Диссертация (1136540), страница 31
Текст из файла (страница 31)
№ 1–2. С. 39–58.18.Allik J. et al. An almost general theory of mean size perception // VisionResearch. 2013. V. 83. С. 25–39.19.Alvarez G.A. Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visualcognition // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2011. V. 15. № 3. С. 122–131.20.Alvarez G.A., Cavanagh P. The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is SetBoth by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects // PsychologicalScience. 2004. V. 15. № 2. С. 106–111.21.Alvarez G.A., Franconeri S.L. How many objects can you track? Evidence fora resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism // Journal of Vision 2007.
V. 7. №13. С. 14.1-10.22.Alvarez G.A., Oliva A. Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that canbe represented with reduced attention // Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences U S A. 2009. V. 106. № 18. С. 7345–7350.23.Alvarez G.A., Oliva A. The Representation of Simple Ensemble VisualFeatures Outside the Focus of Attention // Psychological Science.
2008. V. 19. № 4.С. 392–398.16924.Anderson N.H. Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule inimpression formation. // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1965. V. 70. № 4. С.394–400.25.Anderson N.H. Test of adaptation-level theory as an explanation of a recencyeffect in psychophysical integration. // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971.V. 87.
№ 1. С. 57–63.26.Anderson N.H., Lindner R., Lopes L.L. Integration theory applied tojudgments of group attractiveness. // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1973. V. 26. № 3. С. 400–408.27.Anstis S., Verstraten F.A.., Mather G. The motion aftereffect // Trends inCognitive Sciences. 1998.
V. 2. № 3. С. 111–117.28.Ariely D. Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties // PsychologicalScience. 2001. V. 12. № 2. С. 157–162.29.Atchley P., Andersen G.J. Discrimination of speed distributions: Sensitivity tostatistical properties // Vision Research. 1995. V. 35. № 22. С. 3131–3144.30.Attarha M., Moore C.M. The capacity limitations of orientation summarystatistics // Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2015. V. 77. № 4.
С. 1116–1131.31.Attarha M., Moore C.M., Vecera S.P. Summary statistics of size: Fixedprocessing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity forsingle ensembles. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance. 2014. V. 40. № 4.
С. 1440–1449.32.Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. // PsychologicalReview. 1954. V. 61. № 3. С. 183–193.33.Avraham T., Yeshurun Y., Lindenbaum M. Predicting visual searchperformance by quantifying stimuli similarities // Journal of Vision. 2008. V. 8. №4. С.
9.34.Bacon W.F., Egeth H.E. Local processes in preattentive feature detection. //Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1991. V.17. № 1. С. 77–90.17035.Balas B., Conlin C. Invariant texture perception is harder with synthetictextures: Implications for models of texture processing // Vision Research. 2015.
V.115. С. 271–279.36.Barenholtz E. Convexities move because they contain matter // Journal ofVision. 2010. V. 10. № 11. С. 19–19.37.Barenholtz E., Feldman J. Determination of visual figure and ground indynamically deforming shapes // Cognition. 2006. V. 101. № 3. С. 530–544.38.Barenholtz E., Tarr M.J. Figure-ground assignment to a translating contour: Apreference for advancing vs. receding motion // Journal of Vision. 2009. V. 9. № 5.С.
27–27.39.Barlow H. From single units to population codes and back again // Perception.2001. V. 30. С. 13–13.40.Bauer B. A selective summary of visual averaging research and issues up to2000 // Journal of Vision 2015. V. 15. № 4. С. 14.41.Bauer B. Does Stevens’s Power Law For Brightness Extend to PerceptualBrightness Averaging? // The Psychological Record. 2010. V.
59. № 2.42.Beck D.M., Palmer S.E. Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. //Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2002. V.28. № 5. С. 1071–1084.43.Beck J., Prazdny K., Rosenfeld A. A theory of textural segmentation // Humanand machine vision. New York: Academic Press, 1983.44.Ben-Av M.B., Sagi D. Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity:Experimental results can be predicted by intensity autocorrelations // VisionResearch. 1995. V.
35. № 6. С. 853–866.45.Berg M. van den, Kubovy M., Schirillo J.A. Grouping by Regularity and theperception of illumination // Vision Research. 2011. V. 51. № 12. С. 1360–1371.46.Bergen J.R., Adelson E.H. Early vision and texture perception // Nature. 1988.V. 333. № 6171. С. 363–364.47.Bergen J.R., Julesz B.
Parallel versus serial processing in rapid patterndiscrimination // Nature. 1983. V. 303. № 5919. С. 696–698.17148.Bertamini M., Lawson R. Rapid figure – ground responses to stereogramsreveal an advantage for a convex foreground // Perception. 2008. V. 37. № 4. С.483–494.49.Bettman J.R., Capon N., Lutz R.J. A Multimethod Approach to ValidatingMulti-Attribute Attitude Models // NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume02. 1975.50.Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human imageunderstanding. // Psychological Review. 1987.
V. 94. № 2. С. 115–117.51.Bovik A.C., Clark M., Geisler W.S. Multichannel texture analysis usinglocalized spatial filters // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and MachineIntelligence. 1990. V. 12. № 1. С. 55–73.52.Brady T.F., Alvarez G.A. Hierarchical Encoding in Visual Working Memory:Ensemble Statistics Bias Memory for Individual Items // Psychological Science.2011. V. 22. № 3.
С. 384–392.53.Burr D., Ross J. A Visual Sense of Number // Current Biology. 2008. V. 18. №6. С. 425–428.54.Caelli T., Julesz B., Gilbert E. On perceptual analyzers underlying visualtexture discrimination: Part II // Biological Cybernetics. 1978. V. 29. № 4. С. 201–214.55.Cave K.R., Wolfe J.M. Modeling the role of parallel processing in visualsearch // Cognitive Psychology. 1990. V. 22.
№ 2. С. 225–271.56.ChetverikovA.,CampanaG.,KristjánssonÁ.Buildingensemblerepresentations: How the shape of preceding distractor distributions affects visualsearch // Cognition. 2016. V. 153. С. 196–210.57.Chong S.C. et al. Statistical processing: Not so implausible after all //Perception & Psychophysics. V.
70. № 7. С. 1327–1334.58.Chong S.C., Evans K.K. Distributed versus focused attention (count vsestimate) // Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 2011. V. 2. № 6. С.634–638.17259.Chong S.C., Treisman A. Representation of statistical properties // VisionResearch. 2003. V. 43. № 4. С. 393–404.60.Chong S.C., Treisman A. Statistical processing: computing the average size inperceptual groups // Vision Research 2005. V.
45. № 7. С. 891–900.61.Chubb, Landy. Orthogonal distribution analysis: A new approach to the studyof texture perception // Computational models of visual processing. : MIT Press,1991.62.Corbett J.E. Gestalt grouping facilitates perceptual averaging to increase theefficiency of memory representations // Journal of Vision. 2016.63.Corbett J.E. et al. An aftereffect of adaptation to mean size // Visual Cognition.2012. V. 20. № 2. С. 211–231.64.Corbett J.E., Melcher D. Characterizing ensemble statistics: mean size isrepresented across multiple frames of reference // Attention, Perception, &Psychophysics.
2014. V. 76. № 3. С. 746–758.65.Corbett J.E., Oriet C. The whole is indeed more than the sum of its parts:Perceptual averaging in the absence of individual item representation // ActaPsychologica. 2011. V. 138. № 2. С. 289–301.66.Corbetta M. et al. Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial AttentionShifts and Visual Feature Conjunction // Science. 1995. V. 270. № 5237. С. 802–805.67.Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration ofmental storage capacity // Behav Brain Sci.
2001. V. 24. № 1. С. 87-114-185.68.Curran W., Braddick O.J. Speed and direction of locally-paired dot patterns //Vision Research. 2000. V. 40. № 16. С. 2115–2124.69.Dakin S.C. Seeing statistical regularities: Texture and pattern perception.Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press., 2015.70.Dakin S.C., Watt R.J. The computation of orientation statistics from visualtexture // Vision Research. 1997. V. 37. № 22. С. 3181–3192.71.Dakin S.C., Williams C.B., Hess R.F. The interaction of first- and second-ordercues to orientation // Vision Research. 1999. V. 39.
№ 17. С. 2867–2884.17372.Daugman, J. G. (1985). Uncertainty relation for the resolution in space spatialfrequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortex filters.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2(7), 1160–116973.Demeyere N. et al. Automatic statistical processing of visual properties insimultanagnosia // Neuropsychologia. 2008.
V. 46. № 11. С. 2861–2864.74.Donnelly N., W G., J M. Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions //Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1991. V.17. № 2. С. 561–570.75.Duncan J., Humphreys G. Beyond the search surface: visual search andattentional engagement // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance. 1992. V. 18. № 2. С. 578-588-593.76.Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
