Диссертация (1137858), страница 28
Текст из файла (страница 28)
– 1998– 41. – pp. 146-157.87.D'Aveni R. Top managerial prestige and organizationalbankruptcy // Organization Science. – 1990. – 2. – pp.121-142.88.Daily C., Dalton D. CEO and director turnover in failing firms:an illusion of change? // Strategic Management Journal. – 1995. – 16. –pp.
393 – 400.89.Daily C, Schwenk C. Chief executive officers, top managementteams and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces //Journal of Management. – 1996. – 22. – pp. 185-202.90.Dalton D.R., Daily C.M., Johnson J.L., Ellstrand A.E. Number ofdirectors and financial performance: a meta-analysis // The Academy ofManagement Journal.
– 1999. – 42 (6). – pp. 674-686.91.Demsetz H., Villalonga B. Ownership structure and corporateperformance // Journal of corporate Finance. – 2001. – 7(3). – pp. 209233.92.Dolgopyatova T., Iwasaki I., Yakovlev A. Organization andDevelopment of Russian Business: A firm-level Analysis. – PalgraveMacmillan. – 2009.93.Dulewicz V., Herbert P. Does the composition and practice ofboards of directors bear any relationship to the performance of theircompanies? // Corporate governance. – 2004. – 12(3). – pp. 263-280.94.Dwivedi N., Jain A.K. Corporate governance and performance ofIndian firms: the effect of board size and ownership // EmployeeResponsibilities and Rights Journal.
– 2005. – 17 (3). – pp. 161-172.95.Erhardt N.L., Werbal J.D., Shrader C.B. Board of directordiversity and firm financial performance // Corporate governance. –2003. – 11 (2). – pp. 102 – 11116496.Faccio M. Politically Connected Firms // The AmericanEconomic Review. – 2006. – 96 (1). – pp. 369-386.97.Fama E. F., Jensen M. Separation of Ownership and Control //Journal of Law and Economics. – 1983. – № 26. – p. 301–325.98.Fama.
E. Agency problems and the theory of the firm // Journalof Political Economy. – 1980. – 88. – pp. 288-307.99.Farrell K.A., Hersch P.L. Additions to corporate boards: theeffect of gender // Journal of Corporate finance. – 2005. – 11. – pp. 85196.100.
Faleye O., Hoitash R., Hoitash U. Industry Expertise onCorporate Boards. Northeastern U. D’Amore-McKim School ofBusiness Research Paper No. 2013-04, 2012.101. Ferris S.P., Jagannathan M., Pritchard A.C. Too busy to mind thebusiness? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments //The Journal of Finance. – 2003. – 58 (3).
– pp. 1087-1111.102. Francoeur C., Labelle R., Sinclair-Desgagne B. Gender diversityin corporate governance and top management // Journal of businessethics. – 2008. – 81. – pp. 83-95.103. Golden B.R., Zajac E.J. When will boards influence strategy?Inclination x Power = Strategic Chance // Strategic managementjournal. – 2001. – 22. – pp. 1087 – 1111.104.
Gordon J.N. The rise of independent directors in the UnitedStates, 1950 – 2005: of shareholder value and stock market prices //Stanford Law Review. – 2007. – 59 (6). – pp. 1465 – 1568.105. Jermias J., Gani L. The impact of board capital and boardcharacteristics on firm performance // The British Accounting Review.– 2013. – xxx. – pp. 1-13.165106.
Hambrick D., D'Aveni R. Top team deterioration as part of thedownward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies // ManagementScience. – 1992. – 38. – pp. 1445-1466.107. Hendry K., Kiel G. C. The role of the board in firm strategy:Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives // CorporateGovernance: An International Review. – 2004. – 12(4). – pp. 500–520.108. Hillman A., Zardkoohi A., Bierman L. Corporate politicalstrategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefitsfrom personal service in the US government // Strategic ManagementJournal. – 1999.
– 20. –pp. 67-82109. Hillman A.J., Cannella A.A., Paetzold R.L. The resourcedependence role of corporate directors: strategic adaptation of boardcomposition in response to environmental change // Journal ofManagement Studies. – 2000. – 37 (2). – pp. 235 – 255.110. Hunt V., Layton D., Prince S. Why diversity matters//McKinsey&Company. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа,2015:http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/Organization/Why_diversity_matters?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1501111.
Hu H.W., Tam O.K., Tan M.G.-S. Internal GovernanceMechanisms and Firm Performance in China // Asia Pacific Journal ofManagement. – 2010. – 27. – pp. 727-749.112. Iwasaki I. The determinants of board composition in atransforming economy: Evidence from Russia // Journal of corporatefinance. – 2008. – 14 (5). - pp. 532-544.113. Jackling B., Johl S.
Board structure and firm performance:evidence from India’s top companies // Corporate Governance: anInternational review. – 2009. – 17 (4). – pp. 492 – 509.166114. Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities. New York:Penguin, 1965.115. Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the Firm: ManagerialBehavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure // Journal ofFinancial Economics. – 1976. –Vol. 3. № 4.
– P. 305–360.116. Jiang, Y., Peng M.W. Principal-Principal Conflicts during Crisis// Asia Pacific Journal of Management. –2011. – 28. – pp. 683-695.117. Hillman A.J., Dalziel T. Boards of directors and firmperformance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives.– 2003. – 28 (3). – pp. 383–401.118. Kaymak T., Bektas E. East Meets West? Board Characteristics inan Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkish Banks // CorporateGovernance: An International Review. – 2008. – 16. – pp.
550-561.119. Klein A. Firm Performance and board committee structure //Journal of Law and Economics – 1998. – 41 (1). – pp. 275 – 303120. Kor Y., Sundaramurthy С. Experience-Based Human Capital andSocial Capital of Outside Directors // Journal of Management. –2009. –35. – pp. 981-1004121. Lefort F., Urzua F. Board Independence: Firm Performance andOwnership Concentration: Evidence from Chile // Journal of BusinessResearch.
– 2008. 61. – pp. 615-622122. Mace M. Directors, Myth and Reality. Boston, Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press. – 1986.123. Mak Y.T., Li Y. Determinants of corporate ownership and boardstructure: Evidence from Singapore // Journal of Corporate Finance. –2001. – 7 (3).
– pp. 235-256.124. Mannix K. C. Teva Pharmaceutical announces appointment ofDr. Arie Belldegrun to board of directors // Wall Street Journal. – 2013.- pp. 3 -20.167125. Millstein I.M., MacAvoy P.W. The active board of directors andperformance of the large publicly traded corporation // Columbia LawReview. – 1998. – 98 (5). – pp. 1283-1322126. Minichilli A., Zattoni A., Nielsen S., Huse M. Board taskperformance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinantsof board effectiveness // Journal of Organizational Behavior. – 2012.
–33. – pp. 193-215.127. O’Connel V., Cramer N. The relationship between firmperformance and board characteristics in Ireland // Europeanmanagement Journal. – 2010. – 28. – pp. 387-399.128. Peng M.W. Outside directors and firm performance duringinstitutional transitions // Strategic Management Journal. – 2004. – 25(5). – pp. 453 – 471.129. Penrose E. T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm // OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, 1959.130. Pfeffer.
J. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors:The organization and its environment // Administrative ScienceQuarterly. – 1972. – 17. – pp. 218-228.131. Pfeffer J. Organizational theory and structural perspectives onmanagement // Journal of Management. – 1991. – 17. – pp. 789-803.132. Piefier J., Salancik G. The external control of organizations: Aresource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.133.
Prahalad C.K., Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation// Harvard Business Review. – 1990. – 68(3). – pp. 79-91.134. Pugliese A., Minichilli A., Zattoni A. Integrating agency andresource dependence theory: Firm profitability, industry regulation, andboard task performance // Journal of Business Research. – 2014. – 67. –pp. 1189-1200.168135. Rindova V. What corporate boards have to do with strategy: Acognitive perspective // Journal of Management Studies.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
