2Резюме_Порошин_English_12.12.2018 (1136351), страница 2
Текст из файла (страница 2)
Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. – Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1997.29O’Leary B. Britain’s Japanese Question: Is There a Dominant Party? // Margetts H., Symth G. (eds.) TurningJapanese: Britain with a Permanent Party of Government. – London: Lawrence and Wishart, 199430Kuenzi M., Lambright G. (2005) Party Systems and Democratic Consolidation in Africa’s Electoral Regimes //Party Politics, 11(4).31Van de Walle N.
(2002) Africa’s Range of Regimes // Journal of Democracy, 13; Van de Walle N., Butler K. (1999)Political Parties and Party Systems in Africa’s Illiberal Democracies // Cambridge Review of International Affairs,13(1).32Ware A. Political Parties and Party Systems. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.33Dunleavy P. Rethinking Dominant Party Systems // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) Dominant Political Parties andDemocracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.34Blondel J. Comparing Political Systems.
– New York: Praeger, 1972.35Reuter O.J. The Origins of Dominant Parties. – Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science,Emory University, 2010.36McDonald R. Party Systems and Elections in Latin America. – Chicago: Markham, 1971.37Caulier J.-F., Dumont P. Measuring One-Party Dominance with Voting Power Indices // Bogaards M., Boucek F.(eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons.
– New York:Routledge, 2010.38Sartori G. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry Into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. – NewYork: New York University Press, 1994.39Templeman K.A. The Origins and Decline of Dominant Party Systems: Taiwan’s Transition in ComparativePerspective. – Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 2012.40Lijphart A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. – New Haven:Yale University Press, 1999.41Linz J.
(1990) Perils of Presidentialism // Journal of Democracy, 1(1): 51-69; Linz J. (1990) The Virtues ofParliamentarism //Journal of Democracy, 1(1).42Mainwaring S., Shugart M.S. (1997) Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal //Comparative Politics, 29(4).43Shugart M.S. Comparative Executive–Legislative Relations // Rhodes R.A.W., Binder S.A., Rockman B.A. (Eds.)The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2006; Shugart M.S., Carey J.M.Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics.
– New York: Cambridge University Press,1992; Carey J., Shugart M.S. Executive Decree Authority. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.44Laver M. (1998) Models of Government Formation // Annual Review of Political Science, 1.45Hicken A., Stoll H. (2011) Presidents and Parties: How Presidential Elections Shape Coordination in LegislativeElections. – Comparative Political Studies, 44(7).46Hsieh J.
The SNTV System and Its Political Implications // Tien H. (ed.) Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and DemocraticTransition: Riding the Third Wave. - Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.47Kharitonova O.G. Prezidentstvo i demokratiya: sostoyanie diskussii (in Russian, ‘Presidentialism and democracy:state of discussion’) // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2012. – Vol. 3.4examination because it resulted from the research sample that included politicalregimes that both ceased and continued to exist.The connection between electoral systems and dominant-party regimes is atopic of studies by A.Lijphart48, M.Duverger49, G.Sartori50, R.Taagepera andM.Shugart51, A.Blais52, D.Rae53, W.Riker54, K.McElwain55, P.Norris56, D.Farell57,S.Bowler58.Three main areas of exploring the mechanisms of single-party dominance leftbeyond the dissertation - elitist studies, economic studies and electoral fraud studies.Elitist approaches have been developed by B.Magaloni59, W.Riker60, B.Geddes61,O.Reuter and T.Remington62.
The common view of economic theories states thathigh support for dominant parties is a response to good economic performance ofLijphart A. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. – Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1994; Grofman B., Lijphart A.
(eds.) Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. –New York: Agathon Press, 1986.49Duverger M. Politicheskie partii (in Russian, ‘Political parties’). – Moscow: Academic project, 2002.50Sartori G. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry Into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. – NewYork: New York University Press, 1994.51Taagepera R., Shugart M. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: YaleUniversity Press, 1989.52Blais A.
(ed.) To Keep or Change First Past the Post?: The Politics of Electoral Reform. – Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2008; Blais A., Carty K. (1987) The Impact of Electoral Formulae on the Creation of Majority Governments //Electoral Studies, 5 (2).53Rae D. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. – New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.54Riker W. (1976) The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law // Comparative Politics,9(1): 93-106.55McElwain K.
(2008) Manipulating Electoral Rules to Manufacture Single-Party Dominance // American Journal ofPolitical Science, 52(1): 32-47.56Norris P. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. – New York: Cambridge University Press,2004; Norris P. (1997) Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems // InternationalPolitical Science Review, 18(3).57Farrell D. Comparing Electoral Systems. – London: Prentice Hall, 1997.58Bowler S. Electoral Systems // Rhodes R.A.W., Binder S.A., Rockman B.A. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook ofPolitical Institutions.
– New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.59Magaloni B. (2008) Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule // Comparative PoliticalStudies, 41(4-5).60Riker W. (1976) The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law // Comparative Politics,9(1).61Geddes B. (1999) What Do We Know About Democratization after Twenty Years? // Annual Review of PoliticalScience, 2.62Reuter O.J., Remington T.F.
(2009) Dominant Party Regimes and The Commitment Problem. The Case of UnitedRussia // Comparative Political Studies, 42(4).485the government63. B.Magaloni64, S.Lindberg65, S.Huntington66 argue importance ofelectoral fraud for maintaining power by the ruling parties.There are a lot of studies that analyze the characteristics of country-specificdominant-party regimes, in form of case-study research and comparative research.Among such studies, for example, are the following: Y.Chu on Taiwan67,B.Magaloni on Mexico68, A.Zolberg on African regimes69, G.Esping-Andersen onSweden70, D.Mabry on Mexico71, D.Slater on Great Britain72, J.Pontusson onSweden and Great Britain73, F.Boucek on Great Britain, Italy and Japan74, M.Shalevon Israel75, S.Johnson on Japan76, U.Cornelius and A.Craig on Mexico77, C.-L.Linon Taiwan78, H.Otake on Japan and Germany79, H.Binen on African regimes80,63Hansen T.
(1994) Local Elections and Local Government Performance // Scandinavian Political Studies, 17(1).Magaloni B. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. – New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2006.65Lindberg S.I. Democracy and Elections in Africa. – Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.66Huntington S.P. Political Order in Changing Societies.
– New Haven: Yale University, 1968.67Chu Y. The Legacy of One-Party Hegemony in Taiwan // Diamond L., Gunther R. (eds.) Political Parties andDemocracy. – Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002; Chu Y. A Born-Again Dominant Party? The Transformation ofthe Kuomintang and Taiwan’s Regime Transition // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: Oneparty Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.68Magaloni B. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. - Cambridge UniversityPress, 2006; Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B. (2001) Party Dominance and the Logic of Electoral Design in Mexico’sTransition to Democracy // Journal of theoretical Politics, 13(3).69Zolberg A.R. Creating Political Order: The Party-States of West Africa.
– Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.70Esping-Andersen G. Single-Party Dominance in Sweden: the Saga of Social Democracy // Pempel T.J. (ed.)Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.71Mabry D.J. Mexico’s Accion Nacional: A Catholic Alternative to Revolution. – Syracuse: Syracuse UniversityPress, 1973.72Slater D. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia.
– Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2010.73Pontusson J. Conditions of Labor-Party Dominance: Sweden and Britain Compared // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.74Boucek F. The Factional Politics of Dominant Parties: Evidence from Britain, Italy and Japan // Bogaards M.,Boucek F. (eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons.
– NewYork: Routledge, 2010.75Shalev M. The Political Economy of Labor-Party Dominance and Decline in Israel // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.76Johnson S.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
