Диссертация (1136963), страница 41
Текст из файла (страница 41)
Merz (2006): Locating the Dry Lab on the Lab Map. In: J.Lenhard, G. Küppers, T. Shinn (eds.), Simulation: PragmaticConstructions of Reality. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 25(Dordrecht: Springer), 155-17279.Morowski Ph., Sent. E-M. eds. 2002. Science Bought and Sold: TheNew Economics of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press80.Myers N. ‗Pedagogy and Performativity: Rendering Lives in Sciencein the Documentary Naturally Obsessed: The making of a scientist.‘Isis: Focus Section on Performing Science2010, 101 (4): 817–828.81.Myers N. ‗Dance Your PhD: Embodied Animations, BodyExperiments and the Affective Entanglements of Life ScienceResearch‘, Body & Society, 2012, 18 (1): 151-189.
Special issue onAnimation and Automation, edited by Jackie Stacey and LucySuchman.82.Myers N. Molecular Embodiments and the Body-work of Modelingin Protein Crystallography‘, Social Studies of Science, 2008, 38/2:163-199.83.Myers 2008 – Myers N. Molecular Embodiments and the Bodywork of Modelling in Protein Crystallography // Social Studies ofScience. 2008. № 38(2). P. 163–199.84.Nelkin D. Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions. London:Sage,1979.85.Nelkin D. Science controversies: the dynamics of public disputes inthe United States // Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Petersen J., Pinch T.(Eds.). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.
Sage,Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995, pp. 444–456.86.Nowotny H. 2011. Naked Genes Reinventing the Human in theMolecular Age. Cambridge: MIT Press87.Owen-Smith J. Managing Laboratory Work Through Scepticism //AmericanSociological Review. 2001. Vol. 66. P. 427–452.22188.Pinch T. Confronting Nature: The Sociology od Solar NeutrinoDetaction. Springer, 1986.89.Pinch, Leuenberger Studying Scientific Controversy from the STSPerspective. 2006. paper presented at the EASTS Conference"Science, Controversy and Democracy", http://ionesco.sciencespo.fr/com/ moodledata/3/ Pinch_Leuenberger_Controversies.pdf90.Schaffer S., Shapin S. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle,and the experimental life, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton UniversityPress, 1985.91.Shapin S.
2008.The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a LateModern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press92.Sims B. Safe Science. Material and Social Order in LaboratoryWork. Social Studies of Science. 2005. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 333-366.93.Sismondo S. 2010. An Introduction to Science and TechnologyStudies.
Wiley-Blackwell94.Traweek Sh. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High EnergyPhysics. Harvard University Press, 1988.95.Vink 2007 – Vinck D. Back to the Laboratory as a KnowledgeProduction Space // Revue d‘anthropologie des connaissances. 2007.№ 2.
P. 159–165.96.Wyatt S. Technological Determinism is Dead. Long Live to aTechnological Determinism // Social Studies of Science. 2008. № 3.222Приложение 1. Сетевая структура лабораториибиосистематики и цитологии БИН РАН223Приложение 2. Схема поколений в лабораториибиосистематики и цитологии БИН РАН224Приложение 3. Принцип работы ‘сетевого узла’ напримере лаборатории в университете Ратгерс225Приложение 4.
Рабочее место сотрудника в помещениилаборатории в университете Ратгерс226Приложение 5. Сетевая структура лаборатории вуниверситете Ратгерс227.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
