Диссертация (1136829), страница 30
Текст из файла (страница 30)
3. – P. 328-336.75.Deakin H., Wakefield K. Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers//Qualitative Research. – 2014. – Т. 14. – №. 5. – С. 603-616.76.DiMaggio P. et al. From the ‘digital divide’to ‘digital inequality’: StudyingInternet use as penetration increases //Princeton: Center for Arts and CulturalPolicy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University. – 2001. – Т.
4. –№. 1. – С. 4-2.77.DiMaggio P. et al. Social implications of the Internet //Annual review ofsociology. – 2001. – Т. 27. – №. 1. – С. 307-336.78.Driscoll K. From Punched Cards to" Big Data": A Social History of DatabasePopulism //communication+ 1. – 2012. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С.
1-33.79.Dutton W. H. The Oxford handbook of internet studies. – Oxford University167Press, 2013.80.Dutton W. H. Internet studies: The foundations of a transformative field. 2013.81.Dutton W. H. The social shaping of digital research //International Journal ofSocial Research Methodology. – 2013.
– Т. 16. – №. 3. – С. 177-195.82.Earl J., Kimport K. Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age.Cambridge, Mit Press, 2011.83.Etling B. et al. Public discourse in the Russian blogosphere: Mapping RuNetpolitics and mobilization //Berkman Center Research Publication. 2010. №. 201011.84.Ferraro F., Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I. Economics language and assumptions: Howtheories can become self-fulfilling //Academy of Management Review. – 2005. –Т. 30.
– №. 1. – P.. 8-24.85.Flichy P. The imaginary internet: how Utopian fantasy shaped the making of anew information infrastructure //Business and Economic History. – 2004. – Т. 2.http://www.hnet.org/~business/bhcweb/publications/BEHonline/2004/Flichy.pdf*86.Fourcade M. Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the UnitedStates, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. – Princeton University Press, 2009.87.Fourcade-Gourinchas M. Politics, institutional structures, and the rise ofeconomics: A comparative study //Theory and society. – 2001.
– Т. 30. – №. 3. –P. 397-447.88.Fuller S., Collier J. H. Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge. –Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.89.Galloway A. R. Protocol: How control exists after decentralization. MIT press,2004.90.Gasser U., Schulz W. Governance of Online Intermediaries: Observations from aSeries of National Case Studies. – 2015. Berkman Center Research PublicationNo.2015-5.AvailableatSSRN:168http://ssrn.com/abstract=2566364orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2566364 . Страница посещена 14.08.201591.Goldenberg C., Gallimore R. Local knowledge, research knowledge, andeducational change: A case study of early Spanish reading improvement//Educational Researcher. – 1991.
– Т. 20. – №. 8. – С. 2-14.92.Gore A. Infrastructure for the global village //Scientific American. – 1991. – Т.265. – №. 3. – С. 150-153.93.Guice J. Looking backward and forward at the Internet //The Information Society.– 1998. – Т.
14. – №. 3. – P. 201-211.94.Gunkel D. J. Editorial: introduction to hacking and hacktivism //New Media &Society. – 2005. – Т. 7. – №. 5. – P. 595-597.95.Gupta N., Fischer A. R. H., Frewer L. J. Socio-psychological determinants ofpublic acceptance of technologies: a review //Public Understanding of Science. –2012. – Т. 21.
– №. 7. – С. 782-795.96.Gurstein M. B. Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use foreveryone? //First Monday. – 2011. – Т. 16. – №. 2.97.Heilbroner R. L. Do machines make history? //Technology and culture. – 1967. –Т. 8. – №. 3. – С. 335-345.98.Huang C. M., Chang H. C., Henderson S. Knowledge transfer barriers betweenresearch and development and marketing groups within Taiwanese small‐ andmedium‐ sized enterprise high‐ technology new product development teams//Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. – 2008.– Т. 18. – №. 6. – С. 621-657.99.Irvine A., Drew P., Sainsbury R.
‘Am I not answering your questionsproperly?’Clarification,adequacyandresponsivenessinsemi-structuredtelephone and face-to-face interviews //Qualitative Research. – 2013. – Т. 13. –№. 1. – P. 87-106.100.Jameson F. Culture and finance capital //Critical Inquiry. – 1997. – Т. 24. –№. 1. – P. 246-265169101.Jamet D. L., Moulin–Lyon J. What do Internet metaphors reveal about theperception of the Internet //Metaphorik.
de. – 2010. – Т. 18. – №. 2. – С. 17-32.102.Kelty C. Geeks, social imaginaries, and recursive publics //CulturalAnthropology. 2005. Т. 20. №. 2. P. 185-214.103.Keskinen S., Silius H. The moving disciplinary boundaries of researchstructures and funding. Åbo Akademi University, Finland, 2005.104.Klastrup L.
International handbook of internet research. – London, NewYork : Springer, 2010.105.Kleinrock L. An early history of the internet [History of Communications]// Communications Magazine, IEEE. 2010. Т.48. №8. P. 26-36.106.Knorr Cetina K., Preda A. The sociology of financial markets. – OxfordUniversity Press, 2004.107.Knorr K.
D. The Manufacture of Knowledge An Essay on theConstructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. – 1981.108.Knorr Cetina K. K., Bruegger U. The market as an object of attachment:Exploring postsocial relations in financial markets //Canadian Journal ofSociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. – 2000. – P. 141-168.109.Knorr Cetina K. The epistemics of information: A consumption model//Journal of Consumer Culture. – 2010. – Т. 10. – №.
2. – С. 171-201.110.Krebs R., Wenk S. Current debates about the construction of knowledge inthe social sciences and humanities and the impact of these on disciplinization ineight European countries: Comparative Report //Research Integration. 2005.http://www.york.ac.uk/res/researchintegration/ComparativeReports/Comparative_Report_Interdisciplinarity.pdf111.Leiner B.
M. et al. The past and future history of the Internet//Communications of the ACM. – 1997. – Т. 40. – №. 2. – С. 102-108.112.Lessig L. Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lockdown culture and control creativity. Penguin, 2004.170113.Levitas R. Introduction: the elusive idea of utopia //History of the Humansciences. – 2003. – Т. 16. – №. 1.
– С. 1-10.114.Mansell R. Imagining the Internet: Communication, innovation, andgovernance. – Oxford University Press, 2012.115.Meyer J. W. World society, institutional theories, and the actor //Annualreview of sociology. – 2010. – Т. 36. – С. 1-20.116.Mungiu-Pippidi A., Munteanu I. Moldova's" Twitter Revolution" //Journalof Democracy. – 2009. – Т. 20. – №. 3. – С. 136-142.117.Nye D.
E. From Utopia to" Real-topia"-Inventing the Inevitable //EuropeanContributions to American Studies. 2004. Т. 51. pp.. 161-172. (цит по HermanA., Swiss T. (ed.). The World Wide Web and Contemporary Cultural Theory:Magic, Metaphor, Power. Routledge, 2014).118.Piketty T. Theories of persistent inequality and integenerational mobility//Handbooks in Economics. 2000. Т. 16. P.
429-476.119.Ragnedda M., Muschert G. W. (ed.). The digital divide: The internet andsocial inequality in international perspective. Routledge, 2013.120.Rheingold H. The virtual community. London: Minerva, 1995.121.Ritzer G., Jurgenson N. Production, Consumption, Prosumption The natureof capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’ //Journal of consumer culture.
–2010. – Т. 10. – №. 1. – С. 13-36.122.Robinson G. A mythic perspective of commodification on the World WideWeb //First Monday. – 2002. – Т. 7. – №. 3.123.Schmidt H., Teubener K. Our runet //Cultural identity and media usage. InH. Schmidt, K. Teubener & N. Konradova (Eds.), Control+ Shift. Public andprivate usages of the Russian Internet.
– 2006. – P. 14-20.124.Scholz T. Market ideology and the myths of Web 2.0 //First Monday. 2008.Т. 13. №. 3. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945 .Страница посещена 14.08.2015171125.Silius H. The Professionalisation of Feminist Researchers: the Nordic case//Theories and Methodologies in Postgraduate Feminist Research: ResearchingDifferently. – 2012. – Т. 5. – P. 183.126.Smith M. R., Marx L. Does technology drive history?: The dilemma oftechnological determinism. MIT Press, 1994.127.Smith P. Narrating the guillotine: Punishment technology as myth andsymbol //Theory, Culture & Society. – 2003. – Т. 20.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
