Диссертация (1137483), страница 55
Текст из файла (страница 55)
Adjective Classes in Typological Perspective // DixonR.M.W., Aikhenvald Alexandra Y. (eds). Adjective Classes: A Cross-LinguisticTypology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New-York, 2006. 393 p.91.Dobrovol’skij Dmitrij O., Piirainen E. Figurative Language: Crossculturaland Cross-linguistic Perspectives. Amsterdam [etc.]: Elsevier, 2005.92.Evans N. Semantic typology // J.J. Song (еd.). The Oxford handbook oflinguistic typology. Oxford; New York, 2011.93.Fillmore, Ch. J. Frames and the semantics of understanding // Quaderni diSemantica, 6.2, 1985.
P. 222–254. [в рус. пер.: Фреймы и семантика понимания// Новое в зарубежной лингвистике, вып. XXIII. М.: Прогресс, 1988.]94.François A. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwiningpolysemous networks across languages. // From Polysemy to Semantic Change:Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic / M. Vanhove (ed.). Amsterdam-NewYork: Benjamins (Studies in Language Companion Series 106), 2008. P. 163-21595.Goddard C. (ed.). Cross-linguistic semantics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia,2008.32996.Goddard C. Words as carriers of cultural meaning.
// John R. Taylor (ed.).The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 380398.97.Goddard C., Wierzbicka A. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics AcrossDomains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014a.98.Goddard C., Wierzbicka A. Semantic fieldwork and lexical universals.Studies in Language 38(1), 2014b.99.Goddard C. Lexico-semantic universals: a critical overview // Linguistictypology, 2001, 5.1. P. 1-66.100.
Goldberg A. Constructions: A constructionist grammar approach toargument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.101. Goy A. Grounding Meaning in Visual Knowledge. A Case Study:Dimensional Adjectives. // Coventry Kenny R., Olivier P. (eds.). Spatial Language:Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Dordrecht, 2002. P. 121-145.102. Greenberg, J.H. Universals of kinship terminology. // On LinguisticAnthropology: Essays in Honor of Harry Hoijer. / J.
Maquet (Ed.). Malibu CA:Udena Publications, 1980. P. 9–32.103. Harkins J., Wierzbicka A. (eds.). Emotions in crosslinguistic perspective.Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001.104. Heine B., Kuteva T. Word Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge:University Press, 2002.105. Haspelmath, M. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps andcross-linguistic comparison. // The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2. / M.Tomasello (Ed.). – Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2003. P. 211–243.106. Haspelmath M., Tadmor U. (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: Acomparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009. 1081 p. Электронныйресурс: http://wold.livingsources.org/107. Himmelmann N. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite ororthogonal? // What Makes Grammaticalization?: A Look From Its Fringes And ItsComponents, 2004. P. 21-40.330108. Hopper P.J., Traugott E.C. Grammaticalization. Cambridge, 1993.109.
Johansson, S. Seeing through Multilingual Corpora. On the Use of Corporain Contrastive Studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007.110. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning,Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago, 1987.111. Kay P., McDaniel C. The linguistic significance of the meanings of basiccolor terms. // Language 54, 1978. P.
610–646.112. Kopecka A., Narasimhan Bh. (eds). Events of putting and taking. Acrosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012.113. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. Linguistics of temperature and lexical typology.Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, v. 6/3. St Petersburg: "Nauka", 2010.114. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M., Divjak D., Rakhilina E. V. Aquamotion verbs inSlavic and Germanic: a case study in lexical typology // V.
Hasko, R. Perelmutter(eds.). New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2010.P. 315-341.115. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. Approaching lexical typology // Vanhove M. (ed.)From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2008. P. 3-55.116. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M., Vanhove M. (eds.) New directions in lexicaltypology. A special issue of Linguistics, vol.
50, № 3, 2012117. Lakoff G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What CategoriesReveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.118. Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press [в рус. пер.: Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которымимы живем.
М.: УРСС, 2004].119. Lakoff G., Turner M. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to PoeticMetaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1989.120. Lakoff G. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor // Metaphor and Thought./ ed. A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.121. MacLaury R., Paramei G., Dedrick D. (eds.) Anthropology of Color:Interdisciplinary Multilevel Modeling, Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 2007.331122. Majid A., Enfield N., van Staden M. Parts of the Body: Cross-LinguisticCategorization [Special Issue]. Language Sciences, 2006. 28(2-3 [Special Issue]).123. Majid A., Levinson S. C. (eds.). The senses in language and culture. TheSenses & Society [Special Issue], 6(1). 2011.124. Majid A., Burenhult N.
Odors are expressible in language, as long as youspeak the right language. Cognition 130(2), 2014. P. 266 – 270.125. Majid A., Bowerman M., Van Staden M., Boster J. S. The semanticcategories of cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. CognitiveLinguistics, 18 (2). 2007. Р.
133–152.126. Majid A., Bowerman M. (eds.). Cutting and breaking events: Acrosslinguistic perspective. [Special Issue]. Cognitive Linguistics 18 (2). 2007.127. Majid A., Boster J., Bowerman M. The cross-linguistic categorization ofeveryday events: a study of “cutting and breaking” // Cognition, 109 (2). 2008.
P.235 – 250.128. Majid A., Enfield Nicholas J., van Staden M. (eds.). Parts of the body:Cross-linguistic categorization. [Special Issue]. Language Sciences, 28(2/3). 2006.129. Morgan L.H. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity. (Reprinted in 1997,Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press), 1870.130. Nerlove S., Romney A.K. Sibling terminology and cross-sex behavior.American Anthropologist 74, 1967. P. 1249–1253.131. Newman J.
(ed.). The linguistics of giving. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: JohnBenjamins, 1997.132. Newman J. (ed.). The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying. Amsterdam& Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002.133. Newman J. (ed.). The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009.134. Pantel P., Lin D. Discovering word senses from text. // Proceedings of theEighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery andData Mining. Edmonton, Canada. 2002.
P. 613–619.332135. Radden, G.; Kövecses, Z. Towards a Theory of Metonymy // K.-U. Panther,G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins. 1999. P. 17-59.136. Rakhilina E. V. Verbs of rotation in Russian and Рolish // V. Hasko, R.Perelmutter (eds.).
New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion. Amsterdam:Benjamins, 2010. P. 291-314.137. Reznikova T., Rakhilina E., Bonch-Osmolovskaya A. Towards a typology ofpain predicates // Linguistics. 2012. V. 50. № 3.138. Riemer N. The semantics of polysemy. Berlin, New York: Mouton deGruyter, 2005.139. Rosch E. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 1973. P. 328–350.140. Talmy L. How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory,Research, and Application. // Herbert L. Pick, Jr. and Linda P.
Acredolo(eds.).New York: Plenum Press. 1983. P. 225-82.141. Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, volume I: Concept structuringsystems. i-viii. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2000a. P. 1-565.142. Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, volume II: Typology and processin concept structuring. i-viii. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2000b. P. 1-495.143.
Talmy L. The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language // Hamp B.(ed.), From perception to meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics.Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. P. 37-47.144. Vanhove M. (ed.). From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typologyof lexical semantic associations. Amsterdam, 2008.145. Viberg Å.
The verbs of perception: a typological study. Linguistics 21. 1984.P. 123-162.146. Viberg Å. Verbs of perception. // M. Haspelmath, E.König, W.Oesterreicher,W. Raible (eds.). Language typology and language universals: An internationalhandbook. Berlin - New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2001. P. 1294-1309.147. Viberg Å. Seeing the lexical profile of Swedish through multilingual corpora.The case of Swedish åka and other vehicle verbs.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
