Диссертация (1136851), страница 41
Текст из файла (страница 41)
Vol. 9. № 4.P. 500–520.176. Rawls A. W. Social order as moral order // Handbook of the sociologyof morality / Ed. S. Hitlin and S. Vaisey. N. Y.: Springer, 2010. P. 95–121.177. Rawls A. W. Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch: constitutive orders of sensemaking // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2011. Vol. 41. № 4. P. 396–418.178. Ritzer G. Explorations in social theory: from metatheorizing to rationalization. L.: Sage, 2001.179.
Rogers M. F. Sociology, ethnomethodology and experience: a phenomenological critique. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1983.180. Roth W.-M. Making classifications (at) work: ordering practices inscience // Social Studies of Science. 2005. Vol. 35. № 4. P. 581–621.214181. Ruggerone L. The reflexive order of language and activities: secondthoughts on Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology // International Journal ofSociology and Social Policy. 1996.
Vol. 16. № 4. P. 91–102.182. Sacks H. An initial investigation of the usability of conversational datafor doing sociology // Studies in social interaction / Ed. D. Sudnow.N. Y.: Free Press, 1972a. P. 31–74.183. Sacks H. On the analyzability of stories by children // Directions insociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication / Ed. J. J.Gumperz and D. Hymes. N. Y.: Rinehart & Winston, 1972b. P. 325–345.184. Sacks H. Lectures on conversation.
Vol. 1. Cambridge: Blackwell,1992.185. Sacks H., Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for theorganization of turn-taking for conversation // Language. 1974. Vol.50. № 4. P. 696–735.186. Schegloff E. A. Between macro and micro: contexts and other connections // The micro-macro link / Ed. by J.
C. Alexander et al. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1987. P. 207–234.187. Schegloff E. A. In another context // Rethinking context: language asan interactive phenomenon / Ed. A. Duranti and C. Goodwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992a. P. 193–227.188. Schegloff E. Introduction // Sacks H.
Lectures on conversation. Vol. 1.Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992b. P. 484. P. ix–lxii.189. Schegloff E. A. Sequence organization in interaction: a primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.190. Schegloff E. A., Sacks H. Opening up closings // Semiotica. 1973.Vol. 8. № 4. P. 289–327.191. Sellen A. J., Harper R. The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge:MIT Press, 2002.215192. Sharrock W. The omnipotence of the actor: Erving Goffman on «thedefinition of the situation» // Goffman and social organization : studies in a sociological legacy / Ed. G.
Smith. L.: Routledge, 1999.P. 119–137.193. Sharrock W. Fundamentals of ethnomethodology // Handbook of social theory / Ed. G. Ritzer and B. Smart. L.: SAGE, 2001. P. 249–260.194. Sharrock W. W., Anderson R. J. The ethnomethodologists. Chichester:Ellis Horwood, 1986.195. Skidmore W. Theoretical thinking in sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.196.
Stebbins R. A. A theory of the definition of the situation // CanadianReview of Sociology / Revue canadienne de sociologie. 1967. Vol. 4.№ 3. P. 148–156.197. Studies in social interaction / Ed. D. Sudnow. N. Y.: Free Press, 1972.198. Suchman L. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human—machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1987.199. Suchman L. Human—machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.200. Sudnow D. Temporal parameters of interpersonal observation // Studies in social interaction / Ed.
D. Sudnow. N. Y.: Free Press, 1972.P. 259–279.201. Svensson M. S., Heath Ch., Luff P. Instrumental action: the timely exchange of implements during surgical operations // ECSCW’07: Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer SupportedCooperative Work (24–28 September 2007, Limerick, Ireland) / Ed.L. Bannon et al. Berlin: Springer 2007.
P. 41–60.216202. Swanson G. E. Review of «Studies in ethnomethodology» by HaroldGarfinkel // American Sociological Review. 1968. Vol. 33. № 1.P. 122–124.203. Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction, and technology / Ed. G. Button. L.: Routledge, 1993.204. The theory of social action: the correspondence of Alfred Schutz andTalcott Parsons / Ed.
R. Grathoff. Bloomington: Indiana UniversityPress, 1978.205. Thomas W. I. The unadjusted girl: with cases and standpoint for behavior analysis. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1923.206. Thomas W. I., Znaniecki F. The Polish peasant in Europe and America: monograph of an immigrant group.
Boston: Gorham Press, 1918.207. Understanding everyday life: toward the reconstruction of sociologicalknowledge / Ed. J. D. Douglas. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company,1970.208. Wallace A. F. C. Review of «Studies in ethnomethodology» by HaroldGarfinkel // American Sociological Review. 1968. Vol.
33. № 1.P. 124–126.209. Warner R. S. Toward a redefinition of action theory: paying the cognitive element its due // American Journal of Sociology. 1978. Vol. 83.№ 6. P. 1317–1349.210. Watson R. The character of «institutional talk»: a response to Hesterand Francis // Text. 2000. Vol. 20. № 3. P. 377–391.211. Watson R. The visibility arrangements of public space: conceptual resources and methodological issues in analysing pedestrian movements// Communication & Cognition.
2005. Vol. 38. № 3-4. P. 201–227.212. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.217213. Whalen J., Zimmerman D. H. Working a call: multiparty managementand interactional infrastructure in calls for help // Calling for help:language and social interaction in telephone helplines / Ed. C. Baker,M. Emmison, A. Firth. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005. P. 309–345.214.
Wieder D. L., Zimmerman D. H., Raymond G. UCLA: then and now //The social history of language and social interaction research: people,places, ideas / Ed. W. Leeds-Hurwitz. Cresskill: Hampton Press, 2010.P. 127–158.215. Wilkins J. Review of «Studies in ethnomethodology» by Harold Garfinkel // American Journal of Sociology. 1968.
Vol. 73. № 5. P. 642–643.216. Wilson D. N. An interpretation of the work of Harold Garfinkel: a developmental, epistemological and speculative inquiry. PhD dissertation. Boston: Boston University, 1978.217. Wilson Th. P. Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociologicalexplanation // American Sociological Review. 1970. Vol. 35. № 4.P. 697–710.218. Wilson Th.
P. Garfinkel’s radical program // Research on Languageand Social Interaction. 2003. Vol. 36. № 4. P. 487–494.219. Wilson Th. P. Classical ethnomethodology, the radical program andconversation analysis // Interaction and everyday life: phenomenological and ethnomethodological essays in honor of George Psathas / Ed.H. Nasu and F. C. Waksler. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2012. P. 207–238.220. Wilson Th. P., Zimmerman D. H.
Ethnomethodology, sociology andtheory // Humboldt Journal of Social Relations. 1979/1980. Vol. 7.№ 1. P. 52–88.218221. Workplace studies: recovering work practice and informing systemdesign / Ed. P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, Ch. Heath. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2000.222. Wrong D. H. The problem of order: what unites and divides society.N.Y.: Free Press, 1994.223.
Zimmerman D. H., Pollner M. The everyday world as a phenomenon// Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge / Ed. J. D. Douglas. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1970. P. 80–103.224. Zimmerman D. H., Wieder D. L. Ethnomethodology and the problemof order: comment on Denzin // Understanding everyday life: towardsa reconstruction of sociological knowledge / Ed. by J. D. Douglas.Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1970.
P. 285–298.219.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
