Диссертация (1136540), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
1989. V. 46. № 4. С. 312–332.196. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition // The Quarterlyjournal of experimental psychology. 1993. V. 46. № 2. С. 225–245.197. Teghtsoonian M. The Judgment of Size // The American Journal ofPsychology. 1965. V. 78. № 3. С. 392.198. Treisman A. Features and objects: The fourteenth bartlett memorial lecture //The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A.
1988. V. 40. № 2. С.201–237.199. Treisman A. How the deployment of attention determines what we see //Visual Cognition. 2006. V. 14. № 4–8. С. 411–443.200. Treisman A. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features andfor objects. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance. 1982. V. 8. № 2. С. 194–214.201. Treisman A., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence fromsearch asymmetries. // Psychological Review. 1988. V.
95. № 1. С. 15–48.202. Treisman A., Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1990. V. 16. № 3. С. 459–478.203. Treisman A., Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects //Cognitive Psychology. 1982.
V. 14. № 1. С. 107–141.204. Treisman A., Souther J. Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentiveprocessing of separable features. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.1985. V. 114. № 3. С. 285–310.205. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention //Cognitive Psychology. 1980. V. 12.
№ 1. С. 97–136.206. Treue S., Hol K., Rauber H.J. Seeing multiple directions of motion-physiologyand psychophysics // Nature Neuroscience 2000. V. 3. № 3. С. 270–276.184207. Turatto M. et al. On the speed of pop-out in feature search. // Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010. V. 36. № 5.С. 1145–1152.208. Utochkin I.S.
Ensemble summary statistics as a basis for rapid visualcategorization // Journal of Vision. 2015. V. 15. № 4. С. 8.209. Utochkin I.S., Yurevich M.A. Similarity and heterogeneity effects in visualsearch are mediated by “segmentability” // Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance. 2016. V. 42. № 7. С. 995–1007.210. Vecera S.P. The reference frame of figure-ground assignment // PsychonomicBulletin & Review. 2004. V.
11. № 5. С. 909–915.211. Vecera S.P., Palmer S.E. Grounding the figure: Surface attachment influencesfigure-ground organization // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2006. V. 13. № 4. С.563–569.212. Vecera S.P., Vogel E.K., Woodman G.F. Lower region: A new cue for figureground assignment. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2002. V.
131.№ 2. С. 194–205.213. Verghese P., Stone L.S. Combining speed information across space // VisionResearch. 1995. V. 35. № 20. С. 2811–2823.214. Vickery T.J., King L.-W., Jiang Y. Setting up the target template in visualsearch // Journal of Vision 2005. V. 5. № 1.
С. 81–92.215. Wagemans J. et al. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I.Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. // Psychological Bulletin.2012. V. 138. № 6. С. 1172–1217.216. Walker D., Vul E. Hierarchical Encoding Makes Individuals in a Group SeemMore Attractive // Psychological Science. 2014. V. 25.
№ 1. С. 230–235.217. Watamaniuk S.N., Duchon A. The human visual system averages speedinformation // Vision Research. 1992. V. 32. № 5. С. 931–941.218. Watamaniuk S.N., Sekuler R. Temporal and spatial integration in dynamicrandom-dot stimuli // Vision Research. 1992. V. 32. № 12. С. 2341–2347.185219. Watson D.G., Maylor E.A., Bruce L.A.M. The efficiency of feature-basedsubitization and counting // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance. 2005.
V. 31. № 6. С. 1449–1462.220. Watson S.E., Kramer A.F. Object-based visual selective attention andperceptual organization // Perception & Psychophysics. 1999. V. 61. № 1. С. 31–49.221. Wearden J.H., Ferrara A. Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection byhumans // Q Journal of Experimental Psychology B.
1996. V. 49. № 1. С. 24–44.222. Whiting B.F., Oriet C. Rapid averaging? Not so fast! // Psychonomic Bulletin& Review. 2011. V. 18. № 3. С. 484–489.223. Whitney D., Haberman J., Sweeny T. From Textures to Crowds: MultipleLevels of Summary Statistical Perception // NEW VISUAL NEUROSCIENCES. ,2014. С. 695–709.224. Whitney D., Levi D.M.
Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on consciousperception and object recognition // Trends in Cognitive Science 2011. V. 15. № 4.С. 160–168.225. Williams L.R., Jacobs D.W. Stochastic Completion Fields: A Neural Model ofIllusory Contour Shape and Salience // Neural Computation. 1997. V. 9. № 4.
С.837–858.226. Wolfe J.M. Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction // Perception &Psychophysics. 2001. V. 63. № 3. С. 381–389.227. Wolfe J.M. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search //Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1994. V. 1. № 2. С. 202–238.228. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. : Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis,1998.229.
Wolfe J.M., Bennett S.C. Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of BasicFeatures // Vision Research. 1997. V. 37. № 1. С. 25–43.230. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R., Franzel S.L. Guided search: An alternative to thefeature integration model for visual search. // Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance. 1989. V. 15. № 3.
С. 419–433.186231. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S. What attributes guide the deployment of visualattention and how do they do it? // Nature reviews neuroscience. 2004. V. 5. № 6. С.495–501.232. Wolfe J.M., Pashler H. Visual search // Attention. 1998. V. 1. С. 13–73.233. Yamanashi Leib A., Kosovicheva A., Whitney D.Fastensemblerepresentations for abstract visual impressions. // Nature Communications. 2016.V. 7. 13186.234.
Zosh J.M., Halberda J., Feigenson L. Memory for multiple visual ensembles ininfancy. // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2011. V. 140. № 2. С.141–158.187.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
