Диссертация (1140769), страница 12
Текст из файла (страница 12)
‒ 2008. ‒ T. 10, № 5. ‒ C. 719-722.24. Fu W. J., Xu Y. D., Wang Z. X., Li G., Shi J. G., Cui F. Z., Zhang Y., Zhang X. New ureteralscaffold constructed with composite poly (L‐lactic acid)–collagen and urothelial cells by newcentrifugal seeding system // Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. ‒ 2012. ‒ T. 100, № 7.‒ C. 1725-1733.25. Gilding D., Williams D. Biocompatibility of clinical implant materials // BiodegradablePolymersCRC Press Boca Raton, FL, 1981. ‒ C. 209-232.26.
Gupta N., Mishra S., Dogra P., Hemal A., Seth A., Kumar R. Outcome of end-to-end urethroplasty:single-center experience // Urologia internationalis. ‒ 2009. ‒ T. 82, № 2. ‒ C. 179-182.27. Guralnick M. L., Webster G. D. The augmented anastomotic urethroplasty: indications andoutcome in 29 patients // The Journal of urology. ‒ 2001. ‒ T. 165, № 5. ‒ C. 1496-1501.28. Han D., Gouma P.-I. Electrospun bioscaffolds that mimic the topology of extracellular matrix //Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. ‒ 2006. ‒ T.
2, № 1. ‒ C. 37-41.29. Harris L. D., Kim B.-S., Mooney D. J. Open pore biodegradable matrices formed with gas foaming//. ‒ 1998. № 42. ‒ C. 396-402.30. Heineken F., Skalak R. Tissue engineering: a brief overview // Journal of biomechanicalengineering. ‒ 1991. ‒ T. 113, № 2. ‒ C. 111-112.31. Horst M., Madduri S., Milleret V., Sulser T., Gobet R., Eberli D.
A bilayered hybrid microfibrousPLGA–Acellular matrix scaffold for hollow organ tissue engineering // Biomaterials. ‒ 2013. ‒ T. 34,№ 5. ‒ C. 1537-1545.32. Kanatani I., Kanematsu A., Inatsugu Y., Imamura M., Negoro H., Ito N., Yamamoto S., Tabata Y.,Ikada Y., Ogawa O. Fabrication of an optimal urethral graft using collagen-sponge tubes reinforcedwith copoly (L-lactide/ε-caprolactone) fabric // Tissue engineering. ‒ 2007.
‒ T. 13, № 12. ‒ C. 29332940.33. Langer R. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering // Nat Biotechnol. ‒ 1994. ‒ C.689-93.34. Lauritzen M., Greis G., Sandberg A., Wedren H., Öjdeby G., Henningsohn L. Intermittent selfdilatation after internal urethrotomy for primary urethral strictures: a case–control study //Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. ‒ 2009. ‒ T.
43, № 3. ‒ C. 220-225.35. Lee S. J., Liu J., Oh S. H., Soker S., Atala A., Yoo J. J. Development of a composite vascularscaffolding system that withstands physiological vascular conditions // Biomaterials. ‒ 2008. ‒ T. 29,№ 19. ‒ C. 2891-2898.36. Lee S. J., Oh S. H., Liu J., Soker S., Atala A., Yoo J.
J. The use of thermal treatments to enhancethe mechanical properties of electrospun poly (ɛ-caprolactone) scaffolds // Biomaterials. ‒ 2008. ‒ T.29, № 10. ‒ C. 1422-1430.37. Li C., Xu Y.-M., Song L.-J., Fu Q., Cui L., Yin S. Urethral reconstruction using oral keratinocyteseeded bladder acellular matrix grafts // The Journal of urology. ‒ 2008. ‒ T. 180, № 4.
‒ C. 15381542.38. Lin J., Hao J., Jin J., Deng S., Hu J., Na Y. [Homologous dermal acellular matrix graft for urethralreconstruction in man (report of 16 cases)] // Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. ‒ 2005. ‒ T. 85, № 15. ‒ C.1057-1059.7939. Liu Y., Bharadwaj S., Lee S. J., Atala A., Zhang Y. Optimization of a natural collagen scaffold toaid cell-matrix penetration for urologic tissue engineering // Biomaterials. ‒ 2009. ‒ T.
30, № 23-24. ‒C. 3865-73.40. MacDonald M. F., Al-Qudah H. S., Santucci R. A. Minimal impact urethroplasty allows same-daysurgery in most patients // Urology. ‒ 2005. ‒ T. 66, № 4. ‒ C. 850-853.41. Micol L. A., Ananta M., Engelhardt E.-M., Mudera V. C., Brown R. A., Hubbell J. A., Frey P.High-density collagen gel tubes as a matrix for primary human bladder smooth muscle cells //Biomaterials. ‒ 2011. ‒ T. 32, № 6.
‒ C. 1543-1548.42. Micol L. A., Da Silva L. F. A., Geutjes P. J., Oosterwijk E., Hubbell J. A., Feitz W. F., Frey P. Invivo performance of high-density collagen gel tubes for urethral regeneration in a rabbit model //Biomaterials. ‒ 2012. ‒ T. 33, № 30. ‒ C. 7447-7455.43. Mikos A. G., Lyman M. D., Freed L. E., Langer R. Wetting of poly (L-lactic acid) and poly (DLlactic-co-glycolic acid) foams for tissue culture // Biomaterials. ‒ 1994. ‒ T.
15, № 1. ‒ C. 55-58.44. Mundy A. R. Anastomotic urethroplasty // BJU international. ‒ 2005. ‒ T. 96, № 6. ‒ C. 921-944.45. Nakanishi Y., Chen G., Komuro H., Ushida T., Kaneko S., Tateishi T., Kaneko M. Tissueengineered urinary bladder wall sing PLGA mesh-collagen hybrid scaffolds: a omparison study ofcollagen sponge and gel as a caffold // Journal of pediatric surgery. ‒ 2003. ‒ T.
38, № 12. ‒ C. 17811784.46. Palminteri E., Berdondini E., Fusco F., De Nunzio C., Salonia A. Long-term results of smallintestinal submucosa graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction // Urology. ‒ 2012. ‒ T. 79, № 3. ‒ C. 695701.47. Pansadoro V., Emiliozzi P. Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures:long-term followup // The Journal of urology. ‒ 1996.
‒ T. 156, № 1. ‒ C. 73-75.48. Peterson A. C., Webster G. D. Management of urethral stricture disease: developing options forsurgical intervention // BJU international. ‒ 2004. ‒ T. 94, № 7. ‒ C. 971-976.49. Ram-Liebig G., Engel O., Schwaiger B., Reiss P., Pfalzgraf D., Dahlem R., Fisch M. 621 Tissueengineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty. Outcome of our first 10 patients // European UrologySupplements.
‒ 2012. ‒ T. 1, № 11. ‒ C. e621, e621a.50. Raya-Rivera A., Esquiliano D. R., Yoo J. J., Lopez-Bayghen E., Soker S., Atala A. Tissueengineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study // TheLancet. ‒ 2011. ‒ T. 377, № 9772. ‒ C. 1175-1182.51. Rourke K. F., Jordan G. H. Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to thebulbous urethral stricture // The Journal of urology. ‒ 2005. ‒ T. 173, № 4.
‒ C. 1206-1210.52. Santucci R. A., Joyce G. F., Wise M. Male urethral stricture disease // The Journal of urology. ‒2007. ‒ T. 177, № 5. ‒ C. 1667-1674.53. Santucci R. A., Mario L. A., c Aninch J. W. Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethralstricture: analysis of 168 patients // The Journal of urology.
‒ 2002. ‒ T. 167, № 4. ‒ C. 1715-1719.54. Sievert K.-D., Bakircioglu M. E., NUNES L., TU R., DAHIYA R., TANAGHO E. A. Homologousacellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in the rabbit: histological and functional evaluation //The Journal of urology. ‒ 2000. ‒ T. 163, № 6. ‒ C. 1958-1965.55. Singh O., Gupta S., Arvind N. Anterior urethral strictures: a brief review of the current surgicaltreatment // Urologia internationalis.
‒ 2011. ‒ T. 86, № 1. ‒ C. 1.56. Waxman S. W., Morey A. F. Management of urethral strictures // The Lancet. ‒ 2006. ‒ T. 367, №9520. ‒ C. 1379-1380.57. Wessells H., McAninch J. W. Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: free-graftversus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction // World journal of urology. ‒ 1998. ‒ T. 16, № 3. ‒ C. 175180.58. Akbal C., Lee S. D., Packer S. C., Davis M. M., Rink R. C., Kaefer M. Bladder augmentation withacellular dermal biomatrix in a diseased animal model // The Journal of urology. ‒ 2006. ‒ T. 176, №4.
‒ C. 1706-1711.59. Atala A., Guzman L., Retik A. B. A novel inert collagen matrix for hypospadias repair // J Urol. ‒1999. ‒ T. 162, № 3 Pt 2. ‒ C. 1148-51.8060. Chen F., Yoo J. J., Atala A. Acellular collagen matrix as a possible "off the shelf" biomaterial forurethral repair // Urology. ‒ 1999. ‒ T. 54, № 3.
‒ C. 407-10.61. Chung Y. G., Tu D., Franck D., Gil E. S., Algarrahi K., Adam R. M., Kaplan D. L., Estrada C. R.,Jr., Mauney J. R. Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support tissue regeneration in a rabbit modelof onlay urethroplasty // PLoS One. ‒ 2014. ‒ T. 9, № 3. ‒ C. e91592.62. Donkov, II, Bashir A., Elenkov C. H., Panchev P. K. Dorsal onlay augmentation urethroplasty withsmall intestinal submucosa: modified Barbagli technique for strictures of the bulbar urethra // Int JUrol. ‒ 2006. ‒ T. 13, № 11. ‒ C.
1415-7.63. Dorin R. P., Pohl H. G., De Filippo R. E., Yoo J. J., Atala A. Tubularized urethral replacementwith unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration? // World JUrol. ‒ 2008. ‒ T. 26, № 4. ‒ C. 323-6.64. el-Kassaby A., AbouShwareb T., Atala A. Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosaland acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures // J Urol.
‒ 2008. ‒ T. 179, №4. ‒ C. 1432-6.65. El-Kassaby A. W., Retik A. B., Yoo J. J., Atala A. Urethral stricture repair with an off-the-shelfcollagen matrix // J Urol. ‒ 2003. ‒ T. 169, № 1. ‒ C. 170-3; discussion 173.66. Farahat Y. A., Elbahnasy A. M., El-Gamal O. M., Ramadan A. R., El-Abd S. A., Taha M. R.Endoscopic urethroplasty using small intestinal submucosal patch in cases of recurrent urethralstricture: a preliminary study // J Endourol. ‒ 2009. ‒ T. 23, № 12. ‒ C. 2001-5.67.
Fiala R., Vidlar A., Vrtal R., Belej K., Student V. Porcine small intestinal submucosa graft forrepair of anterior urethral strictures // Eur Urol. ‒ 2007. ‒ T. 51, № 6. ‒ C. 1702-8; discussion 1708.68. Gilbert T. W., Sellaro T. L., Badylak S. F. Decellularization of tissues and organs // Biomaterials. ‒2006. ‒ T. 27, № 19. ‒ C. 3675-3683.69. Hauser S., Bastian P. J., Fechner G., Muller S. C.
Small intestine submucosa in urethral stricturerepair in a consecutive series // Urology. ‒ 2006. ‒ T. 68, № 2. ‒ C. 263-6.70. Huang X., Luo J., Liao Y., Qu Y., Yang Z. [Study on small intestinal submucosa as repairmaterials in urethral reconstruction] // Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. ‒ 2006. ‒ T. 20,№ 3. ‒ C. 206-9.71. Kajbafzadeh A. M., Sabetkish S., Tourchi A., Amirizadeh N., Afshar K., Abolghasemi H., ElmiA., Talab S. S., Eshghi P., Mohseni M. J. The application of tissue-engineered preputial matrix andfibrin sealant for urethral reconstruction in rabbit model // Int Urol Nephrol. ‒ 2014.10.1007/s11255014-0684-3.72. Kanatani I., Kanematsu A., Inatsugu Y., Imamura M., Negoro H., Ito N., Yamamoto S., Tabata Y.,Ikada Y., Ogawa O. Fabrication of an optimal urethral graft using collagen-sponge tubes reinforcedwith Copoly(L-lactide/epsilon-caprolactone) fabric // Tissue Eng.