Диссертация (1097305), страница 62
Текст из файла (страница 62)
VIII(3): 315-393.412. Pinto Y., van der Leij A.R., Sligte I.G., Lamme V.A., Scholte H.S.(2013) Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent. // Journal ofVision. 13(3):16.413. Poljac E., de-Wit L., Wagemans J. (2012) Perceptual wholes can reducethe conscious accessibility of their parts. // Cognition, 123, 308-312.414. Polk T.A., Farah M. (1995) Late experience alters vision // Nature. 376:648-649.415. Pomerantz J.R. (2003a) Configural superiority effects and theidentification of basic features in visual processing. // Mueller H.J.,Krummenacher J. (Eds.) Munich Visual Search Symposium Abstracts.P.8.416.
Pomerantz J.R. (2003b) Wholes, holes, and basic features in vision. //Trends in Cognitive Science. 7(11): 471-473.417. Pomerantz J.R., Kubovy M. (1986) Theoretical approaches to perceptualorganization: Simplicity and likelihood principles. / In K. R. Boff, L.Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, Eds., Handbook of Perception and HumanPerformance. Vol. 2: Cognitive Processes and Performance. New York:Wiley, pp. 36-1-36-46.418. Pomerantz J.R., Pristach E.A. (1989) Emergent features, attention, andperceptual glue in visual form perception. // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance.
15(4): 635-649.358419. Pomerantz J.R., Sager L.C., Stoever R.J. (1977) Perception of wholesand of their component parts: some configural superiority effects. //Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance. 3(3): 422-435.420.
Pomerantz J.R., Portillo M.C. (2004) False Pop Out. Paper presented atthe 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, 2004.421. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. (1984) Components of visual orienting. // BoumaH., Bouwhuis D.G. (Eds.) Attention and Performance X. Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum. Pp. 531-556.422. Posner M.I., Nissen M.J., Ogden W.C.
(1978) Attended and unattendedprocessing modes: The role of set for spatial location. // Pick H.L.,Saltzman I.J. (Eds.) Modes of perceiving and processing information.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 160-174.423. Posner M.I., Petersen S.E. (1990) The attentional system of the humanbrain. // Annual Review of Neuroscience.
13: 25-42.424. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R. (1975) Attention and cognitive control. //Solso R. (Ed.) Information processing and cognition. The LoyolaSymposium. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 55-85.425. Potter M.C., Nieuwenstein M., Strohminger N. (2008) Whole reportversus partial report in RSVP sentences. // Journal of Memory andLanguage. 58(4): 907–915.426.
Prinzmetal W. (1992) The word-superiority effect does not require a Tscope // Perception & Psychophysics. 51(5): 473-484.427. Prinzmetal W., Silvers B. (1994) The word without the tachistoscope. //Perception & Psychophysics. 55(3):296-312.428. Pylyshyn Z.W., Storm R.W. (1988) Tracking multiple independenttargets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.
// Spatial Vision, 3(3):1-19.429. Rabbitt P. (1978) Sorting, categorization, and visual search. // CarteretteE.C., Friedman M.P. (Eds.) Handbook of perception. Vol.IX. AcademicPress. Pp.85-134.430. Rapp B.C. (1992) The Nature of Sublexical Orthographic Organization:359The Bigram Trough Hypothesis Examined // Journal of memory andlanguage, 31, 33-53.431. Raskin J.D. (2002) Constructivism in psychology: Personal constructpsychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. / In J.D.Raskin, S.K.
Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivistpsychology. New York: Pace University Press. Pp. 1-25432. Rauss K., Pourtois G. (2013) What is bottom-up and what is top-downin predictive coding? // Frontiers in Psychology. 4: 276.433. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., Arnell K.M. (1992) Temporarysuppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? //Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance. 18(3): 849-860.434.
Rayner K. (1998) Eye movements in reading and informationprocessing: 20 years of research. // Psychological Bulletin. 124(3):372422.435. Raz A., Buhle J. (2006) Typologies of attentional networks. // NatureReviews Neuroscience, 7, 367-379.436. Reddy L., Van Rullen R. (2007) Spacing affects some but not all visualsearches: implications for theories of attention and crowding. // Journal ofVision. 7(2): 1-17.437. Reicher G.M.
(1969) Perceptual recognition as a function ofmeaningfulness of stimulus material. // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology. 81(2): 275-280.438. Rensink, R.A. (2000) Visual search for change: A probe into the natureof attentional processing. // Visual Cognition, 7:345-376.439. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. (1997) To see or not to see: Theneed for attention to perceive changes in scenes.
// Psychological Science,8: 368-373.440. Ricciardelli P., Bricolo E., Aglioti S.M., Chelazzi L. (2002) My eyeswant to look where your eyes are looking: Exploring the tendency toimitate another individual's gaze. // NeuroReport, 13, 2259-2264.441. Robertson L.C. (2003) Binding, spatial attention and perceptual360awareness. // Nature Review Neuroscience. 4(2): 93-102.442. Roediger H.L., DeSoto K.A.
(2015) The psychology of reconstructivememory. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social andbehavioral sciences, 2 ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, pp. 50-55.443. Rosvold H.E., Mirsky A.F., Sarason I., Bransome E.D., Beck L.H. (1956)A continuous performance test of brain damage. // Journal of ConsultingPsychology, 20 (5), 343-350.444.
Roy-Charland A., Saint-Aubin J., Klein R.M., Maclean G.H., LalandeA., Belanger A. (2012) Eye movements when reading: The importance ofthe word to the left of fixation // Visual Cognition, 20, 328-355.445. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. (1982) An interactive activation modelof context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The context enhancementeffect and some tests and extensions of the model. // PsychologicalReview, 89 (1), 60-94.446. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L., Eds. (1986) Parallel distributedprocessing: Explorations in the microstructure of human cognition.
Vol.1.Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.447. Saint-Aubin J., Klein R.M. (2015) Capturing reading processes inconnected texts with eye movements and a letter detection task. In: R.K.Mishra, N. Srinivasan, F. Huettig. Attentional and Visual Processes inLanguage Processing. New Delhi: Springer, pp. 99-110.448. Salvemini A.V., Stewart A.L., Purcell D.G., Pinkham R.S.
(1998) Aword-superiority effect in the presence of foveal load. // Perceptual andMotor Skills. 86(3, Pt 2): 1311-1319.449. Scaife M., Bruner J. (1975) The capacity for joint visual attention in theinfant // Nature. 253(5489): 265-266.450. Schacter D.L., Buckner R.L. (1998) Priming and the brain.
// Neuron,20(2): 185-195.451. Schank R., Childers P. (1984) The Cognitive Computer: On Language,Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Reading: Addison Wesley.452. Scharlau I., Neumann O. (2003) Perceptual latency priming by maskedand unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional explanation //361Psychological Research. 67: 184–197.453. Schneider W., Dumais S.T., Shiffrin R.M.
(1977) Automatic andcontrolled processing and attention. // Parasuraman R., Davies R. (Eds.)Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 1-27.454. Schneider W., Shiffrin R.M. (1977) Controlled and automatic humaninformation processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. //Psychological Review. 84(1): 1-66.455. Scholl B.J. (2001) Objects and attention: The state of the art. //Cognition, 80(1/2). P.1-46.456.
Scholvinck M.L., Rees G. (2009) Attentional influences on thedynamics of motion-induced blindness. // Journal of Vision, 9(1), 38 3139.457. Schotter E.R., Angele B., Rayner K. (2012) Parafoveal processing inreading. // Attention, Perception and Psychophysics.74(1): 5-35.458. Shannon C.E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. // BellSystem Technical Journal. 27: 379-423, 623-656.459. Shapiro K.L., Ed. (2001) The Limits of Attention. N.Y.: OxfordUniversity Press.460. Shapiro K., Driver J., Ward R., Sorensen R.E. (1997) Priming from theattentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types.
//Psychological Science. 8: 95-100.461. Shapiro K.L., Raymond J.E. (1994) Temporal allocation of visualattention. Inhibition or interference? In: D. Dagenbach, T.H. Carr (Eds.)Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language. Boston, MA:Academic Press. P.151-188.462. Shepard R. N., Metzler J.
(1971) Mental Rotation of Three-DimensionalObjects // Science. 171(3972): 701 – 703.463. Shih S.-I. (2000) Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVPstreams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship. //Perception and Psychophysics, 62(7): 1348-1355.464. Sieroff E.
(1991) Perception of visual letter strings in a case of leftneglect: manipulation of the word form. // Brain & Language, 41: 565589.362465. Sieroff E., Pollatsek A., Posner M. (1988) Recognition of visual letterstrings following injury to the posterior visual spatial system. // CognitiveNeuropsychology, 5(4): 427-449.466. Sieroff E., Posner M. (1988) Cueing spatial attention during processingof words and letter strings in normals. // Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(4): 451-472.467. Simko J., Cummins F. (2011) Sequencing and optimization within anembodied task dynamic model. // Cognitive Science, 35(3): 527-562.468. Simon H.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
