Диссертация (1138653), страница 24
Текст из файла (страница 24)
– Vol. 71.– N 1. – P. 17–56.115.PMI. Practice standard for earned value management [Text] / ProjectManagement Institute, Inc., 2011. – Issue. 2. – 153 p.116.PMI. Руководство к своду знаний по управлению проектами (руководствоPMBoK) [Text] / Пер. с англ. – Project Management Institute, Inc.
[Институтуправления проектами], 2013a. – Вып. 5. – 586 с.141117.PMI. Software Extension to the PMBOK Guide, Fifth Edition [Text] / ProjectManagement Institute, Inc., 2013b. – Issue. 5. – 268 p.118.Portougal V. Business processes: operational solutions for SAP implementation[Text] / V. Portougal, D. Sundaram – Hershey, PA: IRM Press, 2006. – 329 p.119.Radhakrishnan A. A process-oriented perspective on differential business valuecreation by information technology: An empirical investigation [Text] /A. Radhakrishnan, X.
Zu, V. Grover // Omega. The International Journal ofManagement Science. – 2008. – Vol. 36. – N 6. – P. 1105–1125.120.Rahmesh S.P. Scope Creep, scrap & Churn are NOT SINS in RequirementsEngineering [Text] / S.P. Rahmesh, B. Madhavan // Drishtikon: A ManagementJournal. – 2012. – Vol. 3. – N 1. – P. 174–190.121.Ramirez R. Information technology infrastructure, organizational processredesign, and business value: An empirical analysis [Text] / R. Ramirez,N. Melville, E. Lawler // Decision Support Systems. – 2010. – Vol. 49. – N 4. –P. 417–429.122.Rivard S. Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated modelof the contribution of information technology to firm performance [Text] /S. Rivard, L.
Raymond, D. Verreault // The Journal of Strategic InformationSystems. – 2006. – Vol. 15. – N 1. – P. 29–50.123.Rodrigues A. The role of system dynamics in project management [Text] /A. Rodrigues, J. Bowers // International Journal of Project Management. – 1996.– Vol. 14. – N 4. – P. 213–220.124.Rodrigues A.G. System Dynamics in Project Management: Assessing theImpacts of Client Behaviour on Project Performance [Text] / A.G. Rodrigues,T.M.
Williams // The Journal of the Operational Research Society. – 1998. –Vol. 49. – N 1. – P. 2–15.125.Sakka O. Relationship between the interactive use of control systems and theproject performance: The moderating effect of uncertainty and equivocality[Text] / O. Sakka, H.
Barki, L. Côté // International Journal of ProjectManagement. – 2016. – Vol. 34. – N 3. – P. 508–522.142126. Satpathy T. A Guide to the Scrum body of knowledge (SBOK Guide) [Text] /T. Satpathy [and others] – Phoenix, AZ: VMEdu Inc, 2013. – 322 p.127.Serra C.E.M. Benefits Realisation Management and its influence on projectsuccess and on the execution of business strategies [Text] / C.E.M.
Serra,M. Kunc // International Journal of Project Management. – 2015. – Vol. 33. –N 1. – P. 53–66.128.Serrador P. Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success[Text] / P. Serrador, J.K. Pinto // International Journal of Project Management. –2015. – Vol. 33. – N 5. – P. 1040–1051.129.Shull F. What we have learned about fighting defects [Text] / F. Shull[and others] // 8th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium Proceedings.– Ottawa, Canada – 2002. – P. 249–258.130.Špundak M. Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology –Reality or Illusion? [Text] / M. Špundak // Procedia – Social and BehavioralSciences.
– 2014. – N 119. – P. 939–948.131.Sudhaman P. Efficiency analysis of ERP projects—software quality perspective[Text] / P. Sudhaman, C. Thangavel // International Journal of ProjectManagement. – 2015. – Vol. 33. – N 4. – P. 961–970.132.Swartz S.M. Managerial perceptions of project stability [Text] / S.M. Swartz //Project Management Journal. – 2008.
– Vol. 39. – N 4. – P. 17–32.133.Tallon P.P. Competing perspectives on the link between strategic informationtechnology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model[Text] / P.P. Tallon, A. Pinsonneault // MIS Quarterly. – 2011. – Vol. 35. – N 2. –P. 463–486.134.Taylor H. Risk management and problem resolution strategies for IT projects:prescription and practice [Text] / H. Taylor // Project Management Quarterly.
–2006. – Vol. 37. – N 5. – P. 49–63.135.Terlizzi M.A. Barriers to the use of an IT Project Management Methodology ina large financial institution [Text] / M.A. Terlizzi, F. Meirelles, H. Moraes //143International Journal of Project Management. – 2016. – Vol. 34. – N 3. – P. 467–479.136.Thakurta R.
Impact of Scope Creep on Software Project Quality [Text] /R. Thakurta // Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management. – 2013. – Vol. 10.– N 1. – P. 37–46137.Turkulainen V. Managing project-to-project and project-to-organizationinterfaces in programs: Organizational integration in a global operationsexpansion program [Text] / V.
Turkulainen [and others] // International Journal ofProject Management. – 2015. – Vol. 33. – N 4. – P. 816–827.138.Uhl A. A Handbook of Business Transformation Management Methodology[Text] / A. Uhl, L. Gollenia – Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2012. – 345 p.139.Van de Vonder S. Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling:An experimental analysis [Text] / S. Van de Vonder, E. Demeulemeester,W. Herroelen // European Journal of Operational Research.
– 2008. – Vol. 189. –N 3. – P. 723–733.140.VanRensburgA.C.J.Anobject-orientedarchitectureforbusinesstransformation [Text] / A.C.J. Van Rensburg // Computers & industrialengineering. – 1997. – Vol. 33. – N 1. – P. 167–170.141.Vrhovec S.L.R. Diagnosing organizational risks in software projects:Stakeholder resistance [Text] / S.L.R. Vrhovec [and others] // InternationalJournal of Project Management. – 2015.
– Vol. 33. – N 6. – P. 1262–1273.142.Wang C. When traditional information technology project managers encounterthe cloud: Opportunities and dilemmas in the transition to cloud services [Text] /C. Wang [and others] // International Journal of Project Management. – 2016. –Vol. 34. – N 3. – P. 371–388.143.Whyte J. Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configurationmanagement, asset information and ‘big data’ [Text] / J. Whyte, A.
Stasis,C. Lindkvist // International Journal of Project Management. – 2016. – Vol. 34. –N 2. – P. 339–351.144144.Williams T. The Effects of Design Changes and Delays on Project Costs [Text] /T. Williams [and others] // The Journal of the Operational Research Society. –1995. – Vol. 46. – N 7.
– P. 809–818.145.Willis R.R. Hughes Aircraft’s Widespread Deployment of a ContinuouslyImproving Software Process. Technical Report [Text] / R.R. Willis [and others] –Software Engineering Institute, 1998. – 87 p.146.Zhao Y. Risk management on joint product development with power asymmetrybetween supplier and manufacturer [Text] / Y. Zhao, H. Cao // InternationalJournal of Project Management. – 2015.
– Vol. 33. – N 8. – P. 1812–1826.147.Zhu X. An earned-value approach to assess and monitor software projectuncertainty: a case study in software test execution [Text] / X. Zhu, B. Zhou //Information technology journal. – 2010. – N 9(6). – P. 1104–1114.148.Zuykov K. Project communication system as an instrument to achieve schedulestability [Text] / K. Zuykov // Processes and project management. Gdansk:Gdansk University of Technology Publishers.
– 2015. – P. 71–74.149.Отраслевая специфика проектов ERP в России [Электронный ресурс] /URL:http://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/Статья:Отраслевая_специфика_проектов_ERP_в_России (дата обращения 19.04.2017).150.Системы управления предприятием (ERP) рынок России [Электронныйресурс]/URL:http://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/Статья:Системы_управления_предприятием_(рынок_России) (дата обращения 19.04.2017).145ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ 1. Анкета опроса о трудозатратах на изменения впроектахПриводятсявопросыанкеты,использовавшейсядлявыявлениязакономерностей, касающихся трудозатрат на изменения в проектах, аполученные ответы. Опрошено 24 сотрудника организации.1. Укажите Вашу роль в проектах организации.a. Член управляющего совета / Спонсор проекта – 3b.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
