Диссертация (1138653), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
33. – N 2. – P. 363–379.64.Croteau A. An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technologicaldeployment and organizational performance [Text] / A. Croteau, F. Bergeron //The journal of strategic information systems. – 2001. – Vol. 10. – N 2.
– P. 77–99.65.Davis K. A method to measure success dimensions relating to individualstakeholder groups [Text] / K. Davis // International Journal of ProjectManagement. – 2016. – Vol. 34. – N 3. – P. 480–493.66.De Marco A. Cost and schedule monitoring of industrial building projects: casestudy [Text] / A. De Marco, D.
Briccarello, C. Rafele // Journal of ConstructionEngineering and Management. – 2009. – Vol. 135. – N 9. – P. 853–862.67.Demirkan H. Service oriented technology management to improve organizationalagility [Text] / H. Demirkan, M. Goul // International Journal of Innovation andTechnology Management. – 2009. – Vol. 6. – N 1. – P.
1–16.13668.Dunn R. Software defect removal [Text] / R. Dunn – New York: McGrawHill, Inc, 1985 – 368 p.69.Eisenhardt K.M. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in theglobal computer industry [Text] / K.M. Eisenhardt, B.N. Tabrizi // Administrativescience quarterly. – 1995. – N 40. – P. 84–110.70.Fagan M.E. Design and code inspections to reduce errors in programdevelopment [Text] / M.E. Fagan // Pioneers and Their Contributions to SoftwareEngineering / Springer, 2001.
– P. 303–336.71.Ford D.N. Overcoming the 90% Syndrome: Iteration Management in ConcurrentDevelopment Projects [Text] / D.N. Ford, J.D. Sterman // ConcurrentEngineering. – 2003. – Vol. 11. – N 3. – P. 177–186.72.Gregor S. The transformational dimension in the realization of business valuefrom information technology [Text] / S. Gregor [and others] // The Journal ofStrategic Information Systems. – 2006. – Vol. 15. – N 3. – P.
249–270.73.Haji-Kazemi S. Barriers against effective responses to early warning signs inprojects [Text] / S. Haji-Kazemi, B. Andersen, O.J. Klakegg // InternationalJournal of Project Management. – 2015. – Vol. 33. – N 5. – P. 1068–1083.74.Hannan M.T. Structural inertia, organizational change [Text] / M.T. Hannan,J. Freeman // American Sociological Review. – 1984. – Vol. 49. – N 2. – P. 149–164.75.Hermarij J. Better Practices of Project Management based on IPMAcompetences. – 3rd reviewed edition [Text] / J.
Hermarij – Zaltbommel, TheNetherlands: Van Haren Publishing, 2013. – Issue 3. – 660 p.76.Herroelen W. Robust and reactive project scheduling: a review and classificationof procedures [Text] / W. Herroelen, R. Leus // International Journal ofProduction Research. – 2004a. – Vol. 42. – N 8. – P. 1599–1620.77.Herroelen W. The construction of stable project baseline schedules [Text] /W.
Herroelen, R. Leus // European Journal of Operational Research. – 2004b. –Vol. 156. – N 3. – P. 550–565.13778.Herroelen W. Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and researchpotentials [Text] / W. Herroelen, R. Leus // European Journal of OperationalResearch. – 2005. – Vol. 165. – N 2. – P. 289–306.79.Hersch M. Benefit-based earned value management system [Text] / M. Hersch –Patent USA US 20120253876 A1; The original patentee Accenture GlobalServices Limited; Application number US 13/434,417 – Date of publication 4Oct. 2012.80.Hornstein H.A. The integration of project management and organizational changemanagement is now a necessity [Text] / H.A. Hornstein // International Journal ofProject Management. – 2015.
– Vol. 33. – N 2. – P. 291–298.81.Humphrey W.S. Software process improvement at Hughes Aircraft [Text] /W.S. Humphrey, T.R. Snyder, R.R. Willis // IEEE Software. – 1991. – Vol. 8. –N 4. – P. 11–23.82.Jahangirian M. Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review [Text] /M. Jahangirian [and others] // European Journal of Operational Research. – 2010.– Vol. 203.
– N 1. – P. 1–13.83.Jeffries R. Guest Editors’ Introduction: TDD–The Art of Fearless Programming[Text] / R. Jeffries, G. Melnik // Software, IEEE. – 2007. – Vol. 24. – N 3. –P. 24–30.84.Jessen S.A. Can project dynamics be modeled? [Text] / S.A. Jessen //International Conference of System Dynamic Society Proceedings. – 1988. –P. 171–187.85.Johansson R. Case study methodology [Text] / R.
Johansson // Proceedings of theInternational Conference “Methodologies in Housing Research”, Stockholm. –2003. – P. 22–24.86.Kerimoglu O. Organizational adoption of information technologies: Case ofenterprise resource planning systems [Text] / O. Kerimoglu, N. Basoglu, T. Daim// The Journal of High Technology Management Research. – 2008.
– Vol. 19. –N 1. – P. 21–35.13887.Kettunen P. Combining agile software projects and large-scale organizationalagility [Text] / P. Kettunen, M. Laanti // Software Process: Improvement andPractice. – 2008. – Vol. 13. – N 2. – P. 183–193.88.Kitchenham B. Misleading metrics and unsound analyses [Text] / B. Kitchenham,D.R. Jeffery, C. Connaughton // Software, IEEE. – 2007. – Vol.
24. – N 2. –P. 73–78.89.Knapp D. ITSM Process Design Guide [Text] / D. Knapp – Fort Lauderdale, FL:J. Ross Publishing Inc, 2010. – 255 p.90.Kunz J.C. The virtual design team [Text] / J.C. Kunz [and others] //Communications of the ACM. – 1998. – Vol. 41. – N 11. – P. 84–91.91.Kuprenas J.A. Controlling design-phase scope creep [Text] / J.A. Kuprenas,E.B. Nasr // AACE International Transactions Conference Proceedings. – 2003.
–P CSC.01.1– CSC.01.5.92.Larsen T.J. A multilevel explanation of end-user computing satisfaction with anenterprise resource planning system within an international manufacturingorganization [Text] / T.J. Larsen // Computers in Industry. – 2009. – Vol. 60. –N 9. – P. 657–668.93.Lee C.S. Modeling the business value of information technology [Text] /C.S. Lee // Information & Management. – 2001. – N 39. – P.
191–210.94.Lee S. Reliability and stability buffering approach: Focusing on the issues oferrors and changes in concurrent design and construction projects [Text] / S. Lee,F. Peña-Mora, M. Park // Journal of construction engineering and management. –2006. – Vol. 132. – N 5. – P. 452–464.95.Leffingwell D. Calculating the Return on Investment from More EffectiveRequirements Management [Text] / D. Leffingwell // American Programmer. –1997. – Vol.
10. – N 4. – P. 13–16.96.Leus R. Stability and resource allocation in project planning [Text] / R. Leus,W. Herroelen // IIE Transactions. – 2004. – Vol. 36. – N 7. – P. 667–682.13997.Lewin K. Quasi-stationary social equilibria and the problem of permanent change[Text] / K. Lewin // Organization change : a comprehensive reader / Jossey-Bass,2008 – P. 73–77.98.Love P.E.D. Determining the causal structure of rework influences inconstruction [Text] / P.E.D.
Love, P. Mandal, H. Li // Construction Managementand Economics. – 1999. – N 17. – P. 505–517.99.Lu Y. What affects information systems development team performance? Anexploratory study from the perspective of combined socio-technical theory andcoordination theory [Text] / Y. Lu [and others] // Computers in Human Behavior.– 2011. – Vol. 27. – N 2. – P. 811–822.100.Lyneis J.M. Strategic management of complex projects: a case study usingsystem dynamics [Text] / J.M. Lyneis, K.G. Cooper, S.A. Els // SystemDynamics Review.
– 2001. – Vol. 17. – N 3. – P. 237–260.101.MacDonald B. Long-Term Business Modelling Using System Dynamics [Text] /B. MacDonald, J.M.M. Potter, K.O. Jensen // BT Technology Journal. – 2003. –Vol. 21. – N 2. – P. 158–169.102.Mahnic V. A case study on agile estimating and planning using scrum [Text] /V. Mahnic // Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika. – 2011. – Vol.
111. – N 5. – P. 123–128.103.Mathiassen L. Managing change in software process improvement [Text] /L. Mathiassen, O.K. Ngwenyama, I. Aaen // Software, IEEE. – 2005. – Vol. 22. –N 6. – P. 84–91.104.McKeown I. Business transformation, information technology and competitivestrategies: learning to fly [Text] / I. McKeown, G. Philip // International Journalof Information Management. – 2003. – Vol. 23.
– N 1. – P. 3–24.105.Meyer M.W. The performance paradox [Text] / M.W. Meyer, V. Gupta //Research in organizational behavior. – 1994. – N 16. – P. 309–369.106.Nesheim T. When employees and external consultants work together onprojects: Challenges of knowledge sharing [Text] / T. Nesheim, H.M. Hunskaar //140International Journal of Project Management. – 2015.
– Vol. 33. – N 7. –P. 1417–1424.107.Nikula U. Empirical validation of the Classic Change Curve on a softwaretechnology change project [Text] / U. Nikula [and others] // Information andSoftware Technology. – 2010. – Vol. 52. – N 6. – P. 680–696.108.OGC. Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 [Text] / The StationeryOffice. – 2009. – 342 p.109.Ohara S. A Guidebook for Project and Program Management for EnterpriseInnovation (P2M) [Text] / S. Ohara – Project Management Association of Japan.– 2005. – 93 p.110.Olugbode M.
The role of information technology in achieving the organisation’sstrategic development goals: A case study [Text] / M. Olugbode, R. Richards,T. Biss // Information Systems. – 2007. – Vol. 32. – N 5. – P. 641–648.111.Ortiz de Orue D.A. Robust project network design [Text] / D.A. Ortiz de Orue[and others] // Project Management Journal. – 2009. – Vol. 40. – N 2. – P.
81–93.112.O’Toole J. Change resisted. Thirty-three hypotheses why [Text] / J. O’Toole //Organization Change: A Comprehensive Reader. / Jossey-Bass, 1995. – P. 380–392.113.Pellegrinelli S. Programme management: organising project-based change[Text] / S. Pellegrinelli // International Journal of Project Management. – 1997. –Vol. 15. – N 3. – P. 141–149.114.Peters R.J. Quantifying the yield of risk-bearing IT-portfolios [Text] /R.J. Peters, C. Verhoef // Science of Computer Programming. – 2008.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
