Диссертация (1100831), страница 53
Текст из файла (страница 53)
A grammar of spoken Chinese. University ofCalifornia Press, 1968.81. [Dixon 1977] Dixon, R.M.W. (1977) Where Have all the Adjectives Gone?“Studies in Language”, 1, 9-80.82. [Dixon 2004] Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspec339tive. in Dixon, R. M. W. and & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). 2004. AdjectiveClasses: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.83. [Evans 2011] Evans, C.N.
Semantic typology // J.J. Song. The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford; New York, 2011.84. [Feng 1998] Prosodic structure and compound words in Classical Chinese, InJ.L. Packard, ed. New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation. Berlin – NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter. 199885. [Ferris 1993] Ferris, C. The Meaning of Syntax: a Study of Adjectives in English. London. 199386. [Fillmore, Kay 1992] Fillmore, Charles J.; Kay, Paul. Construction grammarcourse book.
Berkeley: University of California,1992.87. [Forza, Scalise 2009] Forza F., Guevara, E. & Scalise, S. (2009) CompoundingAdjectives. Lingue e linguaggio VIII.1 137–16288. [Goddard 2001] Goddard, Cliff. Lexico-semantic universals: a critical overview // Linguistic typology, 2001, 5.1, 1-66.89.
[Goddard 2008] Goddard C. (ed.). Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam:Benjamins, 2008.90. [Goddard, Wierzbicka 2007] Goddard, Cliff; Wierzbicka, Anna. NSM analysesof the semantics of physical qualities: sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp incrosslinguistic perspective. Studies in Language, Volume 31, Number 4, 2007 ,pp. 765-80091. [Goddard, Wierzbicka 2014] Goddard, C & Wierzbicka, A.
Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages, and Cultures, OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, 201492. [Greenberg 1963] Greenberg J., Some universals of grammar with particularreference to the order of meaningful elements. In: Universals of Language.Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 196393. [Guevara, Scalise 2009] Guevara, E.
& Scalise, S. (2009). Searching for Universals in Compounding. In: S.Scalise, E. Magni, E. Vineis & A. Bisetto (eds.),Universals of Language. Amsterdam:Springer.34094. [Haspelmath 1999] Haspelmath M. External possession in a European arealperspective. In Payne D. and Barshi I. (eds.) External possession. Amsterdam:John Benjamins. 1999.95. [Haspelmath 2003] M. Haspelmath. The geometry of grammatical meaning:Semantic maps and crosslinguistic comparison // M. Tomasello (ed.). The newpsychology of language.
V. 2. Mahwah (NJ), 2003. P. 211 – 242.96. [Haspelmath 1993/1997] – Haspelmath M. Indefinite pronouns – Oxford, 1997.97. [Haspelmath, Tadmor 2009] M. Haspelmath, U. Tadmor (eds.). Loanwords inthe world’s languages: A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton,2009.98. [Heine, Kuteva 2002] Heine, B.; Kuteva, T. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002.99. [Hoosain 1992] Hoosain, Rumjahn.
"Psychological Reality of the Word inChinese." In Language processing in Chinese, edited by Hsuan-Chih Chen andOvid J.L. Tzeng. 1992.100.[Kholkina forthc.] Modern Chinese Lexicography. // Encyclopedia of Chi-nese Language and Linguistics. Brill, forthc.101.[Koch 2001] Koch, Peter. Lexical Typology from a Cognitive and Linguis-tic Point of View // Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W., Raible, W.(eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook.Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001. P. 1142-1178102.[Kopecka, Narasimhan 2012] A. Kopecka, B.
Narasimhan (eds). Events ofputting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam, 2012.103.[Koptjevskaja-Tamm 2008] Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. Approaching lexicaltypology. // Vanhove M. (ed.). From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Amsterdam:Benjamins, 2008.104.[Koptjevskaja-Tamm 2012] – Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. New directions inlexical typology // Linguistics 50 – 3 (2012). P. 373 – 394.105.[Koptjevskaja-Tamm forthc.] – Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. The Linguistics ofTemperature.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Benjamins, forthc.341106.[Kövecses 2006-2007] Kövecses, Z. Universality and Variation in the Useof Metaphor In: Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor107.[Kyuseva et al. 2013] Kyuseva, M., Parina, E., Kozlova, K., Shapiro, M.Qualitative concepts ‘sharp’ and ‘blunt’// Association for Linguistic Typology.The 10th Biennal Conference (Leipzig, 2013 August 15-18). Abstracts. 2013.Onlinepublication:http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/conference/2013_ALT10/pdf/abstracts/Abstracts_ALT10_complete.pdf108.[Lakoff 1993] Lakoff, G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Or-tony.
(ed), Metaphor and Thought: Second edition (pp. 202-251). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 1993.109.[Lazard 1981] Lazard G. La quete des universaux semantique en linguis-tique. Le Bulletin du groupe de recherches semio-linguistiques 19. 1981.110.[Lehrer 1992] Lehrer, A. A theory of vocabulary structure: Retrospectivesand prospectives. // Puetz, Manfred (ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution.Studies in honour of Rene Dirven on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, Amsterdam: Benjamins 1992, p. 243-256111.[Li, Thompson 1981] Charles N. Li, Sandra A. Thompson.
Mandarin Chi-nese: a Functional Reference Grammar. University of California Press, 1981.112.[Majid et al. 2006] – Majid A., Enfield N. J., Van Staden M. (eds.). Parts ofthe body: Cross-linguistic categorisation [Special Issue] – Language Sciences,28(2-3). 2006.113.[Majid et al. 2007a] C A. Majid, G. Senft, S.C. Levinson. The language ofolfaction // A. Majid (ed.).
Field manual. V. 10. Nijmegen, 2007.114.[Majid et al. 2007b] – Majid A., Bowerman M., Van Staden M., Boster J.The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: a crosslinguistic perspective // Cognitive linguistics, 18 – 2 (2007). P. 133 – 152.115.[Majid et al. 2007c] – Majid A., Gullberg M., Van Staden M., Bowerman M.How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparisonof cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages // Cognitive linguistics, 18 –3422 (2007).
P. 179 – 194.116.[Majidetal. 2008]–Majid A.,Boster J.,Bowerman M.Thecross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: a study of “cutting andbreaking” // Cognition, 109 (2), 2008. P. 235 – 250.117.[Majid, Levinson 2011] A. Majid, S.C. Levinson (eds). The senses in lan-guage and culture // The senses & society (special issue). 2011. V. 6. № 1.118.[Marchand 1960] Marchand H.
The Categories and Types of Present-dayEnglish Word-formation. 1960.119.[Mengistu 2007] Arberber Mengistu (ed.) The Language of Memory in aCrosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2007120.[Newman 1998] Newman, J. (ed.).
The Linguistics of Giving. Amsterdam:Benjamins, 1998.121.[Newman 2002] Newman J. (ed.). The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing andLying. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2002.122.[Newman 2009] Newman J. (ed.) The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking –Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2009.123.[Norman 1988] Norman J.
Chinese. Cambridge University Press, 1988124.[Packard 2000] Packard, Jerome L. The Morphology of Chinese. A Lin-guistic and Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: 2000.125.[Pavlova, Kholkina 2013] Words of hardness and softness: towards lexicaltypology // Association for Linguistic Typology. The 10th Biennal Conference(Leipzig, 2013 August 15-18).
Abstracts. 2013. Online publication:http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/conference/2013_ALT10/pdf/abstracts/Abstracts_ALT10_complete.pdf126.[Pullum, Huddleston 2002] Adjectives and adverbs. In: R. Huddleston &Pullum J.K. (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp.525-596). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002127.[Rakhilina, Plungian 2012] Rakhilina E, Plungian V. 2012. Time and space// Russian Linguistics 2012.128.[Reznikova et al. 2012] Reznikova, T.; Rakhilina, E.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya,343A. 2012.
Towards a typology of pain predicates // Linguistics. Volume 50, Issue3, pp. 421–465.129.[Scalise, Vogel 2012] Sergio Scalise, Irene Barrie Vogel (eds.) Cross Disci-plinary Issues in Compounding. John Benjamins Publishing, 2010130.[Schachter 1985] Schachter, P. (1985), Parts of Speech Systems, in T.Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: ClauseStructure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 3-61.131.[Senft et al.
2007] C G. Senft, A. Majid, S.C. Levinson. The language oftaste // A. Majid (ed.). Field manual. V. 10. Nijmegen, 2007.132.[Shi 2002] Shi, Y.Z. The Estabilishment of Modern Chinese Grammar. TheFormation of the Resultative Construction and Its Effects. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2002133.[Štekauer, Lieber 2005] Pavol Štekauer, Rochelle Lieber. Handbook ofWord-Formation Springer 2005134.[Svorow 1993] Svorow Soteria. The Grammar of Space.