Диссертация (1097926), страница 40
Текст из файла (страница 40)
P. 177181.16. Linde A.D. The Inationary Universe. // Rept. Prog. Phys. 1984. Vol. 47. P. 925986.17. Vilenkin A., Classial and Quantum Cosmology of the StarobinskyInationary Model // Phys. Rev. D 1984. Vol. 32. P. 251118. Kofman L.A. Linde A.D. Generation of Density Perturbations in theInationary Cosmology. // Nul. Phys.
B 1987. Vol. 282. P. 555.19. Linde A.D. Eternal haoti ination. // Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1986. Vol. 1. P. 81.20. Linde A.D. Eternally Existing Selfreproduing Chaoti Inationary Universe.// Phys. Lett. B 1986. Vol. 175. P. 395400.21. Lidsey J.E., Liddle A.R., Kolb E.W., Copeland E.J., Barreiro T., Abney M.,Reonstruting the inaton potentialan overview // Rev. Mod. Phys. 1997. Vol. 69. P. 373410. [arXiv:astro-ph/9508078℄22. Peterson C.M., Tegmark M., Testing Two-Field Ination // Physial ReviewD 2011. Vol. 83 P. 023522 [arXiv:1005.4056℄23. Shi Pi, Sasaki M., Curvature perturbation spetrum in two-eld ination witha turning trajetory // J. Cosmol.
Astropart. Phys. 2012. Vol. 1210. P. 051. [arXiv:1205.0161℄28124. Linde A.D., Partile Physis and Inationary Cosmology, Chur, Switzerland:Harwood, 199025. Ade P.A.R., et. al. [Plank Collaboration℄, Plank 2013 results. XXII.Constraints on ination // Astron. Astrophys. 2014. Vol. 571. P. A22.[arXiv:1303.5082℄26. Ade P.A.R., et al. [Plank Collaboration℄, Plank 2015 results. XX.Constraints on ination // arXiv:1502.0211427. Chernikov N.A., Tagirov E.A. Quantum theory of salar elds in de Sitterspae-time // Annales Poinare Phys.
Theor. A 1968. Vol. 9. P. 109.28. Tagirov E.A. Consequenes of eld quantization in de Sitter type osmologialmodels // Annals Phys. 1973. Vol. 76 P. 561.29. Callan C.G., Coleman S.R., Jakiw R. A New improved energy momentumtensor // Annals Phys. 1970. Vol. 59.
P. 42.30. Spokoiny B.L., Ination And Generation Of Perturbations In BrokenSymmetri Theory Of Gravity // Phys. Lett. B 1984. Vol. 147. P. 3943.31. Futamase T., Maeda K.-i., Chaoti Inationary Senario In Models HavingNonminimal Coupling With Curvature // Physial Review D 1989. Vol. 39. P. 399404.32. Salopek D.S., Bond J.R., Bardeen J.M., Designing Density FlutuationSpetra in Ination // Physial Review D 1989. Vol. 40.
P. 17531788.33. Fakir R., Unruh W.G., Improvement on osmologial haoti ination throughnonminimal oupling // Physial Review D 1990. Vol. 41. P. 17831791.34. Barvinsky A.O., Kamenshhik A.Yu., Quantum sale of ination and partilephysis of the early universe // Phys. Lett. B 1994.
Vol. 332. P. 270276. [arXiv:gr-q/9404062℄35. Cervantes-Cota J.L., Dehnen H. Indued gravity ination in the SU (5) GUT// Phys. Rev. D 1995. Vol. 51. P. 395 [arXiv:astro-ph/9412032℄36. Faraoni V., A Cruial ingredient of ination // Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2001.282 Vol.
40. P. 2259 [hep-th/0009053℄.37. Bezrukov F.L., Shaposhnikov M.E. The Standard Model Higgs boson asthe inaton // Physis Letters B. 2008. Vol. 659. P. 703706[arXiv:0710.3755℄38. Barvinsky A.O., Kamenshhik A.Yu., Starobinsky A.A. Ination senario viathe Standard Model Higgs boson and LHC // J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2008. Vol.
0811 P. 021 [arXiv:0809.2104℄39. Bezrukov F.L., Magnin A., Shaposhnikov M. Standard Model Higgs bosonmass from ination // Phys. Lett. B 2009 Vol. 675 P. 88.[arXiv:0812.4950℄40. De Simone A., Hertzberg M.P., Wilzek F. Running Ination in the StandardModel // Phys. Lett. B 2009 Vol. 678 P. 1. [arXiv:0812.4946℄41.
Barvinsky A.O., Kamenshhik A.Yu., Kiefer C., Starobinsky A.A., SteinwahsC. Asymptoti freedom in inationary osmology with a non-minimallyoupled Higgs eld // J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009 Vol. 0912 P. 003 [arXiv:0904.1698℄42. Barvinsky A.O., Kamenshhik A.Yu., Kiefer C., Steinwahs C., Tunnelingosmologial state revisited: Origin of ination with a non-minimally oupledStandard Model Higgs inaton // Physial Review D 2010 Vol.81.
P. 043530. [arXiv:0911.1408℄43. Bezrukov F.L., Magnin A., Shaposhnikov M., Sibiryakov S., Higgs ination:onsisteny and generalisations // J. High Energy Phys. 2011. Vol. 1101. P. 016. [arXiv:1008.5157℄44. Barvinsky A.O., Kamenshhik A.Yu., Kiefer C., Starobinsky A.A., SteinwahsC.F. Higgs boson, renormalization group, and naturalness in osmology //Eur. Phys.
J. C 2012. Vol. 72. P. 2219. [arXiv:0910.1041℄45. Barvinsky A.O., Tunneling osmologial state and the origin of Higgs inationin the standard model, Theor. Math. Phys. 2012. Vol. 170, No. 1. P.5270.28346. Bezrukov F. The Higgs eld as an inaton // Class. Quant. Grav. 2013. Vol. 30 P. 214001. [arXiv:1307.0708℄.47. Englert F., Brout R.
Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vetor mesons.// Phys. Rev. Lett. 1964. Vol. 13. . 321322.48. Higgs P.W. Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons. // Phys. Rev.Lett. 1964. Vol. 13. . 508509.49. Aad G., et al. [ATLAS Collaboration℄, Observation of a new partile in thesearh for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detetor at theLHC // Phys. Lett.
B 2012. Vol. 716. P. 1 [arXiv:1207.7214℄50. Chatrhyan S., et al. [CMS Collaboration℄, Observation of a new boson at amass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC // Phys. Lett. B 2012. Vol. 716. P. 30 [arXiv:1207.7235℄51. Ade P.A.R., et. al. [Plank Collaboration℄, Plank 2013 results. XVI.Cosmologial parameters // Astronomy and Astrophisis.
2014. Vol.571. P. A16. [arXiv:1303.5076℄52. P.A.R. Ade, et. al. [Plank Collaboration℄, Plank 2015 results. XIII.Cosmologial parameters // arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO℄.53. P.A.R. Ade, et. al. [Plank Collaboration℄, Plank 2013 Results. XXIV.Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity // Astronomy and Astrophisis. 2014. Vol. 571. P. A24.
[arXiv:1303.5084℄54. Allahverdi R., Enqvist K., Garia-Bellido J., Mazumdar A. Gauge invariantMSSM inaton // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. Vol. 97. P. 191304. [hepph/0605035℄.55. Chatterjee A., Mazumdar A. Tuned MSSM Higgses as an inaton // J.Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011. Vol. 1109. P. 009. [arXiv:1103.5758℄.56. Ibanez L.E., Marhesano F., Valenzuela I. Higgs-oti Ination and StringTheory // J.
High Energy Phys. 2015. Vol. 1501. P. 128[arXiv:1411.5380℄.57. Riess A.G., et al. Observational Evidene from Supernovae for an Aelerating284Universe and a Cosmologial Constant // Astronomial Journal. 1998. Vol. 116, No. 3. P. 10091038.58. Riess A.G., et al. BVRI Light Curves for 22 Type Ia Supernovae. //Astronomial Journal. 1999. Vol. 117.
P. 707724.59. Perlmutter S., et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-RedshiftSupernovae. // Astrophysial Journal. 1999. Vol. 517, No. 2. P.565586.60. Astier P., et al. The Supernova Legay Survey: Measurement of ΩM , ΩΛ andw from the First Year Data Set // Astron. Astrophys.
2006. Vol. 447. P. 3148, [arXiv:astro-ph/0510447℄61. Wood-Vasey W. M., et al. Observational Constraints on the Nature ofDark Energy: First Cosmologial Results from the ESSENCE SupernovaSurvey. // Astrophysial Journal. 2007. Vol. 666, No. 2. P. 694715.[arXiv:astro-ph/0701041℄62. Radmanadhan T., Choudhury T.R., A theoretiian's analysis of the supernovadata and the limitations in determining the nature of dark energy // Mon.
Not.Roy. Astron. So. 2003. Vol. 344. P. 823834. [arXiv:astro-ph/0212573℄63. Choudhury T.R., Padmanabhan T., Cosmologial parameters from supernovaobservations: A Critial omparison of three data sets // Astron. Astrophys. 2005. Vol. 429. P. 807. [astro-ph/0311622℄.64. Knop R.A., et al. [Supernova Cosmology Projet Collaboration℄, Newonstraints on Ω(M), Ω(Λ), and w from an independent set of eleven highredshift supernovae observed with HST // Astrophys. J. 2003.
Vol. 598 P. 102. [astro-ph/0309368℄.65. Riess A.G., et al. [Supernova Searh Team ollaboration℄ Type Ia SupernovaDisoveries at z > 1 from the Hubble Spae Telesope: Evidene for PastDeeleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution // AstrophysialJournal. 2004. Vol. 607, No. 2. P.
665687. [arXiv:astro-ph/0402512℄66. Kowalski M., et al. [Supernova Cosmology Projet Collaboration℄, Improved285Cosmologial Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets,Astrophys. J. 2008. Vol. 686. P. 749. [arXiv:0804.4142℄.67. Allen S.W., Shmidt R.W., Ebeling H., Fabian A.C., van Speybroek L.Constraints on dark energy from Chandra observations of the largest relaxedgalaxy lusters // Monthly Noties of the Royal Astronomial Soiety. 2004. Vol. 353. P.
457.68. Wang S., Khoury J., Haiman Z., May M. Constraining the evolution of darkenergy with a ombination of galaxy luster observables // Physial ReviewD. 2004. Vol. 70. P. 123008.69. Cole S., Perival W.J., Peaok J.A., et al. The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey:Power-spetrum analysis of the nal dataset and osmologial impliations //Monthly Noties of the Royal Astronomial Soiety. 2005. Vol. 362. .505534.70.
Spergel D.N., et al. First Year Wilkinson Mirowave Anisotropy Probe(WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmologial Parameters. //Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2003. Vol. 148. P. 175.71. Spergel D.N. et al. Wilkinson Mirowave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) threeyear results: Impliations for osmology. // Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2007. Vol. 170. P. 377.72. Komatsu E., et al.