Диссертация (1136540), страница 33
Текст из файла (страница 33)
№ 18. С. 3033–3048.137. Leon M., Oden G.C., Anderson N.H. Functional measurement of social values.// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973. V. 27. № 3. С. 301–310.138. Levin I.P. Averaging processes and intuitive statistical judgments //Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1974. V. 12. № 1. С. 83–91.139. Li J., Allinson N.M. A comprehensive review of current local features forcomputer vision // Neurocomputing. 2008.
V. 71. № 10–12. С. 1771–1787.140. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features andconjunctions // Nature. 1997. V. 390. № 6657. С. 279–281.141. Mack A., Rock I. Inattentional blindness // Psyche. 1999. V. 5. № 3.142. Malik J., Perona P. Preattentive texture discrimination with early visionmechanisms // Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1990. V. 7. № 5. С.923.143. Marchant A.P., Simons D.J., Fockert J.W. de. Ensemble representations:effects of set size and item heterogeneity on average size perception // ActaPsychologica. 2013. V. 142.
№ 2. С. 245–250.144. Maule J., Franklin A. Effects of ensemble complexity and perceptual similarityon rapid averaging of hue // Journal of Vision 2015. V. 15. № 4. С. 6.179145. Mohan R., Nevatia R. Perceptual organization for scene segmentation anddescription // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.1992. V. 14. № 6.
С. 616–635.146. Morgan M.J. Differential visual persistence between the two eyes: A model forthe Fertsch-Pulfrich effect. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance. 1977. V. 3. № 3. С. 484–495.147. Murray S.O., Boyaci H., Kersten D. The representation of perceived angularsize in human primary visual cortex // Nature Neuroscience. 2006. V. 9. № 3. С.429–434.148. Myczek K., Simons D.J. Better than average: Alternatives to statisticalsummary representations for rapid judgments of average size // Perception &Psychophysics.
2008. V. 70. № 5. С. 772–788.149. Nakayama K. The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visualprocessingandperception[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.visionlab.harvard.edu/Members/Ken/Papers/053KNVision1990.pdf(дата обращения: 22.10.2016).150. Nakayama K., Silverman G.H. Serial and parallel processing of visual featureconjunctions // Nature. 1986. V. 320. № 6059. С. 264–265.151. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visualperception // Cognitive Psychology. 1977.
V. 9. № 3. С. 353–383.152. Navon D. What does a compound letter tell the psychologist’s mind? // ActaPsychologica. 2003. V. 114. № 3. С. 273–309.153. Neill R.A. Spatio-temporal averaging and the dynamic visual noisestereophenomenon // Vision Research. 1981. V. 21. № 5. С. 673–682.154. Norman L.J., Heywood C.A., Kentridge R.W. Direct encoding of orientationvariance in the visual system // Journal of Vision 2015. V. 15. № 4. С. 3.155. Nothdurft H.-C. Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentivevision // Perception & Psychophysics. 1992.
V. 52. № 4. С. 355–375.156. O’Shea R.P., Blackburn S.G., Ono H. Contrast as a depth cue // VisionResearch. 1994. V. 34. № 12. С. 1595–1604.180157. Oden G.C., Anderson N.H. Integration of semantic constraints // Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1974. V. 13. № 2. С. 138–148.158. Palmer S., Rock I. Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniformconnectedness // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1994.
V. 1. № 1. С. 29–55.159. Palmer S.E. Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping //Cognitive Psychology. 1992. V. 24. № 3. С. 436–447.160. Palmer S.E. Perceptual Grouping: It’s Later Than You Think // CurrentDirections in Psychological Science. 2002. V. 11. № 3. С. 101–106.161. Palmer S.E. Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. : MIT Press, 1999.162. Palmer S.E., Beck D.M. The repetition discrimination task: An objectivemethod for studying perceptual grouping // Perception & Psychophysics. 2007. V.69. № 1. С. 68–78.163.
Palmer S.E., Brooks J.L. Edge-Region Grouping in Figure-GroundOrganization and Depth Perception // Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance. 2008. V. 34. № 6. С. 1353–1371.164. Parkes L. et al. Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in humanvision // Nature Neuroscience 2001. V. 4. № 7. С. 739–744.165. Pavlovskaya M. et al. Computing an average when part of the population is notperceived // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2015.
V. 27. № 7. С. 1397–1411.166. Peterson M.A. The proper placement of uniform connectedness // PsychonomicBulletin & Review. 1994. V. 1. № 4. С. 509–514.167. Peterson M.A., Gibson B.S. Must figure-ground organization precede objectrecognition?. An Assumption in Peril // Psychological Science. 1994. V. 5. № 5. С.253–259.168. Pinna B. What Comes Before Psychophysics? The Problem of «What WePerceive» and the Phenomenological Exploration of New Effects // Seeing andPerceiving.
2010. V. 23. № 5. С. 463–481.169. Poltoratski S., Xu Y. The association of color memory and the enumeration ofmultiple spatially overlapping sets // Journal of Vision. 2013. V. 13. № 8. С. 6–6.181170. Pomerantz J. Emergent Features, Gestalts, and Feature Integration Theory //From Perception to Consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman / под ред. J.M.Wolfe, L.C.
Robertson. : Oxford University Press, 2012. С. 187–192.171. Pomerantz J. Wholes, holes, and basic features in vision // Trends in CognitiveSciences. 2003. V. 7. № 11. С. 471–473.172. Pomerantz J., Kubovy M. Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization:Simplicity and likelihood principles // Handbook of Perception and HumanPerformance. : John Wiley & Sons, 1986.173. Pomerantz J.R. Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form andmotion perception. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1983. V.
112.№ 4. С. 516–540.174. Pomerantz J.R., Cragin A.I. Emergent features and feature combination // TheOxford handbook of perceptual organization. 2015. С. 88–107.175. Pomerantz J.R., Portillo M.C. Grouping and emergent features in vision:toward a theory of basic Gestalts // Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance. 2011. V. 37. № 5. С. 1331–1349.176. Pomerantz J.R., Sager L.C., Stoever R.J. Perception of wholes and of theircomponent parts: Some configural superiority effects. // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance.
1977. V. 3. № 3. С. 422–435.177. Portilla J., Simoncelli E.P. A Parametric Texture Model Based on JointStatistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients // International Journal of ComputerVision. V. 40. № 1. С. 49–70.178. Pylyshyn Z.W., Storm R.W. Tracking multiple independent targets: evidencefor a parallel tracking mechanism // Spat Vis. 1988. V. 3. № 3.
С. 179–197.179. Reynolds J.H., Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing //Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2004. V. 27. № 1. С. 611–647.180. Robitaille N., Harris I.M. When more is less: Extraction of summary statisticsbenefits from larger sets // Journal of Vision.
2011. V. 11. № 12. С. 18–18.181. Rock I., Brosgole L. Grouping based on phenomenal proximity // Journal ofExperimental Psychology. 1964. V. 67. № 6. С. 531–538.182182. Rosenholtz R. A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popoutphenomena // Vision Research. 1999. V. 39. № 19. С. 3157–3163.183. Rosenholtz R.
Search for a unique orientation among heterogeneousdistracters. // Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2000. V. 41. № 4.184. Rosenholtz R. What Statistics Determine Segmentation of Orientation-DefinedTextures? // Perception. 1997. V. 26. № 1 suppl. С. 331–331.185. Rosenholtz R. What your visual system sees where you are not looking //IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. : International Society for Optics and Photonics,2011. С. 786510–786510.186. Rosenholtz R., Huang J., Ehinger K.A. Rethinking the Role of Top-DownAttention in Vision: Effects Attributable to a Lossy Representation in PeripheralVision // Frontiers in Psychology.
2012. V. 3.187. Rosenholtz. Texture perception // The Oxford Handbook of PerceptualOrganization. , 2015.188. Sekuler A.B., Bennett P.J. Generalized Common Fate: Grouping by CommonLuminance Changes // Psychological Science. 2001. V. 12. № 6. С. 437–444.189. Serences J.T., Yantis S. Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence //Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006. V. 10. № 1.
С. 38–45.190. Simoncelli E.P. Vision and the statistics of the visual environment // CurrentOpinion in Neurobiology. 2003. V. 13. № 2. С. 144–149.191. Simons D.J., Myczek K. Average size perception and the allure of a newmechanism // Perception & Psychophysics. V. 70. № 7. С. 1335–1336.192. Srinivasan, GN, Shobha, G. An overview of segmentation techniques for targetdetection in visual images. Bucharest, Romania: , 2008.193. Stahl J.S., Song Wang. Globally Optimal Grouping for Symmetric ClosedBoundaries by Combining Boundary and Region Information // IEEE Transactionson Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
2008. V. 30. № 3. С. 395–411.194. Stevens S.S., Galanter E.H. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozenperceptual continua // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1957. V. 54. № 6. С.377–411.183195. Sutter A., Beck J., Graham N. Contrast and spatial variables in texturesegregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model // Perception &Psychophysics.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
