Диссертация (1137017), страница 40
Текст из файла (страница 40)
Discourse in late modernity // Rethinking CriticalDiscourse Analysis. Edinburgh, 1999.Cohen S. B., Kiliot N. Place-names in Israel’s ideological struggle over theadministered territories // Annals of the Association of American Geographers.1992. Vol. 82. №. 4. P. 653-680.Cosgrove D. Power and place in the Venetian territories // The power of place:bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations.
1989. P. 104.Creighton M. R. Anthropology of Nostalgia // International Encyclopedia of theSocial & Behavioral Sciences. 2001. P. 10744-10746.Crljenko І. The renaming of streets and squares in post-socialist Croatian towns //Мова і суспільство. 2012. №. 3. Vol. 230–241.Davis F. Yearning for yesterday: A sociology of nostalgia. – Free Press, 1979.Davidovich U., Uhr H. Qualitative research online: Self-reported pros and cons ofbeing chat-interviewed online with web cameras // General Online ResearchConference (GOR), 2006.Derrida J. Limited inc. – Northwestern University Press, 1977.Duminy J.
Street renaming, symbolic capital and resistance in Durban, South Africa// Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2014. Vol. 32. №. 2. P.310-328.Dwyer O. J., Alderman D. H. Memorial landscapes: analytic questions and metaphors// GeoJournal. 2008. Vol. 73.
№. 3. P. 165-178.Fairclough N. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourseanalysis // Discourse & Society. 1992. Vol. 3. №. 2. P. 193-217.214Fairclough N. Language and power. – Pearson Education, 2001a.Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research //Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2001b. P. 121-138.Fairclough N.
Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. – PsychologyPress, 2003.Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis // Marges Lingquistiques. 2005a. № 9. P. 7694.Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research // A new agendain (critical) discourse analysis. 2005b. P.
162-185.Fairclough N., Jessop B., Sayer A. Critical realism and semiosis // Alethia. 2002. Vol.5. №. 1. P. 2-10.Fairclough N., Mulderrig J., Wodak R. Critical discourse analysis // Discoursestudies: A multidisciplinary introduction. – 2011. P. 357-378.Faraco J. C. G., Murphy M. D. Street names and political regimes in an Andalusiantown // Ethnology. 1997. P. 123-148.Ferguson P. P. Reading city streets // French Review. 1988. P.
386-397.Fine G. Review [Yearning for Yesterday: A Sociology of Nostalgia by Fred Davis] //Social Forces. 1981. Vol. 60. № 2. P. 636-637.Fine G. A. Reputational entrepreneurs and the memory of incompetence: Meltingsupporters, partisan warriors, and images of President Harding // AmericanJournal of Sociology. 1996. P. 1159-1193.Fine G.
A., Beim A. Introduction: Interactionist approaches to collective memory //Symbolic interaction. 2007. Vol. 30. №. 1. P. 1-5.Foote K. E. Shadowed ground: America’s landscapes of violence and tragedy. –University of Texas Press, 2003.Fraser N. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actuallyexisting democracy // Social text. 1990. P. 56-80.Gill G. Changing symbols: the renovation of Moscow place names // The RussianReview. 2005. Vol. 64. №. 3. P. 480-503.215Goffman E. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. – HarvardUniversity Press, 1974.Hagen J.
‘Pork’ spending, place names, and political stature in West Virginia //Southeastern geographer. 2007. Vol. 47. №. 2. P. 341-364.Hagen J. Theorizing Scale in Critical Place-Name Studies // ACME: An InternationalE-Journal for Critical Geographies. 2011. Vol. 10. №. 1. P. 23-27.Halbwachs M. On collective memory. – University of Chicago Press, 1992.Harrison R. (ed.).
Understanding the politics of heritage. – Manchester UniversityPress, 2010.Harvey D. Social justice and the city. – Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1973.Herman R. D. K. The Aloha State: Place names and the anti-conquest of Hawaii //Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1999. Vol. 89. №. 1. P.76-102.Howitt R.
Scale as relation: musical metaphors of geographical scale // Area. 1998.Vol. 30. №. 1. P. 49-58.Joenniemi P. The New Saint Petersburg: Trapped in Time? // Alternatives. 2003. P.583-609.Kearns R. A., Berg L. D. Proclaiming place: towards a geography of place namepronunciation //Social & Cultural Geography. 2002. Vol. 3. №. 3. P. 283-302.Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democraticpolitics. – Verso, 2001.Laclau E. On populist reason. – Verso, 2005.Larsen H.
A methodological framework for comparative studies of public debate //Sosiologisk Årbok. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 139-153.Lefebvre H. The production of space. – Basil Backwell, 1991.Light D. Political change and official public landscapes: Renaming streets inBucharest after 1989 // Romanian Journal of Society and Politics. 2003.
Vol. 3.№. 1. P. 106-131.216Light D. Street names in Bucharest, 1990–1997: exploring the modern historicalgeographies of post-socialist change // Journal of Historical Geography. 2004.Vol. 30. №. 1. P. 154-172.Light D., Nicolae I., Suditu B. Toponymy and the Communist city: Street names inBucharest, 1948–; 1965 // GeoJournal. 2002. Vol. 56. №.
2. P. 135-144.Light D., Young C. Habit, Memory, and the Persistence of Socialist-Era Street Namesin Postsocialist Bucharest, Romania // Annals of the Association of AmericanGeographers. 2014. Vol. 104. №. 3. P. 668-685.Manatsha B. T. The politics of renaming" colonial" streets in Francistown, Botswana// Historia.
2014. Vol. 59. №. 2. P. 269-288.Marin A. From Leningrad to the ‘new’ St. Petersburg: Actors and Symbolic Stakes ofRenamingRussia’s‘NorthernCapital’.2003.URL:http://net-conf.org/articles_2_Marin_eng.htm.Marin A. Bordering Time in the Cityscape. Toponymic Changes as TemporalBoundary-Making: Street Renaming in Leningrad/St. Petersburg // Geopolitics.2012.
Vol. 17. №. 1. P. 192-216.Massey D. B. Space, place, and gender. – University of Minnesota Press, 1994.Massey D. For space. – Sage, 2005.Merrett C. D. Social justice: What is it? Why teach it? // Journal of geography. 2004.Vol. 103. №. 3. P. 93-101.Mitchell D. The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. –Guilford Press, 2003.Moore N., Whelan Y. (ed.). Heritage, memory and the politics of identity: Newperspectives on the cultural landscape. – Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2012.Myers G. A. Naming and placing the other: Power and the urban landscape inZanzibar // Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie.
1996. Vol. 87.№. 3. P. 237-246.Palonen K. Reading street names politically. 1993. P. 103–121.Palonen E. Constructing communities: Politics of the post-communist city-text ofBudapest // Transit Online. 2006.217Palonen E. The city-text in post-communist Budapest: street names, memorials, andthe politics of commemoration // GeoJournal. 2008. Vol. 73.
№. 3. P. 219-230.Post C. W., Alderman D. H. ‘Wiping New Berlin off the map’: political economy andthe de‐Germanisation of the toponymic landscape in First World War USA //Area. 2014. Vol. 46. №. 1. P. 83-91.Purcell M. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of theinhabitant // GeoJournal. 2002. Vol. 58. №. 2. P.
99-108.Radović S. Politics and counter-politics of identity and space: Several cases fromBelgrade’s streets in the 2000s // Гласник Етнографског института САНУ.2011. №. 2. P. 112-123.Ranger T. O., Hobsbawm E. J. (ed.). The invention of tradition. – Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1983.Rose-Redwood R. S. Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world //Progress in Human Geography. 2006. Vol. 30. №. 4. P. 469-486.Rose-Redwood R. S. “Sixth Avenue is now a memory”: Regimes of spatialinscription and the performative limits of the official city-text // PoliticalGeography. 2008a. Vol.
27. №. 8. P. 875-894.Rose-Redwood R. S. From number to name: symbolic capital, places of memory andthe politics of street renaming in New York City // Social & CulturalGeography. 2008b. Vol. 9. №. 4. P. 431-452.Rose-Redwood R., Alderman D., Azaryahu M. Collective memory and the politics ofurban space: an introduction // GeoJournal. 2008.
Vol. 73. №. 3. P. 161-164.Rose-Redwood R., Alderman D., Azaryahu M. Geographies of toponymic inscription:new directions in critical place-name studies // Progress in Human Geography.2010. Vol. 34. №. 4. P. 453-470.Rose-Redwood R., Alderman D. Critical interventions in political toponymy //ACME:An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies. 2011. Vol. 10. №. 1. P. 16.218Šakaja L., Stanić J. Other(ing), self (portraying), negotiating: the spatial codificationof values in Zagreb’s city-text // Cultural geographies. – 2011. Vol.
18. №. 4. P.495-516.Sauer C. O. The morphology of landscape. University of California Publications inGeography, 1925.Schein R. H. Belonging through land/scape // Environment and planning. A. 2009.Vol. 41. №. 4. P. 811.Schwartz B., Schuman H. History, commemoration, and belief: Abraham Lincoln inAmerican memory, 1945-2001 // American Sociological Review. 2005. Vol.70. №. 2. P. 183-203.Schwartz B.
The social context of commemoration: A study in collective memory //Social Forces. 1982. Vol. 61. №. 2. P. 374-402.Schwartz B. Social change and collective memory: The democratization of GeorgeWashington // American Sociological Review. 1991. P. 221-236.Schwartz B. Memory as a cultural system: Abraham Lincoln in World War II //American Sociological Review. 1996. P. 908-927.Schwartz B. Collective memory and history // The Sociological Quarterly.
1997. Vol.38. №. 3. P. 469-496.Searle J. R. The background of meaning // Speech act theory and pragmatics. –Springer Netherlands, 1980. P. 221-232.Simonsen K. What kind of space in what kind of social theory? // Progress in Humangeography. 1996. Vol. 20. – №. 4. P. 494-512.Seamon D. Body-subject, time-space routines, and place-ballets // The humanexperience of space and place. 1980. P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
