Диссертация (1136958), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
– Т. 27. – №.1. – Р. 415-444.168. Meijs N., Cillessen A. H., Scholte R. H., Segers E., Spijkerman R. Socialintelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity//Journal of Youth and Adolescence. – 2010. – Т. 39. – №. 1. – Р. 62.169. Meisinger E. B., Blake J. J., Lease A. M., Palardy G. J., Olejnik S. F.Variant and invariant predictors of perceived popularity across majority-Black andmajority-White classrooms //Journal of School Psychology. – 2007. – Т. 45. – №.1.
– Р. 21-44.170. Mercken L., Sleddens E. F. C., de Vries H., Steglich C. E. G. Choosingadolescent smokers as friends: The role of parenting and parental smoking//Journal of adolescence. – 2013. – Т. 36. – №. 2. – Р. 383-392.195171. Mercken L., Snijders T. A., Steglich C., Vartiainen E., De Vries H.Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior //SocialNetworks. – 2010. – Т. 32. – №. 1. – Р.
72-81.172. Merten D. E. The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, andconflict among junior high school girls //Sociology of Education. – 1997. – Р. 175191.173. Merton R. K. Social theory and social structure. – Simon and Schuster,1968.174. Monroe J. Getting a puff: A social learning test of adolescents smoking/\Journal of Child Adolescent Substance Abuse. – 2004. – Т. 13. – №.
3. – Р. 7183.175. Moody J. Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America//American journal of Sociology. – 2001. – Т. 107. – №. 3. – Р. 679-716.176. Moreno F. B. Sociometric status of children in a nursery school group//Sociometry. – 1942. – Т. 5.
– №. 4. – Р. 395-411.177. Moreno J. L. Who shall survive. Vol. 58 //Nervous and Mental DiseasePublishing Company, Washington, DC. – 1934.178. Moreno J. L., Jennings, H. H., Stockton, R. Sociometry in the classroom//Sociometry. – 1943. – Т. 6. – №. 4. – Р. 425-428.179. Neal J. W., Cappella E. An examination of network position andchildhood relational aggression: Integrating resource control and social exchangetheories //Aggressive behavior. – 2012. – Т. 38. – №. 2. – Р. 126-140.180. Newcomb A. F., Bagwell C.
L. Children's friendship relations: A metaanalytic review //Psychological bulletin. – 1995. – Т. 117. – №. 2. – С. 306.181. Newcomb A. F., Bukowski W. M. Social impact and social preference asdeterminants of children's peer group status //Developmental Psychology. – 1983.– Т. 19. – №.
6. – Р. 856.182. Newman M. E. Clustering and preferential attachment in growingnetworks //Physical review E. – 2001. – Т. 64. – №. 2.196183. Ojala K., Nesdale D. Bullying and social identity: The effects of groupnorms and distinctiveness threat on attitudes towards bullying //British journal ofdevelopmental psychology. – 2004. – Т. 22. – №. 1. – Р. 19-35.184. Oransky M., Fisher C. The development and validation of the meanings ofadolescent masculinity scale //Psychology of Men Masculinity. – 2009.
– Т. 10. –№. 1. – Р. 57.185. Owens L., Duncan N. "They might not like you but everyone knows you":Popularity among teenage girls //The Journal of Student Wellbeing. – 2009. – Т. 3.– №. 1. – Р. 14-39.186. Oyserman D., Coon H. M., Kemmelmeier M. Rethinking individualismand collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses//Psychological bulletin. – 2002. – Т. 128.
– №. 1. – С. 3.187. Parkhurst J. T., Hopmeyer A. Sociometric popularity and peer-perceivedpopularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status //The Journal of EarlyAdolescence. – 1998. – Т. 18. – №. 2. – Р. 125-144.188. Pärna K., Rahu K., Fischer K., Mussalo-Rauhamaa H., Zhuravleva I.,Umbleja T., Rahu M. Smoking and associated factors among adolescents inTallinn, Helsinki and Moscow: a multilevel analysis //Scandinavian Journal ofSocial Medicine. – 2003. – Т. 31. – №. 5.
– Р. 350-358.189. Peery J. C. Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: A reconceptualization ofsociometric status in preschool children //Child Development. – 1979. – Р. 12311234.190. Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contacttheory //Journal of personality and social psychology. – 2006. – Т. 90. – №. 5. – Р.751.191. Plenty S., Jonsson J. O.
Social Exclusion among peers: The role ofimmigrant status and classroom immigrant density //Journal of youth andadolescence. – 2017. – Т. 46. – №. 6. – С. 1275-1288.197192. Popp D., Laursen B., Kerr M., Stattin H., Burk W. K. Modelinghomophily over time with an actor-partner interdependence model//Developmental psychology. – 2008. – Т.
44. – №. 4. – Р. 1028.193. Poulin F., Chan A. Friendship stability and change in childhood andadolescence //Developmental review. – 2010. – Т. 30. – №. 3. – Р. 257-272.194. Pratt T. C., Cullen F. T., Sellers C. S., Thomas Winfree Jr L., MadensenT. D., Daigle L. E., ... Gau J. M.
The empirical status of social learning theory: Ameta‐analysis //Justice Quarterly. – 2010. – Т. 27. – №. 6. – Р. 765-802.195. Prell C. Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. –Sage, 2012.196. Prinstein M. J. Assessment of adolescents' preference-and reputationbased peer status using sociometric experts //Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. – 2007. –Т. 53. – №.
2. – Р. 243-261.197. Puckett M. B., Aikins J. W., Cillessen A. H. Moderators of the associationbetween relational aggression and perceived popularity //Aggressive Behavior. –2008. – Т. 34. – №. 6. – Р. 563-576.198. Rambaran J. A., Dijkstra J. K., Munniksma A., Cillessen A. H. Thedevelopment of adolescents’ friendships and antipathies: A longitudinalmultivariate network test of balance theory //Social Networks.
– 2015. – . 43. – Р.162-176.199. Rambaran J. A., Hopmeyer A., Schwartz D., Steglich C., Badaly D.,Veenstra R. Academic functioning and peer influences: A short‐term longitudinalstudy of network–behavior dynamics in middle adolescence //Child development.– 2017. – Т. 88. – №. 2. – Р.
523-543.200. Read B., Francis B., Skelton C. Gender, popularity and notions ofin/authenticity amongst 12‐year‐old to 13‐year‐old school girls //British Journal ofSociology of Education. – 2011. – Т. 32. – №. 2. – Р. 169-183.201. Read B., Francis B., Skelton C. Gender, popularity and notions ofin/authenticity amongst 12‐year‐old to 13‐year‐old school girls //British Journal ofSociology of Education. – 2011. – Т. 32. – №. 2. – С.
169-183.198202. Realo A., Allik J. A cross-cultural study of collectivism: A comparison ofAmerican, Estonian, and Russian students //The Journal of Social Psychology. –1999. – Т. 139. – №. 2. – Р. 133-142.203. Reis H. T., Collins W. A., Berscheid E. The relationship context of humanbehavior and development //Psychological bulletin. – 2000. – Т. 126.
– №. 6. – Р.844.204. Ripley RM, Snijders TA, Boda Z, Vörös A, Preciado P. Manual forSIENA version 4.0 (version February 16, 2017). Department of Statistics, NuffieldCollege: Oxford: University of Oxford. 2017.205. Rodkin P. C., Farmer T. W., Pearl R., Acker R.
V. They’re cool: Socialstatus and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls //Social Development.– 2006. – Т. 15. – №. 2. – Р. 175-204.206. Rodkin P. C., Farmer T. W., Pearl R., Van Acker R. Heterogeneity ofpopular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations //Developmental psychology.– 2000. – Т. 36. – №. 1. – Р. 14.207. Rose A.
J., Rudolph K. D. A review of sex differences in peer relationshipprocesses: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development ofgirls and boys //Psychological bulletin. – 2006. – Т. 132. – №. 1. – Р. 98.208. Rubin K. H., Bukowski W. M., Laursen B. (Eds.). Handbook of peerinteractions, relationships, and groups.
– Guilford Press. – 2011.209. Ryan A. M. Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents'motivation, engagement, and achievement in school //Educational Psychologist. –2000. – Т. 35. – №. 2. – Р. 101-111.210. Salmivalli C. Bullying and the peer group: A review //Aggression andviolent behavior. – 2010. – Т.
15. – №. 2. – Р. 112-120.211. Salmivalli C., Lagerspetz K., Björkqvist K., Österman K., Kaukiainen A.Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social statuswithin the group //Aggressive behavior. – 1996. – Т. 22. – №. 1. – Р. 1-15.212. Sandstrom M. J. The Power of Popularity //Popularity in the peer system.– 2011. – С. 219-244.199213. Scheithauer H., Hayer T., Petermann F., Jugert G. Physical, verbal, andrelational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, genderdifferences, and correlates //Aggressive behavior.
– 2006. – Т. 32. – №. 2. – Р.261-275.214. Schwartz D., Gorman A.H. The High Price of High Status: Popularity as aMechanism of Risk // Popularity in the peer system. – The Guilford Press. – 2011.– С. 245-272215. Schwartz D., Gorman A. H., Nakamoto J., McKay T. Popularity, socialacceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academicperformance and school attendance //Developmental psychology. – 2006. – Т.
42.– №. 6. – Р. 1116.216. Sentse M., Dijkstra J. K., Salmivalli C., Cillessen A. H. The dynamics offriendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social networkperspective //Aggressive behavior. – 2013. – Т. 39. – №. 3. – Р. 229-238.217. Sentse M., Scholte R., Salmivalli C., Voeten M. Person–groupdissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status //Journalof abnormal child psychology. – 2007. – Т. 35.
– №. 6. – Р. 1009-1019.218. Shin H., Ryan A. M. Early adolescent friendships and academicadjustment: Examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal socialnetwork analysis //Developmental psychology. – 2014. – Т. 50. – №. 11. – Р. 2462.219. Shippee N.
D., Owens T. J. GPA, depression, and drinking: Alongitudinal comparison of high school boys and girls //Sociological Perspectives.– 2011. – Т. 54. – №. 3. – Р. 351-376.220. Shrum W., Cheek Jr N. H., MacD S. Friendship in school: Gender andracial homophily //Sociology of Education. – 1988. – Р.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
