Диссертация (1136353), страница 21
Текст из файла (страница 21)
Mexico’s Accion Nacional: A Catholic Alternative to Revolution.– Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1973.119. Magaloni B. (2008) Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity ofAuthoritarian Rule // Comparative Political Studies, 41(4-5).120. Magaloni B., Kricheli R. (2010) Political Order and One-Party Rule // AnnualReview of Political Science, 13.121. Magaloni B. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demisein Mexico.
– New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.117122. Mainwaring S., Scully T. (eds.) Building Democratic Institutions: PartySystems in Latin America. – Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.123. Mainwaring S., Shugart M.S. (1997) Juan Linz, Presidentialism, andDemocracy: A Critical Appraisal // Comparative Politics, 29(4).124. March J.G., Olsen J.P. Elaborating the “New Institutionalism” // RhodesR.A.W., Binder S.A., Rockman B.A.
(Eds.) The Oxford Handbook ofPolitical Institutions. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.125. Matlosa K., Karume S. (2004) Ten Years of Democracy and the DominantParty System in South Africa // Election Update 2004: South Africa, 5(10).126. Mauzy D. Electoral Innovation and One-Party Dominance in Singapore //Hsieh J.F., Newman D. (eds.) How Asia Votes 2001. – New York: ChathamHouse, 2002.127. McDonald R. Party Systems and Elections in Latin America. – Chicago:Markham, 1971.128.
McElwain K. (2008) Manipulating Electoral Rules to Manufacture SingleParty Dominance // American Journal of Political Science, 52(1).129. McGann A. The Modal Voter Result: Preference Distributions, Intra-PartyCompetition, and Political Dominance. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,Department of Political Science, Duke University, 1999.130.
Muramatsu M., Krauss E.S. The Dominant Party and Social Coalitions inJapan // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party DominantRegimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.131. Myburgh J., Giliomee H. One-Party Dominance in South-Africa // BogaardsM., Boucek F. (eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts,Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.132. Nohlen D. (ed.) [Nohlen 2005a] Elections in the Americas.
A Data Handbook.Volume I. North America, Central America and the Caribbean. – Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005.133. Nohlen D. (ed.) [Nohlen 2005b] Elections in the Americas. A Data Handbook.Volume II. South America. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.118134. Nohlen D., Grotz F., Hartmann C. (eds.) Elections in Asia and the Pacific. AData Handbook.
Volume I. Middle East, Central Asia and South Asia. –Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.135. Nohlen D., Grotz F., Hartmann C. (eds.) Elections in Asia and the Pacific. AData Handbook. Volume II. South East Asia, East Asia and the South Pacific.– Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.136. Nohlen D., Krennerich M., Thibaut B. Elections in Africa. A Data Handbook.– Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.137. Nohlen D., Stöver P. (eds.) Elections in Europe. A Data Handbook. - Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2010.138. Norris P.
(1997) Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian andMixed Systems // International Political Science Review, 18(3).139. Norris P. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. – NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 2004.140. O’Leary B. Britain’s Japanese Question: “Is There a Dominant Party?” //Margetts H., Smyth G.
(eds.) Turning Japanese: Britain with a PermanentParty of Government. – London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1994.141. Otake H. Defense Controversies and One-party Dominance: the Oppositionin Japan and West Germany // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies:The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.142. Parties and Elections in Europe. http://www.parties-and-elections.eu/143. Pempel T.J. [Pempel 1990a] Conclusion: One-Party Dominance and theCreation of Regimes // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The OneParty Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.144. Pempel T.J.
[Pempel 1990b] Introduction: Uncommon Democracies: the Oneparty Dominant Regimes // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: TheOne-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.145. PolityIVAnnualTime-Series,http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.1191800-2015.146. Pontusson J. Conditions of Labor-Party Dominance: Sweden and BritainCompared // Pempel T.J.
(ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-PartyDominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.147. Rae D. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. – New Haven: YaleUniversity Press, 1967.148. Reuter O.J. The Origins of Dominant Parties. – Unpublished Ph.D.dissertation, Department of Political Science, Emory University, 2010.149. Reuter O.J. The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building AuthoritarianInstitutions in Post-Soviet Russia.
– Cambridge University Press, 2017.150. Reuter O.J., Remington T.F. (2009) Dominant Party Regimes and TheCommitment Problem. The Case of United Russia // Comparative PoliticalStudies, 42(4).151. Reuter O.J., Turovsky R.F. (2014) Dominant Party Rule and LegislativeLeadership in Authoritarian Regimes // Party Politics, 20.152. Rigger S. From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party.– Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.153. Rigger S.
[Rigger 1999a] Grassroots Electoral Organization and PoliticalReform in the ROC on Taiwan and Mexico // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.)The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. –Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.154. Rigger S. [Rigger 1999b] Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. – NewYork: Routledge, 1999.155. Riker W.
(1976) The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination ofDuverger’s Law // Comparative Politics, 9(1).156. Samuels D.J., Shugart M.S. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How theSeparation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. – New York:Cambridge University Press, 2010.157.
Sartori G. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.120158. Sartori G. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry IntoStructures, Incentives, and Outcomes. – New York: New York UniversityPress, 1994.159. Schedler A. [Schedler 2009a] Sources of Competition under ElectoralAuthoritarianism // Lindberg S.I. (ed.) Democratization by Elections: A NewMode of Transition. - Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press,2009.160. Schedler A. [Schedler 2009b] The Contingent Power of AuthoritarianElections // Lindberg S.I.
(ed.) Democratization by Elections: A New Modeof Transition. - Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.161. Schedler A. The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism // Schedler A. (ed.)Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. – Boulder andLondon: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2006.162. Schedler A. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting ElectoralAuthoritarianism. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.163. Scheiner E. Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure ina One-Party Dominant State. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.164.
Schlemmer L. Democracy or Democratic Hegemony? The Future of PoliticalPluralism in South Africa // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The AwkwardEmbrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.165. Shalev M. The Political Economy of Labor-Party Dominance and Decline inIsrael // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party DominantRegimes.
– Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.166. Shepsle K.A. Rational Choice Institutionalism // Rhodes R.A.W., BinderS.A., Rockman B.A. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. –New York.: Oxford University Press, 2006.167. Shugart M.S. Comparative Executive–Legislative Relations // RhodesR.A.W., Binder S.A., Rockman B.A. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook ofPolitical Institutions.
– New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.121168. Shugart M.S., Carey J.M. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Designand Electoral Dynamics. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.169. Simkins C. Stability and Competitiveness in the Political Configurations ofSemi-Developed Countries // Giliomee H., Simkins C.
(eds.) The AwkwardEmbrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.170. Slater D. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathansin Southeast Asia. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.171. Slater D., Smith N.R.
The Power of Counterrevolution: Contentious Originsof Dominant Party Durability in Asia and Africa. Paper presented at the APSAAnnual Conference, Washington, D.C., 2010.172. Stone W.J., Maisel L.S., Maestas C.D. (2004) Quality Counts: Extending theStrategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence // American Journal ofPolitical Science, 48(3).173. Streltsov D. Political Parties in Disarray // Inoguchi T.
(ed.) Japanese andRussian Politics. – New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015; Стрельцов Д.В.Современный японский парламент. – М.: Наука, 1994.174. Svolik M. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. – New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2012.175. Taagepera R., Shugart M. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants ofElectoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.176. Tarrow S. Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: "The Softer they Rise, the Slowerthey Fall!" // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-PartyDominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.177. Templeman K.A.
The Origins and Decline of Dominant Party Systems:Taiwan’s Transition in Comparative Perspective. – Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 2012.178. Toit P. Bridge or Bridgehead? Comparing the Party Systems of Botswana,Namibia, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.)122The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. –Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.179.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
