Диссертация (1136851), страница 39
Текст из файла (страница 39)
Bjelić D., Lynch D. The work of a (scientific) demonstration: respecifying Newton’s and Goethe’s theories of prismatic color // Text in context: contributions to ethnomethodology / Ed. G. Watson and R. M.Seiler. L.: Sage, 1992. P. 52–78.63. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.64. Bruyn S.
T. Review of «Studies in ethnomethodology» by Harold Garfinkel // Social Forces. 1968. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 109–110.65. Busfield J. Review of «Studies in ethnomethodology» by Harold Garfinkel // British Journal of Sociology. 1968. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 345.20366. Button G., Sharrock W. W.
Design by problem solving // Workplacestudies: recovering work practice and informing systems design / Ed.P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, Ch. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 2000. P. 46–67.67. Chua B.-H. Delineating a Marxist interest in ethnomethodology //American Sociologist. 1977. Vol. 12.
№ 1. P. 24–32.68. Cicourel A. V. Cognitive sociology: language and meaning in social interaction. N. Y.: Free Press, 1974.69. Cohen P. S. Modern social theory. L.: Heinemann, 1968.70. Coleman J. S. Review of «Studies in ethnomethodology» by HaroldGarfinkel // American Sociological Review. 1968. Vol. 33. № 1.P.
126–130.71. Collins H. M. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge //Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2004. Vol. 3. № 2.P. 125–143.72. Collins H. M. Language and practice // Social Studies of Science. 2011.Vol. 41. № 2. P. 277.73. Comaroff J. L., Roberts S. Rules and processes: the cultural logic ofdispute in an African context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1981.74. Coser L. A.
Presidential address: Two methods in search of a substance// American Sociological Review. 1975. Vol. 40. № 6. P. 691–700.75. Coulter J. Ethnomethodology and the contemporary condition of inquiry // Contemporary Sociology. 1993. Vol. 22. № 2. P. 261–263.76. Coulter J.
Is contextualising necessarily interpretive? // Journal ofPragmatics. 1994. Vol. 21. № 6. P. 689–698.77. Denzin N. K. Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology // Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological204knowledge / Ed. J. D. Douglas. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company,1970.
P. 259–284.78. Doubt K. Garfinkel before ethnomethodology // American Sociologist.1989. Vol. 20. № 3. P. 252–262.79. Egbert M. M. Scientists’ orientation to an experimental apparatus intheir interaction in a chemistry lab // Issues in Applied Linguistics.1991. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 269–300.80. Ethnomethodological studies of work / Ed. H. Garfinkel. L.: Routledge& Kegan Paul, 1986.81. Ethnomethodology at work / Ed. M. Rouncefield and P. Tolmie.
Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.82. Fele G. The phenomenal field: ethnomethodological perspectives oncollective phenomena // Human Studies. 2008. Vol. 31. № 3. P. 299–322.83. Flynn P. J. The ethnomethodological movement: sociosemiotic interpretations. N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991.84. Garfinkel H. The perception of the other: a study in social order. Unpublished PhD dissertation.
Harvard University, 1952.85. Garfinkel H. Letter to Talcott Parsons. August 19, 1958 // Papers ofTalcottParsons,1921–1979.HarvardUniversityArchives.HUGFP 15.2. Box 11. Folder «G 1957–1958».86. Garfinkel H. Parsons’ primer: «ad hoc uses». Unpublished manuscript.1962.87.
Garfinkel H. Letter to Talcott Parsons. January 14, 1963 // Papers ofTalcottParsons,1921–1979.HarvardUniversityArchives.HUGFP 15.4. Box 8. Folder «G 1962–1963».88. Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall, 1967.89. Garfinkel H. Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phe205nomena of order*, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of theessential quiddity of immortal ordinary society (I of IV): an announcement of studies // Sociological Theory. 1988.
Vol. 6. № 1. P. 103–109.90. Garfinkel H. Respecification: evidence for locally produced, naturallyaccountable phenomena of order*, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc.in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I): anannouncement of studies // Ethnomethodology and the human sciences/ Ed. G. Button. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. P.
10–19.91. Garfinkel H. Ethnomethodology’s program // Social Psychology Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 59. № 1. P. 5–21.92. Garfinkel H. Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’saphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.93. Garfinkel H. Seeing sociologically: the routine grounds of social action.Boulder: Paradigm, 2005.94. Garfinkel H.
Toward a sociological theory of information. Boulder:Paradigm, 2008.95. Garfinkel H., Livingston E. Phenomenal field properties of order informatted queues and their neglected standing in the current situation ofinquiry // Visual Studies. 2003. Vol. 18.
№ 1. P. 21–28.96. Garfinkel H., Sacks H. On formal structures of practical action // Theoretical sociology: perspectives and developments / Ed. J. C. McKinneyand E. A. Tiryakian. N. Y.: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970. P. 338–366.97. Garfinkel H., Wieder D. L. Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis // Text in context: contributionsto ethnomethodology / Ed. G. Watson and R.
M. Seiler. Newbury Park:Sage, 1992. P. 175–206.20698. Garfinkel H., Lynch M., Livingston E. The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar //Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 1981. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 131–158.99. Gellner E. Ethnomethodology: the re-enchantment industry, or TheCalifornian way of subjectivity // Philosophy of the Social Sciences.1975.
Vol. 5. № 4. P. 431–450.100. Giddens A. New rules of sociological method: a positive critique ofinterpretative sociologies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.101. Gidlow B. Ethnomethodology — a new name for old practices // British Journal of Sociology. 1972. Vol. 23. № 4. P. 395–405.102.
Gilbert N., Mulkay M. Opening Pandora’s box: a sociological analysisof scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1984.103. Gleeson D., Erben M. Meaning in context: notes towards a critique ofethnomethodology // British Journal of Sociology. 1976. Vol. 27. № 4.P. 474–483.104. Goffman E. Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction.Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961.105.
Goffman E. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organizationof gatherings. N.Y.: Free Press, 1963.106. Goffman E. Relations in public: microstudies of the public order.N. Y.: Basic Books, 1971.107. Goodwin Ch. Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1981.108.
Goodwin Ch. Seeing in depth // Social Studies of Science. 1995.Vol. 25. № 2. P. 237–274.109. Goodwin Ch. Practices of color classification // Mind, Culture and Activity. 2000. Vol. 7. № 1-2. P. 19–36.207110. Greiffenhagen, Ch., Sharrock W. Does mathematics look certain in thefront, but fallible in the back? // Social Studies of Science. 2011.Vol. 41. № 6. P.
839–866.111. Gurwitsch A. The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973).Vol. I: Constitutive phenomenology in historical perspective. Berlin:Springer, 2009а.112. Gurwitsch A. Some fundamental principles of constitutive phenomenology // Gurwitsch A. The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch(1901–1973). Vol. I: Constitutive phenomenology in historical perspective.
Berlin: Springer, 2009b.113. Gurwitsch A. The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973).Vol. III: The field of consciousness: phenomenology of theme, thematic field, and marginal consciousness. Berlin: Springer, 2010.114. Hama H. The primal scene of ethnomethodology: Garfinkel’s shortstory «Color trouble» and the Schutz–Parsons controversy // AlfredSchutz and his intellectual partners / Ed. H. Nasu et al.
Konstanz:UVK, 2009. P. 435–449.115. Harper R. Inside the IMF: an ethnography of documents, technology,and organisational action. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998.116. Have P. ten. The notion of member is the heart of the matter: on therole of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry // Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research.2002.Vol. 3.№ 3.URL:research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/834/http://www.qualitativeДатадоступа:14.08.2012.117. Heath Ch.
Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.118. Heath Ch., Luff P. Collaboration and control: crisis management andmultimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms //208Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 1992. Vol. 1.№ 1-2.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
