Диссертация (1136144), страница 72
Текст из файла (страница 72)
Vol. 69. pp. 300–307. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.300370215.American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code ofconduct. Effective June 1, 2003, as amended 2010. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf216.Amichai-Hamburger Y., Ben-Artzi E. Loneliness and Internet use // Computers in Hu-man Behavior, 2003. Vol. 19. pp.
71–80. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00014-6217.Amichai-Hamburger Y., Vinitzky G. Social network use and personality // Computers inHuman Behavior, 2010. Vol. 26. pp. 1289–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018218.Anderson S. L., Betz N. E. Sources of social self-efficacy expectations: Their measure-ment and relation to career development // Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2001. Vol.
58, № 1.pp. 98–117. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2000.1753219.Angleitner A., Ostendorf F., John O. P. Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptorsin German: A psycho-lexical study // European Journal of Personality, 1990. Vol. 4. pp. 89–118.doi: 10.1002/per.2410040204220.Anusic I., Schimmack U., Pinkus R. T., Lockwood P. The nature and structure of corre-lations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009.
Vol. 97. pp. 1142–1156. doi: 10.1037/a0017159221.Asahi S., Okamoto Y., Okada G., Yamawaki S., Yokota N. Negative correlation be-tween right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: A fMRI study // EuropeanArchivesofPsychiatry andClinicalNeuroscience,2004.Vol..254.pp. 245–251.doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0488-z222.Ashton M. C., Lee K. Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACOmodel of personality structure // Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2007.
Vol. 11. pp. 150–166. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294907223.Back M. D., Penke L., Schmukle S. C., Sachse K., Borkenau P., Asendorpf J. B. Whymate choices are not as reciprocal as we assume: The role of personality, flirting and physical attractiveness // European Journal of Personality, 2011.
Vol. 25. pp. 120–132. doi: 10.1002/per.806371224.Back M. D., Schmukle S. C., Egloff B. Predicting actual behavior from the explicit andimplicit self-concept of personality // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009. Vol. 97.pp. 533–548.
doi: 10.1037/a0016229225.Back M. D., Stopfer J. M., Vazire S., Gaddis S., Schmukle S. C., Egloff B., Gosling S. D.Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization // Psychological Science, 2010.Vol. 21. pp. 372–374. doi: 10.1177/0956797609360756226.Bäckström M., Björklund F., Larsson M. R. Five-factor inventories have a major generalfactor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally // Journal of Research in Personality, 2009. Vol.
43. pp. 335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013227.Baddeley A. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward // Nature ReviewsNeuroscience, 2003. Vol. 4. pp. 829–839. doi: 10.1038/nrn1201228.Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. Working memory // Psychology of learning and motivation:Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8). / G. H. Bower (Ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press, 1974.pp. 47–89.229.Bakholdina V. Y., Bakholdina D. A., Movsesian A. A., Stupina K. S. On certain aspectsof Dembo-Rubinstein method of self-esteem measurement // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014.
№ 140. pp. 547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.468230.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. // Psycholog-ical Review. 1977. Vol. 84, № 2. pp. 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191231.Bandura A., Reese L., Adams N. E. Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a func-tion of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1982.
Vol. 43, № 1. pp. 5–21. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.5232.Bargh J. A. Bypassing the will: toward demystifying the nonconscious control of socialbehavior // The New Unconscious / R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, J. A. Bargh (Eds.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005. pp. 37–60.372233.Bargh J. A., McKenna K. Y. A., Fitzsimons G. M. Can you see the real me? Activationand expression of the ‗true self‘ on the Internet // Journal of Social Issues, 2002.
Vol. 58. pp. 33–48.doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00247234.Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psy-chological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations // Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 1986. Vol. 51. pp. 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173235.Barresi J., Moore C. Intentional relations and social understanding // Behavioral andBrain Sciences, 1996. Vol. 19. pp. 107–122. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00041790236.Barrick M. R., Mount M. K. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance:A meta-analysis // Personnel Psychology, 1991.
Vol. 44. pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.17446570.1991.tb00688.x237.Barrick M. R., Mount M. K., Judge T. A. Personality and performance at the beginningof the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? // International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2001. Vol. 9. pp. 9–30. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00160238.Barron F. X. The psychology of creativity // New directions in psychology II /T. M. Newcomb (Ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1965. pp.
1–134.239.Basten U., Stelzel C., Fiebach C. J. Trait anxiety modulates the neural efficiency of in-hibitory control // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011. Vol. 23. pp. 3132–3145.doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00003240.Baumeister R. F. Identity: cultural change and the struggle for self. New York, NY: Ox-ford University Press, 1986. 312 p.241.Baumgarten F. Die Charaktereigenschaften // Beitraege zur Charakter- und Persoenlich-keitsforschung. Vol. 1. Bern: A. Francke, 1933.242.Bem D. J. Self-perception: The dependent variable of human performance // Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Performance, 1967.
Vol. 2. pp. 105–121. doi: 10.1016/00305073(67)90025-6373Benet-Martínez V., John O. P. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups:243.Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. // Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 1998. Vol. 75. pp. 729–750. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729Berkovits I., Hancock G. R., Nevitt J. Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated244.measure designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations // Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2000.
Vol. 60. pp. 877–892. doi: 10.1177/00131640021970961Bickel W. K., Jarmolowicz D. P., Mueller E. T., Gatchalian K. M., McClure S. M. Are245.executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference toaddiction // Psychopharmacology, 2012. Vol. 221.
pp. 361–387. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2689-xBiesanz J. C. The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individ-246.ual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy // Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010.Vol. 45. pp. 853–885. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.519262Bishop D. V. M., Adams C. V., Norbury C. F. Distinct genetic influences on grammar247.and phonological short-term memory deficits: evidence from 6-year-old twins // Genes, Brain and Behavior, 2006.
Vol. 5. pp. 158–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00148.xBlack S. L., Johnson A. F. Employers‘ use of social networking sites in the selection248.process//TheJournalofSocialMediainSociety,2012.Vol.1.pp.7–28.http://www.thejsms.org/index.php/TSMRI/article/view/2249.Blackwell L. S., Trzesniewski K. H., Dweck C. S. Implicit theories of intelligence pre-dict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention // Child Development, 2007.
Vol. 78. pp. 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x250.Block J. Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment // Journal of Consulting Psychol-ogy, 1961. Vol. 25. pp. 392–397. doi: 10.1037/h0042979251.Bogg T., Roberts B. W. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality // Psychological Bulletin, 2004. Vol.
130.pp. 887–919. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.887374252.Booth-Kewley S., Vickers R. R. Associations between major domains of personality andhealth behavior // Journal of Personality, 1994. Vol. 62. pp. 281–298. doi: 10.1111/j.14676494.1994.tb00298.x253.Borkenau P., Brecke S., Möttig C., Paelecke M. Extraversion is accurately perceived af-ter a 50-ms exposure to a face // Journal of Research in Personality, 2009. Vol. 43. pp.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
