behavior. – 2012. –Vol. 34.
– № 4. – P. 540-541.198. Spencer-Rodgers J. The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of socialcategories and task groups. / J. Spencer-Rodgers, D.L. Hamilton, S.J. Sherman //Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. – 2007. – Vol. 92. – № 3. – P. 369-388.199. Spitzmuller M. Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positiveconsequences of different forms of helping / M. Spitzmuller, L. Van Dyne // Journalof Organizational Behavior. – 2012.
– Vol. 34. – № 4. – P. 560-580.200. Stets J.E. Identity theory and social identity theory / J.E. Stets, P.J. Burke// Social Psychology Quarterly. – 2000. – P. 224-237.144201. Stone-Romero E.F. The construct validity of conceptual and operationaldefinitions of contextual performance and related constructs / E.F. Stone-Romero, K.Alvarez, L.F. Thompson // Human resource management review.
– 2009. – Vol. 19.– № 2. – P. 104-116.202. Stoner J. The role of identity in extra-role behaviors: development of aconceptual model / J. Stoner, P.L. Perrewé, T.P. Munyon // Journal of ManagerialPsychology. – 2011. – Vol. 26. – № 2. – P. 94-107.203. Stryker S. The vitalization of symbolic interactionism / S.
Stryker // SocialPsychology Quarterly. – 1987. – Vol. 50. – № 1. – P. 83-94.204. Svirydzenka N. Group entitativity and its perceptual antecedents in varietiesof groups: A developmental perspective / N. Svirydzenka, F. Sani, M. Bennett //European Journal of Social Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 40. – № 4. – P. 611-624.205. Tajfel H. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict / H.
Tajfel, J.C. Turner// The social psychology of intergroup relations. – 1979. – P. 33-47.206. Tajfel H. Individuals and groups in social psychology / H. Tajfel // BritishJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology. – 1979. – Vol. 18. – № 2. – P. 183-190.207. Thoits P.A. Multiple identities and psychological well-being: Areformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis / P.A. Thoits // AmericanSociological Review.
– 1983. – P. 174-187.208. Turner J.C. Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimalgroup paradigm / J.C. Turner // Differentiation between social groups: Studies inthe social psychology of intergroup relations. – 1978. – P. 101-140.209. Turnipseed D.L. Good soldiers and their syndrome: Organizationalcitizenship behavior and the work environment. / D.L. Turnipseed, G. Murkison //North American Journal of Psychology. – 2000.
– Vol. 2. – № 2. – P. 281-303.210. Turnipseed D.L. Performance Perceptions of Organizational CitizenshipBehaviours at Work: a Bi-Level Study among Managers and Employees / D.L.Turnipseed, A. Rassuli // British Journal of Management. – 2005. – Vol. 16. – № 3.– P. 231-244.211. Van Dyne L. Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitionalclarity (a bridge over muddied waters) / L. Van Dyne, L.L.
Cummings, J.M. Parks// Research in organizational behavior. – 1995. – Vol. 17. – P. 215-215.145212. Van Dyne L. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of constructand predictive validity / L. Van Dyne, J.A. LePine // Academy of ManagementJournal. – 1998. – Vol. 41. – № 1. – P. 108-119.213. Van Dyne L. In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMXon helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. / L. Van Dyne,D. Kamdar, J.
Joireman // Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 93. – № 6.– P. 1195-1207.214. Van Dyne L. Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition,measurement, and validation / L. Van Dyne, J.W. Graham, R.M. Dienesch //Academy of Management Journal.
– 1994. – Vol. 37. – № 4. – P. 765-802.215. Van Eerde W. Vroom’s expectancy models and work-related criteria: Ameta-analysis / W. Van Eerde, H. Thierry // Journal of Applied Psychology. – 1996.– Vol. 81. – № 5. – P. 575-586.216. Vandenberg R.J. A review and synthesis of the measurement invarianceliterature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research/ R.J. Vandenberg, C.E. Lance // Organizational Research Methods.
– 2000. – Vol. 3.– № 1. – P. 4-70.217. Velicer W.F. Determining the number of components from the matrix ofpartial correlations / W.F. Velicer // Psychometrika. – 1976. – Vol. 41. – № 3. –P. 321-327.218. Vey M.A. In-Role or Extra-Role Organizational Citizenship Behavior:Which Are We Measuring? / M.A. Vey, J.P. Campbell // Human performance. –2004.
– Vol. 17. – № 1. – P. 119-135.219. Vigoda-Gadot E. Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empiricalexamination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace / E. Vigoda-Gadot// Journal of Business and Psychology. – 2006. – Vol. 21. – № 3. – P. 377-405.220. Viswesvaran C. Assessment of individual job performance: A review ofthe past century and a look ahead / C. Viswesvaran // Handbook of industrial, workand organizational psychology. – 2001. – Vol. 1.
– P. 110-126.221. Viswesvaran C. Perspectives on models of job performance / C.Viswesvaran, D.S. Ones // International Journal of Selection and Assessment. –2000. – Vol. 8. – № 4. – P. 216-226.146222. Wilder D.A. Social categorization: Implications for creation and reductionof intergroup bias / D.A. Wilder // Advances in experimental social psychology. –1986. – Vol. 19. – P. 291-355.223.
Williams L.J. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment asPredictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors / L.J. Williams,S.E. Anderson // Journal of Management. – 1991. – Vol. 17. – № 3. – P. 601-617.224. Wittenbaum G.M. Small-Group Research in Social Psychology: Topicsand Trends over Time / G.M. Wittenbaum, R.L. Moreland // Social and PersonalityPsychology Compass. – 2008. – Vol. 2. – № 1.
– P. 187-203.225. Yammarino F.J. A new kind of organizational behavior. Vol. 8 / F.J.Yammarino, F. Dansereau. – Elsevier, 2009. – 13-60 p.226. Yzerbyt V. The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity andidentification / V. Yzerbyt et al. // European review of social psychology. – 2000.
–Vol. 11. – № 1. – P. 257-295.227. Yzerbyt V. The Psychology of Group Perception: Perceived Variability,Entitativity, and Essentialism / V. Yzerbyt, C.M. Judd, O. Corneille. – PsychologyPress, 2004. – 490 p.228. Zinbarg R.E. Estimating h for Structures Containing Two Group Factors:Perils and Prospects / R.E. Zinbarg, W. Revelle, I. Yovel // Applied PsychologicalMeasurement. – 2007. – Vol. 31.
– № 2. – P. 135-157.229. Zyphur M.J. Toward Understanding the Existence of Groups: TheRelationship between Climate Strength and Entitativity / M.J. Zyphur, G. Islam //IBMEC Working Paper (WPE–12–2006). – 2006. – P. 1-40.147Список иллюстраций1.1 Динамика появления новых публикаций на тематику связииндивида и группы с использованием различных теоретическихконструктов . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231.2 Сравнение показателей эмоциональной приверженности в разныхстранах . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251.3 Конструкты, используемые в социальной психологии для описаниясвязи индивида и группы . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402.1 Экстраролевое поведениe и другие типы поведения в организации 633.1 График собственных значений факторов методики «Экстраролевоеповедение» . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803.2 Экстраролевое поведение — исходная модель, предложенная Б.Г.Ребзуевым .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813.3 Экстраролевое поведение — альтернативная модель, предложеннаяБ.Г. Ребзуевым, основанная на трех источниках ожиданий . . . . 833.4 Многокомпонентная модель идентификации — Модель А . . . . 873.5 Сравнение воспринимаемой целостности рабочей группы иорганизации по всей выборке (N=352) . . . .
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
