Диссертация (1136353), страница 20
Текст из файла (страница 20)
–Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.59.Chu Y. The Legacy of One-Party Hegemony in Taiwan // Diamond L.,Gunther R. (eds.) Political Parties and Democracy. – Johns HopkinsUniversity Press, 2002.60.Coleman J. The Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa // Almond G., Coleman J.(eds.) Politics of the Developing Areas. – Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress, 1960.61.Coleman J.S. The Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa // Almond G., Coleman J.(eds.) Politics of the Developing Areas. – Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress, 1960.62.Collier R.B. The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and RegimeChange in Mexico. – Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, 1992.63.Collier R.B.
The Transformation of Labor-Based One-Partyism at the End ofthe 20th Century: The Case of Mexico // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) TheAwkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam:Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.64.Cook M.L. The Mexican Paradox: Neo-Liberalism and Labor Entrenchmentin Mexico’s Ruling Party // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The AwkwardEmbrace: One-party Domination and Democracy.
– Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.11265.Cornelius W., Craig A. The Mexican Political System in Transition. – Centerfor U.S.-Mexican Studies, 1991.66.Cox G. Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World's ElectoralSystems. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.67.Diaw A., Diouf M. The Senegalese Opposition and its Quest for Power //Olukoshi A.O.
(ed.) The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Nordic Africa Institute, 1998.68.Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B. (2001) Party Dominance and the Logic ofElectoral Design in Mexico’s Transition to Democracy // Journal oftheoretical Politics, 13(3).69.Downs A. An Economic Theory of Democracy. – New York: Harper andRow, 1957.70.Dunleavy P. Rethinking Dominant Party Systems // Bogaards M., Boucek F.(eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases,and Comparisons.
– New York: Routledge, 2010.71.Eisenstadt T. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and ElectoralInstitutions. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.72.Esping-Andersen G. Single-Party Dominance in Sweden: the Saga of SocialDemocracy // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-PartyDominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.73.Farrell D. Comparing Electoral Systems. – London: Prentice Hall, 1997.74.Freedom House. Freedom in the World.
https://freedomhouse.org/reporttypes/freedom-world75.Friedman S. No Easy Stroll to Dominance: Party Dominance, Opposition andCivil Society in South Africa // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The AwkwardEmbrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.76.Gandhi J. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. – New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2008.11377.Gandhi J., Przeworski A. (2007) Authoritarian Institutions and the Survivalof Dictators // Comparative Political Studies, 40(11).78.Geddes B. (1999) What Do We Know About Democratization after TwentyYears? // Annual Review of Political Science, 2.79.GeddesB.Minimum-WinningCoalitionsandPersonalizationinAuthoritarian Regimes // Annual Meetings of the American Political ScienceAssociation.
– Chicago, 2004.80.Geddes B. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America.– Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.81.Geddes B. Why Parties and Elections in Authoritarian Regimes? RevisedVersion of a Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of theAmerican Political Science Association. – Washington, D.C., 2005.82.Geddes B., Zaller J. (1989) Sources of Support for Authoritarian Regimes //American Journal of Political Science, 33.83.Giliomee H., Simkins C. [Giliomee, Simkins 1999a] The Dominant PartyRegimes of South Africa, Mexico, Taiwan and Malaysia: A ComparativeAssessment // Giliomee H., Simkins C.
(eds.) The Awkward Embrace: Oneparty Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood AcademicPublishers, 1999.84.Giliomee H., Simkins C. [Giliomee, Simkins 1999b] Conclusion // GiliomeeH., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination andDemocracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.85.Golosov G. (2013) Authoritarian Party Systems: Patterns of Emergence,Sustainability and Survival // Comparative Sociology, 12(5).86.Golosov G. Electoral Integrity and Voter Turnout in ContemporaryAutocracies // Garnett H.A., Zavadskaya M. (eds.) Electoral Integrity andPolitical Regimes: Actors, Strategies and Consequences.
– New York:Routledge, 2018.11487.Greene K.F. (2002) Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition inDominant Party Regimes: A Theory and the Case of Mexico // ComparativePolitical Studies, 35.88.Greene K.F. (2008) Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization //American Journal of Political Science, 52.89.Greene K.F. (2010) [Greene 2010a] The Political Economy of Single-PartyDominance // Comparative Political Studies, 43.90.Greene K.F. [Greene 2010b] A Resource Theory of Single Party Dominance:The PRI in Mexico // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) Dominant PoliticalParties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons.
- NewYork: Routledge, 2010.91.Greene K.F. Why Dominant Parties Lose?: Mexico’s Democratization inComparative Perspective. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.92.Grofman B., Lijphart A. (eds.) Electoral Laws and Their PoliticalConsequences. – New York: Agathon Press, 1986.93.Hansen T. (1994) Local Elections and Local Government Performance //Scandinavian Political Studies, 17(1).94.Hicken A., Stoll H. (2011) Presidents and Parties: How Presidential ElectionsShape Coordination in Legislative Elections.
– Comparative Political Studies,44(7).95.Horowitz D.L. (1993) Democracy in Divided Societies // Journal ofDemocracy, 4(4).96.Hsieh J. The SNTV System and Its Political Implications // Tien H. (ed.)Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the ThirdWave. – Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.97.Huntington S.P. Political Order in Changing Societies. – New Haven: YaleUniversity, 1968.98.Huntington S.P., Moore C. Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: TheDynamics of Established One-party Systems. – New York: Basic Books,1970.11599.Inoguchi T.
The Political Economy of Conservative Resurgence underRecession: Public Policies and Political Support in Japan, 1977-1983 //Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party DominantRegimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.100. Johnson S. Opposition Politics in Japan: Strategies under a One-PartyDominant Regime. – London and New York: Nissan Institute/Routledge. –2000.101.
Kaufman R.R. Dominant Party and Opposition Parties in Mexico: From Crisisto Reform to Crisis // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace:One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood AcademicPublishers, 1999.102. Kirchheimer O. The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems// LaPolamabara J., Weiner M. (eds.) Political Parties and PoliticalDevelopment.
– Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.103. Köllner P. (2006) The Liberal Democratic Party at 50: Sources of Dominanceand Change in the Koizumi Era // Social Science Japan Journal, 9(2).104. Krauss E.S., Pierre J. The Decline of Dominant Parties: Parliamentary Politicsin Sweden and Japan in the 1970s // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes.
– Ithaca: CornellUniversity Press, 1990.105. Kreuzer M. (2009) How Party Systems Form: Path Dependency and theInstitutionalization of the Postwar German Party System // British Journal ofPolitical Science, 39.106. Kuenzi M., Lambright G. (2005) Party Systems and DemocraticConsolidation in Africa’s Electoral Regimes // Party Politics, 11(4).107.
Laver M. (1998) Models of Government Formation // Annual Review ofPolitical Science, 1.108. Least squares index.https://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/Docts/lsq.php116109. Levite A. Tarrow S. (1983) The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in DominantParty Systems: A Comparison of Israel and Italy // Comparative Politics,15(3).110. Levitsky S., Way L. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after theCold War. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.111. Lijphart A. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-SevenDemocracies, 1945-1990.
– Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.112. Lijphart A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance inThirty-Six Countries. – New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.113. Lin C.-L. Paths to Democracy: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective.Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. – Yale University, 1998.114. Lindberg S.I. Democracy and Elections in Africa. – Baltimore: The JohnsHopkins University Press, 2006.115. Lindberg S.I., Jones J. Laying a Foundation for Democracy or UnderminingIt? Dominant Parties in Africa’s Burgeoning Democracies // Bogaards M.,Boucek F.
(eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts,Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. - New York: Routledge, 2010.116. Linz J. (1990) [Linz 1990a] Perils of Presidentialism // Journal of Democracy,1(1).117. Linz J. (1990) [Linz 1990b] The Virtues of Parliamentarism //Journal ofDemocracy, 1(1).118. Mabry D.J.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
