2Резюме_Порошин_English_12.12.2018 (1136351)
Текст из файла
National Research UniversityHigher School of EconomicsAs a manuscriptAlexander PoroshinDETERMINANTS OF SINGLE-PARTY DOMINANCEPERSISTENCE IN VARIOUS TYPES OF POLITICAL REGIMESSUMMARY OF THE DISSERTATIONfor the purpose of obtaining academic degreeDoctor of Philosophy in Political Science HSEAcademic Supervisor:Oxana Kharitonova,PhD in Political ScienceMoscow, 2018Research designStatement of research problem. The existing academic literature on thefactors of dominant party regimes persistence mostly focuses on regimes with anyduration. There is a problem of insufficient attention to specific factors influencingthe durability of single-party dominance within the set of "absolute" dominant partyregimes that overcome a critical duration threshold.Thus, the following question needs to be clarified: "why are dominant partyregimes that overcome a critical duration threshold have different longevity?" Mainfocus of existing literature is oriented to revealing determinants of the emergence ofsingle-party dominance.
My research aims to fill the gap and concentrates on singleparty dominance persistence among regimes that overcome a critical longevitythreshold.Literature review. Dominant party regime’s1 extraordinary longevity is apart of the mainstream research in political science, but most of academic literaturerelates to case-study research on country-specific regimes characteristics.Most significant contribution to developing the comprehensive understandingof the dominant party regimes and the nature of the emergence and persistence ofsingle-party dominance is provided by K.Greene2, S.Huntington and C.Moore3,A.Arian and S.H.Barnes4, S.Levitsky and L.Way5, T.Pempel6, H.Giliomee andThe terms ‘single-party dominance’ and ‘dominant party regime’ are used as a synonyms in the research.Greene K.F.
Why Dominant Parties Lose?: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. – New York:Cambridge University Press, 2007; Greene K.F. (2008) Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization // AmericanJournal of Political Science, 52; Greene K.F. (2002) Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in DominantParty Regimes: A Theory and the Case of Mexico // Comparative Political Studies, 35; Greene K.F. (2010) ThePolitical Economy of Single-Party Dominance // Comparative Political Studies, 43; Greene K.F.
A Resource Theoryof Single Party Dominance: The PRI in Mexico // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) Dominant Political Parties andDemocracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.3Huntington S.P., Moore C. Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-partySystems. – New York: Basic Books, 1970; Huntington S.P. Political Order in Changing Societies. – New Haven: YaleUniversity, 1968.4Arian A., Barnes S.H. (1974) The Dominant Party System: a Neglected Model of Democratic Stability // The Journalof Democracy, 36.5Levitsky S., Way L. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War.
– Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2010.6Pempel T.J. Introduction: Uncommon Democracies: the One-party Dominant Regimes // Pempel T.J. (ed.)Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990; Pempel T.J.Conclusion: One-Party Dominance and the Creation of Regimes // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: TheOne-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.122C.Simkins7,B.Magaloni8,A.McGann9,F.Boucek10,K.A.Templeman11,A.Schedler12, O.J.Reuter and T.Remington13, B.Geddes14, J.Brownlee15, J.Gandhiand A.Przeworski16, M.Svolik17, D.Slater and N.Smith18.Studies by G.Sartori19, M.Duverger20, A.Arian and S.H.Barnes21, K.MatlosaandS.Karume22,D.Anckar23,M.Bogaards24,7A.Lijphart25,J.Coleman26,Giliomee H., Simkins C. Conclusion // Giliomee H., Simkins C.
(eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-partyDomination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999; Simkins C. Stability andCompetitiveness in the Political Configurations of Semi-Developed Countries // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) TheAwkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.8Magaloni B. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. – New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2006; Magaloni B., Kricheli R. (2010) Political Order and One-Party Rule // Annual Review ofPolitical Science, 13; Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B. (2001) Party Dominance and the Logic of Electoral Design inMexico’s Transition to Democracy // Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13(3); Magaloni B.
(2008) Credible PowerSharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule // Comparative Political Studies, 41(4-5).9McGann A. The Modal Voter Result: Preference Distributions, Intra-Party Competition, and Political Dominance.Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Duke University, 1999.10Boucek F. Electoral and Parliamentary Aspects of Dominant Party Systems // Pennings P., Lane J.E. (eds.),Comparing Party System Change. – London: Routledge, 1998.11Templeman K.A.
The Origins and Decline of Dominant Party Systems: Taiwan’s Transition in ComparativePerspective. – Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 2012.12Schedler A. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. – New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 2013; Schedler A. The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism // Schedler A. (ed.) Authoritarianism:The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. – Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2006; Schedler A. Sourcesof Competition under Electoral Authoritarianism // Lindberg S.I. (ed.) Democratization by Elections: A New Modeof Transition. – Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009; Schedler A. The Contingent Power ofAuthoritarian Elections // Lindberg S.I.
(ed.) Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition. – Baltimoreand London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.13Reuter O.J., Remington T.F. (2009) Dominant Party Regimes and The Commitment Problem. The Case of UnitedRussia // Comparative Political Studies, 42(4); Reuter O.J. The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building AuthoritarianInstitutions in Post-Soviet Russia. – Cambridge University Press, 2017.14Geddes B. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. – Berkeley: University of CaliforniaPress, 1994; Geddes B., Zaller J.
(1989) Sources of Support for Authoritarian Regimes // American Journal of PoliticalScience, 33; Geddes B. Minimum-Winning Coalitions and Personalization in Authoritarian Regimes // AnnualMeetings of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2004; Geddes B. Why Parties and Elections inAuthoritarian Regimes? Revised Version of a Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the AmericanPolitical Science Association. – Washington, D.C., 2005.15Brownlee J. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. – Cambridge University Press, 2007.16Gandhi J.
Political Institutions under Dictatorship. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008; Gandhi J.,Przeworski A. (2007) Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Dictators // Comparative Political Studies, 40(11).17Svolik M. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.18Slater D., Smith N.R.
The Power of Counterrevolution: Contentious Origins of Dominant Party Durability in Asiaand Africa. Paper presented at the APSA Annual Conference, Washington, D.C., 2010.19Sartori G. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.20Duverger M. Politicheskie partii (in Russian, ‘Political parties’). – Moscow: Academic project, 2002.21Arian A., Barnes S.H.
(1974) The Dominant Party System: a Neglected Model of Democratic Stability // The Journalof Democracy, 36.22Matlosa K., Karume S. (2004) Ten Years of Democracy and the Dominant Party System in South Africa // ElectionUpdate 2004: South Africa, 5(10).23Anckar D. (1997) Dominating Smallness: Big Parties in Lilliput Systems // Party Politics, 3(2).24Bogaards M. (2004) Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party System in Africa // European Journal ofPolitical Research, 43.25Lijphart A.
Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. – New Haven:Yale University Press, 1999.26Coleman J. The Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa // Almond G., Coleman J. (eds.) Politics of the Developing Areas.– Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960.3S.Mainwaring and T.Scully27, G.Cox28, B.O’Leary29, M.Kuenzi and G.Lambright30,N.Van de Walle31, A.Ware32, P.Dunleavy33, J.Blondel34, O.Reuter35, R.McDonald36,J.-F.Caulier and P.Dumont37 are important due to conceptualization andoperationalization of single-party dominance.G.Sartori38,H.Templeman39,A.Lijphart40,J.Linz41,S.Mainwaring42,M.Shugart and J.Carey43, M.Laver44, A.Hicken and H.Stoll45, J.Hsieh46,O.Kharitonova47 consider effects of institutional design on the emergence andpersistence of dominant-party regimes.
Particularly, H.Templeman argues thatparliamentary regimes are more durable. However, this argument requires re27Mainwaring S., Scully T. (eds.) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. - Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1995.28Cox G. Making Votes Count.
Характеристики
Тип файла PDF
PDF-формат наиболее широко используется для просмотра любого типа файлов на любом устройстве. В него можно сохранить документ, таблицы, презентацию, текст, чертежи, вычисления, графики и всё остальное, что можно показать на экране любого устройства. Именно его лучше всего использовать для печати.
Например, если Вам нужно распечатать чертёж из автокада, Вы сохраните чертёж на флешку, но будет ли автокад в пункте печати? А если будет, то нужная версия с нужными библиотеками? Именно для этого и нужен формат PDF - в нём точно будет показано верно вне зависимости от того, в какой программе создали PDF-файл и есть ли нужная программа для его просмотра.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
