Диссертация (1155012), страница 40
Текст из файла (страница 40)
68 – 79.234. Шелепова, Е.С. Психологические характеристики профессиональнойдеятельности инженеров-проектировщиков в промышленном и гражданскомстроительстве: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук: 19.00.03 /Е.С. Шелепова. – М.,2007. – 23 с.227235. Шептура,А.В.Психологическиеособенностиуверенностииадаптивности иностранных студентов: дис. … канд.
психол. наук: 19.00.01 /А.В.Шептура. – М., 2015. – 195 с.236. Шляхта, Д.А. Индивидуально-типические особенности активностиличности в коммуникативной, волевой и познавательной сферах: автореф. дис. …канд. психол. наук: 19.00.01 /Д.А. Шляхта. – М., 2008. – 22 с.237. Юревич, А.В. Социальная психология научной деятельности /А.В.Юревич. – М.: Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2013.
– 447 с.238. Яголковский, С.Р. Инновационность и креативность субъекта какдетерминанты успешности его продуктивной деятельности /С.Р. Яголковский//Высшаяшколаэкономики[Сайт].–М.,2010.–Режимдоступа:https://www.hse.ru/data/2010/05/13/1217818155/%D0%AF%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%A1.%D0%A0..pdf.239. Яголковский, С.Р. Психология инноваций: подходы, модели, процессы:Монография /С.Р. Яголковский. – М.: Издательский дом Высшей школыэкономики, 2011. – 264 с.240. Яркова, Т.А. Научные основы организации научно-исследовательскойдеятельности/Т.А.Яркова//ВестникЧелябинскогогосударственногоуниверситета.
– 2013. – № 3. – С. 215 – 228.241. Abele, A.E. How do objective and subjective career success interrelate overtime? /A.E. Abele, D. Spurk //Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. –2009. – Vol. 82. – P. 803 – 824.242. Abele, A.E. The construct of career success: measurement issues and anempiricalexample/A.E.Abele,D.Spurk,J.Volmer//ZeitschriftfürArbeitsmarktforschung. – 2011. – Vol. 43, № 3.
– P. 195 – 206.243. Abele, A.E. The dual impact of gender and the influence of timing ofparenthood on men’s and women’s career development: Longitudinal findings /A.E.Abele, D. Spurk //International Journal of Behavioral Development. – 2011. – Vol. 35,№ 3. – P. 225 – 232.228244. Abramo, G. How do you define and measure research productivity? /G.Abramo, C.A. D’Angelo //Scientometrics. – 2014. – Vol. 101.
– P. 1129 – 1144.245. Albert, C. Determinants of Research Productivity in Spanish Academia /C.Albert, M.A. Davia, N. Legazpe //European Journal of Education. – 2016. – Vol 51, №4. – P. 535 – 549.246. Antonio-Garcia, M.T. Determinants of success for biomedical researchers: aperception-based study in a health science research environment /M.T. Antonio-Garcia,I. Lopez-Navarro, J. Rey-Rocha //Scientometrics.
– 2014. – Vol. 101. – P. 1747 – 1779.247. Atencio, M. A critical success factors frame work that includes leadershipcompetencies for successful delivery of projects: A Dissertation Presented for TheDoctoral of Philosophy Degree /Marca Atencio. – Manchester, 2013. – 212 p.248. Babu, A.R. Determinants of research productivity /A.R. Babu, Y.P.
Singh//Scientometrics. – 1998. – Vol. 43, № 3. – P. 309 – 329.249. Baccini, A. Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientificperformance /A. Baccini, L. Barabesi, M. Cioni, C. Pisani //Scientometrics. – 2014. –Vol. 101. – P.
2035 – 2062.250. Barrios, M. Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis /M.Barrios, A. Villarroya, A. Borrego //Scientometrics. – 2013. – Vol. 95, № 1. – P. 15 – 23.251. Beaudry, C. Impact of research funding and scientific production onscientific impact: Are Quebec academic women really lagging behind? /C. Beaudry, V.Lariviere //DRUID Society Conference. – Copenhagen: CBS, 2014. – P.
1 – 31.252. Bloch, C. Competitive Research Grants and Their Impact on CareerPerformance /C. Bloch, E.K. Graversen, H.S. Pedersen //Minerva. – 2014. – Vol. 52. – P.77 – 96.253. Brinkmann, S. Psychology as a Moral Science: Perspectives on Normativity/S. Brinkmann. – New York, London: Springer, 2011. – 174 p.254. Bunt, A. Probabilistic Student Modelling to Improve Exploratory Behaviour/A. Bunt, C. Conati //Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. – 2003. –Vol.
13, № 3. – P. 269 – 309.229255. Carayol, N. Individual and Collective Determinants of Academic Scientists’Productivity /N. Carayol, M. Matt //Information Economics and Policy. – 2006. – Vol.,№ 1. – P. 55 – 72.256. Cardoso, A.R. Comparing the Early Research Performance of PhDGraduates in Labor Economics in Europe and the USA /A.R.
Cardoso, P. Guimaraes,K.F. Zimmermann //Scientometrics. – 2010. – Vol. 84. – P. 621 – 637.257. Chua, A. The triple package /A. Chua, J. Rubenfeld. – London: Bloomsbury,2015. – 288 p.258. Di Fabio, A. Beyond fluid intelligence and personality traits in scholasticsuccess: Trait emotional intelligence /A.
Di Fabio, L. Palazzeschi //Learning andIndividual Differences. – 2015. – Vol. 40. – P. 121 – 126.259. Edelman, S. Curiosity and Exploration [Electronic resource] /S. Edelman. –Northridge, 1997. – DOI: http://www.csun.edu/~vcpsy00h/students/explore.htm.260. Farsides, T. Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: therole of personality, intelligence, and application /T. Farsides, R. Woodfield //Personalityand Individual Differences.
– 2003. – Vol. 34. – P. 1225 – 1243.261. Feist, G.J. A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and ArtisticCreativity /G.J. Feist //Personality and Social Psychology review. – 1998. – Vol. 2, № 4.– P. 290 – 309.262. Feist, G.J. The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind/G.J. Feist. – New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006.
– 316 p.263. Feist, G.J. The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascentdiscipline /G.J. Feist, M.E. Gorman //Review of General Psychology. – 1998. – Vol. 2,№ 1. – P. 3 – 47.264. Feist, G.J. The psychology of scientific thought and behavior /G.J. Feist//The Psychologist. – 2013. – Vol. 26, № 12. – P. 864 – 867.265. Formation and development of innovative culture of a personality and group:resolution of the 3rd session on of the sectoral Congress of the IASHE in the field ofPsychology (London, November, 20 – December, 20, 2013) /International Academy of230Science and Higher Educational; the Curator: Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University.– London: IASHE, 2014.
– 90 p.266. Gazzaniga, M.S. Psychological Science” Mind, Brain, and Behavior /M.S.Gazzaniga, T. Heatherton, D. Halpern. – New York: W.W. Norton, 2003. – 589 p.267. Gonzalez-Brambila, C. The determinants of research output and impact: Astudy of Mexican researchers /C. Gonzalez-Brambila, F. Veloso //Research Policy. –2007. – Vol.
36, № 7. – P. 1035 – 1051.268. Hart, J. Does a “Triple Package” of traits predict success? /J. Hart, C.F.Chabris //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2016. – Vol. 94. – P. 216 – 222.269. Jungbauer-Gans, M. Determinants of Success in University Careers:Findings from the German Academic Labor Market /M. Jungbauer-Gans, Ch. Gross//Zeitschrift fur Soziologie. – 2013. – Vol. 42, № 1. – P. 74 – 92.270. Jurgena, I. Notions of Teachers in Vocational Education aboutPurposefulness [Electronic resource] /I. Jurgena, D.
Cedere, S. Grase //Society.Integration.Education.–2015.–Vol.2.–DOI:http://journals.ru.lv/index.php/SIE/article/view/461.271. Jurgena, I. Students’ views on the professional career opportunities /I.Jurgena, D. Cedere, S. Grase //Engineering for Rural Development. In: Proceedings ofthe 13th International scientific conference „Engineering for rural development”. –Jelgava: LLU, 2014. – P.
522 – 528.272. Kashdan, T.B. How are curious people viewed and How do they behave insocial situation? From the perspectives of self, friends, parents, and unacquaintedobservers /T.B. Kashdan, R.A. Sherman, J. Yabro, D.C. Funder //Journal of Personality.– 2013. – Vol. 81, № 2. – P. 142 – 154.273. Kappe, R. Predicting academic success in higher education: What’s moreimpotent that being smart? /R.
Kappe, H. van der Flier //European Journal of Psychologyof Education. – 2012. – Vol. 27. – P. 605 – 619.274. Kappe, R. Determinants of Success: a Longitudinal Study in HigherProfessional Education /R. Kappe. – Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, 2011. – 173 p.231275. Kim, K. Determinants of Research Productivity: A Korean Case /K. Kim//Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy. – 2014. – Vol. 3, № 2.
– P. 193 – 215.276. Krapp, A. Interest and Curiosity. The Role of Interest in a Theory ofExploratory /A. Krapp //Keller, H., Schneider, K., Henderson B., Eds. Curiosity andexploration. – New York: Springer, 1994. – P. 79 – 100.277. Kwon, K. The impact of graduate students on research productivity in Korea/K. Kwon, S.H. Kim, T. Park, E.K. Kim, D. Jang //Journal of Open Innovation:Technology, Market, and Complexity. – 2015.
– Vol. 1:21. – P. 1 – 11.278. Kyvik, S. Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields oflearning /S. Kyvik //Higher Education. – 1990. – Vol. 19. – P. 37 – 55.279. Laidra, K. Personality and intelligence as predictors of academicachievement: a cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school /K. Laidra, H.Pullmann, J.
Allik //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2007. – Vol. 42. – P. 441 –451.280. Larivie’re, V. Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact:an analysis of Quebec university professors /V. Larivie’re, E. Vignola-Gagne, Ch.Villeneuve, P. Gelinas, Y.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
