Диссертация (1173473), страница 26
Текст из файла (страница 26)
11 p.156. Fairclough, Isabella and Fairclough, Norman. Political discourse analysis: amanual for advanced students. London: Routledge, 2012. 281 p.157. Fairclough, Norman. Language and power. (2nd edition). London and NewYork: Routledge, 2001. 135 p.158. Fludernik, Monika. Genres, Text Types, or Discourse Modes? NarrativeModalities and Generic Categorization.
Style Summer, 2000 [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2342/is_2_34/ai_68279076/(дата обращения 02.07.2016).157159. Foucault, Michel. What is an Author? Tr. Donald F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon.In: Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, New York: Cornell UniversityPress, 1977. 124–127 pp.160. Fraser B. Perspectives of Politeness / B. Fraser. Journal of Pragmtics, 14, 1981.219–236 pp.161. Freccero, Carla. Popular Culture: An Introduction.
New York: New YorkUniversity Press, 1999. 200 p.162. Geurts, Bart; Beaver, David I. Discourse Representation Theory. StanfordEncyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University [Электронный ресурс]. URL:http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/discourse-representation-theory/ (дата обращения17.07.2016).163. Gimmler, Antje. The Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas. Carnegie MellonUniversity[Электронныйресурс].http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/cavalier/Forum/meta/background/agimmler.htmlURL:(датаобращения 14.09.2016).164. Giora, Rachel.
On Our Mind: Salience context and figurative language. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2003. 272 p.165. Graesser, Arthur C. Introduction to the Handbook of Discourse Processes.UniversityofMemphis[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.memphis.edu/psychology/graesser/publications/documents/Handbook_chapte r_1.doc (дата обращения 29.09.2016).166. Gruber J.S. Frame information and lexically-based inference /J.S. Gruber.
Quaderni di semantica, 1985. Vol. VI, no. 2. Р. 58–78.167. Gruber J.S. Lexical, conceptual and encyclopedic meaning /J.S. Gruber. Quaderni di semantica, 1985. Vol. VI, no. 2. Р. 254–267.168. Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol.1.
Reason and theRationalization of Society. L.: Heinemann, 1984. 562 p.169. Hacker, Kenneth L. Political Linguistic Discourse Analysis. The Theory andPractice of Political Communication Research. NY: State University of NewYork Press, 1996. 236 p.158170. Halliday, M.A.K. Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation oflan- guage and meaning. London: Arnold, 1978.
256 p.171. Harris Z. Discourse analysis // Language, 1952. V.28. №1. P. 1–30.172. Higginbotham J. On Semantics /J. Higginbotham // Linguistic Inquiry. 1985. Vol.16, no. 4. Р. 67–94.173. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Ebooks. University of Adeleide [Электронныйресурс].URL:http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hobbes/.../chapter3.html(датаобращения 04.09.2016).174.
Hobbes, Thomas. Of Man, Being the First Part of Leviathan. Barleby[Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.bartleby.com/34/5/ (дата обращения04.09.2016).175. Hofmann Th.R. Semantic frames and content representation /Th.R. Hofmann.Quaderni di semantica, 1985. Vol. VI, no. 2. Р. 267–284.176. Hudson D. Frame semantics, frame linguistics, frame…? /D. Hudson. Quadernidi semantica, 1986. Vol.
VII, no. 2. Р. 85–101.177. Hudson R. Some basic assumptions about linguistic and non-linguisticknowledge /D. Hudson. Quaderni di semantica, 1985. Vol. VI, no. 2. Р. 284–287.178. Hume, David. Of the Standart of Taste. Minnesota State University Moorhead[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/phil%20of%20art/hume%20on%20taste.htm(дата обращения 12.07.2016).179. Hunt, Theodore W. The Principles of Written Discourse.
Project Gutenberg[Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924031232873(дата обращения 19.09.2016).180. Jackendorff R. Semantic Structures. Cambrige /R. Jackendorff. Mass.: MIT Press,1991. 267 р.181. Jorgensen, Marianne and Phillips, Louise. Discourse analysis as theory andmethod. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage, 2002. 240 p.182. Kecskes, Istvan. Intercultural Pragmatics.
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,2014. 6 p.159183. Kecskes, Istvan. Word, Context and Communication Meaning. Russian Journalof Linguistics, 2014, 40–153 pp.184. Knapp P.H. Expressions of the emotions / P.H. Knapp. New York: Academicpress, 1963.185. Kress G. Ideological Structures in Discourse // Handbook of Discourse Analysis.Vol.4 Discourse Analysis in Society. / Ed.
By T.A. van Dijk. London: AcademicPress, 1985. P. 27–29.186. Kridalaksana, Harimurti. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama,1984. 295 р.187. Lind E.A., O'Barr W.M. The social significance of speech in the courtroom //Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: 1979. P. 66–87188. Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Raleigh, N.C. AlexCatalogue.
Net Library [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.netlibrary.com/(дата обращения 15.08.2016).189. Longacre, Robert E. Discourse Typology in Relation to Language Typology. In:Sture Allén (ed.). Text Processing: Text Analysis and Generation, Text Typologyand Attribution. Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium, 51. Stockholm: Almqvist andWiksell 1982: 457–86.190. Longacre, Robert E. The Grammar of Discourse. New York : Plenum, cop.
1996.191. Martin, J.R., and White, Peter R.R. The language of evaluation. London:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 291 p.192. Miller, Donna, Rose. «...to meet our common challenge»: ENGAGEMENTstrategies of alignment and alienation in current US international discourse.Textus, 18(1), 2004, 39–62 pp.193. Mills, Sara. Discourse. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 188 p.194. Musolff, Andreas. Is There such a Thing as Discourse History? The Case ofMetaphor.CambridgeScholarsPublishing[Электронныйhttp://www.c-s-p.org/Flyers/9781847182272-sample.pdf17.08.2016).(датаресурс].URL:обращения160195.
Owen M. Apologies and Remedial Interchanges. A Study of Language Use inSocial Interaction / M. Owen. Berlin; N.Y.; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers, 1983.250 p.196. Phan, Peter C. The Wisdom of Holy Fools in Postmodernity. Theological Studies.December 01, 2001. Access My Library [Электронный ресурс]. URL:http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-27202326_ITM(датаобращения 17.08.2016).197. Ponton, Douglas M.
The Female Political Leader: a Study of Gender-identity inthe Case of Margaret Thatcher. Journal of Language and Politics, Vol. 9 (2), 2010.195–218 pp.198. Protevi J. (Edited) The Edinburgh Dictionary of Continental Philosophy.Edinburgh University Press, 2005. 641 p.199. Rayevska N.M. Modern English Grammar.
Kiev: Vysca skola, 1976. C. 169–304.200. Renkema, Jan. Introduction to Discourse Studies. Philadelphia: John BenjaminsPub., 2004. 403 p.201. Saluveer M. Frames in linguistic descriptions /M. Saluveer. - Quaderni disemantica, 1986. Vol. VII, no. 2. Р. 295–305.202. Sawyer, M. James. A Summary of Discourse Theory. Bible Organisation[Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://bible.org/seriespage/1-summary-discoursetheory (дата обращения 17.08.2016).203.
Schiffrin D. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Cabridge, MA, 1994. 470 p.204. Schrag, Calvin O. The Self After Postmodernity. New Haven: CT YaleUniversity Press, 1997. 176 p.205. Searle J.R. Speech acts/ An essay in the philosophy of language. / J.R.
Searle.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. 278 p.206. Sinclair, John and Coulthard, Malcolm. Towards an analysis of discourse: theEnglish used by pupils and teachers. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1975, 163 p.207.Stubbs M. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of NaturalLanguage. Oxford: 1983. 279 p.208. Tarigan Henry Guntur, Pengajaran Kosakata. Bandung, Indonesia: 1987. 264 р.161209. Tennen D. Frames and schemas in interaction /D. Tennen. Quaderni di semantica,1986.
Vol. VII, no. 2. Р. 326–335.210. Thompson, Ewa M. Ways Out of the Postmodern Discourse. Modern Age[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-113525432/ways-out-postmodern-discourse.html (дата обращения 20.08.2016).211. Verdoolaege, Annelies. Reconciliation discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,2008. 238 p.212. Weiss, Gilbert, Wodak, Ruth. Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity andCritical Discourse Analysis. In G. Weiss and R. Wodak, Critical DiscourseAnalysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 1–32). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd, 2003.213.
White, Peter R.R. Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of thelanguage of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 2003, 259–284 pp.214. Wilks Y. Text structures and knowledge structures /Y. Wilks. - Quaderni disemantica, 1986. Vol. VII, no. 2. Р. 335–344.215. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.
Anonymous Translation.File produced by Matthew Stapleton, and David Widger. Project Gutenberg[Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext04/tloph10.txt.(дата обращения 22.08.2016).216. Wodak, Ruth. The discourse-historical approach. In Wodak, Ruth and Meyer,Michael. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 2001, 63–95 pp.217.
Zvegincev V.A. Remarks on situational semantics /V.A. Zvegincev. - Quaderni disemantica, 1986. - Vol. VI, no. 2. Р. 344-352.Список словарей:218. Апресян Ю.Д., Апресян В.Ю., Богуславская О.Ю. Новый объяснительныйсловарь синонимов русского языка / под общ. руководством Ю.Д. Апресяна.М.: Языки русской культуры, 2003. 557 c.219.
АрутюноваН.Д.ЛингвистическийСоветская Энциклопедия, 1990. 587 с.энциклопедическийсловарь.М.:162220. Ахманова О.С. Словарь лингвистических терминов. 2-е изд. М.: Советскаяэнциклопедия, 1969. 608 с.221. Большой академический словарь русского языка в 17 томах / гл.ред. К.С.Горбачевич. М.: Наука, 2005. Т. 1. 661 c.222. Большой толковый словарь русского языка / сост.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
