Диссертация (1136540), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
//Psychological Review. 1989. V. 96. № 3. С. 433–458.77.Durgin F.H. Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity anddistribution of texture. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance. 1995. V. 21. № 1. С. 149–169.78.Durgin F.H., Huk A.C. Texture density aftereffects in the perception ofartificial and natural textures // Vision Research. 1997.
V. 37. № 23. С. 3273–3282.79.Elder J., Zucker S. The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination oftwo-dimensional shapes // Vision Research. 1993. V. 33. № 7. С. 981–991.80.Elder J.H., Goldberg R.M. Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for theperceptual organization of contours // Journal of Vision. 2002. V. 2. № 4. С. 5.81.Emmanouil T.A., Treisman A. Dividing attention across feature dimensions instatistical processing of perceptual groups // Perception & Psychophysics. V. 70. №6.
С. 946–954.82.Fischer J., Whitney D. Object-level visual information gets through thebottleneck of crowding // Journal of Neurophysiology. 2011. V. 106. № 3. С. 1389–1398.17483.Fockert J. de, Wolfenstein C. Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets offaces // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
2009. V. 62. № 9. С.1716–1722.84.Fockert J.W. de, Marchant A.P. Attention modulates set representation bystatistical properties // Perception & Psychophysics. 2008. V. 70. № 5. С. 789–794.85.Fogel I., Sagi D. Gabor filters as texture discriminator // BiologicalCybernetics. 1989. V. 61. № 2.86.Fouriezos G., Rubenfeld S., Capstick G.
Visual statistical decisions //Perception & Psychophysics. 2008. V. 70. № 3. С. 456–464.87.Friedman-Hill S., Wolfe J.M. Second-order parallel processing: visual searchfor the odd item in a subset // Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance. 1995. V. 21. № 3. С. 531–551.88.Gabor, D. (1946). Theory of communication.
Institution of ElectricalEngineers, 93(Part III), 429–457.89.Garner W.., Felfoldy G.L. Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various typesof information processing // Cognitive Psychology. 1970. V. 1. № 3. С. 225–241.90.Garner W.R. Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. // Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General.
1978. V. 107. № 3. С. 287–308.91.Gegenfurtner K.R. Thresholds for the identification of the direction of motionof plaid patterns defined by luminance or chromatic contrast // Vision Research.1998. V. 38. № 6. С. 881–888.92.Geisler W.S. et al. Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contourgrouping performance // Vision Research.
2001. V. 41. № 6. С. 711–724.93.Geisler W.S., Perry J.S. Contour statistics in natural images: Grouping acrossocclusions // Visual Neuroscience. 2009. V. 26. № 1. С. 109.94.Gepshtein, S. (2010). Two psychologies of perception and the prospect of theirsynthesis. Philosophical Psychology, 23, 217–281.95.Ghose T., Palmer S.E. Extremal edges versus other principles of figure-groundorganization // Journal of Vision. 2010. V. 10. № 8.
С. 3–3.17596.Gibson J.J. The Perception of Visual Surfaces // The American Journal ofPsychology. 1950. V. 63. № 3. С. 367.97.Graesser C.C., Anderson N.H. Cognitive algebra of the equation: Gift size =generosity = income. // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1974. V. 103. № 4. С.692–699.98.Graham N., Sutter A., Venkatesan C. Spatial-frequency- and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation // Vision Research.1993. V. 33. № 14.
С. 1893–1911.99.Grau J.W., Nelson D.K. The distinction between integral and separabledimensions: Evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness. // Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General. 1988. V. 117. № 4. С. 347–370.100. Haberman J., Whitney D. Efficient summary statistical representation whenchange localization fails // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2011. V. 18. № 5. С.855–859.101. Haberman J., Whitney D.
Ensemble perception: Summarizing the scene andbroadening the limits of visual processing // From perception to consciousness:Searching with Anne Treisman. 2012. С. 339–349.102. Haberman J., Whitney D. Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender fromsets of faces // Current Biology. 2007. V.
17. № 17. С. R751–R753.103. Haberman J., Whitney D. Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces.// Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 2009. V.35. № 3. С. 718–734.104. Haberman J., Whitney D. The visual system discounts emotional deviantswhen extracting average expression // Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.2010. V.
72. № 7. С. 1825–1838.105. Hadad B.-S., Kimchi R. Time course of grouping of shape by perceptualclosure: Effects of spatial proximity and collinearity // Perception & Psychophysics.V. 70. № 5. С. 818–827.106. Halberda J., Sires S.F., Feigenson L. Multiple spatially overlapping sets can beenumerated in parallel // Psychological science. 2006. V. 17. № 7. С. 572–576.176107. Han S., Humphreys G.W., Chen L.
Uniform connectedness and classicalGestalt principles of perceptual grouping // Perception & Psychophysics. 1999. V.61. № 4. С. 661–674.108. Haralick R. Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture // Proceedings ofIEEE. 1979. V. 67. С. 786–804.109. He S., Cavanagh P., Intriligator J.
Attentional resolution and the locus of visualawareness // Nature. 1996. V. 383. № 6598. С. 334–337.110. Howard I., Rogers B. Perceiving in Depth, Volume 2: Stereoscopic vision.Oxford University Press. 2012111. Hulleman J., Humphreys G.W. A new cue to figure–ground coding: top–bottom polarity // Vision Research. 2004. V. 44. № 24. С. 2779–2791.112. Im H.Y., Chong S.C. Computation of mean size is based on perceived size //Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 2009.
V. 71. № 2. С. 375–384.113. Im H.Y., Chong S.C. Mean Size as a Unit of Visual Working Memory //Perception. 2014. V. 43. № 7. С. 663–676.114. Im H.Y., Halberda J. The effects of sampling and internal noise on therepresentation of ensemble average size // Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.2013. V. 75. № 2. С. 278–286.115. Ittelson W.H.
Size as a Cue to Distance: Static Localization // AmericanJournal of Psychology 1951. Т. 64. № 1. С. 54.116. Jacobs D.W. Perceptual completion and memory. Carnegie Mellon Univ,Pittsburgh, PA: , 2003.117. Julesz B. Experiments in the Visual Perception of Texture // ScientificAmerican. 1975. V. 232. № 4. С. 34–43.118. Julesz B. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions //Nature. 1981. V. 290. № 5802. С. 91–97.119. Julesz B. Towards the Automation of Binocular Depth Perception.
// IFIPCongress. , 1962. С. 439–444.177120. Julesz B., Gilbert E.N., Victor J.D. Visual discrimination of textures withidentical third-order statistics // Biological Cybernetics. 1978. V. 31. № 3. С. 137–140.121. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Objectspecific integration of information // Cognitive Psychology.
1992. V. 24. № 2. С.175–219.122. Kanizsa G., Gerbino W. Convexity and symmetry in figure-groundorganization // Vision and artifact. New York: Springer, 1976.123. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A. Visual attention as a multilevel selection process //Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2004. V. 4. № 4. С. 483–500.124. Kimchi R. Perceptual organization and visual attention // Progress in BrainResearch. : Elsevier, 2009.
С. 15–33.125. Kimchi R. The perceptual organization of visual objects: A microgeneticanalysis // Vision research. 2000. V. 40. № 10. С. 1333–1347.126. Kimchi R. Uniformconnectednessandorganization of hierarchical patterns. // JournalgroupingofinExperimentalthe perceptualPsychology:Human Perception and Performance. 1998. V. 24. № 4.127.
Kimchi R. et al. Microgenesis and Ontogenesis of Perceptual OrganizationEvidence From Global and Local Processing of Hierarchical Patterns //Psychological Science. 2005. V. 16. № 4. С. 282–290.128. Kimchi R. et al. Perceptual organization, visual attention, and objecthood //Vision Research. 2016. V. 126. С. 34–51.129. Kimchi R., Palmer S.E.
Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns.// Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1982.V. 8. № 4. С. 521–535.130. Knierim J.J., Van Essen D.C. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns inarea V1 of the alert macaque monkey // Journal of Neurophysiology. 1992. V.
67.№ 4. С. 961–980.178131. KubovyM.,WagemansJ.GROUPINGBYPROXIMITYANDMULTISTABILITY IN DOT LATTICES:. A Quantitative Gestalt Theory //Psychological Science. 1995. V. 6. № 4. С. 225–234.132. Kurylo D.D. Time course of perceptual grouping // Perception &Psychophysics. 1997. V. 59. № 1. С. 142–147.133. Landauer A.A., Rodger R.S. Effect of «Apparent» Instructions on BrightnessJudgments // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1964. V. 68. № 1. С. 80.134. Landy M.S., Bergen J.R.
Texture segregation and orientation gradient // VisionResearch. 1991. V. 31. № 4. С. 679–691.135. Landy M.S., Graham. Visual perception of texture // The VisualNeurosciences. : MIT Press, 2004.136. Lee S.-H., Blake R. Detection of temporal structure depends on spatialstructure // Vision Research. 1999. V. 39.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
