Диссертация (1136958), страница 31
Текст из файла (страница 31)
– №.4. – Р. 208-217.114. Gottfredson D. C. Schools and delinquency. – Cambridge UniversityPress, 2011.115. Gouldner A. W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement//American sociological review. – 1960. – Р. 161-178.116. Gremmen M. C., Dijkstra J. K., Steglich C., Veenstra R. First Selection,Then Influence: Developmental Differences in Friendship Dynamics RegardingAcademic Achievement //Developmental psychology. – 2017.
– Т. 53. – №. 7. – С.1356 - 1370.117. Güroğlu B., Haselager G. J., Van Lieshout C. F., Scholte R. H.Antagonists in Mutual Antipathies: A Person‐Oriented Approach //Journal ofresearch on adolescence. – 2009. – Т. 19. – №. 1. – Р. 35-46.118. Haynie D. L., Doogan N. J., Soller B. Gender, friendship networks, anddelinquency: A dynamic network approach //Criminology. – 2014. – Т. 52. – №. 4.– Р. 688-722.119. Haynie D.
L., Nansel T., Eitel P., Crump A. D., Saylor K., Yu K.,Simons-Morton B. Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-riskyouth //The Journal of Early Adolescence. – 2011. – Т. 21. – №. 1. – Р. 29-49.120. Hedström P., Bearman P. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of analyticalsociology. – Oxford University Press, 2009.190121. Hedström P., Swedberg R. Social mechanisms //Acta Sociologica. – 1996.– Т.
39. – №. 3. – Р. 281-308.122. Hedström P., Ylikoski P. Causal mechanisms in the social sciences//Annual review of sociology. – 2010. – №. 36. – Р. 49-67.123. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. – New York: WileyHeider The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. – 1958.124. Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. Cultures and organizations:Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. – The McGraw-HillCompanies, 2010.125. Houtte M., Stevens P. A. J. School ethnic composition and aspirations ofimmigrant students in Belgium //British Educational Research Journal. – 2010. –Т. 36. – №. 2.
– С. 209-237.126. Hox J. J., Moerbeek M., van de Schoot R. Multilevel Analysis:Techniques and Applications. – New York: Routledge 2010127. Huitsing G., Snijders T. A., Van Duijn M. A., Veenstra R. Victims,bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive andnegative networks //Development and Psychopathology. – 2014. – Т.
26. – №. 3. –Р. 645-659.128. Huitsing G., Van Duijn M. A., Snijders T. A., Wang P., Sainio M.,Salmivalli C., Veenstra R. Univariate and multivariate models of positive andnegative networks: Liking, disliking, and bully–victim relationships //SocialNetworks. – 2012. – Т. 34. – №. 4. – Р. 645-657.129. Huitsing G., Veenstra R., Sainio M., Salmivalli C. “It must be me” or “Itcould be them?”: The impact of the social network position of bullies and victimson victims’ adjustment //Social Networks. – 2012. – Т. 34.
– №. 4. – Р. 379-386.130. Hummon N. P., Doreian P. Some dynamics of social balance processes:bringing Heider back into balance theory //Social Networks. – 2003. – Т. 25. – №.1. – Р. 17-49.131. Ivaniushina V., Alexandrov D. Anti-School Culture and Social Networksin Schools //Educational Studies. – 2013. – №. 2. – Р. 233-251.191132. Jonkmann K., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O. Social dominance in adolescence:The moderating role of the classroom context and behavioral heterogeneity //ChildDevelopment. – 2009.
– Т. 80. – №. 2. – Р. 338-355.133. Jose R., Hipp J. R., Butts C. T., Wang C., Lakon C. M. Network structure,influence, selection, and adolescent delinquent behavior: Unpacking a dynamicprocess //Criminal Justice and Behavior. – 2016. – Т. 43. – № .2. – Р. 264-284.134. Juvonen J, Graham S, editors. Peer harassment in school: The plight of thevulnerable and victimized. – Guilford Press, 2001.135.
Juvonen J., Graham S. Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and theplight of victims //Annual review of psychology. – 2014. – №. 65. – Р. 159-185.136. Juvonen J., Ho A. Y. Social motives underlying antisocial behavior acrossmiddle school grades //Journal of Youth and Adolescence. – 2008. – Т. 37. – №. 6.– Р. 747-756.137. Kandel D. B. Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescentfriendships //American journal of Sociology.
– 1978. – Т. 84. – №. 2. – р. 427-436.138. Kennedy E. Correlates of perceived popularity among peers: A study ofrace and gender differences among middle school students //Journal of NegroEducation. – 1995. – P. 186-195.139. Kiefer S. M., Wang J. H. Associations of coolness and social goals withaggression and engagement during adolescence //Journal of AppliedDevelopmental Psychology. – 2016. – №. 44. – Р. 52-62.140. Kim E., Akers R. L., Yun M. A cross-cultural test of social structure andsocial learning: Alcohol use among South Korean adolescents //Deviant behavior.– 2013.
– Т. 34. – №. 11. – Р. 895-915.141. Kiuru N., Aunola K., Nurmi J. E., Leskinen E., Salmela-Aro K. Peergroup influence and selection in adolescents' school burnout: A longitudinal study//Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. – 2008. – Р. 23-55.142. Kiuru N., Burk W. J., Laursen B., Salmela-Aro K., Nurmi J. E. Pressureto drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent192peer networks and peer groups //Journal of adolescence.
– 2010. –Т. 33. – №. 6. –Р. 801-812.143. Knecht A. B., Burk W. J., Weesie J., Steglich C. Friendship and alcoholuse in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach //Journal ofResearch on Adolescence. – 2011. – Т. 21. – №. 2. – Р. 475-487.144. Knecht A. B., Burk W. J., Weesie J., Steglich C. Friendship and alcoholuse in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach //Journal ofResearch on Adolescence.
– 2011. – Т. 21. – №. 2. – С. 475-487.145. Koch H. L. Popularity in preschool children: Some related factors and atechnique for its measurement //Child Development. – 1933. – Т. 4. – №. 2. – Р.164-175.146. Kretschmer D., Leszczensky L., Pink S. Selection and influence processesin academic achievement—More pronounced for girls? //Social Networks.
– 2018.– №. 52. – Р. 251-260.147. Kruse H. The SES-Specific Neighbourhood Effect on InterethnicFriendship Formation. The Case of Adolescent Immigrants in Germany //Europeansociological review. – 2017. – Т. 33. – №. 2. – С. 182-194.148. Kruse H., Smith S., van Tubergen F., Maas I. From neighbors to schoolfriends? How adolescents’ place of residence relates to same-ethnic schoolfriendships //Social networks. – 2016.
– Т. 44. – С. 130-142.149. Kwon K., Lease A. M., Hoffman L. The impact of clique membership onchildren's social behavior and status nominations //Social Development. – 2012. –Т. 21. – №. 1. – С. 150-169.150. Ladd G. W. Social networks of popular, average, and rejected children inschool settings //Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. –1983. – Р.
283-307.151. LaFontana K. M., Cillessen A. H. Children's perceptions of popular andunpopular peers: a multimethod assessment //Developmental psychology. – 2002.– Т. 38. – №. 5. – Р. 635.193152. Lansford J. E., Parker J. G. Children's interactions in triads: Behavioralprofiles and effects of gender and patterns of friendships among members//Developmental Psychology. – 1999. – Т. 35. – №. 1. – Р.
80.153. Lansu T. A., Cillessen A. H., Karremans J. C. Adolescents' SelectiveVisual Attention for High‐Status Peers: The Role of Perceiver Status and Gender//Child development. – 2014. – Т. 85. – №. 2. – Р. 421-428.154. Laursen B., Bukowski W. M., Nurmi J. E., Marion D., Salmela-Aro K.,Kiuru N. Opposites detract: Middle school peer group antipathies //Journal ofexperimental child psychology. – 2010. – Т. 106.
– №. 4. – Р. 240-256.155. Lease A. M., Kennedy C. A., Axelrod J. L. Children's social constructionsof popularity //Social development. – 2002. – Т. 11. – №. 1. – Р. 87-109156. Lease, A. M., Musgrove K. T., Axelrod J. L. Dimensions of social statusin preadolescent peer groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and socialdominance //Social Development. – 2002.
– Т. 11. – №. 4. – Р. 508-533.157. Legewie J., DiPrete T. A. School context and the gender gap ineducational achievement //American Sociological Review. – 2012. – Т. 77. – №. 3.– Р. 463-485.158. Lemann T. B., Solomon R. L. Group characteristics as revealed insociometric patterns and personality ratings //Sociometry. – 1952. – Т. 15. – №. ½.– Р. 7-90.159. Leszczensky L., Pink S. Ethnic segregation of friendship networks inschool: Testing a rational-choice argument of differences in ethnic homophilybetween classroom-and grade-level networks //Social Networks.
– 2015. – №. 42.– Р. 18-26.160. Lindenberg S. Social rationality, semi-modularity and goal-framing: Whatis it all about? //Analyse Kritik. – 2008. – Т. 30. – №. 2. – Р. 669-687.161. Lusher D., Koskinen J., Robins G. (Eds.). Exponential random graphmodels for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. – CambridgeUniversity Press, 2012194162. Malecki C. K., Elliot S. N. Children's social behaviors as predictors ofacademic achievement: A longitudinal analysis //School Psychology Quarterly. –2002. – Т. 17. – №. 1. – P. 1-23.163.
Manski C. F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflectionproblem //The review of economic studies. – 1993. – Т. 60. – №. 3. – Р. 531-542.164. Masten C. L., Juvonen J., Spatzier A. Relative importance of parents andpeers: Differences in academic and social behaviors at three grade levels spanninglate childhood and early adolescence //The Journal of Early Adolescence. – 2009. –Т. 29. – №. 6. – Р. 773-799.165. Mayeux L., Cillessen A. H. It's not just being popular, it's knowing it, too:The role of self‐perceptions of status in the associations between peer status andaggression //Social Development.
– 2008. – Т. 17. – №. 4. – Р. 871-888.166. Mayeux L., Sandstrom M. J., Cillessen A. H. Is being popular a riskyproposition? //Journal of Research on Adolescence. – 2008. – Т. 18. – №. 1. – Р.49-74.167. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. Birds of a feather:Homophily in social networks //Annual review of sociology. – 2001.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
