Диссертация (1155012), страница 41
Текст из файла (страница 41)
Gingras //Scientometrics. – 2011. – Vol. 87. – P. 483 – 498.281. Lissoni, F. Scientific productivity and academic promotion: a study onFrench and Italian physicists /F. Lissoni, J. Mairesse, F. Montobbio, M. Pezzoni//Industrial and Corporate Change. – 2011. – Vol. 20, № 1. – P. 253 – 294.282. Litman, J.A. Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking newinformation /J.A. Litman //Cognition and Emotion. – 2005. – Vol. 19, № 6. – P. 793 –814.283. Litman, J.A.
Epistemic curiosity, feeling-of-knowing, and exploratorybehavior /J.A. Litman, T.L. Hutchins, R.K. Russon //Cognition and Emotion. – 2005. –Vol. 19, № 4. – P. 559 – 582.284. Lounsbury, J.W. Intelligence, “Big Five” personality traits, and work driveas predictors of course grade /J.W. Lounsbury, E. Sundstrom, J.M. Loveland, L.W.Gibson //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2003. – Vol. 35. – P.
1231 – 1239.232285. Lucas, B. How to teach vocational education: A theory of vocationalpedagogy /B. Lucas, E. Spenser, G. Claxton. – London: City & Guilds Center for SkillsDevelopment, 2012. – 134 p.286. Lyubomirsky, S. The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does HappinessLead to Success? /S. Lyubomirsky, L. King, E. Diener //Psychological Bulletin. – 2005.– Vol. 131, № 6. – P. 803 – 855.287.
Neill, U.S. Assessing Research Productivity [Electronic resource] /U.S.Neill, C.B. Thompson, D.S. Gibson //The Scientist, January 1, 2015. – DOI:http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleno/41682/title/Assessing-Research-Productivity/.288. Njoo, M. Exploratory learning with a Computer Simulation for ControlTheory: Learning Processes and Instructional Support /M. Njoo, T. de Jong //Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching. – 1993. – Vol.
30, № 8. – P. 821 – 844.289. Obembe, O.B. Determinants of scientific productivity among NigerianUniversity academics /O.B. Obembe //Indian Journal of Science and Technology. – 2012.– Vol. 5, № 2. – P. 2155 – 2164.290. Othman, N. Exploring the Innovative Personality Characteristics amongTeachers /N. Othman //International Education Studies. – 2016. – Vol. 9, № 4. – P. 1–8.291.
Pastor, J.M. The determinants of the research output of universities:specialization, quality and inefficiencies /J.M. Pastor, L. Serrano. – Scientometrics. –2016. – Vol. 109. – P. 1255 – 1281.292. Perkins, D.N. The possibility of invention /In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.) //Thenature of creativity. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
– P. 362 – 385.293. Reio, T.G. Jr. Adult curiosity dimensionality /T.G. Reio Jr. //Proceedings ofthe Seventh Annual College of Education Research Conference. – Miami: FloridaInternational University, 2008. – P. 123 – 128.294. Rey-Rocha, J. Exploring social integration as a determinant of researchactivity, performance and prestige of scientists. Empirical evidence in the Biology andBiomedicine field /J. Rey-Rocha, B. Garzon-Garcia, M. J. Martin-Sempere//Scientometrics. – 2007.
– Vol. 72, № 1. – P. 59 – 80.233295. Salyer, S.D. An Investigation of the Relationships among Work Values,Personality traits, Job Satisfaction, and Career Satisfaction: A Dissertation Presented forThe Doctoral of Philosophy Degree /Shannon Danielle Salyer. – Knoxville, 2007.–98 p.296. Seligman, M.E.P. Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation ofInterventions /M.E.P. Seligman, T.A. Steen, N. Park, Ch. Peterson //AmericanPsychologist. – 2005. – Vol.
60, №. 5. – P. 410 – 421.297. Simonton, D.K. Applying the Psychology of Science to the Science ofPsychology: Can Psychologists Use Psychological Science to Enhance Psychology as aScience? /D.K. Simonton //Perspectives on Psychological Science. – 2009. – Vol. 4, №1. – P.
2 – 4.298. Singh, Y.P. Interpersonal communication and scientific productivity /Y.P.Singh, S.N. Laharia //Interaction. – 1986. – Vol. 4. – P. 27 – 32.299. Sitdikova, S.N. Personal determinants of women career success /S.N.Sitdikova //Russian Psychological Journal. – 2009. – Vol. 6, № 4. – P.
63 – 66.300. Sorensen, H.T. I-determinants for a successful PhD or postdoctoral outcome/H.T. Sorensen //Clinical Epidemiology. – 2016. – Vol. 8. – P. 297 – 303.301. Sotudeh, H. Gender differences in science: the case of scientific productivityin Nano Science & Technology during 2005 – 2007 /H. Sotudeh, N. Khoshian//Scientometrics.
– 2014. – Vol. 98, № 1. – P. 457 – 472.302. Sternberg, R.J. A three-facet model of creativity /In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.)//The nature of creativity. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. – P. 125 –147.303. Supangco, V. Organizational and Individual Determinants of Success /V.Supangco //4th Annual BSP UP Professorial Chair Lectures. – Malate, Manila: BangkoSentral ng Pilipinas, 2011.
– P. 2- 16.304. Van der Lee, R. Gender contributes to personal research funding success inThe Netherlands [Electronic resource] /R. van der Lee, N. Ellemers //Proceeding of theNational Academy of Sciences Early Edition, September 21, 2015. – DOI:www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510159112..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
