Диссертация (1148577), страница 38
Текст из файла (страница 38)
/ A. W.Koornneef, F. Wijnen, E. Reuland // Ambiguity in anaphora workshopproceedings. — Malaga, Spain, 2006. — P. 65–72.26.MacDonald, M. C. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. / M. C.MacDonald, N. J. Pearlmutter, M. S. Seidenberg // Psychological Review. —1994. — № 101. — P. 676–703.27.Frazier, L. Sentence processing: a tutorial review. / L. Frazier // Attention andPerformance XII, 1987.
— P. 559–586.28.Frazier, L. Semantic evaluation of syntactic structure: Evidence from eyemovements. / L. Frazier, M. N. Carminatti, A. E. Cook, H. Majewski, K. Rayner// Cognition. — 2006. — № 99. — P. B53–B62.29.Boland, J. E. Linking eye movements to sentence comprehension in reading andlistening. / J. E. Boland // The OnLine Study of Sentence Comprehension:Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond. — New York, 2004. — P. 51–76.30.Staub, A.
Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. / A. Staub,K. Rayner // The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. — NY, 2007. —P. 327–341.21631.Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax / N. Chomsky — Cambridge,Mass.: MIT Press, 1965. — 296 p.32.Исаченко, А. В.
О грамматическом порядке слов. / А. В. Исаченко //Вопросы языкознания. — 1966. — № 6. — С. 27–34.33.Федорова, О. В. Экспериментальный анализ дискурса / О. В. Федорова —М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2014. — 512 с.34.Grosz, B. J. Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse. / B. J. Grosz, C.L. Sidner // Computantional Linguistics. — 1986. — № 12(3). — P. 175–204.35.Grosz B. J. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence ofdiscourse / B. J. Grosz, A. K.
Joshi, S. Weinstein // Computational Linguistics. —1995. — № 21(2). — P. 202–225.36.Joshi, A. K. Control of inference: Role of some aspects of discourse structure–centering / A. K. Joshi, S. Weinstein // Proceedings of International JointConference on Artificial Intelligence, 1981. — P. 435–439.37.Walker, M. A. Centering Theory in Discourse / M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi, E.
F.Prince — Oxford Clarendon Press, 1998. — 451 p.38.Poesio, M. Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations / M. Poesio,R. Stevenson, B. D. Eugenio, J. Hitzeman // Computational Linguistics. — 2004.— № 30. — P. 309–363.39.Chafe, W. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, and topics /W. Chafe // Subject and Topic. — New York, 1976. — P. 25–76.40.Givon, T. Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study /T. Givon — J.
Benjamins, 1983. — 492 p.41.Kameyama, M. Intra-sentential centering: A case study / M. Kameyama //Centering Theory in Discourse. — Oxford, 1998. — P. 89–112.21742.Miltsakaki, E. Locating topics in text processing / E. Miltsakaki // Proceedings ofComputational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN). — Utrecht, 1999. — P. 1–12.43.Danes, F.
Zur linguistischen der textstruktur / F. Danes // Folia Linguistica. —1970. — № 4(1–2). — P. 72–78.44.Brennan, S. A centering approach to pronouns / S. Brennan, M. Friedman,C. Pollard // Proceedings of the 25th ACL, 1987. — P. 155–162.45.Walker, M. A. Japanese discourse and the process of centering / M. A. Walker,M. Iida, S.
Cote // Computational Linguistics. — 1994. — № 20(2). — P. 193–232.46.Ariel, M. Referring and accessibility / M. Ariel // Journal of Linguistics. — 1988.— № 24. — P. 65–87.47.Ariel, M. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents / M. Ariel — London Routledge,1990. — 280 p.48.Ariel, M. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar / M. Ariel //Journal of Pragmatics. — 1991. — № 16. — P.
443–463.49.Ariel, M. Accessibility theory: An overview / M. Ariel // Text representation:Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. — Amsterdam, 2001. — P. 29–87.50.Clark H. H. Definite reference and mutual knowledge / H. H. Clark,C.R. Marshall // Elements of discourse understanding. — Cambridge, 1981. — P.10–63.51.Ariel, M. The linguistic status of 'here and how' / M. Ariel // CognitiveLinguistics.
— 1998. — № 9. — P. 189–237.52.Trueswll, J. C. Towards a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntacticambiguity resolution / J. C. Trueswll, M. K. Tanenhaus // Perspectives on senteceprocessing. — Hillsdale, HJ, 1994. — P. 155–179.21853.van den Broek P. A "landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns ofactivation and the construction of a stable memory representation / P. van denBroek, K. Risden, C. R. Fletcher, R. Thurlow // Models of understanding test. —Mahwah, NJ, 1996.
— P. 165–187.54.Arnold, J. E. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-orientedprocesses / J. E. Arnold // Language and Cognitive Processes. — 2008. — №23:4. — P. 495–527.55.Arnold, J. E. The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and fequency ofreference continuation / J. E. Arnold // Discourse Processes. — 2001. — № 31.— P. 137–162.56.Arnold, J. E. Reference for and discourse patterns / J. E. Arnold — Doctoraldissertation, Stanford University, 1998. — 291 p.57.Kibrik, A. A. Reference in discourse / A.
A. Kibrik — Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2011. — 688 p.58.Kibrik, A. A. Anaphora in Russian Narrative Prose: A Cognitive Account / A. A.Kibrik // Studies in Anaphora. — Amsterdam, 1996. — P. 255–304.59.Kibrik, A. A. A Cognitive Calculative Approach Towards Discourse Anaphora /A. A. Kibrik // Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor ResolutionConference (DAARC2000) . — Lancaster, 2000. — P. 72–82.60.Кибрик, А.
А. Механизмы устранения референциального конфликта /А. А. Кибрик // Моделирование языковой деятельности в интеллектуальныхсистемах. — Москва, 1987. — С. 128–146.61.Kibrik, A. A. Maintenance of Reference in Sentence and Discourse / A. A. Kibrik// Language Typology. — Amsterdam, 1991. — P.
57–84.62.Кибрик, А. А. Референция и рабочая память: о взаимодействии лингвистикис психологией и когнитивной наукой / А. А. Кибрик // Материалы первой219российской интернет-конференции по когнитивной науке. — Москва, 2004.— С. 29–43.63.Mann, W. Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of textorganization / W. Mann, S. A.
Thompson // Text. — 1988. — № 8. — P. 243–281.64.Mann, W. Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis / W. Mann,C. Matthiessen, S. A. Thompson // Discourse description. — Amsterdam, 1992.— P. 39–78.65.Tomlin, R. S. Linguistic reflections of cognitive events / R. S. Tomlin //Coherence and grounding in discourse. — Amsterdam, 1987. — P.
455–479.66.Givón, T. Syntax: A fuctional-typological introduction / T. Givón. —Amsterdam:Benjamins. — Volume 2. —1990. — 410 p.67.Kibrik, A. A. Reference in discourse / A. A. Kibrik — Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2011. — 651 p.68.Kibrik, A. A. Cognitive inferences from discourse observations: Reference andworking memory / A. A. Kibrik // Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics.Proceedings of the 5th International cognitive linguistics conference. —Amsterdam, 1999.
— P. 29–52.69.Elman J. Rethinking Innateness. A Connectionist Perspective on Development / J.Elman, K. Plunkett, D. Parisi, A. Karmiloff-Smith, E. Bates, M. H. Johnson —Cambridge MAMIT Press, 1996. — 450 p.70.Gruening, A. Referential Choice and Activation Factors: A Neural NetworkApproach / A. Gruening, A. A. Kibrik // Proceedings of the 4th Discourseanaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium.
— Lisbon, 2002. — P. 81–86.71.Grüning, A. Modeling referential choice in discourse: A cognitive calculativeapproach and a Neural Networks approach / A. Grüning, A. A. Kibrik //220Anaphora processing: Linguistic, cognitive and computational modelling. —Amsterdam, 2005. — P. 163–198.72.Hobbs, J. R. Coherence and coreference / J. R. Hobbs // Cognitive Science. —1979. — № 3(1). — P.
67–90.73.Kehler, A. Coherence and Coreference Revisited / A. Kehler, H. Kertz, H. Rohde,J. Elman // Journal of Semantics. — 2008. — № 25. — P. 1–44.74.Rohde, H. Grammatical and Information-Structural Influences on PronounProduction / H. Rohde, A. Kehler // Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience. —2014. — № 29(8). — P. 912–927.75.Hobbs, J. R. Literature and Cognition / J. R. Hobbs — Center for the Study ofLanguage (CSLI), 1990. — 180 p.76.Kehler, A.
Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar / A. Kehler —Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. — 200 p.77.Stevenson, R. Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events /R. Stevenson, R. Crawley, D. Kleinman // Language and Cognitive Processes.
—1994. — № 9. — P. 519–548.78.Fukumura, K. Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into accountlikelihood of reference? / K. Fukumura, P. G. van Gompel // Journal of Memoryand Language. — 2010. — № 62. — P. 52–66.79.Carlson, G. N. Thematic roles and language comprehension / G. N. Carlson,M. K. Tanenhaus // Syntax and Semantics. — New York.
— P. 263–300.80.Taraban, R. Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentenceprocessing:Influencesofcontent-basedexpectations/R.Taraban,J. L. McClelland // Journal of Memory and Language. — 1988. — № 27. —P. 597–632.22181.Stowe, L. A. Thematic structures and sentence comprehension / L. A.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
